Tue Jul 31, 2012, 12:39 AM
Galraedia (2,580 posts)
Mitt Romney Would End Wind Energy Tax Credit
Source: Huffington Post
Mitt Romney would end a tax credit for wind energy producers if he's elected, his campaign confirmed to the Des Moines Register Monday, setting a clear contrast with President Barack Obama on the issue. "He will allow the wind credit to expire, end the stimulus boondoggles, and create a level playing field on which all sources of energy can compete on their merits," Iowa campaign spokesman Shawn McCoy said in a statement to the paper. "Wind energy will thrive wherever it is economically competitive, and wherever private sector competitors with far more experience than the president believe the investment will produce results." Support for the wind energy tax credit could be a big issue in Iowa, which has the highest number of wind energy jobs in the country, according to the Register. Romney joins a number of other Republicans in opposing the tax break, under the argument that it costs too much -- around $1.6 billion this year -- and props up businesses with government subsidies. Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/30/mitt-romney-wind-energy-tax-credit_n_1721369.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
|
18 replies, 2752 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Galraedia | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| elleng | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| pansypoo53219 | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| jerseyjack | Jul 2012 | #16 | |
| SoapBox | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| cstanleytech | Jul 2012 | #4 | |
| Nambe | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| freshwest | Jul 2012 | #6 | |
| Betty Jo | Jul 2012 | #7 | |
| AsahinaKimi | Jul 2012 | #8 | |
| PoliticAverse | Jul 2012 | #9 | |
| SleeplessinSoCal | Jul 2012 | #10 | |
| onehandle | Jul 2012 | #15 | |
| SleeplessinSoCal | Jul 2012 | #17 | |
| truthisfreedom | Jul 2012 | #11 | |
| SleeplessinSoCal | Jul 2012 | #12 | |
| AllyCat | Jul 2012 | #13 | |
| smirkymonkey | Aug 2012 | #18 | |
| Jim Lane | Jul 2012 | #14 |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 12:47 AM
elleng (40,543 posts)
1. 'Level playing field'
|
is exactly what a tax credit seeks, 'level' with BIG OIL!
Good, let him lose Iowa! |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:10 AM
pansypoo53219 (9,316 posts)
2. SO, he is gonna kill the tax credits gas companies get too?
Response to pansypoo53219 (Reply #2)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 07:06 AM
jerseyjack (1,361 posts)
16. Or the deplection allowances oil companies get?
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:19 AM
SoapBox (5,820 posts)
3. What a stink'n SOB
|
...I really hate this guy.
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:23 AM
cstanleytech (5,311 posts)
4. Does that mean it would get the blowhards over on fox news to shut up? If so then I support it!!!
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:42 AM
Nambe (8,518 posts)
5. "Idiot Wind", Mit has a monopoly.
|
If I didn't have scars, I would feel sorry for him.
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:43 AM
freshwest (31,480 posts)
6. Someone should check his donor list to see if big oil is willing to give up their subsidies...
|
To get to the real reason behind his strategy. Will he just cut alternative energy, or the energy companies, too, to be fair?
The latter doesn't seem likely with the team he's got, and his association with Darth. And will he tell all those Iowa farmers to give up their crop subsidies? Of course we'll never know, since they won't release his donor names to the public. We've got to get Disclose passed before the election... |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:48 AM
Betty Jo (66 posts)
7. Bain Energy Companies
|
You all should go google "Bain Energy"
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:57 AM
AsahinaKimi (18,092 posts)
8. Those
|
Last edited Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:58 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) COMMIE WIND MACHINES ARE NOTHING BUT A TWIRLING WIND OF SOCIALIST CHANGE!!!
MEH.... |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:57 AM
PoliticAverse (5,537 posts)
9. And the ethanol subsidy ? n/t
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:05 AM
SleeplessinSoCal (1,639 posts)
10. Is it me, or is this HUGE? Time to really tackle energy and the free ride for the oil companies.
Response to SleeplessinSoCal (Reply #10)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 06:58 AM
onehandle (35,463 posts)
15. Energy is a question of national security. It must be nationalized. nt
Response to onehandle (Reply #15)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 07:35 PM
SleeplessinSoCal (1,639 posts)
17. I agree. It should have been done after WW2. How do you get most Americans' support today?
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:05 AM
truthisfreedom (17,677 posts)
11. Let's find out how much Mitt and his buddy donors have into dirty energy.
|
Because that's what the issue is here. $20B in subsidies for oil. $1.6B in subsidies for wind. Climate change is real. Mitt is obviously terraforming our planet, which explains the Mormon alien connection. See? Figured it out.
|
Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #11)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:06 AM
SleeplessinSoCal (1,639 posts)
12. Gosh Dang it all to heck! I think you've got it.
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:25 AM
AllyCat (7,520 posts)
13. Can someone explain to me how giving billions in subsidies to Big Oil and cutting
|
the wind credit "levels the playing field"?
|
Response to AllyCat (Reply #13)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 04:51 AM
smirkymonkey (11,673 posts)
18. Well it does for the extremely rich who are heavily invested in Big Oil.
|
And you know, those guys need a "level playing field".
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 06:25 AM
Jim Lane (3,830 posts)
14. Everyone mentions Big Oil, but let's not forget the nukes
|
If nuclear power had to compete on a level playing field, without the government distorting the free market, there probably wouldn't be any civilian nuclear power plants.
|

