HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » New Republic:Barack Obama...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sun Jan 27, 2013, 01:57 AM

New Republic:Barack Obama is Not Pleased

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by OKNancy (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: The New Republic

The president on his enemies, the media, and the future of football

Barack Obama's pre-presidential manifesto, The Audacity of Hope, has only one extended riff on gun control—not a homily on behalf of the cause or even a meditation on the deep divisions opened by the debate, but a story of crummy luck. While State Senator Barack Obama was vacationing in Hawaii, visiting his grandmother and hoping to "reacquaint myself with Michelle," the Illinois legislature abruptly returned to consider bills making the possession of illegal firearms a felony offense. Joining this special session would have required him to backtrack thousands of miles with a sick 18-month old in tow. So Obama stayed put on the islands, while back in Springfield, the package failed by a slim margin. His campaign manager warned him that a political opponent would likely pillory his absence in an attack ad featuring a beach chair and a Mai Tai.

That Obama didn't include the substantive case for gun control in his treatise was characteristic. A strain of wisdom ruled a generation of Democratic Party politics: You might pay a price for reticence on the issue in a big city like Chicago, but in the rest of the country, it was a noble loser, bait for backlash in electorally crucial Rust Belt states with not even the remotest hope for legislative victory. In 2010, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence judged Obama's efforts on behalf of its issue worthy of an "F."

So when the president learned of the massacre in Newtown, how could he not have felt at least a pang of guilt about the failure of his party and administration to keep gun control on even a low simmer? Indeed, his aides described the massacre as having knocked his tightly held interior life into full view like no other event. "I had never seen him like that as long as I've known him," his speechwriter Jon Favreau later told The New York Times, recalling the day of the killings, when Obama sat gob-smacked behind his desk.

On the day we visited the White House, about a month later, the president had just finished presenting his robust slate of gun control proposals—so robust, in fact, that the next morning's newspaper would declare it almost certainly doomed to failure in Congress. But that was the point. On gun control, the president never expected John Boehner and Mitch McConnell to join him on a surveying expedition in search of the mythic land of Common Ground. Compromise was a conversation for the distant future, one he would entertain only after making a muscular argument and creating the political space for his ideas. It was an approach emblematic of a new pugnacity, which also revealed itself in our interview.



Read more: http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/112242/obama-interview-2013-exclusive-sit-down-the-president



interview at link

4 replies, 1641 views

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply New Republic:Barack Obama is Not Pleased (Original post)
cal04 Jan 2013 OP
Purveyor Jan 2013 #1
roguevalley Jan 2013 #2
AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #3
OKNancy Jan 2013 #4

Response to cal04 (Original post)

Sun Jan 27, 2013, 02:21 AM

1. Late Breaking News...really? eom

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cal04 (Original post)

Sun Jan 27, 2013, 02:33 AM

2. next time someone equates gun control to losing their weapons, remember that they

banned Thompson submachine guns back in the day and no one got their guns taken. Just thought I would throw that out.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 27, 2013, 03:05 AM

3. They were not banned.

Tightly regulated. The 1934 NFA still permitted them to be registered and sold up until 1986 when the Hughes Amendment closed the registry. All the registered ones still in circulation are perfectly legal.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cal04 (Original post)

Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:12 AM

4. locking - this is a feature article, not breaking news

Additionally the entire article if for subscribers only. The link does not work. Perhaps post in GD with your summary of the article???
Thanks.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink