Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:01 PM Nov 2012

The Petraeus Legacy: A Paramilitary CIA?

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by muriel_volestrangler (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: The Nation

While much of the media focus on l’affaire Petraeus has centered on the CIA director’s sexual relationship with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, the scandal opens a window onto a different and more consequential relationship—that between the CIA and the military’s Joint Special Operations Command. In a behind-the-scenes turf war that has raged since 9/11, the two government bodies have fought for control of the expanding global wars waged by the United States—a turf war that JSOC has largely won. Petraeus, an instrumental player in this power struggle, leaves behind an agency that has strayed from intelligence to paramilitary-type activities. Though his legacy will be defined largely by the scandal that ended his career, to many within military and intelligence circles, Petraeus’s career trajectory, from commander of US military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan to the helm of the CIA, is a symbol of this evolution.

“I would not say that CIA has been taken over by the military, but I would say that the CIA has become more militarized,” Philip Giraldi, a retired career CIA case officer, told The Nation. “A considerable part of the CIA budget is now no longer spying; it’s supporting paramilitaries who work closely with JSOC to kill terrorists, and to run the drone program.” The CIA, he added, “is a killing machine now.”

As head of US Central Command in 2009, Petraeus issued execute orders that significantly broadened the ability of US forces to operate in a variety of countries, including Yemen, where US forces began conducting missile strikes later that year. During Petraeus’s short tenure at the CIA, drone strikes conducted by the agency, sometimes in conjunction with JSOC, escalated dramatically in Yemen; in his first month in office, he oversaw a series of strikes that killed three US citizens, including 16-year-old Abdulrahman Awlaki. In some cases, such as the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, commandos from the elite JSOC operated under the auspices of the CIA, so that the mission could be kept secret if it went wrong.

One current State Department liaison who has also worked extensively with JSOC describes the CIA as becoming “a mini-Special Operations Command that purports to be an intelligence agency.” For all the praise Petraeus won for his counterinsurgency strategy and the “surge” in Iraq, he says, his real legacy is as a “political tool,” an enabler of those within the national security apparatus who want to see a continuation of covert global mini-wars. Pointing to the “mystique that surrounds JSOC” and Adm. William McRaven, commander of the Special Operations Command, the liaison says, “Petraeus was trying to implement that kind of command climate at the CIA.”

Read more: http://www.thenation.com/article/171247/petraeus-legacy-paramilitary-cia#

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Petraeus Legacy: A Paramilitary CIA? (Original Post) octoberlib Nov 2012 OP
What's next? CIA-backed snipers along parade routes in Dallas!? villager Nov 2012 #1
Recommended: James Douglass' "JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters." Peace Patriot Nov 2012 #3
I keep hearing good things about that book.... villager Nov 2012 #4
There may be some validity to Petraeus' militarization... BouzoukiKing Nov 2012 #2
Locking - not Latest Breaking News muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #5
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. What's next? CIA-backed snipers along parade routes in Dallas!?
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:16 PM
Nov 2012

Oh wait....

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
3. Recommended: James Douglass' "JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters."
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 01:26 AM
Nov 2012

It still matters.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
4. I keep hearing good things about that book....
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 02:37 AM
Nov 2012

Thanks for the reminder.

BouzoukiKing

(163 posts)
2. There may be some validity to Petraeus' militarization...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 01:11 AM
Nov 2012

...of CIA. Consider also that before taking over the reins, he may not have supported the idea.

The truth is that raw intelligence-gathering - as the world has become more and more technologized - is almost exclusively the province of NSA these days, and their purely electronic/computer/satellite techniques.

CIA was originally a covert military organization - arising from the OSS of WWII. Having lost some major battles in the political infighting of Washington, they appear to be returning to their roots.

Is this necessarily a bad thing? Do countries need organizations like that? I believe so.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,407 posts)
5. Locking - not Latest Breaking News
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:39 AM
Nov 2012

This is an analysis article on what Petraeus did in the CIA and military, not new facts. It would go better in Good Reads or GD. Thank you.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Petraeus Legacy: A Pa...