Alleged 'Innocence of Muslims' Filmmaker Taken in For Interviewing by Deputies
Source: LA Times
Alleged 'Innocence of Muslims' filmmaker taken in for interviewing by deputies
September 15, 2012 | 12:46 am
Just after midnight, authorities descended on the Cerritos home of the man believed to be the filmmaker behind the anti-Muslim movie that has sparked protests and rioting in the Arab world.
Los Angeles County sheriff's deputies escorted a man believed to be Nakoula Basseley Nakoula to an awaiting car. The man declined to answer questions on his way out and wore a hat and a towel over his face. He kept his hands in the pocket of a winter coat.
Sheriff's officials could not be reached by The Times, but department spokesman Steve Whitmore told NBC4 that deputies assisting the federal probation department took Nakoula to the sheriff's substation in Cerritos for interviewing.
Authorities waited until most media had left for the day.
Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/09/anti-muslim-film-nakoula-basseley-innocence-muslims.html
MADem
(135,425 posts)of his internet use.
I'm guessing they bagged his computer and assorted "devices" as well.
He had been ordered not to own or use devices with access to the Web without approval from his probation officer - and any approved computers were to be used for work only. "Defendant shall not access a computer for any other purpose," the terms read.
Restrictions were also placed on him enlisting others to get on the Internet for him.
The picture accompanying the article is something--isn't he Wrapped in Swaddling Clothes?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)and put him back in jail/prison then The US could tell the Middle-East that the man that made the film is in jail/prison.
Ya think?
MADem
(135,425 posts)I think that's probably how they'll approach this. It's the one easy hook they have.
SkyDaddy7
(6,045 posts)Violated his probation & if so needs to be back in jail just like anyone else who violates their probation. Right?
How it is seen in the Middle East could just be an added benefit of enforcing our laws here at home.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Its appeasement at its most vile, but then again, it is international politics.
hlthe2b
(102,257 posts)Missycim
(950 posts)they would revoke it just to calm down the crazies in the ME.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)They'd still revoke his probation, either way.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Its a common parole requirement for white collar crime and is uniformly ignored. It makes for a handy hook when needed since everyone uses the Internet.
ToxMarz
(2,166 posts)You seem to suggest that authorities are violating his civil rights to probation or something. He is a convicted felony. The judicial system has given him leniency, and he has once again shown contempt for the laws and society. And gotten innocent people killed.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)They will revoke his parole as a sop to the mobs. That sets a horrible precedent since that will be the expectation for the next time something gets their undies in a knot something similar will happen. If the person is not on parole, what could the US Government do?
He failed to follow parole requirements. That is no where near the same as showing "contempt for the laws and society". We also do not know if his parole officer gave him permission to use the Internet or not (it was not a blanket ban)
He has gotten no one killed. It is pretty clear now that a armed attack was being planned for Benghazi on 9/11.
The trailer is still trash, but the likely US Governement reaction is going to cause more problems in the long run that it solves
brush
(53,776 posts)Probation or not for this guy is not what we should be concerned about. We should be concerned about who's behind him and who put up the money for this film. Don't be naive. This whole matter, especially the timing of it being translated to Arabic just before 9/11 and the middle east media being alerted, does not begin or end with him. They need to follow the money trail and find out who put this whole thing into motion. My guess is it's from some right wing source.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Certainly more people. However some are posting here that is just conspiracy woo. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014231417#post11 I do not understand their motivations.
rayofreason
(2,259 posts)Bragi
(7,650 posts)Busting this guy on a minor parole violation means he will soon be released, and then once again AQ etc. will be able to loudly proclaim that once again the American government refuses to arrest the perpetrators, and maybe get people all riled up again.
AQ can milk this tactic as as long as the US refuses to state clearly to one and all that Americans right to free speech isn't going to be curtail by government to avoid hurting the feelings of any religious group. Sacrilege and blasphemy are legal in the US. That isn't up for negotiation.
So far, the US government has been afraid to tell the truth about its inability to stop anyone from exercising their right to free speech. I wish it would get over this reluctance.
Arresting this guy for pissy little parole violations, and then letting him go a few days later, doesn't help.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)At least here in Texas, they will revoke it for any infraction. There is almost never any leeway. I don't know about California but I doubt it is much different. The probation program is the mercy they give you, there is very little afterwards.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The no Internet access without permission requirement is common for white collar crime. It is also uniformly unenforced *unless* there is another concern. Then it is the hook used since not using the Internet is almost impossible today. If the Feds do that here, they will have to get a judge to go along with it.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,326 posts)... when violations are brought to the attention of the parole authorities?
there is leeway you could drive a truck through. Don't know about Federal. Maybe they have room in their prisons for every violation, I don't know.
hlthe2b
(102,257 posts)Gawd, how horrible it would be to be perceived as following our own laws, while also being concerned about preventing further violence.
What a truly perverted sense of priorities.
"enforcing terms of probation" tends to be QUITE selective. Something tells me that if he had uploaded pictures of his vacation to his Facebook page they would not be paying much attention to him.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Naw...
MADem
(135,425 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)[img][/img]
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Embattled Anti-Muslim Film Producer Remains Locked Inside Cerritos Home
September 14, 2012 9:43 PM
CERRITOS (CBSLA.com) Nakoula Nakoula, the embattled producer of the anti-Muslim movie The Innocence of Muslims, remained locked behind the doors of his Cerritos home Friday.
Carter Evans, reporting for CBS2 and KCAL9, said Nakoula had a visitor.
The front door opened briefly when Nokoulas new attorney, Steve Seiden, arrived.
He said, Ive been asked to consult with Mr. Nakoula regarding matters that Im not at liberty to discuss. Were not going to answer any questions today.
Later, Seiden spoke to Evans by phone.
Seiden is a criminal defense attorney. He told Evans he was hired specifically to represent Nakoula in regard to his supervised released after he served time for bank fraud in a federal prison.
...
Video at link:
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/09/14/embattled-anti-muslim-film-producer-remains-locked-inside-cerritos-home/
Swagman
(1,934 posts)StrictlyRockers
(3,855 posts)This saga will take many more twists before it unravels.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)SkyDaddy7
(6,045 posts)Thanks for keeping things real. It seems too many folks these days try to make a Conspiracy out of everything...Sometimes, well, MOST of the time things are as they appear. This guy may have violated his probation & if so then he needs to go back to jail regardless of what it may look like.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Latest is the producer who also did soft core porn (Brown?). I still think there are more tawdry characters to be identified...but its not going be like the Grassy Knoll either.
Swagman
(1,934 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)I'm with you, at least at this point...I don't post nearly as much here as I used to back in the day (I've been here since DU's founding, under a different name).
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)classykaren
(769 posts)Other web sites are naming a Sam Roberts a soft porn director as the one responsible . Why all the different information?
ck4829
(35,072 posts)But he's a political prisoner according to the freepers.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)take a look at some of the replys in this thread.
Bragi
(7,650 posts)oldsarge54
(582 posts)What I find interesting is the use of the word "alleged" in the title of this piece. That word is usually associated with a criminal that has been charged but not convicted. Being that this story has more twists than a corkscrew, has he been charged with anything? And to the free speachers who remonstrated with me rather vigorously earlier. Free speech means you can say what you want. Free speech does not mean you do not have to face the consequences resulting from what you said.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... that this guy is a bit player in this mess. Since there were many people involved in this, it might take some time to sort out who did what.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)A lot of details and supposed facts about this thing have turned out to be shaky.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)"He is gone and he is free," he said of Nakoula, who was bundled up in a coat, hat and white scarf as he was escorted from the premises by a sheriff's deputy.
Whitmore earlier dismissed reports that Nakoula had been arrested, saying he was never in handcuffs and had left his house willingly to be interviewed.
Karen Redmond, a spokeswoman for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, said Friday that Nakoula's federal probation was under review.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/anti-islam-filmmaker/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Bragi
(7,650 posts)Much of the world seems confused about American laws. It's time to get the message out that people in the US can freely desecrate things, burn holy books and flags, engage in outrageous blasphemy through word or film, and it's all legal in America, it's called free speech. This isn't up for negotiation.
Once people understand that, then they will understand that the American government is not responsible for every helpful or hateful statement made by every American citizen.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)regarding revocation of his parole, I think they might have said 'next week'.
I didn't catch it all.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)WTF does scrum mean?
All I could find out was it was a term for Rugby or a software grouping.
Anyone?
Paparazzi=sc(r)um?
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Have you never heard this use of the word before?
It is fairly common usage.
daleo
(21,317 posts)A bit like North American football's concept of a scrimmage. In Canadian politics it is a sort of informal press conference, wher a group of reporters surround politicians as they walk, and shout questions at them. It is a sort of controlled chaos.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)What are you talking about?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Saying nasty things about a historical figure is not a crime in the US.
rayofreason
(2,259 posts)Our refusal to pass blasphemy laws and our obstruction of similar efforts in the UN is "insensitive."
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Anyone?
jsr
(7,712 posts)askeptic
(478 posts)taking him in for "police interviews"
ck4829
(35,072 posts)That's part of his probation deal.
askeptic
(478 posts)That this guy did -- that is an assumption on your part
ck4829
(35,072 posts)Taking on the alias "Sam Bacile" doesn't give a person free license to violate their probation though.
So, tell me when he's been cleared, they'll announce it.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)ck4829
(35,072 posts)He hasn't been cleared yet, they let him go, but he's not out of the woods yet
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Fuck him and his Fundie Friends.
ck4829
(35,072 posts)Just look at some of the replies here and in other threads. He's a good fraudster, he's got plenty of suckers.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Seems rather a coward to me... If he is innocent of the making of this film or participation in it's promotion, I would suppose there would be reason to hide.
If he's not innocent, then he's a truly cowardly man.
RobinA
(9,890 posts)Why all this attention on who made or might have made this movie? This movie is protected in this country. What difference does it make who made it, why it was made or anything else about this film. I don't get what looks like a criminal investigation.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)He is on probation for financial fraud. One term of probation is not to use internet. He likely posted the trailer to YouTube under the "Sam Bacile" alias.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Bragi
(7,650 posts)That's why it won't fly. Any lawyer will demand immediate release and get it, sooner or later.
When he finally gets released, AQ can then organize more riots against the US for -- once again -- refusing to silence this blasphemer.
As long as no-one explains and defends the first amendment, it will be more fodder for AQ.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Using the internet violated the terms of his probation. That the movie caused an uproar certainly called attention to him, but doesn't change the fact that he violated his probation.
Bragi
(7,650 posts)There are various possible outcomes. If a violation is seen as trivial by a judge, then probation can just be reinstated.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)he may not use the internet without judicial approval, may not have someone use the internet on his behalf, and he may not use false name. He violated all three... that doesn't seem trivial to me.
Bragi
(7,650 posts)You know, the kind who says "so, what exactly is going on here?"
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Then the people in the middle east might get the wrong idea that we can just arrest people for making stupid statements. I do have to say that I would love nothing better than seeing his probation revoked, but it might give the wrong impression to the people protesting us.