Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 01:18 AM Jan 2012

Alternative UC tuition plan attracts interest

UC Riverside students received a dose of validation Wednesday from system President Mark G. Yudof over their radical plan to abolish tuition and replace it with post-graduation payments equaling 5% of their income for 20 years.

Speaking at a UC regents meeting on the Riverside campus, Yudof said he was "very impressed" with the proposal — despite the obstacles it would face in implementation. "We think the ideas are constructive," Yudof said, promising that his staff would study the plan.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-uc-regents-20120119,0,7115732.story

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alternative UC tuition plan attracts interest (Original Post) Tiggeroshii Jan 2012 OP
Can you update with a link to the source? Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #1
Oops! Sorry! Tiggeroshii Jan 2012 #2
Hey, it happens! Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #3
Professor Reich advocated this plan (at a 10% rate) often when I was an undergrad at Cal. bayareamike Jan 2012 #4
Putting students into debt for 20 years EFerrari Jan 2012 #5
Given that I have over 100,000 dollars in debt to pay off (undergrad + law school) bayareamike Jan 2012 #7
Wow. Occulus Jan 2012 #6
Only in America harun Jan 2012 #8
Next up will be people buying stock in prospective talent to pay for their tuition as a chance harun Jan 2012 #9
As a UC employee I say don't hold your breath lunatica Jan 2012 #10
That is not such a bad idea at all. Call it the Higher Education Tax. Fool Count Jan 2012 #11
only the students benefit from education? mopinko Jan 2012 #12

bayareamike

(602 posts)
7. Given that I have over 100,000 dollars in debt to pay off (undergrad + law school)
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 08:30 PM
Jan 2012

I'd say that paying 10% of my income would be a much better -- and much more fair -- deal. It encourages students to pursue what they want.

harun

(11,348 posts)
9. Next up will be people buying stock in prospective talent to pay for their tuition as a chance
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 08:45 PM
Jan 2012

to get a piece of future returns.

The end game of this is a society where those who contribute or potentially can contribute to corporate profits are one class and the others are compost.

Should be a joy.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
10. As a UC employee I say don't hold your breath
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 09:03 AM
Jan 2012

President Yudof tells everyone their ideas are great. Then you never hear another word about it. If the students want this alternative they will have to really fight for it. If they don't stop fighting for it, in my experience he will say he's creating a committee to study the issue and to come up with plans and that the committee is to meet with him in a year to come up with their findings. When the year is up the committee will indeed come up with decent research and even decent ways to address the problem, but... But we don't have the money to implement the solutions will be the answer. The entire matter will then be forgotten instantly.

UC has done this for decades.

Right now they're in the throes of cutting every single department's funding and will start laying off people as they decide to centralize their workforce yet again in it's history. They do this shit until they realize it simply doesn't work and they have to start rehiring people again. It has never worked before, but actually cutting jobs and freezing salaries is always their solution.

UC has and will continue to prefer foreign students who pay through the nose in spite of it's historic mandate to enroll students from California first because those students don't have to pay insane tuitions. UC is no longer a university for the state and it's youth. It's become a corporate money making machine. They've been actively cutting jobs in administration for a few years now. I went through being laid off when they decided to consolidate all their research departments under one department. I was lucky to get rehired with a handful of staff to do the job of 65 units instead of one.

 

Fool Count

(1,230 posts)
11. That is not such a bad idea at all. Call it the Higher Education Tax.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 08:30 PM
Jan 2012

It is more fair than a universal state tax to finance higher education in that only those who benefit from
it pay, and better yet, they pay in proportion to how much they benefited. Anything to make the rich
pay more tax can't be all bad, can it?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Alternative UC tuition pl...