Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:31 PM Oct 2012

Romney On 47 Percent: ‘I Said Something That’s Just Completely Wrong’

Source: TPM

Mitt Romney's secretly taped comment about "47 percent" of Americans never made an appearance in last night's presidential debate. But on Sean Hannity's show on Fox tonight, Mitt Romney was asked what his response would have been had the debate moderator Jim Lehrer, or President Obama, confronted the candidate about the tape.

Here's his answer, portions of which likely would have been prepared ahead of the debate:

"Well, clearly in a campaign with hundreds if not thousands of question and answer sessions, now and then you're going to say something that doesn't come out right. In this case I said something that's just completely wrong. And I absolutely believe however that my life has shown that I care about the 100 percent and that has been demonstarted throughout my life. This whole campaign is about the 100 percent. When I become president it'll be about helping the 100 percent."

In a press conference shortly after the tape was released by Mother Jones, Romney took a different position. He then said that while his comments were "not elegantly stated" and "off the cuff," they were still "a message which I'm going to carry and continue to carry, which is look, the president's approach is attractive to people who are not paying taxes because my discussion about lowering taxes isn't as attractive to them."

Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/romney-on-47-percent-i-said-something-thats

89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney On 47 Percent: ‘I Said Something That’s Just Completely Wrong’ (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2012 OP
Like Obama noted, five weeks before the election and it's "never mind”. gateley Oct 2012 #1
Exactly right n/t adamuu Oct 2012 #63
So when was he lying, then or now? Lasher Oct 2012 #2
There is no honesty with this guy. Fgiriun Oct 2012 #20
Pres Obama denied Mitt the chance to say this while 60 million folks were watching...... FrenchieCat Oct 2012 #3
Makes total sense EarlG Oct 2012 #6
Precisely, Frenchie! Bet he had a real Zinger Cha Oct 2012 #7
He probably had more than just a zinger LynneSin Oct 2012 #61
Exactly. All the bed wetters need to just relax. BlueStreak Oct 2012 #8
this is what I meant here in this post nadine_mn Oct 2012 #12
Yes, AWESOME that it sucks for Romney :) I'm watching the rerun of Piers Mogan right now and ... Tx4obama Oct 2012 #24
and they would have connected it to his winning the debate and how this issue was settled JI7 Oct 2012 #40
I caught that too. He instead chose the comfortable surrounding of Faux for this. I guess the silvershadow Oct 2012 #75
As always, his timing is impeccable Canuckistanian Oct 2012 #4
I know! How will the media spin this??? nt barnabas63 Oct 2012 #5
The media is still awfully busy tonight....... FrenchieCat Oct 2012 #9
lol..that pic made me laugh! nt barnabas63 Oct 2012 #11
Great cartoon! eom BlueMTexpat Oct 2012 #43
Mitt, Mitt, full of shit GoddessOfGuinness Oct 2012 #10
Mittshit goclark Oct 2012 #87
Why Mr. Romney? Were your comments starting to affect your personal aspirations? FrenchieCat Oct 2012 #13
wait- he never apologised... he said "it didn't come out right". stlsaxman Oct 2012 #85
Which time? (I said something that was completely wrong!) SaveAmerica Oct 2012 #14
So Romney Flip-Flops About "47 Percent" DallasNE Oct 2012 #15
Mitt said something completely wrong Flatpicker Oct 2012 #16
Which version of the Mittbot2012 will be on the ballot? freshwest Oct 2012 #17
Come on, you Twitter Litterates... DreamGypsy Oct 2012 #18
Now he's really lying for the Lord jsr Oct 2012 #19
Why are we all calling him Mitt, the guy's real first name is Willard. politicaljack78 Oct 2012 #21
The Etch-A-Sketch is shaking so fast it will catch fire SHRED Oct 2012 #22
+1 AsahinaKimi Oct 2012 #28
You know, those things really don't last forever Maeve Oct 2012 #54
50.1% NICO9000 Oct 2012 #23
Well, allow me to submit something "not elegantly stated." calimary Oct 2012 #25
Now we know what Romney would have said NYC Liberal Oct 2012 #26
That's exactly why Obama didn't bring it up.... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #32
What a pantload of malarkay. He's trying to head off what he knows is coming. nt babylonsister Oct 2012 #27
You were completely wrong? Oh. Okay. I'll vote for YOU then. Kablooie Oct 2012 #29
Exactly. If you're running for president of the F'ing US-of-A, VWolf Oct 2012 #53
Indeed... dchill Oct 2012 #82
Mitt, the Bait and Switch guy.. what a piece of lying, elitist crappola he is. He panders to so crunch60 Oct 2012 #30
You can't make this stuff up. He is literally undebatable andym Oct 2012 #31
and that's exactly what happened to Obama... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #34
Nice! daleanime Oct 2012 #69
those types of folks used to be called "crazymakers" shanti Oct 2012 #71
He said quite a few wrong things there... jmowreader Oct 2012 #33
I think Romney jumped the shark on his flip flops. Herlong Oct 2012 #35
I guess when you're wealthy, you can afford to take every position. LiberalAndProud Oct 2012 #36
. jsr Oct 2012 #37
Gees! DemKittyNC Oct 2012 #38
Now to be fair he has taken one stand that he refuses to back down from..... daleanime Oct 2012 #70
Ouch... DemKittyNC Oct 2012 #78
BULLSHIT MOTHER FUCKER. YOU GOT CAUGHT! nt cbrer Oct 2012 #39
I don't think "demonstarted" is a typo. Nostradammit Oct 2012 #41
Yes. He has "demonstarted" his 100% support Tracer Oct 2012 #55
47% of what he asserted in the debate was completely wrong .... rizlaplus Oct 2012 #42
Everything you say is completely wrong. SamKnause Oct 2012 #44
Nah...I believed him the first time. /nt Ash_F Oct 2012 #45
What about the 2000% Wrongny. Festivito Oct 2012 #46
If he had not caught lying, he wouldn't have changed his mind Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #47
So I'm to surmise that the Crack Fourth Estate will call Mitt on his "flip-flop" . . . . HughBeaumont Oct 2012 #48
What?? Romney lied again?? Shocker!!! nt. OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #49
Reading this thread makes me Rustycup Oct 2012 #50
OK, so according to posters here, that makes him better than Al Sharpton graham4anything Oct 2012 #51
too late asshole........no one will believe you...no one..nt. Stuart G Oct 2012 #52
I want to know: WHO WAS MITT TALKING TO? hexola Oct 2012 #56
My guess is standard C-Level types DaveJ Oct 2012 #76
Sorry Mitt- can't put that genie back in the bottle Marrah_G Oct 2012 #57
Is anyone keeping the count on these etch-a-sketch moments? SacoMaine61 Oct 2012 #58
Liar. nt onehandle Oct 2012 #59
Mitt, you've said many things that are completely wrong. gkhouston Oct 2012 #60
something, many things, how about everything he has said. olddad56 Oct 2012 #86
And you wonder why Obama didn't bring this up during the debate LynneSin Oct 2012 #62
Well Romney, most your followers are saying 47% are moochers now. DaveJ Oct 2012 #64
Flip Flop Blue Gardener Oct 2012 #65
a bell cannot be unrung SemperEadem Oct 2012 #66
Due to the latest jobs report. Third Doctor Oct 2012 #67
**cough Bullshit**cough bamacrat Oct 2012 #68
Sorry Mitt. that was NOT a Q&A, you had the floor at a fundraiser. Period. progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #72
Exactly. He didn't answer a question incorrectly. kcass1954 Oct 2012 #81
"Completely Wrong (but I still believe it)" progressoid Oct 2012 #73
So does this mean he's NOT doubling down? Arkana Oct 2012 #74
flip flop mitt samgreatuncle Oct 2012 #77
How long ago was that xxqqqzme Oct 2012 #79
"Mitt Happens IS a liberal." alp227 Oct 2012 #80
Good lesson he does no believe what he says, question is what does he believe? gordianot Oct 2012 #83
Except for firing Big Bird and Jim Lehrer, no one knows. kiranon Oct 2012 #84
Flippity floppity floo bushisanidiot Oct 2012 #88
Kick! sarcasmo Oct 2012 #89

Lasher

(27,664 posts)
2. So when was he lying, then or now?
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:36 PM
Oct 2012

I don't think it's both. He was being honest with his rich benefactors.

Fgiriun

(169 posts)
20. There is no honesty with this guy.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:29 AM
Oct 2012

I think he has absolutely no belief outside of the mormon president prophecy. Well, maybe he does have a core belief and that is that the poor are lazy and therefore undeserving and the rich are hardworking honest americans that lie and cheat for the good of all.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
3. Pres Obama denied Mitt the chance to say this while 60 million folks were watching......
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:37 PM
Oct 2012

that must suck for Romney!

Maybe he can go on an apology tour and sell his "No Apologies" piece of shit of a book while he's at it!

EarlG

(21,985 posts)
6. Makes total sense
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:52 PM
Oct 2012

I bet the Romney camp spent more time than anything preparing for a discussion of the 47% remark at the debate. And now we know what their plan was -- Romney was going to do a big mea culpa in front of a national audience, on his terms, with the plan being that the pundits would all up and declare the issue dead. "Oh, he's addressed it, let's move on!"

Obama didn't bring it up so they had to do the mea culpa today, they can't wait any longer because they know the 47% remark is killing them. But by denying Romney the chance to do it at the debate this "oops my bad" will get little attention and the issue is still alive and kicking.

Cha

(297,966 posts)
7. Precisely, Frenchie! Bet he had a real Zinger
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:52 PM
Oct 2012

at the ready...just itchin' to pop outta that Lyin' hole of his.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
61. He probably had more than just a zinger
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:07 AM
Oct 2012

he probably had a look and figured out how to make his eyes water and perhaps shed a tear or 2.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
8. Exactly. All the bed wetters need to just relax.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:53 PM
Oct 2012

Don't anybody try to tell me that Obama "forgot" to bring up the 47% thing. Obama had a strategy for this debate and executed it.

This is exactly where it needs to be.

And he got a bonus with Romney plainly admitting he is killing Medicare for those under 56 and Romney flat-out lying (and being nailed by fact-checkers on many things, but particularly pre-existing conditions.

Basically very little of Romney's brilliant performance stands up to the light of day the following morning.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
24. Yes, AWESOME that it sucks for Romney :) I'm watching the rerun of Piers Mogan right now and ...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:51 AM
Oct 2012

they are sitting around still talking about "WHY didn't Obama call Mitt out on the 47% comment?"

I LOVE IT that Mitt wasn't able to talk about it on TV last night while all those millions of folks were watching the debate


 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
75. I caught that too. He instead chose the comfortable surrounding of Faux for this. I guess the
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:42 PM
Oct 2012

chairs were the right height. Maybe since Leherer didn't ask, he was disappointed not to put it behind him, so he had to go on Insanity to do it. It won't work, unless it's cover for stealing the election in 4 weeks.

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
4. As always, his timing is impeccable
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 11:41 PM
Oct 2012

The day after his big victory (yeah, right) and he's REMINDING the public of his biggest political FAIL.

Honestly, are his handlers secret Dem operatives?

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
13. Why Mr. Romney? Were your comments starting to affect your personal aspirations?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:06 AM
Oct 2012

He was against the 47% before he was for them!

Apology not accepted!

DallasNE

(7,404 posts)
15. So Romney Flip-Flops About "47 Percent"
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:10 AM
Oct 2012

Sounds like a dog bites man story to me.

What Romney is saying here might work if was just a couple of words like "legitimate rape" but Romney's statement was roughly a 40-word paragraph -- nothing inadvertent about what Romney said and no possible way this can be inadvertent.

Flatpicker

(894 posts)
16. Mitt said something completely wrong
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:13 AM
Oct 2012

When he said "I accept your nomination for President of the United States of America".

F**k Mitt in his disingenuous mouth.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
17. Which version of the Mittbot2012 will be on the ballot?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:19 AM
Oct 2012

And who the hell is doing the programming on this model?





I know, but won't say...

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
18. Come on, you Twitter Litterates...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:27 AM
Oct 2012

...of which I am not one.

Isn't this a perfect opportunity for trending 'I said something that's just completely wrong':

I like big bird...Oh, I said something that's just completely wrong


My tax rate has been above 13% for the last 10 years ...Oh, I said something that's just completely wrong


My tax rate cut will not reduce revenue by $10 trillion over 5 years...Oh, I said something that's just completely wrong


The possibilities are endless.

politicaljack78

(312 posts)
21. Why are we all calling him Mitt, the guy's real first name is Willard.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:32 AM
Oct 2012

Such a noble name for such a 'dignified' individual. He reminds of a colleague named Lance Charles XXXX, who preferred Charles, and yes he was a habitual liar as well. Willard has the unique ability to shed personas like his does his expensive suits. Whatever fits the occasion. Anybody want to bet $10,000 that Willard will now claim to be pro-choice again?

Maeve

(42,306 posts)
54. You know, those things really don't last forever
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:40 AM
Oct 2012

There comes a point where you just can't shake it away and they won't draw any more. Mitt is reaching that point.

NICO9000

(970 posts)
23. 50.1%
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:47 AM
Oct 2012

A few months ago, he said that was the number he needed to win. Does he now include the 49.9% who he doesn't need votes from (so he thinks) in the new 100% he suddenly cares about?

This guy really thinks people will buy any crap. The disingenuous nature of everything out of his maw is just a goddamn bad joke and I'm really tired of having to keep suffering through it.

calimary

(81,566 posts)
25. Well, allow me to submit something "not elegantly stated."
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:56 AM
Oct 2012

Fuck You, mr. wrongney. Take your half-billion-or-more empire and your snotty, smug little wifey and go back to Massachusetts. Or La Jolla CA. Or Utah. Or Michigan. Or whichever state is your home state this week.



NYC Liberal

(20,138 posts)
26. Now we know what Romney would have said
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:05 AM
Oct 2012

had Obama brought this up in the debate. He was RIGHT not to hand Romney the opportunity on a platter.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
32. That's exactly why Obama didn't bring it up....
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:30 AM
Oct 2012

...because he knew that Romney would have a very well-rehearsed retort to it--that he had practiced over and over and over and over.

Why give Mitt Romney a chance to refute and spin one of the worst and most revealing things that he's ever said?

Better to let it lie. Good on the President.

Also, Hannity asked Romney this on Hannity's show on Fox News. You can damn well bet that Romney WANTED to be asked this question. He was most likely disappointed that Obama didn't. Cuz, he really had a few soundbytes waiting to finally put his 47 percent remarks to rest. Hannity's show is scripted to help Romney. If Hannity asked Romney about the 47 percent, it's because Romney was chomping at the bit to give a big speech.

As we can all see, the answer was a big, ridiculous lie!

Kablooie

(18,645 posts)
29. You were completely wrong? Oh. Okay. I'll vote for YOU then.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:26 AM
Oct 2012

What? You were wrong about taxes?
What? You were wrong about everything else too?
Well that does it! We need a president who's always wrong about everything in the White House.
You've got MY vote Mitch!

VWolf

(3,944 posts)
53. Exactly. If you're running for president of the F'ing US-of-A,
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:30 AM
Oct 2012

you're not allowed to be "completely wrong". On anything.

Just imagine if Pres Obama EVER said anything like that.
He'd be buried in a New York minute.

dchill

(38,603 posts)
82. Indeed...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 05:02 PM
Oct 2012

Why not further increase your chances, Mitty, and "confess" to all the other things you've been "completely wrong" about? That ought to keep you occupied until election day. At least.

 

crunch60

(1,412 posts)
30. Mitt, the Bait and Switch guy.. what a piece of lying, elitist crappola he is. He panders to so
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:26 AM
Oct 2012

many different agendas, he doesn't know who he is or what he believes. He sold his soul long ago.

andym

(5,446 posts)
31. You can't make this stuff up. He is literally undebatable
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:30 AM
Oct 2012

because as soon as you make a point he can just say no that's not what I meant, it's not true.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
34. and that's exactly what happened to Obama...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:34 AM
Oct 2012

Obama showed up to debate and communicate about this policies and ideas--and to speak to the American people.

Romney showed up to unleash the biggest mindfuck of all time in a Presidential debate.

I explained it to my kids this way, "Imagine if you were running for student council and your opponent was constantly telling people that she wanted to put more desserts in school lunches. So, you debate her and you argue about why more desserts in school lunches is a bad thing--then she turns and say, 'I NEVER said I wanted more desserts in school lunches! You are lying! Shame on you!"

My kids both started laughing and they both said, "An adult would never do that? Would they?"

My response, "It's the same adult who strapped his dog to the roof of his car. So yes. He would do that."

Man, Romney is such a bastard.

jmowreader

(50,585 posts)
33. He said quite a few wrong things there...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:33 AM
Oct 2012

First is his assertion that 47 percent of Americans don't pay federal income taxes. (I have to specify because if I just say 'taxes,' implying that everyone KNOWS that's what the issue is about, someone here is sure to ask, 'what about sales taxes, gasoline taxes, indirect taxes like property tax on a rental apartment, etc.?') It probably was true during the couple of years we had the Making Work Pay credit, but it certainly isn't now.

Second is the implication that anyone in this whatever-the-real-number-is is a shiftless bum who drives his or her Cadillac to the welfare office.

There's probably a third but my brain hurts just thinking about it.

Suffice it to say that if President Obama would have Mitt Romney fitted with magnets and placed in a big coil, his flip-flops and spins would generate enough energy to light up Boston.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
36. I guess when you're wealthy, you can afford to take every position.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 02:18 AM
Oct 2012

The upshot is that you don't own a single one. Mitt has proven that he is the Chameleon Candidate. He will adopt any convenient view at any convenient time. He's not lying, he just changed his mind momentarily. I suspect that if there is a buck in it for him, he'd sell us all out in a heartbeat (and certainly 47% of us) without a twinge of conscience.

DemKittyNC

(743 posts)
38. Gees!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 02:36 AM
Oct 2012

I would have more respect for this guy if he just came out and said YES, this is how I feel and I will not apologize for it. At least make a stand on something - be it bad or good. I can not think of one single thing this guy has said that he has stuck with? No Democrat from this point on should ever be accused again of not sticking with their positions when the GOP and the Repugs have themselves produced the King of KINGS of the flip-floppers.

Short live the KING! Hooray!

November 6th can not get here soon enough...

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
70. Now to be fair he has taken one stand that he refuses to back down from.....
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:22 AM
Oct 2012

he refuses to show us his tax returns.

DemKittyNC

(743 posts)
78. Ouch...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:26 PM
Oct 2012

You make a good and true point. I back down and bow to your superiority. How could I have ever overlooked that one.

SamKnause

(13,114 posts)
44. Everything you say is completely wrong.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 05:19 AM
Oct 2012

Romney will say or do anything to get elected.

He has no principles.

He has no self respect.

The Republican Party has no moral compass.

They picked two excellent candidates (Romney/Ryan) to prove their contempt for truth and honesty.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
46. What about the 2000% Wrongny.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 06:15 AM
Oct 2012

Why do we have those bases all over the world if all we'll care about is Americans.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
48. So I'm to surmise that the Crack Fourth Estate will call Mitt on his "flip-flop" . . . .
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:27 AM
Oct 2012

. . . like they repeatedly did with John Kerry.

What say we shoot for "when the Earth crashes into the Sun" on that one?

Rustycup

(41 posts)
50. Reading this thread makes me
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:08 AM
Oct 2012

feel a little better because you are right....Romney just kept throwing everything at Obama and if he did say one think...Romney would turn it around and the news would be about Obama being a meaning. Now they are showing Obama stump speech as a way to make up and showing Romney's lies. I just hope the tactic works. Obama still needs to shine at the town hall. I am sure the campaign already knows the questions will be all from teabaggers and stupid...

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
51. OK, so according to posters here, that makes him better than Al Sharpton
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:10 AM
Oct 2012

all it takes is an apology-right?



(this is based on a thread I started about Rev. Al Sharpton and the animosity because some felt he never apologized for something that had nothing to do with him in the first place.)

so I guess all those Sharpton haters now love Mittens.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
56. I want to know: WHO WAS MITT TALKING TO?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:46 AM
Oct 2012

Who was at this fund raiser?

Why did Romney think those remarks would resonate with those donors?

Who paid big bucks to hear this message?

This was NOT a mistake, gaffe, or a mis-speak...

Romney's words were exactly what these people wanted to hear.

Who are they?

DaveJ

(5,023 posts)
76. My guess is standard C-Level types
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:44 PM
Oct 2012

I'm guessing these are folks who manage lots of workers, and think they can tell their workers how to vote. Overpaid executives often think they were anointed by the creator, and that the common folk are pawns in their games.

This is different than the "investor class" which really controls the world. C-Level types are similar to us, workabees who accomplished things to get there, but usually have no compassion for those they manage, which is one of the qualifications for getting there in the first place.

Just a guess, though. Yeah it would be good to know exactly who they were.

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
60. Mitt, you've said many things that are completely wrong.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:01 AM
Oct 2012

And you've said them on video. Sucks to be you.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
62. And you wonder why Obama didn't bring this up during the debate
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:10 AM
Oct 2012

I'm guessing there is a good chance the #1 thing that Mitt practiced during his mock debates leading up to the real one against Obama was just exactly this.

He probably had all of this memorized including how he would stand and the looks he would give and possibly some tears welling up in his eyes.

Imagine if he did that in front of a massive audience being broadcasted on all the major network channels.

Obama would have looked like a bully and Romney would have looked remorseful and worthy of a second chance.

Denied!

DaveJ

(5,023 posts)
64. Well Romney, most your followers are saying 47% are moochers now.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:39 AM
Oct 2012

Just go to any riecht wing website, or comments section of wsj.com, or facebook, and you'll see that many, probably the vast majority of republicans and tea baggers hate half the country for being financially poor. No sympathy, no empathy, no ideas or desire for help. Just unadulterated despise for half the country.

You said what your party really feels, because you correctly knew that's what your base thinks.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
66. a bell cannot be unrung
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:07 AM
Oct 2012

toothpaste cannot be put back in the tube.

closing the barn door after the horse has gotten out.

No, mittiot... what you've gotten is called the fallout in the aftermath after you dropped a nuclear bomb in front of a room full of like-minded people--The thing is: you felt safe enough in that room and with those sorts of people to tell your truth in front of them.

See, this is why liars should be ostracized and excoriated at every turn. They never allow anyone but themselves a level playing field.

Third Doctor

(1,574 posts)
67. Due to the latest jobs report.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:10 AM
Oct 2012

Obama should continue to put the 47% around his neck. Mitt can't even pretend that he gives a damn about the average person.

bamacrat

(3,867 posts)
68. **cough Bullshit**cough
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:15 AM
Oct 2012

This is like someone apologizing for cheating only after they get caught. We saw your true feelings asshole.

kcass1954

(1,819 posts)
81. Exactly. He didn't answer a question incorrectly.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 03:11 PM
Oct 2012

These were prepared remarks made at an event which we were never supposed to hear.
He intended to make these statements.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
74. So does this mean he's NOT doubling down?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:00 PM
Oct 2012

Is he hoping that he can use "I apologized!" as a response whenever it's brought up?

Sorry, Mitt, but you can't take it back now.

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
79. How long ago was that
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:30 PM
Oct 2012

video released? Now we get a 'oops' my bad? This deceitful prick is rotten to his core.

alp227

(32,073 posts)
80. "Mitt Happens IS a liberal."
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:39 PM
Oct 2012

Creeping in Freeperville I see...

Mitt Happens IS a liberal.

He has no core principles nor what we called in the olden days, “the courage of one’s convictions.”

He can never stick to a position without taking the other side. He makes Obama look principled!

I can’t stand him and I won’t vote for a liberal - not this one.


Also...


Ahhhhh.
Oh good god.
He has a fantastic debate then back peddles on something that is true..........who advises this man.
(Really the ‘media is lying’ about this is a lame excuse)



NO! He should stand by it, and clarify:

Mr. Obama, You have increased the percentage of those taking out of the government budget to almost 50%. Does it occur to you that those who are paying in, and being buried in taxes are going to stop working at some point? You can’t keep taking from one half and giving to the other half. People aren’t going to work if they are being fleeced to pay others not to work.

I say that he has NOTHING to apologize for and should just explain the facts calmly and clearly.


Yep, he just handed a big debate win for Obama there



Don’t ignore them. Revoke all their benefits. I’m sick and tired of being taxed to pay for these parasites.

Yeah, parasites like new small business owners that are creating new jobs but aren’t making much profit yet.


At least some said things like

Didn’t like it at first, but I now think this was best. After some coverage on Friday it will largely die down. It will neuter attacks largely on this later, at least compared to what would have been.

And quite frankly, a lot of people just want to hear a politician admit an error....they like honesty like that.

His statement was right, but despite explaining why it was, many just don’t get it still and see it as a personal attack on them.

This was a wise move to run out and do in the post-debate glow.



It was stupid.

There have been a number of callers to the various radio talk shows who've claimed to be conservative, a member of the 47% who don't pay federal income taxes, and who are Romney voters. They were still voting for him, but just thought his characterization of the entire group as all Obama supporters was a little insulting.

gordianot

(15,252 posts)
83. Good lesson he does no believe what he says, question is what does he believe?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:38 PM
Oct 2012

Obviously do not believe what he says. Case closed!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Romney On 47 Percent: ‘I ...