Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking News: Earthquake measuring 7.0 magnitude strikes Myanmar: USGS (Original Post) nolabels Nov 2012 OP
Has anybody noticed the frequency of earthquakes lately? darkangel218 Nov 2012 #1
Kind of makes you wonder if global warming might have something to do with it? nolabels Nov 2012 #5
Take a few billion tons of ice each off of Greenland and Antarctica... Systematic Chaos Nov 2012 #26
It's not any more than usual Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2012 #14
Not any MORE than usual, but they are getting stronger over all. TalkingDog Nov 2012 #28
Massive ice migration. joshcryer Nov 2012 #32
hmm. Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2012 #37
I wished I knew more about rocks... SkyDaddy7 Nov 2012 #43
Rocks are good. Human nature is better TalkingDog Nov 2012 #44
sorry, I'll explain better next time Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2012 #48
7.8 in Canada before Halloween neversaydie Nov 2012 #23
7.5 in Guatamala on Nov 7 bananas Nov 2012 #33
Yes, I have. davidwparker Nov 2012 #30
duh.. femrap Nov 2012 #35
No, but I've noticed increase media attention towards them, which isn't the same thing. (nt) Posteritatis Nov 2012 #36
Wait- isn't that exactly where the President is heading- like this week? KaryninMiami Nov 2012 #2
Yor right , I heard that sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #7
I heard that too,,, ReRe Nov 2012 #13
Shake Map Sedona Nov 2012 #3
7.0 isn't too big? Is there a tsunami warning? aquart Nov 2012 #4
Heck i don't know, i am only the messenger nolabels Nov 2012 #8
7.0 is not only big, it's devastating. eyewall Nov 2012 #21
A lot depends on the depth and on other local factors starroute Nov 2012 #29
I don't want to get into a semantic argument eyewall Nov 2012 #42
And the 6.8 Nisqually quake in 2001 caused only scattered damage starroute Nov 2012 #45
A 6.8 is not a 7.0... MisterJones Nov 2012 #46
And this quake in Myanmar was a 6.8 starroute Nov 2012 #47
Link: Hissyspit Nov 2012 #6
Another link, says 6.6: Hissyspit Nov 2012 #9
7.0 is brutal on unreinforced masonry. hunter Nov 2012 #10
Only 9 and 10 KM down Warpy Nov 2012 #11
Isn't President Obama there??? kestrel91316 Nov 2012 #12
not till later in the week. nt Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2012 #15
Planned for next week, I think htuttle Nov 2012 #16
7 would be pretty big in California terms.... defacto7 Nov 2012 #17
In the east the ground rings like a bell. The 4.3 in SE Ky was felt in Cincy. alfredo Nov 2012 #19
Actually its only a 6.6 airplaneman Nov 2012 #18
6.8 itsrobert Nov 2012 #22
Thanks I stand corrected 6.8 n/t. airplaneman Nov 2012 #38
What's that about 20 times less powerful? defacto7 Nov 2012 #40
6.1 miles deep Scairp Nov 2012 #49
Umm...unless the earthshaking news is that Justin Bieber & his girlfriend broke up, you need the Pachamama Nov 2012 #20
No tsunami, too far inland. Here's the report from the Pacific Tsunami Center Liberty Belle Nov 2012 #24
re: Breaking News: Earthquake measuring 7.0 magnitude strikes Myanmar: USGS allan01 Nov 2012 #25
Thank you. I kept getting a tragic story about..... left on green only Nov 2012 #39
The 2010 Haiti earthquake that killed over 300,000 people ... Make7 Nov 2012 #27
5 dead sp far; 6.8 Hissyspit Nov 2012 #31
Are you crazy.... femrap Nov 2012 #34
IRIS Seismic Monitor calling it 6.6 gauguin57 Nov 2012 #41

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
5. Kind of makes you wonder if global warming might have something to do with it?
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:41 PM
Nov 2012

I am sure there are going to be many more un-thought of consequences of it as it becomes more pronounced

Systematic Chaos

(8,601 posts)
26. Take a few billion tons of ice each off of Greenland and Antarctica...
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:04 AM
Nov 2012

...and those landmasses are going to settle as a reaction. That's major enough to affect plates and fault lines everywhere.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
37. hmm.
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:30 AM
Nov 2012

there are more registered because we have 30 times the number of sensors that we had in 1973, and more are reported. thus the increase in "total strength" (this means all added together).

using a timescale of 40 years means bubkiss when discussing geologic activity.

edit cause I can't add, but I do know rocks

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
44. Rocks are good. Human nature is better
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:14 PM
Nov 2012

When you throw out statements that blatantly deny other people's reality, no matter how "technically" accurate they are, people are going to question your statements.

So unless you are willing to sit down and give us a concise and engaging geology and history lesson, the billions of years of change you are talking about means bubkiss to us.

We're dealing with finite reality and one that seems to be changing. That makes people nervous. Some random stranger telling us that it's okay because there are more sensors or this isn't unusual really doesn't do anything but make people MORE anxious.

Hint: The better you explain things, the less people question you and the more reassured they are.

neversaydie

(69 posts)
23. 7.8 in Canada before Halloween
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:15 PM
Nov 2012

I've been watching since October 28; a 7.8 in Masset, Canada generated a Tsumani warning in Hawaii. I have cousins there so I watched their local news and all the people trying to evacuate. Ended up not being much.

It does look like a lot of activity around the pacific plate (? is that what it's called). Canada, then Hawaii, then Alaska, Japan, and a couple of days ago Guatamala. My friend's 100-year-old mom had to be moved.

Who can you ask to find out if this is normal or increased activity? Glad my little sis doesn't live in SF right now.

davidwparker

(5,397 posts)
30. Yes, I have.
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:54 AM
Nov 2012

The earthquakes are likened to the birth pains a woman feels when she is about to give birth. These birth pains increase in both frequency and intensity.

Jesus told them, “Don’t let anyone mislead you, for many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Messiah.’ They will deceive many. And you will hear of wars and threats of wars, but don’t panic. Yes, these things must take place, but the end won’t follow immediately. Nation will go to war against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in many parts of the world. But all this is only the first of the birth pains, with more to come.


See TalkingDog's graph at entry #28.

 

femrap

(13,418 posts)
35. duh..
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:19 AM
Nov 2012

now I go to the links and it's all about Justin Bieber.

wtf: :


Where are the f*cking juries when you need them???????????

Don't fuck with Mother Nature...a-hole!

KaryninMiami

(3,073 posts)
2. Wait- isn't that exactly where the President is heading- like this week?
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:38 PM
Nov 2012

Swear I read that somewhere that he was leaving for there tomorrow or very soon.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
13. I heard that too,,,
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:02 PM
Nov 2012

... that PO was going there soon.... I'm not real crazy about him going there...they have
had some serious civil strife in the past month.

eyewall

(674 posts)
21. 7.0 is not only big, it's devastating.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:12 PM
Nov 2012

The Kobe eq was smaller than that, the famous Northridge quake was 6.8. The Loma Prieta quake in the Bay Area was 7.2 originally but was downgraded later to a 7.0.

7.0 is a HUGE earthquake.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
29. A lot depends on the depth and on other local factors
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:38 AM
Nov 2012

This one seems to have been felt fairly strongly in its immediate vicinity, but only lightly down on the coast.

You really have to get up towards 8.0 before you get into "devastating" territory -- unless it happens directly under a city that's built on landfill or has lots of shoddily constructed apartment houses.



eyewall

(674 posts)
42. I don't want to get into a semantic argument
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:08 AM
Nov 2012

The 7.0 in Santa Cruz destroyed the entire downtown area including the historic Pacific Garden Mall, wrecked over 30,000 homes, most beyond repair, wiped out huge sections of Watsonville twenty miles to the south, took out highways and caused major slides 40 miles north and south plus it dropped the entire town of Moss Landing by about 12 inches in the Harkens Slough.

In addition to all this local damage it pancaked a two tiered highway in Oakland, 80 miles away, knocked out a section of the Bay Bridge and devastated the Marina District in San Fransisco about 90 miles from the epicenter. The Marina District was the only part of this that was built on landfill.

Between Watsonville to the south and San Fransisco to the north there were tens of thousands of homes and businesses destroyed or made unsafe to occupy, roads and overpasses wrecked, many beyond repair and infrastructure damage that still persists to this day. The ground lurched vertically eight feet. A wave about a foot tall sped along the ground at around 100mph knocking out street lights and cracking almost anything on top of it including every curb, sidewalk, building and overpass in Capitola. The damage on the coast I witnessed personally. I heard stories of similar effects in Los Gatos, Mountain View, San Jose and Brisbane. Almost everyone in three counties lost their dishes, TV sets, basically anything breakable that was not strapped down.

What does it take to allow the use of the term "devastating"?

starroute

(12,977 posts)
45. And the 6.8 Nisqually quake in 2001 caused only scattered damage
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 02:27 PM
Nov 2012

Largely because it had a depth of 32 miles, it was nothing like the Santa Cruz quake. The point isn't semantics -- it's that the magnitude alone doesn't make a quake "devastating."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Nisqually_earthquake

One of the largest recorded earthquakes in Washington state history, it measured 6.8 on the moment magnitude scale and lasted approximately 45 seconds. The epicenter of the earthquake was Anderson Island, about 17 km (11 mi) northeast of Olympia. The focus was at a depth of 52 km (32 mi). Tremors were felt as far away as Scio, Oregon, across the border in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and 175 mi (282 km) east in Pasco, Washington. There were also reports that it was felt as far away as Spokane, Washington and Sandpoint, Idaho.

About 400 people were injured. Most of the property damage occurred very near the epicenter or in unreinforced concrete or masonry buildings, such as those in the First Hill, Pioneer Square and Sodo neighborhoods of Seattle. The air traffic control tower at Sea-Tac Airport was heavily damaged during the quake; it has since been replaced with a more earthquake-resistant tower. The quake splintered a buttress under the dome of the capitol building in Olympia, however previous earthquake-resistance work prevented more serious harm to the building.[6] Additionally, the earthquake caused power outages in downtown Seattle. The U.S. Military's Ft. Lewis and McChord Air Force Base received damage in the quake. There was very slight damage in Victoria, British Columbia.

MisterJones

(23 posts)
46. A 6.8 is not a 7.0...
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:13 PM
Nov 2012

Not comparable and yes magnitude does matter. Depth, location and engineering matter as well. Don't be so dismissive. A 7.0 is not to be dismissed...

starroute

(12,977 posts)
47. And this quake in Myanmar was a 6.8
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:33 PM
Nov 2012

Read further down in the thread and you'll see the number got adjusted.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
6. Link:
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:41 PM
Nov 2012
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE8AA00L20121111?

Earthquake measuring seven magnitude strikes Myanmar: USGS
BANGKOK | Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:31pm EST

BANGKOK (Reuters) - An earthquake measuring 7.0 magnitude struck Myanmar on Sunday, around 6o km (37 miles) northwest of Mandalay, the U.S. Geological Survey said.

hunter

(38,318 posts)
10. 7.0 is brutal on unreinforced masonry.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:53 PM
Nov 2012

And reinforced concrete can't be trusted in places with poorly enforced or inadequate building codes.

This is a big earthquake.

Warpy

(111,278 posts)
11. Only 9 and 10 KM down
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:53 PM
Nov 2012

and a 6.6 at USGS. It's still strong enough to do a lot of damage and shallow enough to be catastrophic if it hit just the wrong place.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
17. 7 would be pretty big in California terms....
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:07 PM
Nov 2012

but it would be catastrophic in East Coast terms. It all depends on the kind of wave it produces and the type of ground. A lot of variables.

Scairp

(2,749 posts)
49. 6.1 miles deep
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:40 PM
Nov 2012

That's either pretty shallow or rather deep, depending on the topography of the area. Voice of America is reporting 12 deaths and many injuries, had a photo of a collapsed bridge that spanned the Irrawaddy. Sounds bad enough, especially for a Third world country with few resources to assist it's citizens in a natural disaster.

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
20. Umm...unless the earthshaking news is that Justin Bieber & his girlfriend broke up, you need the
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:44 PM
Nov 2012

.....correct link....

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
24. No tsunami, too far inland. Here's the report from the Pacific Tsunami Center
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:33 PM
Nov 2012

TSUNAMI BULLETIN NUMBER 001
PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS
ISSUED AT 0122Z 11 NOV 2012

THIS BULLETIN IS FOR ALL AREAS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN.

... TSUNAMI INFORMATION BULLETIN ...

THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY.

THIS BULLETIN IS ISSUED AS ADVICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. ONLY
NATIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE
DECISIONS REGARDING THE OFFICIAL STATE OF ALERT IN THEIR AREA AND
ANY ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE.

AN EARTHQUAKE HAS OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS

ORIGIN TIME - 0113Z 11 NOV 2012
COORDINATES - 22.5 NORTH 96.0 EAST
LOCATION - MYANMAR
MAGNITUDE - 7.0

EVALUATION

A DESTRUCTIVE TSUNAMI WAS NOT GENERATED BASED ON EARTHQUAKE AND
HISTORICAL TSUNAMI DATA. THIS EARTHQUAKE IS LOCATED TOO FAR
INLAND TO GENERATE A TSUNAMI IN THE INDIAN OCEAN.

THIS WILL BE THE ONLY BULLETIN ISSUED BY THE PACIFIC TSUNAMI
WARNING CENTER FOR THIS EVENT UNLESS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
BECOMES AVAILABLE.

THE JAPAN METEOROLOGICAL AGENCY MAY ISSUE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FOR THIS EVENT. IN THE CASE OF CONFLICTING INFORMATION...THE
MORE CONSERVATIVE INFORMATION SHOULD BE USED FOR SAFETY.

left on green only

(1,484 posts)
39. Thank you. I kept getting a tragic story about.....
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:47 AM
Nov 2012

.....the Earth shattering breakup of Bustin Jeeber and Golina Somez.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Breaking News: Earthquake...