Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:56 PM Sep 2012

U.S. to auction state shale for drilling

Source: SF Gate

A nearly 18,000-acre stretch of land extending from California's Central Coast to the San Joaquin Valley is the setting for a brewing debate over an oil-extraction method that has little governmental oversight.

The land, which spans Monterey, San Benito and Fresno counties, rests on a large chunk of the Monterey Shale, a formation of underground minerals long eyed by the energy industry for its potential to yield billions of barrels of oil.

That potential is expected to come closer to reality in December, when the federal government - which owns below-surface rights to the mostly private land - is scheduled to hold an auction to lease out parcels to oil and gas companies.

The lease sale, the second on the Monterey Shale in about a year, will occur in the midst of a growing battle among environmentalists, politicians and the energy industry over the drilling technique known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking." It injects a high-pressure mix of water, sand and chemicals into the ground to unlock oil and natural gas from shale rock layers deep within the earth - resources that cannot be tapped with conventional drilling techniques.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/U-S-to-auction-state-shale-for-drilling-3850852.php



Fracking in California near the San Andreas fault? Sure, what could go wrong?
51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. to auction state shale for drilling (Original Post) Duer 157099 Sep 2012 OP
In order for this to work, they need to do three things Orrex Sep 2012 #1
"inspire them to hire non-union, non-US workers too." zbdent Sep 2012 #2
Fracking is NEVER safe. RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #3
+1 limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #30
This is already fueling boom towns in North Dakota and Texas. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #4
C'mon Down oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #5
That sounds about right. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #12
Don't forget how the boom in heavy industry takes a toll on Ilsa Sep 2012 #16
Good luck finding a place to live arounf the Bakken fields. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #8
Dude, I'm seriously thinking of sleeping in my truck. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #11
If you are close to a small city, join an athletic club. Ilsa Sep 2012 #15
Good advice, thanks. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #19
The fracking will happen whether you are there or not. Ilsa Sep 2012 #26
What's it gonna be like in 10 years when the well has dried up RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #38
Our county had a small boom for the time that the oil companies were putting in a pipeline. We jwirr Sep 2012 #43
They tell me the fault line pscot Sep 2012 #6
Fracking near a fault? FUCKING IDIOTIC!!! Odin2005 Sep 2012 #7
Terrible Vision oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #23
Yay! More Fracking Hydra Sep 2012 #9
Frick and Frack = Willard and Lyin Ryan. Hubert Flottz Sep 2012 #10
"NIMBY" Is The Operative Principle, Here. Paladin Sep 2012 #13
No, I believe it is "NOMBAF" Duer 157099 Sep 2012 #14
Not "Nimby" at all -- Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2012 #45
I live in Stockton, California datadiva Sep 2012 #17
Where's a fucking Occupy, when you need one? Gone home to push the "Don't vote" meme. nt patrice Sep 2012 #18
Make that the Ayn Rand, "There's no choice", so don't vote meme, in my area, which pretty much patrice Sep 2012 #20
what a thoughtful, relevant post. Occulus Sep 2012 #24
Based on facts. I don't need to justify myself to you. I know what happened here. nt patrice Sep 2012 #28
Ans I didn't ASK for any justification. Occulus Sep 2012 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #37
How does voting affect this? limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #27
Haven't you heard, "Everything's Obama's fault. Don't vote. Let is crash and burn, so we can patrice Sep 2012 #29
This isn't what we voted for. limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #31
Does the environment ever take priority. JRLeft Sep 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #22
Auctions Such As This Happen All The Time. Paladin Sep 2012 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #36
Again, There's A Long-Standing Procedure In Place....... Paladin Sep 2012 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #41
As A Matter Of Fact, I DO Have Special Insight. Paladin Sep 2012 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #49
Don't vote for candidates who support this. This is global warming denialism. limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #25
As a CA native who went through the bkkyosemite Sep 2012 #34
This They_Live Sep 2012 #35
I sure do. It's class war all over again RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #39
Now that is a test state. I wonder if California is going to do an EPA study? jwirr Sep 2012 #42
Are they fucking KIDDING???? Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2012 #44
And California gets nothing in return KamaAina Sep 2012 #46
Here's the area in question KamaAina Sep 2012 #47
Parkfield has had a pretty steady record of M6 quakes, but never a huge one slackmaster Sep 2012 #51
Here we go again. nt woo me with science Sep 2012 #50

Orrex

(63,212 posts)
1. In order for this to work, they need to do three things
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:02 PM
Sep 2012

1. Ensure that there's no before-the-fact research to verify safety

2. Guarantee that drilling companies don't have to reveal the components of their chemical "fracking" soup

3. Preemptively absolve the drilling companies of any liability or accountability if their fracking should lead to any negative economic, health, or geologic consequences


Hell, give them a huge tax break while we're at it, and see if we can inspire them to hire non-union, non-US workers too.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
3. Fracking is NEVER safe.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:19 PM
Sep 2012

If they cannot guarantee the safety of the water, they should abandon the project.
Fracking can never be safe. As long as they drill below ground water, there is always the probability that ground water will get polluted with natural gas and fracking fluid. This is a fact.
If you don't understand how, just do a bit of research.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
30. +1
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:06 PM
Sep 2012

The gas bubbles up into streams sometimes. Or makes geisers.

The worst part is that it is only really noticed when it bubbles up to the surface like that in a dramatic way. In most cases it just silently contaminates the water and we never hear about it.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
4. This is already fueling boom towns in North Dakota and Texas.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:27 PM
Sep 2012

Williston, ND, has gone from 12,000 to 25,000 people in two years. Guys are paying good money to sleep in essentially barracks. I know a guy who dragged a portable shower up there and sells showers for $10. Rumor is dishwashers are getting $20 an hour, if you can find one (but when I looked, I only saw a bar offering a position for $10).

Likewise around Kenedy, Texas. I just read about how they've created 45,000 jobs in the past few years and expect to add another 75,000. The Texas Department of Transportation can't issue commercial drivers' licenses fast enough, so there's a big bottleneck. Truckers are supposedly getting up to $80,000 a year.

I don't think fracking is a smart approach, but I'm seriously thinking about hopping in my pickup and hitting one of these boom towns. I don't want to be an oil patch worker, but I could sell 'em whiskey or something.

oldsarge54

(582 posts)
5. C'mon Down
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:43 PM
Sep 2012

We have in the counties involved increases in violent crime, prostitution, and folks building shacks to rent at high cost. it is the classic boom town experience. Doesn't do a whole lot of good in the long term. That is the problem with boom town thinking.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
12. That sounds about right.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:24 PM
Sep 2012

Reams of rootless young working men generate lots of vice activity. And there was one horrible crime associated with the Williston boom: A couple of itinerant workers were out driving around and smoking crack and kidnapped and killed this Montana woman who was out jogging.

And yes, after the boom, the bust. You see that all around the West, around the extractive industries.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
16. Don't forget how the boom in heavy industry takes a toll on
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:49 PM
Sep 2012

Roads and bridges. Texas said it is looking at hundreds of millions of dollars in road repair work to be done in all of the areas where there has been a fracking boom.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
8. Good luck finding a place to live arounf the Bakken fields.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:47 PM
Sep 2012

I have a friend who teaches out there (Parshal, ND), and the land values are through the roof.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
11. Dude, I'm seriously thinking of sleeping in my truck.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:22 PM
Sep 2012

If I can find a place to park it.

I'd pay $10 for a shower every two or three days if I was making good money.

But I'm I'm going to be living in my truck, I won't show up in North Dakota until the spring. It gets kind of cold in Williston in, oh, November, December, January, February, March.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
15. If you are close to a small city, join an athletic club.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:41 PM
Sep 2012

For $50-100 a month, you could shower every day and make friends in the club. They might even have decent food to eat if they have a cafe.**

There are truck tents, you know, for $100-150, depending on your vehicle. And some companies might give you a special stipend if temporary housing is expensive.

Try south Texas. The winters are generally mild. And I've heard that there are lots of jobs that have bloomed because of the oil industry. There is also a new Caterpillar Mfg plant in South Texas.

**I considered living out of my vehicle, going to work, and spending my free time at an athletic club one year to save money before moving. I had a lot of the details worked out.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
19. Good advice, thanks.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:20 PM
Sep 2012

I think fracking is stupid and dangerous--and short-sighted--but I'm getting old and have zilch to retire on. I may just have to see if I can't find a way to make and save some money in the patch.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
26. The fracking will happen whether you are there or not.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:18 PM
Sep 2012

Might as well find a way to makeup some of the money you need for retirement.

Also check the Caterpillar plant in Victoria, Texas. Huge new facility. Pay should be decent.

Also, the local college in Victoria is training commercial truck drivers. I don't know what the cost is, though.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
38. What's it gonna be like in 10 years when the well has dried up
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 10:58 PM
Sep 2012

and all those jobs are gone?
OK for short term, but horrible for the long term.
Truckers don't get 80k/yr unless they work their buns off.
The kind of truckers they need to haul hazardous materials might get near that though.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
43. Our county had a small boom for the time that the oil companies were putting in a pipeline. We
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:51 AM
Sep 2012

learned a big lesson that boom means until the work in done. It is probably worth going to that area temporarily but I would not move my family there.

oldsarge54

(582 posts)
23. Terrible Vision
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 06:56 PM
Sep 2012

I have this terrible vision of several million gallons of KY making it to the fault line. Where are the liberal most found in California, West, or East of the fault line. Might have a weird effect next election. From someone who remembers the 60s concern of the west coast taking a dive.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
9. Yay! More Fracking
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:03 PM
Sep 2012

More poisoned groundwater for variable return!

The fact that water is more valuable than methane seems not to have hit enough people in the face yet, including the Obama Administration.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
20. Make that the Ayn Rand, "There's no choice", so don't vote meme, in my area, which pretty much
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:20 PM
Sep 2012

explains quietude on this issue.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
33. Ans I didn't ASK for any justification.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:56 PM
Sep 2012

Defensive much?

(hint: occupy has JACK SHIT to do with hydraulic fracturing. But you KNEW that when you posted; you just wanted to make a gratuitous, irrelevant dig at the whole movement)

Response to Occulus (Reply #33)

patrice

(47,992 posts)
29. Haven't you heard, "Everything's Obama's fault. Don't vote. Let is crash and burn, so we can
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:52 PM
Sep 2012

start over."

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
31. This isn't what we voted for.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:45 PM
Sep 2012

This is a national issue spanning several states and it requires a national response. The federal EPA and BLM should be protecting us from this dangerous industrial activity instead of siding with the oil companies every time.

Oil companies slop millions of dollars around to the piggies in DC and in our state capitols, to make sure their policies go through without a hitch.

Oil and gas companies spend millions to inject their propaganda into cable news shows to mislead the public. So cable news fails to adequately cover stories that could rile the public against new oil and gas projects.

This is all to enhance the profits of oil companies. Global warming has not been a priority. The risk of water contamination has not been a priority. Fuck this shit.

You raise a good question about how much Obama is to blame for this. I think there is plenty of blame to go around but the President should not be held accountable for his environmwntal policies at this time because there is no real way to do so. We have to keep the gop out, so vote for Obama.

But I promise this is the last time in my life I will ever vote for a candidate at any level of government who supports fracking.


Response to Duer 157099 (Original post)

Paladin

(28,257 posts)
32. Auctions Such As This Happen All The Time.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:50 PM
Sep 2012

They are usually administered by the BLM (Bureau of Land Management), part of the Department of the Interior. The federal government owns huge amounts of land in the West, and these auctions of mineral rights happen frequently in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, etc. Don't lay this on "the Administration," just because it's happening in some place scenic, for a change........

Response to Paladin (Reply #32)

Paladin

(28,257 posts)
40. Again, There's A Long-Standing Procedure In Place.......
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 07:52 AM
Sep 2012

....for imposing operational restrictions on federal oil and gas leases. Do a little research on the matter, instead of getting snarky with me......

Response to Paladin (Reply #40)

Paladin

(28,257 posts)
48. As A Matter Of Fact, I DO Have Special Insight.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 04:21 PM
Sep 2012

Special insight, derived from years of dealing with federal oil and gas leasing procedures. Looks like you're way too smart to benefit from my experience, so I'll just sign off. Best of luck in dealing with your own personal fault lines......

Response to Paladin (Reply #48)

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
25. Don't vote for candidates who support this. This is global warming denialism.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:12 PM
Sep 2012

Obviously it's too late for this election since we are already commited to candidates. But next election don't vote for this.

I hear people talking about this creating jobs. They tend to exaggerate the jobs numbers.

But more importantly, we could create millions of green jobs building and installing solar and wind power, modernizing the electric grid, accelerating clean energy research, and converting to electric cars.

There is no need to choose between jobs and the environment. Quite the opposite. Jobs and the environment go together perfectly. The idea that we have to choose between the two is a lie intended to keep people from defending their communities against this kind of unwanted industrial development. We were promised green jobs. What happened?

Instead the politicians, who are paid spokesmen for the oil & gas corporations, pulled a bait and switch. And now they are force feedeing us the dirtiest jobs imaginable. The exact opposite of what we voted for.

On top of the adding to global warming, this also will contaminate water and possibly cause earthquakes, and disrupt communities.

Don't step into a voting booth and put your stamp of approval on it. Well obvioulsy it's not like you have a choice. But next election.

Consider Al Gore in 2016.


bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
34. As a CA native who went through the
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:59 PM
Sep 2012

Loma Prieta 7.1 quake I can tell you THEY ARE STUPID GREEDY IDIOTS...omg FRICKIN IDIOTS...

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
39. I sure do. It's class war all over again
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:01 PM
Sep 2012

Some of the oil companies, and the Koch brothers are now buying up water rights. They know that the water in the fracking area will be undrinkable, so they are gearing up to sell water, while they make big profits on gas.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
44. Are they fucking KIDDING????
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:02 AM
Sep 2012


I had not idea this sale was going on here -- I am stupified. Who ever thinks this is a good idea has their head up their ass. Looks like I need to hook up with some local groups for some direct action.
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
46. And California gets nothing in return
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:40 PM
Sep 2012

We are the only oil-producing jurisdiction on Earth that does not have a severance fee, thanks to obstinate repukes, who prevent it from getting the required two-thirds majority.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
47. Here's the area in question
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:50 PM
Sep 2012


The name "Coalinga" may be vaguely familiar to Californians. That's because it had a 6.5-magnitude earthquake in 1983. Not shown on the map, underneath the white box that says "Parcels for sale..." is Parkfield. The stretch of the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield is the most heavily studied and instrumented stretch of fault in the world, because of the frequency of small quakes there.
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
51. Parkfield has had a pretty steady record of M6 quakes, but never a huge one
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:15 PM
Sep 2012

That's what makes it interesting. It's in the middle of a long and relatively straight segment of the San Andreas fault.



http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/parkfield/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. to auction state sha...