Romney On 47 Percent: ‘I Said Something That’s Just Completely Wrong’
Source: TPM
Mitt Romney's secretly taped comment about "47 percent" of Americans never made an appearance in last night's presidential debate. But on Sean Hannity's show on Fox tonight, Mitt Romney was asked what his response would have been had the debate moderator Jim Lehrer, or President Obama, confronted the candidate about the tape.
Here's his answer, portions of which likely would have been prepared ahead of the debate:
"Well, clearly in a campaign with hundreds if not thousands of question and answer sessions, now and then you're going to say something that doesn't come out right. In this case I said something that's just completely wrong. And I absolutely believe however that my life has shown that I care about the 100 percent and that has been demonstarted throughout my life. This whole campaign is about the 100 percent. When I become president it'll be about helping the 100 percent."
In a press conference shortly after the tape was released by Mother Jones, Romney took a different position. He then said that while his comments were "not elegantly stated" and "off the cuff," they were still "a message which I'm going to carry and continue to carry, which is look, the president's approach is attractive to people who are not paying taxes because my discussion about lowering taxes isn't as attractive to them."
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/romney-on-47-percent-i-said-something-thats
gateley
(62,683 posts)adamuu
(2,099 posts)Lasher
(27,664 posts)I don't think it's both. He was being honest with his rich benefactors.
Fgiriun
(169 posts)I think he has absolutely no belief outside of the mormon president prophecy. Well, maybe he does have a core belief and that is that the poor are lazy and therefore undeserving and the rich are hardworking honest americans that lie and cheat for the good of all.
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)that must suck for Romney!
Maybe he can go on an apology tour and sell his "No Apologies" piece of shit of a book while he's at it!
EarlG
(21,985 posts)I bet the Romney camp spent more time than anything preparing for a discussion of the 47% remark at the debate. And now we know what their plan was -- Romney was going to do a big mea culpa in front of a national audience, on his terms, with the plan being that the pundits would all up and declare the issue dead. "Oh, he's addressed it, let's move on!"
Obama didn't bring it up so they had to do the mea culpa today, they can't wait any longer because they know the 47% remark is killing them. But by denying Romney the chance to do it at the debate this "oops my bad" will get little attention and the issue is still alive and kicking.
Cha
(297,966 posts)at the ready...just itchin' to pop outta that Lyin' hole of his.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)he probably had a look and figured out how to make his eyes water and perhaps shed a tear or 2.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Don't anybody try to tell me that Obama "forgot" to bring up the 47% thing. Obama had a strategy for this debate and executed it.
This is exactly where it needs to be.
And he got a bonus with Romney plainly admitting he is killing Medicare for those under 56 and Romney flat-out lying (and being nailed by fact-checkers on many things, but particularly pre-existing conditions.
Basically very little of Romney's brilliant performance stands up to the light of day the following morning.
nadine_mn
(3,702 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)they are sitting around still talking about "WHY didn't Obama call Mitt out on the 47% comment?"
I LOVE IT that Mitt wasn't able to talk about it on TV last night while all those millions of folks were watching the debate
JI7
(89,285 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)chairs were the right height. Maybe since Leherer didn't ask, he was disappointed not to put it behind him, so he had to go on Insanity to do it. It won't work, unless it's cover for stealing the election in 4 weeks.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)The day after his big victory (yeah, right) and he's REMINDING the public of his biggest political FAIL.
Honestly, are his handlers secret Dem operatives?
barnabas63
(1,214 posts)FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)barnabas63
(1,214 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,374 posts)GoddessOfGuinness
(46,435 posts)goclark
(30,404 posts)Love it!
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)He was against the 47% before he was for them!
Apology not accepted!
stlsaxman
(9,236 posts)SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)DallasNE
(7,404 posts)Sounds like a dog bites man story to me.
What Romney is saying here might work if was just a couple of words like "legitimate rape" but Romney's statement was roughly a 40-word paragraph -- nothing inadvertent about what Romney said and no possible way this can be inadvertent.
Flatpicker
(894 posts)When he said "I accept your nomination for President of the United States of America".
F**k Mitt in his disingenuous mouth.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)And who the hell is doing the programming on this model?
I know, but won't say...
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)...of which I am not one.
Isn't this a perfect opportunity for trending 'I said something that's just completely wrong':
I like big bird...Oh, I said something that's just completely wrong
My tax rate has been above 13% for the last 10 years ...Oh, I said something that's just completely wrong
My tax rate cut will not reduce revenue by $10 trillion over 5 years...Oh, I said something that's just completely wrong
The possibilities are endless.
jsr
(7,712 posts)politicaljack78
(312 posts)Such a noble name for such a 'dignified' individual. He reminds of a colleague named Lance Charles XXXX, who preferred Charles, and yes he was a habitual liar as well. Willard has the unique ability to shed personas like his does his expensive suits. Whatever fits the occasion. Anybody want to bet $10,000 that Willard will now claim to be pro-choice again?
SHRED
(28,136 posts)yup!
Maeve
(42,306 posts)There comes a point where you just can't shake it away and they won't draw any more. Mitt is reaching that point.
A few months ago, he said that was the number he needed to win. Does he now include the 49.9% who he doesn't need votes from (so he thinks) in the new 100% he suddenly cares about?
This guy really thinks people will buy any crap. The disingenuous nature of everything out of his maw is just a goddamn bad joke and I'm really tired of having to keep suffering through it.
calimary
(81,566 posts)Fuck You, mr. wrongney. Take your half-billion-or-more empire and your snotty, smug little wifey and go back to Massachusetts. Or La Jolla CA. Or Utah. Or Michigan. Or whichever state is your home state this week.
NYC Liberal
(20,138 posts)had Obama brought this up in the debate. He was RIGHT not to hand Romney the opportunity on a platter.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)...because he knew that Romney would have a very well-rehearsed retort to it--that he had practiced over and over and over and over.
Why give Mitt Romney a chance to refute and spin one of the worst and most revealing things that he's ever said?
Better to let it lie. Good on the President.
Also, Hannity asked Romney this on Hannity's show on Fox News. You can damn well bet that Romney WANTED to be asked this question. He was most likely disappointed that Obama didn't. Cuz, he really had a few soundbytes waiting to finally put his 47 percent remarks to rest. Hannity's show is scripted to help Romney. If Hannity asked Romney about the 47 percent, it's because Romney was chomping at the bit to give a big speech.
As we can all see, the answer was a big, ridiculous lie!
babylonsister
(171,107 posts)Kablooie
(18,645 posts)What? You were wrong about taxes?
What? You were wrong about everything else too?
Well that does it! We need a president who's always wrong about everything in the White House.
You've got MY vote Mitch!
VWolf
(3,944 posts)you're not allowed to be "completely wrong". On anything.
Just imagine if Pres Obama EVER said anything like that.
He'd be buried in a New York minute.
dchill
(38,603 posts)Why not further increase your chances, Mitty, and "confess" to all the other things you've been "completely wrong" about? That ought to keep you occupied until election day. At least.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)many different agendas, he doesn't know who he is or what he believes. He sold his soul long ago.
andym
(5,446 posts)because as soon as you make a point he can just say no that's not what I meant, it's not true.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Obama showed up to debate and communicate about this policies and ideas--and to speak to the American people.
Romney showed up to unleash the biggest mindfuck of all time in a Presidential debate.
I explained it to my kids this way, "Imagine if you were running for student council and your opponent was constantly telling people that she wanted to put more desserts in school lunches. So, you debate her and you argue about why more desserts in school lunches is a bad thing--then she turns and say, 'I NEVER said I wanted more desserts in school lunches! You are lying! Shame on you!"
My kids both started laughing and they both said, "An adult would never do that? Would they?"
My response, "It's the same adult who strapped his dog to the roof of his car. So yes. He would do that."
Man, Romney is such a bastard.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)maybe queen ann knows something we don't!
jmowreader
(50,585 posts)First is his assertion that 47 percent of Americans don't pay federal income taxes. (I have to specify because if I just say 'taxes,' implying that everyone KNOWS that's what the issue is about, someone here is sure to ask, 'what about sales taxes, gasoline taxes, indirect taxes like property tax on a rental apartment, etc.?') It probably was true during the couple of years we had the Making Work Pay credit, but it certainly isn't now.
Second is the implication that anyone in this whatever-the-real-number-is is a shiftless bum who drives his or her Cadillac to the welfare office.
There's probably a third but my brain hurts just thinking about it.
Suffice it to say that if President Obama would have Mitt Romney fitted with magnets and placed in a big coil, his flip-flops and spins would generate enough energy to light up Boston.
Herlong
(649 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)The upshot is that you don't own a single one. Mitt has proven that he is the Chameleon Candidate. He will adopt any convenient view at any convenient time. He's not lying, he just changed his mind momentarily. I suspect that if there is a buck in it for him, he'd sell us all out in a heartbeat (and certainly 47% of us) without a twinge of conscience.
DemKittyNC
(743 posts)I would have more respect for this guy if he just came out and said YES, this is how I feel and I will not apologize for it. At least make a stand on something - be it bad or good. I can not think of one single thing this guy has said that he has stuck with? No Democrat from this point on should ever be accused again of not sticking with their positions when the GOP and the Repugs have themselves produced the King of KINGS of the flip-floppers.
Short live the KING! Hooray!
November 6th can not get here soon enough...
daleanime
(17,796 posts)he refuses to show us his tax returns.
DemKittyNC
(743 posts)You make a good and true point. I back down and bow to your superiority. How could I have ever overlooked that one.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)Nostradammit
(2,921 posts)"and that has been demonstarted throughout my life."
Tracer
(2,769 posts)for the 1%.
rizlaplus
(159 posts).. and still collating.
SamKnause
(13,114 posts)Romney will say or do anything to get elected.
He has no principles.
He has no self respect.
The Republican Party has no moral compass.
They picked two excellent candidates (Romney/Ryan) to prove their contempt for truth and honesty.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Festivito
(13,452 posts)Why do we have those bases all over the world if all we'll care about is Americans.
Blue Yorker
(436 posts)Flip flopper.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts). . . like they repeatedly did with John Kerry.
What say we shoot for "when the Earth crashes into the Sun" on that one?
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)Rustycup
(41 posts)feel a little better because you are right....Romney just kept throwing everything at Obama and if he did say one think...Romney would turn it around and the news would be about Obama being a meaning. Now they are showing Obama stump speech as a way to make up and showing Romney's lies. I just hope the tactic works. Obama still needs to shine at the town hall. I am sure the campaign already knows the questions will be all from teabaggers and stupid...
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)all it takes is an apology-right?
(this is based on a thread I started about Rev. Al Sharpton and the animosity because some felt he never apologized for something that had nothing to do with him in the first place.)
so I guess all those Sharpton haters now love Mittens.
Stuart G
(38,455 posts)hexola
(4,835 posts)Who was at this fund raiser?
Why did Romney think those remarks would resonate with those donors?
Who paid big bucks to hear this message?
This was NOT a mistake, gaffe, or a mis-speak...
Romney's words were exactly what these people wanted to hear.
Who are they?
DaveJ
(5,023 posts)I'm guessing these are folks who manage lots of workers, and think they can tell their workers how to vote. Overpaid executives often think they were anointed by the creator, and that the common folk are pawns in their games.
This is different than the "investor class" which really controls the world. C-Level types are similar to us, workabees who accomplished things to get there, but usually have no compassion for those they manage, which is one of the qualifications for getting there in the first place.
Just a guess, though. Yeah it would be good to know exactly who they were.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)SacoMaine61
(114 posts)I can't keep up...
onehandle
(51,122 posts)gkhouston
(21,642 posts)And you've said them on video. Sucks to be you.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I'm guessing there is a good chance the #1 thing that Mitt practiced during his mock debates leading up to the real one against Obama was just exactly this.
He probably had all of this memorized including how he would stand and the looks he would give and possibly some tears welling up in his eyes.
Imagine if he did that in front of a massive audience being broadcasted on all the major network channels.
Obama would have looked like a bully and Romney would have looked remorseful and worthy of a second chance.
Denied!
DaveJ
(5,023 posts)Just go to any riecht wing website, or comments section of wsj.com, or facebook, and you'll see that many, probably the vast majority of republicans and tea baggers hate half the country for being financially poor. No sympathy, no empathy, no ideas or desire for help. Just unadulterated despise for half the country.
You said what your party really feels, because you correctly knew that's what your base thinks.
Blue Gardener
(3,938 posts)I thought flip-flopping was a bad thing in repuke world
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)toothpaste cannot be put back in the tube.
closing the barn door after the horse has gotten out.
No, mittiot... what you've gotten is called the fallout in the aftermath after you dropped a nuclear bomb in front of a room full of like-minded people--The thing is: you felt safe enough in that room and with those sorts of people to tell your truth in front of them.
See, this is why liars should be ostracized and excoriated at every turn. They never allow anyone but themselves a level playing field.
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)Obama should continue to put the 47% around his neck. Mitt can't even pretend that he gives a damn about the average person.
bamacrat
(3,867 posts)This is like someone apologizing for cheating only after they get caught. We saw your true feelings asshole.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Fuck you.
kcass1954
(1,819 posts)These were prepared remarks made at an event which we were never supposed to hear.
He intended to make these statements.
progressoid
(50,011 posts)wink wink nudge nudge.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Is he hoping that he can use "I apologized!" as a response whenever it's brought up?
Sorry, Mitt, but you can't take it back now.
samgreatuncle
(7 posts)xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)video released? Now we get a 'oops' my bad? This deceitful prick is rotten to his core.
alp227
(32,073 posts)Creeping in Freeperville I see...
He has no core principles nor what we called in the olden days, the courage of ones convictions.
He can never stick to a position without taking the other side. He makes Obama look principled!
I cant stand him and I wont vote for a liberal - not this one.
Also...
Ahhhhh.
Oh good god.
He has a fantastic debate then back peddles on something that is true..........who advises this man.
(Really the media is lying about this is a lame excuse)
NO! He should stand by it, and clarify:
Mr. Obama, You have increased the percentage of those taking out of the government budget to almost 50%. Does it occur to you that those who are paying in, and being buried in taxes are going to stop working at some point? You cant keep taking from one half and giving to the other half. People arent going to work if they are being fleeced to pay others not to work.
I say that he has NOTHING to apologize for and should just explain the facts calmly and clearly.
Dont ignore them. Revoke all their benefits. Im sick and tired of being taxed to pay for these parasites.
Yeah, parasites like new small business owners that are creating new jobs but arent making much profit yet.
At least some said things like
Didnt like it at first, but I now think this was best. After some coverage on Friday it will largely die down. It will neuter attacks largely on this later, at least compared to what would have been.
And quite frankly, a lot of people just want to hear a politician admit an error....they like honesty like that.
His statement was right, but despite explaining why it was, many just dont get it still and see it as a personal attack on them.
This was a wise move to run out and do in the post-debate glow.
It was stupid.
There have been a number of callers to the various radio talk shows who've claimed to be conservative, a member of the 47% who don't pay federal income taxes, and who are Romney voters. They were still voting for him, but just thought his characterization of the entire group as all Obama supporters was a little insulting.
gordianot
(15,252 posts)Obviously do not believe what he says. Case closed!
kiranon
(1,727 posts)bushisanidiot
(8,064 posts)Bunny rabbit romney