Tue Jan 15, 2013, 02:21 PM
Redfairen (624 posts)
DOMA: House Republicans Poised To Spend $3 Million On Legal Defense
Source: Huffington Post
House Republican leaders have signed on to spend up to $3 million to keep defending the Defense of Marriage Act in court, according to a copy of their newly revised legal contract obtained by The Huffington Post. House Republican leaders took over the legal defense of DOMA in the spring of 2011, when Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Obama administration would no longer defend it on the grounds that they found it unconstitutional. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders hired attorneys at the law firm Bancroft LLC to represent the House in court cases involving the federal ban on gay marriage -- all with taxpayer dollars. On Jan. 4, Rep. Candice Miller (R-Mich.), who chairs the House Administration Committee, signed a revised contract with Bancroft LLC that increases the spending cap to $3 million to allow Bancroft attorneys to keep defending DOMA in various court cases. The revised contract also bears the signatures of Bancroft partner Paul Clement and Kerry Kircher, general counsel for the House of Representatives. ....... The revised contract comes on the heels of House Republican leaders inserting language into the rules package for the 113th Congress that authorizes the House legal team to keep paying outside counsel to defend DOMA. The rules package also states that the House legal team continues to "speak for" all House members in its defense of DOMA -- language that infuriated Democrats opposed to the matter. All but one Republican, Rep. Walter Jones (N.C.), voted to pass the rules package, effectively endorsing the DOMA language. But a Jones spokesman told The Huffington Post that Jones' opposition wasn't DOMA-related. Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/15/doma-republicans_n_2479666.html?ir=Gay+Voices&ref=topbar
|
16 replies, 1169 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Redfairen | Jan 2013 | OP | |
| sakabatou | Jan 2013 | #1 | |
| lunasun | Jan 2013 | #13 | |
| sakabatou | Jan 2013 | #15 | |
| valerief | Jan 2013 | #2 | |
| freshwest | Jan 2013 | #3 | |
| eggplant | Jan 2013 | #4 | |
| Dollface | Jan 2013 | #5 | |
| Stringfellow Hawke | Jan 2013 | #6 | |
| tomm2thumbs | Jan 2013 | #7 | |
| obama2terms | Jan 2013 | #8 | |
| NYtoBush-Drop Dead | Jan 2013 | #9 | |
| JudyM | Jan 2013 | #16 | |
| HockeyMom | Jan 2013 | #10 | |
| ChiTownChavista | Jan 2013 | #11 | |
| Politicub | Jan 2013 | #12 | |
| wordpix | Jan 2013 | #14 |
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 02:29 PM
sakabatou (29,105 posts)
1. Keeping consenting couples from marrying just because of the Bible
|
Disgusting.
|
Response to sakabatou (Reply #1)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:52 PM
lunasun (3,633 posts)
13. what does it say in the bible about marriage that they reference?
|
just wondering
I just do not know what part of the bible is against gay marriage I only see signs like Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve but not bible quotes anyway, that 3Mil could have gone to charities!!!! |
Response to lunasun (Reply #13)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:00 AM
sakabatou (29,105 posts)
15. It's not about marriage per se, it's more about the sex
|
At least, that's what I think it is.
|
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:02 PM
valerief (35,681 posts)
2. Because they care about the debt. nt
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:51 PM
eggplant (975 posts)
4. They are probably offsetting it against the taxes they would lose...
|
...when the couples started filing as married filing jointly.
Oh wait, they are in favor of lowering taxes. can't ... hold ... dissonant ... ideas ... in ... head ... >* pop *< |
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:54 PM
Dollface (1,440 posts)
5. Republicans, pissing away a fortune since 1981
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 04:06 PM
Stringfellow Hawke (25 posts)
6. I want all 3 million back.
|
The House Republicans should remove $3 million and another $10 million from their warchest to pay for the DOMA which is going to be a massive overturn.
We should not be paying one red cent from our coffers. |
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:19 PM
tomm2thumbs (9,190 posts)
7. a small price to pay, to lose the majority in 2 years
|
Keep it up, and they'll be spending as much on flowers at the funeral of the Republican Party entirely. (I'll send a card) |
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 06:36 PM
obama2terms (339 posts)
8. Absolutely disgusting
|
Repukes whine about having how gay people getting married goes against their beliefs, well my tax dollars going to fund something that hurts gay people goes against my beliefs.
|
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 06:44 PM
NYtoBush-Drop Dead (237 posts)
9. It better be coming out of their own pockets.
Response to NYtoBush-Drop Dead (Reply #9)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 10:07 AM
JudyM (2,303 posts)
16. "... all with taxpayer dollars." nt
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 07:50 PM
HockeyMom (10,736 posts)
10. Just cut Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security
|
to cut the "deficit". but it's OK to spend MILLIONS so those bad gays cannot marry.
|
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 09:07 PM
ChiTownChavista (52 posts)
11. Unbelievable!
|
The Repugs hypocrisy is beyond belief.
|
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 09:14 PM
Politicub (5,869 posts)
12. This drives me nuts. They know they're spitting in our face.
|
There is nothing good or redeeming about the GOP. Nothing.
|
Response to Redfairen (Original post)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 11:46 PM
wordpix (12,478 posts)
14. I wish there were some way to sue for this money back. Outrageous!
|
Not just the money, either, but trying to save the sinking ship DOMA that is going down soon, anyway
|

