Breaking News: Earthquake measuring 7.0 magnitude strikes Myanmar: USGS
Source: Reuters
No link yet, just seen it on top
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/10/entertainment-us-bieber-gomez-idUSBRE8A90HN20121110
7.0 isn't really too big, but just was thinking i should post it, since i saw it
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/10/entertainment-us-bieber-gomez-idUSBRE8A90HN20121110
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Scary..
nolabels
(13,133 posts)I am sure there are going to be many more un-thought of consequences of it as it becomes more pronounced
Systematic Chaos
(8,601 posts)...and those landmasses are going to settle as a reaction. That's major enough to affect plates and fault lines everywhere.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)just seems like it when you hear about a few in a row.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)A lot stronger.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)The stresses are small but they add up over longer periods of time: http://www.geologie.uni-hannover.de/257.html?&L=1
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)there are more registered because we have 30 times the number of sensors that we had in 1973, and more are reported. thus the increase in "total strength" (this means all added together).
using a timescale of 40 years means bubkiss when discussing geologic activity.
edit cause I can't add, but I do know rocks
SkyDaddy7
(6,045 posts)I do know they have an awful lot of info stored within them!
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)When you throw out statements that blatantly deny other people's reality, no matter how "technically" accurate they are, people are going to question your statements.
So unless you are willing to sit down and give us a concise and engaging geology and history lesson, the billions of years of change you are talking about means bubkiss to us.
We're dealing with finite reality and one that seems to be changing. That makes people nervous. Some random stranger telling us that it's okay because there are more sensors or this isn't unusual really doesn't do anything but make people MORE anxious.
Hint: The better you explain things, the less people question you and the more reassured they are.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)neversaydie
(69 posts)I've been watching since October 28; a 7.8 in Masset, Canada generated a Tsumani warning in Hawaii. I have cousins there so I watched their local news and all the people trying to evacuate. Ended up not being much.
It does look like a lot of activity around the pacific plate (? is that what it's called). Canada, then Hawaii, then Alaska, Japan, and a couple of days ago Guatamala. My friend's 100-year-old mom had to be moved.
Who can you ask to find out if this is normal or increased activity? Glad my little sis doesn't live in SF right now.
bananas
(27,509 posts)davidwparker
(5,397 posts)The earthquakes are likened to the birth pains a woman feels when she is about to give birth. These birth pains increase in both frequency and intensity.
Jesus told them, Dont let anyone mislead you, for many will come in my name, claiming, I am the Messiah. They will deceive many. And you will hear of wars and threats of wars, but dont panic. Yes, these things must take place, but the end wont follow immediately. Nation will go to war against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in many parts of the world. But all this is only the first of the birth pains, with more to come.
See TalkingDog's graph at entry #28.
femrap
(13,418 posts)now I go to the links and it's all about Justin Bieber.
wtf: :
Where are the f*cking juries when you need them???????????
Don't fuck with Mother Nature...a-hole!
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)KaryninMiami
(3,073 posts)Swear I read that somewhere that he was leaving for there tomorrow or very soon.
sandyshoes17
(657 posts)nt
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... that PO was going there soon.... I'm not real crazy about him going there...they have
had some serious civil strife in the past month.
Sedona
(3,769 posts)I have clients in Chitagong Bangledesh, hope they're OK
POTUS is going to Burma.
On edit Burma = Myanmar
aquart
(69,014 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)eyewall
(674 posts)The Kobe eq was smaller than that, the famous Northridge quake was 6.8. The Loma Prieta quake in the Bay Area was 7.2 originally but was downgraded later to a 7.0.
7.0 is a HUGE earthquake.
starroute
(12,977 posts)This one seems to have been felt fairly strongly in its immediate vicinity, but only lightly down on the coast.
You really have to get up towards 8.0 before you get into "devastating" territory -- unless it happens directly under a city that's built on landfill or has lots of shoddily constructed apartment houses.
eyewall
(674 posts)The 7.0 in Santa Cruz destroyed the entire downtown area including the historic Pacific Garden Mall, wrecked over 30,000 homes, most beyond repair, wiped out huge sections of Watsonville twenty miles to the south, took out highways and caused major slides 40 miles north and south plus it dropped the entire town of Moss Landing by about 12 inches in the Harkens Slough.
In addition to all this local damage it pancaked a two tiered highway in Oakland, 80 miles away, knocked out a section of the Bay Bridge and devastated the Marina District in San Fransisco about 90 miles from the epicenter. The Marina District was the only part of this that was built on landfill.
Between Watsonville to the south and San Fransisco to the north there were tens of thousands of homes and businesses destroyed or made unsafe to occupy, roads and overpasses wrecked, many beyond repair and infrastructure damage that still persists to this day. The ground lurched vertically eight feet. A wave about a foot tall sped along the ground at around 100mph knocking out street lights and cracking almost anything on top of it including every curb, sidewalk, building and overpass in Capitola. The damage on the coast I witnessed personally. I heard stories of similar effects in Los Gatos, Mountain View, San Jose and Brisbane. Almost everyone in three counties lost their dishes, TV sets, basically anything breakable that was not strapped down.
What does it take to allow the use of the term "devastating"?
starroute
(12,977 posts)Largely because it had a depth of 32 miles, it was nothing like the Santa Cruz quake. The point isn't semantics -- it's that the magnitude alone doesn't make a quake "devastating."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Nisqually_earthquake
One of the largest recorded earthquakes in Washington state history, it measured 6.8 on the moment magnitude scale and lasted approximately 45 seconds. The epicenter of the earthquake was Anderson Island, about 17 km (11 mi) northeast of Olympia. The focus was at a depth of 52 km (32 mi). Tremors were felt as far away as Scio, Oregon, across the border in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and 175 mi (282 km) east in Pasco, Washington. There were also reports that it was felt as far away as Spokane, Washington and Sandpoint, Idaho.
About 400 people were injured. Most of the property damage occurred very near the epicenter or in unreinforced concrete or masonry buildings, such as those in the First Hill, Pioneer Square and Sodo neighborhoods of Seattle. The air traffic control tower at Sea-Tac Airport was heavily damaged during the quake; it has since been replaced with a more earthquake-resistant tower. The quake splintered a buttress under the dome of the capitol building in Olympia, however previous earthquake-resistance work prevented more serious harm to the building.[6] Additionally, the earthquake caused power outages in downtown Seattle. The U.S. Military's Ft. Lewis and McChord Air Force Base received damage in the quake. There was very slight damage in Victoria, British Columbia.
MisterJones
(23 posts)Not comparable and yes magnitude does matter. Depth, location and engineering matter as well. Don't be so dismissive. A 7.0 is not to be dismissed...
starroute
(12,977 posts)Read further down in the thread and you'll see the number got adjusted.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Earthquake measuring seven magnitude strikes Myanmar: USGS
BANGKOK | Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:31pm EST
BANGKOK (Reuters) - An earthquake measuring 7.0 magnitude struck Myanmar on Sunday, around 6o km (37 miles) northwest of Mandalay, the U.S. Geological Survey said.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)@BreakingNews: Magnitude 6.6 earthquake has hit near Shwebo, Myanmar - @USGS http://t.co/UvQciXBU
hunter
(38,318 posts)And reinforced concrete can't be trusted in places with poorly enforced or inadequate building codes.
This is a big earthquake.
Warpy
(111,278 posts)and a 6.6 at USGS. It's still strong enough to do a lot of damage and shallow enough to be catastrophic if it hit just the wrong place.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)htuttle
(23,738 posts)I wondered the same thing and just did a quick google on it.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)but it would be catastrophic in East Coast terms. It all depends on the kind of wave it produces and the type of ground. A lot of variables.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)airplaneman
(1,239 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)airplaneman
(1,239 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)I don't remember how that works.
Scairp
(2,749 posts)That's either pretty shallow or rather deep, depending on the topography of the area. Voice of America is reporting 12 deaths and many injuries, had a photo of a collapsed bridge that spanned the Irrawaddy. Sounds bad enough, especially for a Third world country with few resources to assist it's citizens in a natural disaster.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts).....correct link....
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)TSUNAMI BULLETIN NUMBER 001
PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS
ISSUED AT 0122Z 11 NOV 2012
THIS BULLETIN IS FOR ALL AREAS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN.
... TSUNAMI INFORMATION BULLETIN ...
THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
THIS BULLETIN IS ISSUED AS ADVICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. ONLY
NATIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE
DECISIONS REGARDING THE OFFICIAL STATE OF ALERT IN THEIR AREA AND
ANY ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE.
AN EARTHQUAKE HAS OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS
ORIGIN TIME - 0113Z 11 NOV 2012
COORDINATES - 22.5 NORTH 96.0 EAST
LOCATION - MYANMAR
MAGNITUDE - 7.0
EVALUATION
A DESTRUCTIVE TSUNAMI WAS NOT GENERATED BASED ON EARTHQUAKE AND
HISTORICAL TSUNAMI DATA. THIS EARTHQUAKE IS LOCATED TOO FAR
INLAND TO GENERATE A TSUNAMI IN THE INDIAN OCEAN.
THIS WILL BE THE ONLY BULLETIN ISSUED BY THE PACIFIC TSUNAMI
WARNING CENTER FOR THIS EVENT UNLESS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
BECOMES AVAILABLE.
THE JAPAN METEOROLOGICAL AGENCY MAY ISSUE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FOR THIS EVENT. IN THE CASE OF CONFLICTING INFORMATION...THE
MORE CONSERVATIVE INFORMATION SHOULD BE USED FOR SAFETY.
allan01
(1,950 posts)the Reuters link is bad order .
left on green only
(1,484 posts).....the Earth shattering breakup of Bustin Jeeber and Golina Somez.
Make7
(8,543 posts)... was a 7.0 magnitude earthquake.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)@BreakingNews: Report: 5 killed after magnitude-6.8 earthquake strikes northern Myanmar - @AP http://t.co/h1A8eLJc
femrap
(13,418 posts)7.0 is huge!!!! Sh*t.
Are you screwing with us?