Mitt Romney suggests cutting mortgage interest deduction on eve of presidential debate
Source: Newsday
DENVER - Offering deficit-cutting ideas before his first debate with President Barack Obama, Mitt Romney says he might be willing to reduce income tax deductions used by millions of families for home mortgage interest and health care costs.
He suggested the changes could be part of a plan that includes a 20 percent cut in tax rates across the board, continuation of upper income tax cuts that Obama wants to end and a comprehensive tax overhaul plan that the Republican presidential contender has so far declined to flesh out in detail. Romney says his overall plans would invigorate the slowly recovering U.S. economy. . .
. . . In an interview Monday night with Denver TV station KDVR, Romney said, "As an option you could say everybody's going to get up to a $17,000 deduction. And you could use your charitable deduction, your home mortgage deduction, or others your health care deduction, and you can fill that bucket, if you will, that $17,000 bucket that way. And higher income people might have a lower number." . . .
Read more: http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/mitt-romney-suggests-cutting-mortgage-interest-deduction-on-eve-of-presidential-debate-1.4066809
Got to have that 20 percent tax cut for the Koch brothers, after all. As Ryan said, that's the most important thing of all.
So long, Mittens, and good riddance.
yourout
(7,528 posts)completely bottom out in less than a year.
CthulhusEvilCousin
(209 posts)from a conservative a few months ago when Romney first said this. It came out in some "secret" donor meeting and is not news to me since I read it, though this is the first time Romney has said it publicly.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)That will be eliminated in the Romney - Ryan tax plan
The mortgage interest deductions for 2nd, 3rd, 4th......11th will still apply.
So, the filthy rich will still be able to buy houses on the cheap.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Remember John McCain?
McCain not sure how many houses he owns
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Journeyman
(15,031 posts)Salviati
(6,008 posts)WestWisconsinDem
(127 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Heather MC
(8,084 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 3, 2012, 12:26 AM - Edit history (1)
helps us to survive as we pay for them. This guy is so out of touch as to be crazy! Does he want even more people to lose their homes?!
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)I wish those making the claim would provide some numbers.
The mortgage interest deduction largely benefits the rich.
Exactly! Those who don't understand that are not paying attention. The average middle class person is getting less than $200. Many people think that the amount of interest they paid comes off their tax bill. Not so. Your taxable income is reduced by the amount of interest you paid, that's all.
So someone making $75,000 living in a $200,000 house is not getting jack (on average $179). But the guy making $250,000 living in a $1,000,000 house is getting a couple grand off his tax bill.
Of course the real estate lobby wants us to believe that the MID promotes home ownership. But the Canadians, British, and Austrailians don't have it and their home ownership rates are about the same as the US. But they have an incentive to propogate this myth because the MID is most beneficial in the first few years of home ownership. Being halfway done paying my mortgage, I've paid almost all of the interest and the rest is principal. Therfore I have a tiny deduction. My realtor friends remind me of this all the time in an attempt to get me to buy a new house.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)you don't even get to deduct interest.
What happens is
itemized deductions
mortgage interest
property (or sales) taxes
other deductions
other deductions
___________
total itemized deductions = X
but your gain is only X - standard deduction.
So in order to gain, you not only have to be paying a lot of interest, but a lot of real estate taxes and other itemizable expenses.
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)This guy really is either the dumbest motherfucker on the planet, or he's trolling us all.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...and it has been a REAL struggle, believe me.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)I liked Gul Dukat.
He had more depth and empathy than the Money Man.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Dukat had some scruples.
CthulhusEvilCousin
(209 posts)had a greater ability to relate to human beings.
KatyMan
(4,190 posts)She thinks Dukat is one of the sexiest characters around!
PopeOxycontinI
(176 posts)after taking a 70k deduction for his goddamn HORSE!
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)But God forbid a middle class family take a deduction for their home - likely their only one, too.
Obvious moochers to Romney and Ryan.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)President Obama should say at the debate. It's outrageous.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)I wouldn't trust Romney (or, Ryan) any further than I could see them.
I think Mitt is trying to lose. He knows he's not going to win without cheating and this work is harder than he thought. Why before the debate? Too obvious.
Sidnerd
(6 posts)It's probably considered an expense, so yes, it would stay.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Mortgage is a "personal" deductions...
The deductibility of mortgage interest keeps the values of homes high, allowing a whole mess of people to build up equity in order to leverage their assets for things such as education.
Well, business is so much more important to the GOP. What else should we expect.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,328 posts)redwitch
(14,944 posts)Grrr...........
spinbaby
(15,090 posts)We're already paying astronomical premiums, co-pays, and deductibles and now they want to take away the deduction for health insurance. That and the loss of the home-mortgage deduction will be crippling for the middle class.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)has been the goal since Nixon flew to China. And most presidents since have played a part (including Clinton with NAFTA)
primavera
(5,191 posts)At the rate you're going, only 1% of the electorate will end up voting for you!
bluemarkers
(536 posts)cut social security
cut medicare
raise taxes on the middle class
slap women in the you know what
calls veterans and current troops a laundry list ...
seriously?
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)Mitty does not want to win this election. I am sure of it now.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Heather MC
(8,084 posts)I know a wing nut, that went off on me last week when I said Mittens would eliminate the Mortgage deduction. He said prove it, show me where he said that.
I hope this is on Video somewhere
Wednesdays
(17,374 posts)I'm sure they'd provide you the proof.
They may even have the video up on their website. (I'm texting this from my phone, otherwise I'd see for myself.)
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)klook
(12,155 posts)So if you paid $20k of mortgage interest, medical expenses, etc., you'd get -- for example -- only $17k in deductions.
In case there was any doubt, yes -- he intends to screw almost every American. This is just the latest example.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)If you have a 300k mortgage with 5% rate. you are paying. 16k in interest. in NoVa 300k is a cheap mortgage. I think mitt Romney doesn't know this. And he thinks we will hear 17k cap and think wow that's alot!!! but it isn't, it's pittance .
And if that's what you're paying in mtg. interest, you've used up your bucket -- so charitable contributions, out-of-pocket medical costs, unreimbursed business expenses, etc. etc. do nothing to reduce your taxable income.
Rmoney would truly be dangerous for the country. I can't believe he has a ghost of a chance of winning.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)That Mitt is going after only Income earners. My DH said all money made is income. I had to explain in Mitts World Money made in the stock market is not income and therefore taxed differently and would not be subject to deduction limitations. My DH thought our deductions didn't come anywhere near 17k. until I explain Mitt intends to include the Mort Int. deduction. Then he said but wait a minute we wouldn't be able to write off any of our charitable donations, or business expenses. then it hit him. he said oh no this Guy would really screw us over.
It took a second but my DH got it. This deduction limitation is a very very very bad plan, for those of us living just above the bottom and barely hitting the middle
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)That Mitt is going after only Income earners. My DH said all money made is income. I had to explain in Mitts World Money made in the stock market is not income and therefore taxed differently and would not be subject to deduction limitations. My DH thought our deductions didn't come anywhere near 17k. until I explain Mitt intends to include the Mort Int. deduction. Then he said but wait a minute we wouldn't be able to write off any of our charitable donations, or business expenses. then it hit him. he said oh no this Guy would really screw us over.
It took a second but my DH got it. This deduction limitation is a very very very bad plan, for those of us living just above the bottom and barely hitting the middle
rob whitey
(3 posts)That's overstating it a bit. If you are in the 25% income bracket that $16k is a $4000 deduction. And that's only the first year. It drops dramatically every year because you pay the interest first.
The fact is that the rich benefit a lot more from the mortgage interest deduction than the poor or middle class. It's a $100 billion per year tax cut that benefits the poor not at all, the middle class a little bit, and the upper middle class and rich get almost all of this cut. We can't argue about tax cuts for the rich and argue for the mortgage interest deduction in the same breath.
NotThisTime
(3,657 posts)I have ten grand in medical this year, a mortgage deduction, state income taxes, property taxes, my children are deductions. I have no money LEFT. I don't want to complain, others have it worse, but if you want to crater this country, this is the way to do it.
janx
(24,128 posts)"With a small plane circling above trailing a sign that read, 'Hey Mitt, How do you like us now? The 47 Percent', FOX31 also asked Romney if he wishes he could take back his controversial..."
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)He says he will take away deductions from "High income people" but Mitt doesn't consider the money he makes as "income" it's Dividens
so He is not talking about himself or his rich friends his talking about employees who make a high income.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)jmowreader
(50,557 posts)People like my parents, who are in the "have some money but are not rich" class, buy houses with cash.
Romney's people don't. They are who the "interest only" mortgage was invented for. These guys take out an interest-only mortgage at...oh, let's say five percent...that resets in five years to buy the house, and at the same time they buy a bond that pays 20 percent. If the bond is enough larger than the mortgage, it will throw off enough income to pay the principal on the mortgage at time of reset. They also buy smaller bonds that will pay enough interest to make their house payments. In this way, a Romney-type can buy a house and never pay a cent of their own money.
OTOH, if a Romney type bought a house with cash he would lose the use of that money until the house was sold.
The problem with the interest-only mortgage is it became a handy tool for guys like Romney to put people in houses they couldn't afford, so they'd have mortgages to tranche and write credit default swaps against...all of which were used to fund corporate takeovers.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)No, if such things existed, the financial world would be a different place. They could invest in a hedge fund, that might pay 20%, but bonds are agreements, and they don't pay 20%. Not even junk bonds. If a bond is paying 20%, it means most people expect the holder to go bankrupt, and the bond will become worthless.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)As are credit derivatives. I could have said 'financial instrument' and probably should, but the point is clear: the rich get rich and stay that way by spending OPM.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Seriously? Cut the mortgage deduction?
Be my guest and shout that proposal from the highest mountain top. I wonder if any reporter will be smart enough to ask "So, he'll be cutting the mortgage deduction for everyone? Isn't that a massive tax increase on business?
central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)he just wants to cancel the mortgage deduction on first homes. You can still take the full deduction on your second home, your Aspen chalet, and your beach home. Now are you happy?
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)$17,000 for anyone with a family and their self group insurance and medical bills on top of that, know that is nothing.
It would be an extreme increase in those making from zero to under $200,000 tax bill.
but then it would save Mitt millions and millions.
I myself would give everyone an $80,000 or under don't pay taxes, then tax anything over that at higher and higher rates, with those making more than a million say pay 75% of every profit dollar over a million.
Mojambo
(17,422 posts)I'm floored. I really am.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Keep talking, Mitt, we're loving your ideas! At least the fact that they're helping us win this election.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)I'm confused about the whole thing. What is the $17,000 bucket? How much does one usually get for these deductions?
I don't do deductions and shit so I don't know how any of this works.
I'd like to blast the guy about it but I don't know if I'd be right in doing so.
Any help?
wordpix
(18,652 posts)is pretty obscure and I don't get it either.
Must be a Rmoney "zinger" to talk about a "bucket."
rob whitey
(3 posts)Good question! Why should you be upset by this? Apparantly you should be upset by it because it came from a Republican. Eliminating the mortgage interest deductions should be a Democrat ideal, but for some reason those who write the party line prefer the deal.
The top tax rate is 35%. It's for people making the big bucks. But almost nobody pays 35%. The reduce their taxable income by all kinds of deductions, and the biggest deductions go to the richest Americans.
You said it yourself, you don't do deductions so it benefits you not at all. You are like many in the middle class, and almost all of the poor. So it's no surprise that of the $100 billion (yes, billion with a "B" most of it goes to the upper middle class and rich. Folks making over $200,000.
When people complain about the rich getting tax breaks, this is one of the biggest. The average MID for middle class people is $179. It's well over $2,000 for the people making over $200,000.
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)absolutely, 100% sure he's going to do this.
In order to GIVE millionaires a tax break,
he must TAKE from those at the bottom.
He will eliminate the mortgage interest deduction,
robbing millions of middle class homeowners of
money they were counting on. For me, that equals
$5,000 - $7,000 for the first 8 or 9 years of my
mortgage. We are talking about billions of dollars
going into rich folks pockets that would otherwise
go into local economies. It's just like Reagan did
when he eliminated credit card interest deductions.
Mitt calls this plan "eliminating tax loopholes" -- and he's
not referring to his Cayman Island accounts.
He also intends to force people living below the
poverty level to pay federal income tax by
eliminating the earned income tax deduction.
He calls it "broadening the tax base."
He is not human; he is a cyborg who makes
Ronald Reagan look like St. Vincent.
0rganism
(23,954 posts)Seriously, this guy doesn't even act like he wants the job. Why would anyone hire him?
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)The scary thing here is: take your average teabagger or freeper, cut his tax rate but eliminate all his deductions, cause his tax bill to go up, and 99 percent of them will tell you they got a tax cut. The ONLY thing those assholes care about is the rate, and the rate is only half of what you pay.
I have been saying here on this forum that the only way Romney can possibly make his economics work (the rate cut, defense spending hike and balancing the budget all at the same time) is to eliminate every deduction except charitable contributions...and they have to keep that one to keep the churches happy. If things get tight after that he will probably try to restrict the charitable deduction to religious institutions, which is extremely unconstitutional but I won't be surprised if he thinks of it.
Beowulf
(761 posts)wouldn't this be devastating to charities, museums, non-profits of all stripes?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)The UK Tories proposed a limit (specifically on charitable donations, and at a higher rate) in the budget this year, but were forced to back down when charities said it would hit them too much:
He announced in the Budget a limit of £50,000 or 25% of income, whichever was higher, on the amount a person could donate instead of paying it in tax.
...
The chancellor said in a newspaper interview he had been "shocked" by the scale of legal tax avoidance by the very rich, after seeing the result of a confidential study by HM Revenue and Customs and this was a "specific" loophole he wanted to close.
...
Sir Stuart Etherington, chief executive of the National Council for Voluntary Organisations, said: "This is a victory for common sense and validates the strength of feeling from the thousands of organisations who lent their weight to the 'Give it Back, George' campaign. This is a great day for philanthropy."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18278253
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)now this???
I rely on the deductions that we get.. what an asshole.
I hope all the right wing Realtors see this.. i left the industry because I was so sick of their blatant pandering to the right, even tho it was always against their best interests.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,120 posts)mckara
(1,708 posts)The is a cunard designed to reinforce a notion making Thatcherism possible when taking over businesses with small down payments and piles of borrowed money. Interest deductions make the whole process affordable for Bain and their ilk of immoral scalpers who destroy businesses and jobs. Without interest deductions, hostile takeovers would require more skin in the game and prevent most schemes from reaching fruition!
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)can get right on to USA Dystopia, leading the world at the bottom of the heap. Reagan started it, Romney/Ryan want to finish the job.
mindfulNJ
(2,367 posts)...but I didn't think he'd say it!
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)bag of rocks. They will think this is a great idea if told to think so ...
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I think the suspenders holding up Mitt's family values have popped.
His wife's hobby takes deductions that exceed working class families entire incomes.
eringer
(460 posts)First, the Republicans will decimate the Federal workforce (its in their platform) and then Romney will take away the tax deduction for their biggest invertment. Added together, DC area homeowners will realize a 25 to 30 percent drop in the value of their homes while resales will rival those in Detroit. Amazing how many homes in the DC area have yard signs for Romney. They can't all be renters.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)DC residents are overwhelmingly for O
Hugin
(33,144 posts)Keep this up and people won't vote Republican for the next 3 elections.
On the Road
(20,783 posts)just keeping his plan a secret.
Social Security is the third rails of American politics, and the mortgage deduction isn't too far behind. Romney has taken one in each hand.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Actually he's more than likely Ferrengi.
He's got to be kidding about the mortgage tax credit, Unless he's trying to lose.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)NICO9000
(970 posts)As a homeowner for 15 years, that mortgage deduction is HUGE for us. Mittens is a dick, plain and simple.
truthisfreedom
(23,147 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)I mean, I do believe it, but... this guy could not be trying any harder to lose this election.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)We don't want you talking out loud about options Mitt. We want to hear the details of what is in your plans. This just sounds like some kind of deflection away from what the real issues are. It is common practice to present your worst option first so when you do announce your best option it looks very good in comparison -- classic straw man argument. I don't buy a word of this. Is sucks and even Romney knows this.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)and the states that are net losers in the re-distribution of Federal tax money? I've always thought that New York taxes itself to provide services that other states rely on the Federal government to provide. That deal works only as long as New Yorkers can deduct their state and local taxes.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)By tomorrow talk radio will be all about "Why should ordinary white working stiffs who can not afford to buy a home subsidize houses bought by Blacks and Mexicans?" Never mind that a lot of the renters are either in the housing industry or have jobs made possible by the housing industry and this change in the tax codes will cost them their jobs.
Frisbee
(1,955 posts)"Got to have that 20 percent tax cut for the Koch brothers, after all. As Ryan said, that's the most important thing of all."
As if the Koch brothers would be satisfied at 20%. The day it became 20% they'd start maneuvering for 10% or less. The greedy bastards will never be satisfied.
LittlestStar
(224 posts)One of the best incentives to owning is the deductible interest. Not only will primary home sales tank, what would be the point of owning income property? I swear watching Romney is like watching a 3 year old with a lighter next to a can of gasoline.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)will start funding ads against this slimey greedy bastard.
Mellow56
(10 posts)We have not been able to claim mortgage interest on our small house in years. We're told we don't pay enough interest.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)I'm a renter. I don't itemize deductions and my guess is most poor people don't either. Romney says he's going to cut the rates by 20%, which will be a bigger cut for the wealthy, and reduce deductions and exemptions. The poor and middle class could end up paying MORE tax.