Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,072 posts)
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 03:41 AM Dec 2011

Occupy Wall Street Protesters Report to Court

The line outside the summons court was longer than normal on Wednesday morning, as those accused of the usual offenses, like allowing a dog to wander off a leash or drinking a beer on a public stretch of pavement, were joined by protesters from Occupy Wall Street.

Many of the protesters, numbering nearly 200, had last seen one another in October after their arrests for crossing the roadway of the Brooklyn Bridge; they had ridden the same city bus used to transport prisoners, or had shared stories inside a police precinct station house.

On Wednesday, they had another shared experience, passing through two magnetometers on their way to the fourth floor of 346 Broadway, where court cases tend to move swiftly and are often disposed of with small fines or conditional discharges. The court is normally reserved for cases that can safely be categorized as minor and rarely qualify as headline material.

Inside a courtroom, Judge Neil Ross heard pleas. Many defendants agreed to arrangements that will result in their charges being dismissed if they are not arrested within six months. But others declined, saying they wanted to go to trial.

full: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/15/nyregion/occupy-wall-street-members-report-to-court-for-brooklyn-bridge-rally.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Occupy Wall Street Protesters Report to Court (Original Post) alp227 Dec 2011 OP
tough choice, take the dismissals or allow criminals to testify against you nt msongs Dec 2011 #1
The dismissal offer is a suppression tactic. joshcryer Dec 2011 #2
Agreed. TexasTowelie Dec 2011 #3
They should take a chapter from the Chicago Seven. nt Javaman Dec 2011 #4
Why did police take summonses, and then return them to the court? midnight Dec 2011 #5
TRIAL! TRIAL! TRIAL! Earth_First Dec 2011 #6

joshcryer

(62,286 posts)
2. The dismissal offer is a suppression tactic.
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 04:54 AM
Dec 2011

What would a speech-related individual be arrested for "in 6 months" but another speech-related incident? It's clearly suppression, basically "STFU, stay home."

midnight

(26,624 posts)
5. Why did police take summonses, and then return them to the court?
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 12:14 PM
Dec 2011

Martin J. Stolar, a lawyer representing several protesters, made a motion to dismiss all of the charges, saying the original summonses had been taken from the court by the police and then returned, which he said “raises questions about the integrity of every single summons.”

A prosecutor for the Manhattan district attorney’s office said the summonses had been removed for the “purpose of supplementing affidavits.”

Judge Ross denied Mr. Stolar’s motion, saying, “There is nothing to suggest any impropriety.”

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
6. TRIAL! TRIAL! TRIAL!
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 02:49 PM
Dec 2011

Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal does nothing *BUT* limit free speech as pointed out above, and is essentially not a plea deal at all but a guilty or guilty charge in this instance...

DEMAND a trial.

Any attorney worth their weight in court will also demand this...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Occupy Wall Street Protes...