Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 01:04 PM Sep 2012

Iranian foundation ups price on Rushdie's head

Source: Reuters

DUBAI, Sept 16 (Reuters) - An Iranian religious foundation has increased its reward for the killing of British author Salman Rushdie, in response to a U.S.-made film that mocks the Prophet Mohammad, sparking protests across the Muslim world.

Rushdie, an Indian-born British novelist who has nothing to do with the film, was condemned to death in 1989 by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran's late leader, over his novel "The Satanic Verses," saying its depiction of the Prophet Mohammad was blasphemous.

Khomeini's fatwa - religious edict - was condemned in the West as incitement to murder and an assault on freedom of speech, but a wealthy Iranian religious organisation has offered a large reward to anyone carrying it out and decided to increase the bounty amid the furore over the online film.

"I am adding another $500,000 to the reward for killing Salman Rushdie, and anyone who carries out this sentence will receive the whole amount immediately," said Hassan Sanei, the foundation's head, in a statement carried by the Iranian Students' News Agency (ISNA).

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/16/film-protests-iran-rushdie-idUSL5E8KG2F920120916

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iranian foundation ups price on Rushdie's head (Original Post) oberliner Sep 2012 OP
Well, just how convenient is this timing...for the idiots on both sides? cr8tvlde Sep 2012 #1
I thought they had forgotten about The Satanic Verses slackmaster Sep 2012 #2
one thing ill give them is the long memory, you still hear talk of andalusia and the balkans from loli phabay Sep 2012 #19
Do they think anyone was holding off killing Rushdie before because the money wasn't good enough? htuttle Sep 2012 #3
I agree with your assessment oberliner Sep 2012 #4
True, he has survived this threat for 23 years treestar Sep 2012 #9
All the pro-censorship people probably thinks he should be jailed for offending... Odin2005 Sep 2012 #5
I can only assume you are referring to all the "progressives" on this board.... shakeemondown Sep 2012 #6
I know, right? And if one more person throws out the Crusades as a Flatulo Sep 2012 #7
If I see the stupid "fire in a public theater" argument again I'll puke. fujiyama Sep 2012 #14
Well said oberliner Sep 2012 #24
The local newspaper for the nearest large city (Worcester, MA) interviewed Flatulo Sep 2012 #20
The Bill Maher show could be really interesting this week. Behind the Aegis Sep 2012 #8
Salman Rushdie, embassy sieges, it's like a greatest hits of fundamentalist nonsense. name not needed Sep 2012 #10
this is what they need to understand. vicar Sep 2012 #11
I always loved that speech. nt Flatulo Sep 2012 #12
Thank You. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #15
Thanks blaze Sep 2012 #16
Just read about him ancianita Sep 2012 #13
Maybe we should put a 1/2 mil reward on the head of Hassan Sanei askeptic Sep 2012 #17
I like the cut of your jib, sir! Flatulo Sep 2012 #21
My favorite Bill Maher guest. sarcasmo Sep 2012 #18
Cenk Uygur does a good job defending free speech cpwm17 Sep 2012 #22
3.3 million dollars to the killer defacto7 Sep 2012 #23
 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
19. one thing ill give them is the long memory, you still hear talk of andalusia and the balkans from
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 07:11 PM
Sep 2012

some of the nuts, probuably unless they get confirmation that rushdie is dead it will still be in effect two hundred years from now.

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
3. Do they think anyone was holding off killing Rushdie before because the money wasn't good enough?
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 01:50 PM
Sep 2012

The 'reward' is up to $3.3 million dollars now. They could probably just hire a proper hit man for that. I think they find their public posturing more important than the deed.





Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
5. All the pro-censorship people probably thinks he should be jailed for offending...
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 02:01 PM
Sep 2012

...people's religious sensibilities and think it's his fault if he gets assassinated.

 

shakeemondown

(9 posts)
6. I can only assume you are referring to all the "progressives" on this board....
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 04:14 PM
Sep 2012

The ones who want this movie making fool put under the jail...First Amendment be damned...

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
7. I know, right? And if one more person throws out the Crusades as a
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 04:32 PM
Sep 2012

justification for Muslim rage, I think I'll puke. Jesus, it was only a thousand fucking years ago. Let's all move on and vow to do better.

I say we crank alternative energy way up to high, (fuck the cost - let the government or NASA do it if the private sector can't see high enough profits yet; it's a matter of national survival), get off the oil high and let the Islamic world stew for another millennium or so until they learn how to act like adults.

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
14. If I see the stupid "fire in a public theater" argument again I'll puke.
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 06:15 PM
Sep 2012

If this idiotic piece of garbage movie is incitement, well my God, we should go banning half of what's on youtube. I'm kind of shocked how little people understand about the concept and importance of the first amendment's protection of distasteful, disgusting, and at times even hateful speech. I saw the "Innocence of Muslims" video. It's incredibly stupid and I suppose it's offensive to Muslims, but fortunately we don't jail people for just making shitty and offensive movies. If we did, I'd say jail Joel Schumacher for those two batman movies. Those were certainly devoid of artistic expression (Uma Thurman in a tight outfit not withstanding)...

We cannot and should not be cowed into submission by any particular religious group - and that includes Muslims (primarily), but also Christians, Scientologists, Jews, Hindus, or whatever other group at the moment has a stick up its collective ass because someone dares make fun of some dead person that claimed they spoke to some sky deity a few thousand years ago.

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
20. The local newspaper for the nearest large city (Worcester, MA) interviewed
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 07:53 PM
Sep 2012

A half dozen or so local Muslim residents for their views on the embassy attacks. While they all condemned the violence, each and every one of them called for an outright ban on criticizing Islam.

Now I understand that most of these people came from repressive regimes with subserviant pulations and wholly state-owned media, but dammit, our First Amendment rights cannot be sacrificed to appease any cranky religious group.

askeptic

(478 posts)
17. Maybe we should put a 1/2 mil reward on the head of Hassan Sanei
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 06:43 PM
Sep 2012

I wonder how quickly he would resign...

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
22. Cenk Uygur does a good job defending free speech
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 11:27 PM
Sep 2012


I saw some on DU go so far as to call for blasphemy laws in the US, euphemistically called anti hate speech laws. They want to favor certain religious viewpoints over others by force of law. No, we have the First Amendment which covers both freedom of speech and religion. Our Founding Fathers thought it was so important that they put it # 1.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iranian foundation ups pr...