Scandal in Ireland as woman dies in Galway 'after being denied abortion'
Source: guardian
Health authorities in Ireland are investigating the death of a pregnant woman whose husband says she was denied an abortion following severe complications.
Savita Halappanavar, who was 17 weeks pregnant, died of septicaemia a week after presenting with back pain on 21 October at University hospital in Galway, where she was found to be miscarrying.
After the 31-year-old dentist was told that she was miscarrying, her husband reportedly said that she had asked for a medical termination a number of times over a three day period, during which she was in severe pain.
But he said these requests were denied because a foetal heartbeat was still present and they were told at one point: "This is a Catholic country."
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/14/ireland-woman-dies-after-abortion-refusal
How "pro life" is THAT??
We shall not let that happen!!!
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Catholic country indeed.
femrap
(13,418 posts)organized religions. So very sad. She was treated worse than a broodmare.
morningglory
(2,336 posts)Response to morningglory (Reply #4)
freshwest This message was self-deleted by its author.
sheshe2
(83,772 posts)Don't even get me started!
Pro life my ass.
Heartbreaking.
Baitball Blogger
(46,715 posts)Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)The Irish Times story linked from The Guardian mentions that Ms. Halappanavar's is Hindu. That "This is a catholic country" statement is especially disturbing in this context. She was found to be miscarrying on the 21st. The pregnancy was over. Having a dying fetus inside her body put her life at risk. The presence of a foetal heartbeat was irrelevant. They broke Ireland's already antiquated law and killed this woman.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Maybe it's not my place to tell the Irish what to do.
But as someone who was raised in a half-Irish-American, way-too-Catholic family, I do feel confident to tell the Catholic Church that it needs to back the fuck away from the personal lives and decisions of women, and everyone else for that matter.
-app
Patiod
(11,816 posts)Still more to do, though
crunch60
(1,412 posts)Ms. Halappanavar's MURDER!
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)There is no physician with even a twinge of ethics who would stand by and let a woman suffer and die so needlessly, so cruelly.
Any physician who denied her life-saving treatment is guilty of not only abandoning his or her medical training and oath, but they are liable for her death.
Sickening, disgusting, tragic, CRIMINAL.
Ireland should join the year 2012.
oldbanjo
(690 posts)colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)Since they would not save the mother, they effectively killed the fetus after all.
They could have delivered the fetus and then let God decide if the fetus lived or died. What they did was commit a double murder by failing to render aid when it was possible and available, violating all standards and ethics of their profession.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)with a former pastor over how far right he is on this issue. ie in cases like this. I'm not pro abortion. Not entirely pro choice but so called Pro Life is a bullshit term. Even George Carlin knew this. The primary argument from the anti abortion is that of the two sides. Republicans kill far less people than Dems kill babies. As I don't have the stats. I'd need someone else to null this argument (PM'd. as I don't often follow up what I write (ADD) no I don't have ADHD
CitizenPatriot
(3,783 posts)they are pro freedom for women.
Abortions aren't fun; they are a medical procedure.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Well I never!
I just remembered to put that on my shopping list the other day--milk, eggs, abortion...
(do I really need the sarcasm tag?)
AAO
(3,300 posts)I know because I've seen pictures of fetuses, and have seen and even held babies. They are not the same.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)So "Catholic country" means what? Ham handed ignorance? Superstition at the expense of the individual?
Sometimes the indolence that Ireland expresses towards women makes me not want to be a citizen of it.
sheshe2
(83,772 posts)How about the GOP of the US of A!
Look at the war on women that is being waged here! The platform they ran on.
Legitimate rape, forcible rape, children born of rape...an act of God!
Paul Ryan and Mitt both stated (though the Mittster flopped many times) that abortion under any circumstance would not be permissible.
We too have to get out of the 1500s mentality!
diane in sf
(3,913 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)The horrible men who think God wants women to suffer and die during pregnancy. Yes, that includes the Pope and every other person who thinks a fetus is more important than a living, breathing woman.
Damn them all to hell!
Response to Stargazer09 (Reply #12)
freshwest This message was self-deleted by its author.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They need to fix this mess, too. Maybe the needless death of this poor woman will be a catalyst.
sheshe2
(83,772 posts)The Catholic church has always wanted to control women! To my disgust so do those horrible, dirty old white men of the GOP! They make my skin crawl!
They have put through Congress an unprecedented number of laws banning Womens rights!
New Report on the Anti-Women Voting Record of the 112th Congress Identifies 55 Anti-Women Votes by House Republicans
http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?q=news%2Fnew-report-on-the-anti-women-voting-record-of-the-112th-congress-identifies-55-anti-women-votes#.UKMXS83hVQY.email
MADem
(135,425 posts)This last election in USA was a referendum on those assholes in Congress. It's why McCaskill went back, why Duckworth won, etc.
Megahurtz
(7,046 posts)crim son
(27,464 posts)who would call this a case of God's will rather than a tragedy. Yeah, it's bullsh**.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Who the hell would even want to worship such a sadistic god?
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...since obviously, to use modern medicine is to try and thwart God's will.
mainer
(12,022 posts)Or so the GOP says.
KauaiK
(544 posts)This makes me so angry. Women in THIS country died before Roe v Wade. I know. I lived in that era when there were NO choices. This is what the Akins & Murdocks will do in the US if they and their ilk ever ever get into power.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)there were no choices for poor women. Those with means could always find medically safe abortions. (I didn't mean that as snark, btw.)
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)This just infuriates me. It is right out of the middle ages and a horrific crime.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)make me sick.
DakotaLady
(246 posts)The holy and pious ... make me sick too.
Well stated in just those few words.
Initech
(100,076 posts)nolabear
(41,963 posts)In case tht's even needed. It's an incredible tragedy all the way around. But she didn't have to die.
JEB
(4,748 posts)has rivers of blood to dye the Bishop's robes red.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)there was absolutely no reason not to terminate the pregnancy, so it seems the hospital decided that both would die, this is beyond mere negligence it is murder
AAO
(3,300 posts)ck4829
(35,077 posts)MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Dead women and girls mean nothing to them.
valerief
(53,235 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)Someone must be executed for this.
Monk06
(7,675 posts)No abortion and the woman had septicaemia ??!! That is a death sentence for being a woman.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)DFW
(54,387 posts)They need to be indicted for murder, themselves.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)They most likely wouldn't do a D&C either, until it was conclusively proven that the fetus was dead. By that time, the mother would have been dead as well.
At what point does simple common sense and medical knowledge trump dog(shit)ma?
And as for pro-life -- the fetus is all that matters. Do we need any more evidence?
mainer
(12,022 posts)She was carrying a source of infection, which was the fetus as well as other products of conception. As long as that infectious package was inside her, antibiotics could not be effective. Immediate abortion was medically necessary.
I've repeatedly argued with anti-choice folks who insist there is never a medical necessity for abortion. I have a medical background and can point to a number of medical conditions, but they never believe me. Here is one concrete case to prove it.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)If they knew the fetus was dead, they would have done a D&C to make sure all the tissue, etc., was removed. But even when it was obvious that she needed an abortion, they wouldn't do it. So even a D&C would have been too late for her, once they considered the fetus to be gone. So, the woman, in my eyes, was doomed no matter what.
My point is, they dick around until it is too late, even after it is obviously clear that the life of the mother is endangered. That is medically negligent, IMO, regardless of what any religion has to say about it.
I was very nearly in this woman's place several years ago, and I also had a good friend who quickly died from sepsis (so I know how fast it can happen) so I know of what I speak.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Heywood J
(2,515 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)No country has been the victim of catholic interference more than Ireland.
rizlaplus
(159 posts)Disgusting. The Irish Prime Minister did promise the Roman Catholic lobby that he would never legislate for abortion nor for the X case.
The X case.
The X case involved a fourteen year old girl who had been raped by a neighbour and became pregnant. X told her mother of suicidal thoughts because of the unwanted pregnancy, and as abortion was illegal in Ireland, the family travelled to England for an abortion. Before the abortion was carried out, the family asked the Garda Síochána if DNA from the aborted foetus would be admissible as evidence in the courts, as the neighbour was denying responsibility. Hearing that X planned to have an abortion, the Irish Attorney General, sought an injunction under Article 40.3.3 of the Constitution of Ireland (which outlaws abortion) preventing her from having the procedure carried out. The injunction was granted by Mr Justice Declan Costello in the High Court.
The High Court injunction was appealed to the Supreme Court, which overturned it by a majority of four to one. The majority opinion held that a woman had a right to an abortion under Article 40.3.3 if there was "a real and substantial risk" to her life. This right did not exist if there was a risk to her health but not her life; however it did exist if the risk was the possibility of suicide. X had a miscarriage shortly after the judgement, before an abortion could be carried out.
The man who raped her and got her pregnant was sentenced to 14 years in prison. This was reduced on appeal to 4 years.
rizlaplus
(159 posts)That way the statistic that annually 4,000 Irish women have abortions doesn't show up in the official record!
Medical Council guidelines and all sides of the debate accept there is a clear argument to help miscarrying women pass the foetus if their health is at risk in the very early stages of pregnancy. However, the women claimed they were advised to "read between the lines" and travel to clinics in Britain. One woman, Jennifer, said that in 2003 when she was 16 weeks pregnant, she started bleeding and went to her local hospital.
"All the nurses inside [the unit] just started crying uncontrollably. They said there was no hope for the baby and they couldnt understand I hadnt miscarried. There was no ... fluid [around the foetus], he had one kidney, fluid on his brain. But there was a heartbeat. They kept listening."
Jennifer said GPs and four consultants met her separately after work in their own time for scans, only to tell her "you need to make a decision immediately" due to the impact on her health. She said one said to her mother: "I know what I would do if it was my daughter, you need to read between the lines. You need to do it urgently.
http://www.irishexaminer.com/archives/2012/1116/world/miscarrying-women-told-to-aposread-between-linesapos-and-go-to-uk-214156.html
anti-poopyhead
(12 posts)Apparently not all english-speaking zealots moved to US yet.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It sounds like the doctors have problems, too, and could be arrested if they do the wrong thing.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)This is the most helpful article I have found: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/world/europe/22iht-letter22.html?pagewanted=all
Since a woman has a constitutional right to an abortion if her life is at risk (including risk from suicide), then if doctors are fearful, they are either fearful of law enforcement officials who may interpret this "unclear" law differently or they are fearful of the power of the anti-choicers.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)I know someone to whom this happened, but didn't not die.
Her water broke before the fetus was viable, but into "late term abortion" territory. The baby cannot survive this and infection is a pretty sure bet. But they would not induce labor/abort the fetus until she either got an infection and was therefore at risk, or the baby died. So she laid in the hospital for several days with her dying baby inside until it either died or she became septic. This was not a Catholic hospital, and it was in the US. Finally she got a fever and they immediately induced labor. She was able to be treated for the infection and lived to tell the story. I found this at the time and still find it beyond disgusting. It's the kind of thing that makes me understand the rage behind terrorism.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)I am glad your friend survived. It seems to me that risk of infection should have been enough for a "life at risk" determination (though common sense would say that a non-viable fetus make that whole argument moot anyway). Basically they are saying that the risk of death has to be "high enough" to warrant intervention. But the higher the risk, the more likely women will die even with intervention.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Leave it too complicated and can lead to horrible situations like this. Which is why it should be entirely up to the woman.
Though even in the US, there are reasonable regulations allowed on the third trimester (Roe v. Wade) so things like this can still happen.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)but I suspect that the thinking may be that in the case of a miscarriage, it is better to let events proceed naturally unless there is a a strong reason(such as a clear sign of infection) to speed things along. It may be a matter of standard medical practice and have nothing to do with the pro-life/pro choice arguments at all.
In fact, this may be what happened in the Irish case: http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/1114/timeline-savita-halappanavars-death.html
If the time line is accurate, it would appear to me that she was miscarrying because of an infection and that the medical people should have realized this from the very beginning!
"Speaking to RTÉ's News at One, Praveen Halappanavar said his wife had gone to their GP and "everything was ok" three or four days before she presented at the hospital back pain.
Mr Halappanavar said the couple were told that their baby was "perfectly alright" and was due on 30 March."
http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/1114/savita-halappanavar-university-hospital-galway.html
The other possibility is that if the water breaks but labor does not ensue, then it may be possible to delay delivery for a few days or a few weeks. That can make can make a huge difference in the survival of a pre-term infant. It all depends on the specifics of each case. It's situations like these that need to be addressed by doctors and women as they arise rather than being forced into a one size fits all piece of legislation.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I had the impression they had gone to a modern law on abortion, but no. Must have been divorce I was thinking of, which they have been allowed only relatively recently there.
The real and substantial risk still puts the decision in other hands though - doctors? Very behind the times for 2012.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)That says it all.
How about having the decision made by a professional (i.e., doctor) and the patient?
To me, it's Hippocratic Oath 101. You do what is in the best interest of the patient.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)No exceptions for women, none. Not rape, incest or the life of the mother.
I hope all women democratic voters realize just how close we are in this country to these horrors.
Tonkinlievet
(12 posts)The scourge of humanity!!
Worship any deity that makes you comfortable, but don't try to force feed that shit sandwich to ME...or anybody else!!!
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)Couldn't they see she was dying? Why does that fetus have more rights than the mother?
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...and it is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay past time the Republic of Ireland cut the umbilical chord with the catholic church...unless they want MORE scrutiny for defending that cult of sadistic child-buggerers...
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)SpartanDem
(4,533 posts)"God Will" this afternoon
progressoid
(49,990 posts)NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)the answer: as many as it takes until one stays forever in their power, unquestioning.
the powers that be, they hate you -- always have, always will.
(the unspoken secret is they also fear you organized...)
ChoralScholar
(4,871 posts)liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)And what our own GOP want for the women of America. I hope this wakes up the sleeping part of Ireland. Religion is worse than meth.
LibGranny
(711 posts)and she was a dentist! Horrible, just horrible!
Sundome
(26 posts)hopefully that hospital can be charged with murder.
Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)I am ashamed that Ireland's medieval abortion law still stands
Blame for denying Savita Halappanavar a termination lies with all of us who keep quiet about abortion rights
Emer O'Toole
The Guardian, Wednesday 14 November 2012
In beautiful Galway, my home town, Savita Halappanavar died in the hospital I was born in after being denied a potentially life-saving abortion. She presented with back pain, and was found to be miscarrying. A day of agony later, knowing her pregnancy couldn't survive, she asked for a termination, but was refused. "This is a Catholic country," she was allegedly told.
As long as the foetal heart kept beating doctors would not grant her wish. It beat for three days. Halappanavar vomited, shook and collapsed. On the third day the weak sound faded to nothing and doctors removed the dead foetus. That evening, Halappanavar died of septicaemia.
This is a Catholic country. If these were indeed the words used by the doctors, then the hospital did not feel the need to sugarcoat its rationale with references to Halappanavar's psychological health, or the wellbeing of her foetus. Its ideology was not veiled as Youth Defence, Precious Life and Ireland's other powerful anti-abortion lobbyists have learned to do in the language of care and concern for women. The rationale was not cloaked in academic arguments about the moment when human life begins.
Halappanavar objected that she was neither Irish nor a Catholic: a futile attempt to appeal for choice over what was happening to her body. As a medical professional, she most likely knew that her 17-week-old foetus would not be conscious of its existence ending. But her appeal to value her life over an insentient foetus's heartbeat was ignored. There is no abortion on the pope's own island and she had no time to get to England.
More:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/15/ireland-medieval-abortion-law-savita