Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:38 PM
kpete (38,895 posts)
Scalia: Constitution is ‘dead, dead, dead’
Source: The Hill
Scalia: Constitution is ‘dead, dead, dead’ By Jonathan Easley - 01/29/13 09:11 AM ET U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia emphatically rebutted the notion that the Constitution is a living document in a lecture at Southern Methodist University on Monday. “It’s not a living document,” Scalia said, according to a report in the Dallas Morning News. “It’s dead, dead, dead.” Scalia also told the crowd that sometimes the decisions he arrives at are not in concert with his political convictions. “The judge who always likes the results he reaches is a bad judge,” he said. Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/279789-scalia-constitution-is-dead-dead-dead#ixzz2JO4Hi7vI
|
91 replies, 6874 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| kpete | Jan 2013 | OP | |
| villager | Jan 2013 | #1 | |
| kestrel91316 | Jan 2013 | #60 | |
| Scairp | Jan 2013 | #74 | |
| PerceptionManagement | Jan 2013 | #75 | |
| MynameisBlarney | Jan 2013 | #2 | |
| demwing | Jan 2013 | #3 | |
| Ian Iam | Jan 2013 | #8 | |
| DhhD | Jan 2013 | #44 | |
| R. Daneel Olivaw | Jan 2013 | #14 | |
| demwing | Jan 2013 | #15 | |
| Downtown Hound | Jan 2013 | #4 | |
| lrellok | Jan 2013 | #5 | |
| Angry Dragon | Jan 2013 | #6 | |
| sakabatou | Jan 2013 | #39 | |
| demwing | Jan 2013 | #56 | |
| Dyedinthewoolliberal | Jan 2013 | #7 | |
| wilt the stilt | Jan 2013 | #17 | |
| malthaussen | Jan 2013 | #9 | |
| NoGOPZone | Jan 2013 | #10 | |
| Botany | Jan 2013 | #11 | |
| kysrsoze | Jan 2013 | #29 | |
| msanthrope | Jan 2013 | #12 | |
| robertpaulsen | Jan 2013 | #13 | |
| Scuba | Jan 2013 | #16 | |
| Baitball Blogger | Jan 2013 | #18 | |
| JHB | Jan 2013 | #42 | |
| yardwork | Jan 2013 | #19 | |
| n2doc | Jan 2013 | #23 | |
| yardwork | Jan 2013 | #25 | |
| SunSeeker | Jan 2013 | #20 | |
| MADem | Jan 2013 | #21 | |
| NinetySix | Jan 2013 | #22 | |
| John2 | Jan 2013 | #73 | |
| Paladin | Jan 2013 | #24 | |
| Klukie | Jan 2013 | #26 | |
| demwing | Jan 2013 | #35 | |
| MessiahRp | Jan 2013 | #37 | |
| broadcaster75201 | Jan 2013 | #27 | |
| Plucketeer | Jan 2013 | #28 | |
| global1 | Jan 2013 | #30 | |
| LeftInTX | Jan 2013 | #31 | |
| DhhD | Jan 2013 | #47 | |
| hack89 | Jan 2013 | #55 | |
| Lesmoderesstupides | Jan 2013 | #70 | |
| Octafish | Jan 2013 | #32 | |
| Crowman1979 | Jan 2013 | #33 | |
| pansypoo53219 | Jan 2013 | #34 | |
| AlexDeLarge | Jan 2013 | #36 | |
| dbackjon | Jan 2013 | #38 | |
| DallasNE | Jan 2013 | #40 | |
| Jack Rabbit | Jan 2013 | #41 | |
| DhhD | Jan 2013 | #49 | |
| Jack Rabbit | Jan 2013 | #65 | |
| Madmiddle | Jan 2013 | #43 | |
| Old and In the Way | Jan 2013 | #45 | |
| GoCubsGo | Jan 2013 | #61 | |
| Blue_Tires | Jan 2013 | #46 | |
| bongbong | Jan 2013 | #53 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 2013 | #48 | |
| AzDar | Jan 2013 | #50 | |
| yellowcanine | Jan 2013 | #51 | |
| GoCubsGo | Jan 2013 | #64 | |
| geardaddy | Jan 2013 | #52 | |
| cynzke | Jan 2013 | #54 | |
| Igel | Jan 2013 | #68 | |
| Odin2005 | Jan 2013 | #57 | |
| Demeter | Jan 2013 | #58 | |
| GoCubsGo | Jan 2013 | #59 | |
| MissMarple | Jan 2013 | #62 | |
| Lint Head | Jan 2013 | #63 | |
| unblock | Jan 2013 | #66 | |
| Hosnon | Jan 2013 | #67 | |
| high density | Jan 2013 | #69 | |
| muntrv | Jan 2013 | #71 | |
| Zorra | Jan 2013 | #72 | |
| cantbeserious | Jan 2013 | #76 | |
| davidpdx | Jan 2013 | #77 | |
| ZRT2209 | Jan 2013 | #78 | |
| Incitatus | Jan 2013 | #79 | |
| olddad56 | Jan 2013 | #80 | |
| SoapBox | Jan 2013 | #81 | |
| aquart | Jan 2013 | #82 | |
| wickerwoman | Jan 2013 | #83 | |
| 47of74 | Jan 2013 | #88 | |
| RedCloud | Jan 2013 | #84 | |
| BudHardener | Jan 2013 | #85 | |
| LiberalFighter | Jan 2013 | #86 | |
| Thor_MN | Jan 2013 | #87 | |
| Initech | Jan 2013 | #89 | |
| Sunlei | Jan 2013 | #90 | |
| lunatica | Jan 2013 | #91 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:40 PM
villager (18,983 posts)
1. So... no one other than land-owning white guys should ever have been allowed to vote?
|
Well, thanks for being honest, at least, Scalia.
|
Response to villager (Reply #1)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:16 PM
kestrel91316 (45,405 posts)
60. Apparently so. On the up side, he now has to face the fact that him impoverished Italian immigrant
|
ancestors would have had no vote, nor many rights, and then HE HIMSELF today would be poor and landless and so unable to vote.
Does he truly not know how to add 2 and 2????? |
Response to villager (Reply #1)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 09:56 PM
Scairp (2,250 posts)
74. Who foisted this asshole on our country?
|
Bush I? Reagan? I don't recall but fuck you very much whoever it was. Didn't he read the job description for a Supreme court justice? It specifically involves interpreting the Constitution to determine if a particular case or law or bill passed is Constitutional. Maybe that's why we get such crazy shit from him. He doesn't even believe in the thing he is supposed to cherish. What an abomination.
|
Response to Scairp (Reply #74)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 10:37 PM
PerceptionManagement (273 posts)
75. The problem with Supreme Asshole Fat Tony is..
|
he is an asshole. Pick a side in any decision he has made and you can be sure Fat Tony will have done whatever it takes to hurt as many people as possible and then claim 'strict constitutionalism'. In hell, ann coulter will blow scalia's soft dick for eternity.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:40 PM
MynameisBlarney (1,257 posts)
2. Yet another reason
|
to impeach the asshole.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:41 PM
demwing (10,959 posts)
3. So explain the amendment process, Fat Tony
|
please proceed, Justice...
|
Response to demwing (Reply #3)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:46 PM
Ian Iam (386 posts)
8. I vastly prefer the other version.....
" |
Response to Ian Iam (Reply #8)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:09 PM
DhhD (730 posts)
44. The government of the Bill of Rights instead of the government of the Constitution.
|
And his version of the Bill of Rights too.
|
Response to demwing (Reply #3)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:57 PM
R. Daneel Olivaw (2,928 posts)
14. Living dead?
Response to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #14)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:59 PM
demwing (10,959 posts)
15. It's an Amendment Apocalypse!
|
The Night of the Living Bill of Rights!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:42 PM
Downtown Hound (8,201 posts)
4. Yes, due in no small part to that presidential selection you made a little over a decade ago. n/t
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:44 PM
lrellok (26 posts)
5. If it is dead
|
Why should we then not replace it with something relevant to modern society?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:44 PM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
6. I think he should resign
|
Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #6)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:45 PM
demwing (10,959 posts)
56. I think we should resign
|
Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:45 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) him...
I don't think he'll do it himself |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:44 PM
Dyedinthewoolliberal (6,457 posts)
7. Why is his opinion
|
given so much attention? He's not the Chief Justice..........
|
Response to Dyedinthewoolliberal (Reply #7)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:00 PM
wilt the stilt (3,224 posts)
17. same question I have about rand paul n/t
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:47 PM
malthaussen (2,224 posts)
9. So he swore to defend a dead thing?
|
I dunno, like, isn't that a little late for defense?
-- Mal |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:48 PM
NoGOPZone (2,646 posts)
10. Nice of him to gloat about it nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:48 PM
Botany (36,043 posts)
11. Then quit Tony.
|
If the Constitution is no longer a living and dynamic document in your view
then quit right now. |
Response to Botany (Reply #11)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:27 PM
kysrsoze (3,326 posts)
29. Exactly... or explain how corporations now = people. That rat fucker!
|
Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:29 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:50 PM
msanthrope (16,503 posts)
12. Somebody's gotta get that man an evaluation. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:53 PM
robertpaulsen (7,566 posts)
13. OK Scalia, let's try to find some common ground.
|
If I can agree with you that the Constitution is not "living", i.e. it doesn't eat, sleep, breathe, shit and fuck, then can you agree with me that a corporation is not a "person", i.e. it doesn't eat, sleep, breathe, shit and fuck?
Well, OK, maybe corporations do shit all over indigenous people from third-world countries and fuck us all with their greenhouse gas emissions, but let's not nitpick, OK? |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:00 PM
Scuba (26,748 posts)
16. Well, if there's one man who knows what it takes to be a "bad judge" it's Tony.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:00 PM
Baitball Blogger (11,279 posts)
18. Scalia is the experiment that this country needed to go through to convince us once and for all
|
that strict constructionist have no place on the Supreme Court.
|
Response to Baitball Blogger (Reply #18)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:05 PM
JHB (17,805 posts)
42. He was needed to make it clear there's no such thing as a "strict constructionist"
|
There's just people who claim they are because it gives their views a coat of patriotic whitewash.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:03 PM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
19. Scalia is a weirdo.
|
We should have let the Republicans appoint Bork. He's gone now and Obama would be appointing a replacement, and no way could Bork have been as bad as Scalia.
|
Response to yardwork (Reply #19)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:15 PM
n2doc (26,097 posts)
23. Scalia was not Bork's replacement
|
Kennedy was. Scalia was a later appointment, as was Thomas. If your world we would have had both, because the Repubs had already decided to go all extreme on their choices.
|
Response to n2doc (Reply #23)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:19 PM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
25. You're right. Reagan had originally considered Bork when he nominated Scalia instead.
|
The Bork nomination was separate.
Scratch my plan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan_Supreme_Court_candidates |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:09 PM
SunSeeker (5,032 posts)
20. Scalia is dead, dead, dead wrong.
|
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:14 PM
MADem (86,021 posts)
21. What a sick fuck....so what's he saying? Don't even try for an ERA?
|
I can't bear that jerk...!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:14 PM
NinetySix (1,301 posts)
22. If this is the case, then we do not actually have liberty or self-determination, but
|
are under the thumb of tyrants 200-years dead.
Rousseau held that Sovereignty, the general will of a people, is superior to government, and that when government no longer serves the ends of that Sovereignty, namely the common good, that government is dispensible and may be replaced with a new government of a different form. A government is thus always in flux ("alive," in this sense), mutating to better serve public ends, else it is in peril of being abolished and replaced. So, Mr. Justice: ever read Rousseau, you ignorant fuck? The Founders did. |
Response to NinetySix (Reply #22)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 08:34 PM
John2 (1,728 posts)
73. It was the intent
|
of the men who wrote the Constitution and also placed into it the Bill of Rights. The overthrow of the British Government was the justification for the American Revolution. The right for the people to rebel was also the justification for the French Revolution. Those men were thinking in the context of the Era.
I also read the comments from right wingers praising Justice Scalia. I've made these comments over and over. The only power given to any Constitution is if the people consent to it. The people have the right to change it by not only peaceful means but violent means also. Time and time again, people in the Republican Party or on the Right continue to cite the original intent of the men who created this document. That document was created after4r the violent overthrow of a government and it was also changed after a violent Civil War. It was also changed through less violent means during the Civil Rights Movement but there was still violence. By it's own history, this is a living document and subject to change. The country is changing through demographics. In order to meet those changes, the Constitution also needs to evolve. There are a small group in this country, that likes to live in the Past and rule the majority. You can only push the majority too far before they use the last resort. The Republican Party is playing a dangerous game. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:17 PM
Paladin (8,693 posts)
24. He's Just As Unhinged As So Many Of Us Have Suspected. (nt)
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:20 PM
Klukie (2,211 posts)
26. Jefferson, on reform of the Virginia Constitution
|
"Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the ark of the Covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment... laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind... as that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, institutions must advance also, to keep pace with the times.... We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain forever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors." -- Thomas Jefferson, on reform of the Virginia Constitution
|
Response to Klukie (Reply #26)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:42 PM
demwing (10,959 posts)
35. I just sent this to the SCOTUS
Response to Klukie (Reply #26)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:46 PM
MessiahRp (5,404 posts)
37. I read that in Stephen Dillane's voice.
|
He was amazing as Jefferson.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:23 PM
broadcaster75201 (146 posts)
27. So the Air Force is unconstitutional?
|
Who knew.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:23 PM
Plucketeer (6,281 posts)
28. Poor Tony....
|
Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:29 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) His powers of comprehension are DEAD - DEAD - DEAD.
Edit to observe..... Antonin would be well advised to adopt Clarabell Thomas' approcah to pontificating. How's that line go..... Better to not speak and let folks only SPECULATE as to your ignorance - rather than confirming you're a dunce by speaking your tiny mind. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:28 PM
global1 (10,589 posts)
30. I Guess It's Only A Living Document When We Consider the Second Amendment.....nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:29 PM
LeftInTX (2,231 posts)
31. Bye Bye standing Army
Response to LeftInTX (Reply #31)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:11 PM
DhhD (730 posts)
47. Back to the Militias.
Response to LeftInTX (Reply #31)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:43 PM
hack89 (21,265 posts)
55. "The Congress shall have Power .... To raise and support Armies,..."
|
Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:51 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Section 8
The Congress shall have Power to: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; |
Response to hack89 (Reply #55)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 06:45 PM
Lesmoderesstupides (156 posts)
70. no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years
|
hence the 2 year DoD budget cycle, gives em wiggle room around the pesky Constitution the FF were not fans for a permanent Standing Army, Navy different story they PROTECT Commerce and trade.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:30 PM
Octafish (33,442 posts)
32. Stupid NAZI gangster even talks like a mafiosi.
|
A soldier, at that.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:31 PM
Crowman1979 (3,086 posts)
33. So now the constitution is pick & choose.
|
Just like the bible!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:32 PM
pansypoo53219 (9,315 posts)
34. ok mr opus dei, is the bible dead then?
|
oh wait. he would say yes.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
AlexDeLarge This message was hidden by Jury decision.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:20 PM
dbackjon (3,523 posts)
38. That phrase should describe the judicial careers
|
Of you, Alito and Thomas
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:54 PM
DallasNE (2,954 posts)
40. Scalia, How Dead Was The Constitution
|
In the Bush v Gore and Citizens United rulings? Those are extreme examples of legislating from the bench, where you were in the 5-4 majorities, showing that you have no credibility.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:05 PM
Jack Rabbit (40,701 posts)
41. Jack Rabbit: Scalia's mind is "dead, dead, dead"
|
While I agree with Scalia that a good judge will arrive at decisions he does not like, his "originalist" view of the Constitution is both unimaginative and unsatisfactory. Do we need to amend the constitution every time a new technological advance creates a situation that James Madison could not have fathomed in his wildest dreams? Would Scalia interpret the Second Amendment to give the right of an individual to put a Howitzer in his back yard or to build a nuclear bomb in his garage?
|
Response to Jack Rabbit (Reply #41)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:15 PM
DhhD (730 posts)
49. The 2nd Amendment needs to be reworded,changed or removed. The US has the federal Armed Forces; no
|
Militia is needed anymore.
|
Response to DhhD (Reply #49)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:28 PM
Jack Rabbit (40,701 posts)
65. . . . because the Founding Fathers did not inted to maintain a standing army
|
So where was Scalia when we needed him during the Vietnam War? Would his originalist legal philosophy have led him to declare the draft unconstitutional?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:06 PM
Madmiddle (115 posts)
43. The actual question was
|
Hey Toe Knee, how's your wife in bed? His answer; dead, dead, dead. Quite honest for a schmuck.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:09 PM
Old and In the Way (36,256 posts)
45. The only thing dead about the Constitution is
|
Justice Scalia's utter disrespect for the role he should be playing in interpreting it. He is a partisan Republican hack who is willing to subvert the ideals of the document to further the interests of a small minority of people in this country.
|
Response to Old and In the Way (Reply #45)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:18 PM
GoCubsGo (13,008 posts)
61. Yep, he just hates what's in it.
|
It kills him to know that the Constitution gives to all of the unwashed masses all sorts of freedoms he doesn't think we deserve. What a vile man.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:09 PM
Blue_Tires (31,708 posts)
46. How does he get away with continually saying this?
|
If Sotomayor said this, it would be national news, congressional repubs would be calling for her dismissal and there would be a congressional investigation into Obama's selection, vetting and approval processes...
|
Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #46)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:37 PM
bongbong (5,436 posts)
53. Same answer to pretty much every political question
|
IOKIYAR
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:11 PM
rocktivity (36,625 posts)
48. Rocktivity: Scalia is
|
a 'murderer, murderer, murder'.
rocktivity |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:22 PM
AzDar (8,758 posts)
50. Just like his brain, brain, brain.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:24 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
51. But you liked the outcome of Bush V Gore didn't you Tony?
|
Are you now conceding that was bad judging?
|
Response to yellowcanine (Reply #51)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:27 PM
GoCubsGo (13,008 posts)
64. I don't think that's what he is saying.
|
He is saying that he doesn't like the some of the decisions he makes, because he is forced to comply with the Constitution, even though he disagrees with it. I'm sure he is quite content with his Bush v Gore decision, as he was able to come up with a rationalization that his warped decision was somehow constitutional.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:31 PM
geardaddy (14,312 posts)
52. Va fanculo, Antonio.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:38 PM
cynzke (142 posts)
54. So Scalia....
|
What are you there for? A paycheck? So when did the constitution "die, die, die"? Before or after your appointment? What a stupid, irresponsible and dangerous claim to make.
|
Response to cynzke (Reply #54)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 06:37 PM
Igel (17,557 posts)
68. He'd say it was never alive.
|
It doesn't grow and change that much. If you want it changed, you amend it.
I have a cat. It grows and changes. If I want it changed, I can amend it--it's neutered, making it loss some function--but if I do that too many times then it, too, is dead. Hard to amend it to give it *new* functions. Since it's gotten harder to make changes to the Constitution the alternative has been to amend the definitions of the terms used in it and to make it say novel things--not just expand "freedom of the press" to similar kinds of activities, but to make it say novel things. "Emanations of penumbras" sort of things. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:48 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
57. Somebody give this idiot a remidial class on Common Law.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:55 PM
Demeter (65,396 posts)
58. And Scalia and his compadres killed it
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:14 PM
GoCubsGo (13,008 posts)
59. Scalia: My brain is dead, dead, dead.
|
This asshole doesn't belong on a road-kill pick-up crew, let alone on the Supreme Court. Just because you hate what's in the Constitution doesn't mean it's dead, you filthy dirt bag.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:20 PM
MissMarple (9,570 posts)
62. Tony is always right. Just ask him.
|
I saw an interview with him a few years ago, he actually stated that he was always right. The other justices can be wrong but not Tony. Although it must be a trial to be surrounded by so many deficient people, he does manage maintain cordial relationships with them.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:27 PM
Lint Head (10,441 posts)
63. So the right to bear arms is dead?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:36 PM
unblock (23,762 posts)
66. he's used that line before.
|
and it was crap he himself didn't believe in then, too.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 06:26 PM
Hosnon (7,422 posts)
67. While he may think otherwise, that's just his interpretation.
|
When he is off the Court, that interpretation will likely have one less proponent.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 06:44 PM
high density (13,382 posts)
69. It's dead until something like DC vs Heller comes along
|
and then it suddenly becomes living and people like Scalia interpret it how they want to.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 08:11 PM
muntrv (8,345 posts)
71. Hey Tony! Clarence Thomas would still be a slave under your interpretation of
|
the Constitution.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 08:14 PM
Zorra (18,804 posts)
72. Scalia's ability to reason fairly and logically is dead, dead, dead. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 10:46 PM
cantbeserious (1,980 posts)
76. Finally, We Can Rescind The Second Amendment
|
eom
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:01 PM
davidpdx (8,782 posts)
77. I know on the day this happens
|
I'm going to get spanked hard on DU and I'll take it. The day he dies I will be grave dancing.
I absolutely despise him. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:38 PM
ZRT2209 (622 posts)
78. meaning only muskets should be allowed
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:47 PM
Incitatus (4,193 posts)
79. I hate when I misread OPs. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 12:28 AM
olddad56 (2,832 posts)
80. and he helped kill it when he selected Dubya for President.
|
The constitution was pretty much superceded by the provisions in the Patriot Act. The most unpatriotic of all acts.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 01:50 AM
SoapBox (5,820 posts)
81. Hey, Scanklia...
|
Fuck off!!!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 01:55 AM
aquart (67,535 posts)
82. Sounds like a confession of murder to me.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 02:14 AM
wickerwoman (5,275 posts)
83. Then since his job is to defend it, he should be "unemployed, unemployed, unemployed"
Response to wickerwoman (Reply #83)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 09:29 PM
47of74 (6,660 posts)
88. YES, YES, YES
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 03:00 PM
RedCloud (8,959 posts)
84. yet corporations are alive and killing us?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 05:52 PM
BudHardener (16 posts)
85. He was talking to his Pleasure Pickle
|
“The judge who always likes the results he reaches is a bad judge,” he said.
So, Scalia admits he always likes his results. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 05:58 PM
LiberalFighter (31,079 posts)
86. If the Constitution is dead then doesn't that mean there shouldn't be any USSCJ's?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 09:27 PM
Thor_MN (4,605 posts)
87. I'll be damned. The guilty do return to the scene of the crime.
|
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 10:34 PM
Initech (38,867 posts)
89. Yup and guess who killed it? (hint: Bush v. Gore)
|
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 04:58 AM
Sunlei (2,246 posts)
90. he is very conservative & sometimes a smartass, I don't think he ever took bribes for him and wife.
|
He got in very easy compaired to some but I don't think he lied under oath.
I wish there were about 10 more Justices,none of them were allowed to take any bribes for them or family (removed if they did) and more were Constitution professors for at least 10 years before appointment. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 06:53 AM
lunatica (28,848 posts)
91. Well, he did do his part to kill it by selecting Bush in 2000
|
But as usual, in his conceit he overestimates the results of his own actions.
|


"