The Subpoena That Rocked The Election Is Legal Garbage, Experts Say
Source: Huffington Post
12/20/2016 02:25 pm ET Updated 3 hours ago
The warrant connected to the FBI search that Hillary Clinton says cost her the election shouldnt have been granted, legal experts who reviewed the document released on Tuesday told The Huffington Post.
FBI Director James Comey shook up the presidential race 11 days before the election by telling Congress the agency had discovered new evidence in its previously closed investigation into the email habits of Clinton, who was significantly ahead in the polls at the time.
When Comey made the announcement, the bureau did not have a warrant to search a laptop that agents believed might contain evidence of criminal activity. The FBI set out to rectify that two days later, on Oct. 30, when agents applied for a warrant to search the laptop, which was already in the FBIs possession. The FBI had seized the computer as part of an investigation into former Rep. Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
The unsealed warrant reveals Comeys intrusion on the election was as utterly unjustified as we suspected at time, Brian Fallon, a Clinton campaign spokesman, said on Twitter Tuesday.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-subpoena-that-rocked-the-election-is-legal-garbage-attorney-say_us_58597cd9e4b03904470b0633
Comey was not available for comment, as he's on a skiing vacation in the Urals.
still_one
(92,190 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)It's a subject that deserves to be posted many times and places. FINALLY Hillary & all the dems are proven correct. we all KNEW this was a BS stunt to damage Hillary's campaign.
still_one
(92,190 posts)would get more attention
I also agree with you, it needs to be exposed as much as possible
man on the moonshine
(59 posts)And, you know what? Comey's, while we're at it.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)and now he's skiing in the Urals (Russia)
unblock
(52,229 posts)obviously comey's announcement had a huge effect.
supposedly the supboena and search and eventual admission that there was no "there there" riled up the right wing, taking it as a cover-up.
but if the subpoena had been denied, they would have been outraged that that anyway, and also left to speculate that there was indeed something dastardly in them thar emails.
too my mind it all comes back to comey's announcement, that was by far the biggest part of the problem.
completely separately, there is the violation of privacy in having the fbi scour emails they had no business looking through, but that didn't have any real impact on the election.
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)the vote an probably turned some voters to trump.
unblock
(52,229 posts)personally, i was pissed when comey's letter came out, but relieved when the subpoena was granted and hillary was cleared before the election.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)unblock
(52,229 posts)not the subpoena.
maxrandb
(15,330 posts)just as if there were no letter, there would be no subpoena.
The letter was released 2 days before the subpoena, and there is no fucking way that Comey didn't know what the fucking ReTrumplicans and MSM would do with his letter.
The subpoena was one way Comey tried to cover his lying, racist, "Russian ass-kissing" ass!
He and the rogue FBI fuckers knew there was NO JUSTIFICATION for his fucking letter. The subpoena provided the fucking dickhead with some fucking cover from the criticism that he was fondling Trumps balls as they bounced off of his chin.
BTW - before some overly sensitive DUer chastises me for using an oral sex reference and accusing me of being anti-gay...let me just say that Comey taking Trumps dick down his throat has nothing to do with homosexuality...and everything to do with Comey being a fucking Trump whore
unblock
(52,229 posts)i agree that it's entirely possible the comey had the whole timeline planned, but at least in the media, they were distinct, sequential events -- the letter, the leak, the uproar, the subpoena request, the granting of the subpoena, the call for quick analysis, the question of how to even scan through that many emails in time, etc.
for me the simpler explanation is that comey just wanted his letter to leak and the cloud of suspicion to doom hillary, and any subpoena and exoneration to come after the election.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)was purely political.
If he'd had a legitimate reason for bringing up the emails just before the election, it should have been stated there.
unblock
(52,229 posts)tenorly
(2,037 posts)Mighty big shoes to fill there, Jimbo.
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)tenorly
(2,037 posts)Know what I mean?
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)TaterBake
(56 posts)Now prosecute all the FBI scum who broke the law trying to sway the election.
Won't happen.
The dems will "forgive" them.
And you wonder why we keep losing elections.... And governorships. And suffer from gerrymandering, voter suppression, and election fraud and purged voters by the million.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Another rigged election. Don said it over and over again. That good old FBI, boy don't they just stand for justice!
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)since we all know Trump nor the Republicans in the Senate or House will uphold the law and investigate?
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)I suggest that the press get all over the FBI with FOI Act requests. And that the Dems sue anyone they are allowed to sue---members of the press and people like Rudy who colluded. Comey probably can not be sued for illegal acts committed in office, but if you get enough others to testify, he can be indicted.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)the real issue is the granting of the warrant, not the request. LE is free to request any bogus warrant they want. The check is that a warrant must be approved based on certain criteria. So on that basis was this approved, and is it a basis on which it should have been approved.
Anyway, the warrant in this incident is a side issue in my opinion. Once the letter was out, even if the warrant had NOT been granted, the damage had been done. Actually, not granting it might have done more damage. Nevertheless, one hopes that search warrants aren't granted on a partisan basis. That's a REAL problem.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Here we have FBI seizing materials without a warrant, and the pre-elect colluding with a foreign power to win the election.
The Wgate "plumbers" just broke into Dem HQ and stole some documents about Daniel Ellsberg. NOTHING like this.
Comey should be out on this, if not indicted.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)45 years ago republicans were generally just run of the mill politicians who had some sense of civic service, and our country was a fully functional democracy.
Today, republicans completely deranged lunatics who have lost all sense of civic service, view this positions in government as 100 percent about acruing power to the republican party and country on November 8 took the last step toward becoming an emergent, authoritarian, fascists state.
So, while, yes, this is infinitely worse than Watergate, practically speaking it will amount to N O T H I N G other than burning our asses.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)At least sort of.
Now it's all oligarchy, all the time. (In Rex Tillerson's case he's an oiligarch...)
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Oh, did we have our names on a new foundation's documents? NO! (Even though they did).
Oh did we have to get a warrant to seize Abedin's laptop? NO! (Even though FBI did need it).
FIRE COMEY! ENOUGH!
wordpix
(18,652 posts)xor
(1,204 posts)but then again, you never know these days