Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:52 PM Oct 2016

#PodestaEmails23: WikiLeaks releases new mails from Clinton chair

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by NancyBlueINOklahoma (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Russia Today

The 23rd batch of emails from the account of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, have been published online by WikiLeaks.

More than 36,000 emails from Podesta’s account have been released by the whistleblowing site, which has vowed to publish a total of 50,000 emails before the US presidential election on November 8.

On Saturday, the emails revealed comments from Clinton adviser Neera Tanden, in which she expressed her lack of faith in the Clintons’ judgement, as well as concerns from Hill columnist Brent Budowsky, who has featured prominently in the leaked emails, regarding the suitability of her candidacy.

* * *
In an email exchange between Chelsea Clinton and Podesta released Sunday, the two are writing to arrange a group meeting and go on to discuss technology and security concerns when traveling in China.

Read more: https://www.rt.com/usa/364741-clinton-podesta-emails-released/



Here is a story from Russia Today. I think it illustrates how the Russians are taking a page from Fox News and coupling it with materials gleaned from Russian hackers to push stories that drive the U.S. MSM news narrative. Think of Fox News pushing stories about Acorn, and now you have Russia Today sending out a steady flow of stolen e-mails.

This will ultimately be incorporated into the Trump campaign and U.S. media outlet, but the story that is missing is the rapid coordination between hackers, wikileaks, then the dissemination and editorializing provided by Russia Today for the benefit of the Trump campaign. Russia Today even creates hashtag handles to make sure their followers get the latest round of e-mails that have been disclosed.

Now, if you are holding your breath for Russia Today to release similar materials relating to the Trump campaign, you are in for a long wait.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
#PodestaEmails23: WikiLeaks releases new mails from Clinton chair (Original Post) TomCADem Oct 2016 OP
Russia today is a propaganda outlet financed by Putin. still_one Oct 2016 #1
EXACTLY. Total Russian Propaganda, Which the MSM Will Adopt TomCADem Oct 2016 #7
And Ed Schultz should be excoriated for being part of RT. LiberalFighter Oct 2016 #30
This week is going to be ugly for the Clinton camp meadowlark5 Oct 2016 #2
Gonna be uglier for Trump Loki Liesmith Oct 2016 #3
I hope so meadowlark5 Oct 2016 #5
I am watching with baited breath. Farmgirl1961 Oct 2016 #10
++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one Oct 2016 #13
Yeah, Hillary is going to lose. duffyduff Oct 2016 #4
No meadowlark5 Oct 2016 #6
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #9
Transparent in what way? meadowlark5 Oct 2016 #11
Oh no, a different opinion! ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2016 #14
Russia probably has been holding the best for last. Grey Lemercier Oct 2016 #17
"Did the Clinton camp underestimate their thuggery as well?" molova Oct 2016 #32
I do not know who alerted on this ms liberty Oct 2016 #8
Thank You. Russia Today Is Replete With These Sort of Stories... TomCADem Oct 2016 #12
Trump's plan is working. He has Russia working hand in hand with our own FBI world wide wally Oct 2016 #15
Trump is not that brilliant Grey Lemercier Oct 2016 #18
Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn sometimes world wide wally Oct 2016 #19
yes, but that doesnt mean the blind squirrel masterminded the acorn distribution Grey Lemercier Oct 2016 #20
I wouldn't even claim he "masterminded" it. world wide wally Oct 2016 #21
well, you said it was "Trumps's plan" Grey Lemercier Oct 2016 #22
He always talks about how much Putin likes him and then says, "wouldn't it be nice if the US and world wide wally Oct 2016 #23
lol at your "pay more attention" shade toss Grey Lemercier Oct 2016 #24
You too world wide wally Oct 2016 #25
ooooh, discussing security concerns re: a trip to China, what a scandal! not wordpix Oct 2016 #26
Yawn...Russia is about as creative as the GOP in this election. C Moon Oct 2016 #27
my my ellennelle Oct 2016 #28
to my own points ellennelle Oct 2016 #29
Weak sauce, Julian. GeorgeGist Oct 2016 #31
Don't post RT articles in LBN - locking OKNancy Oct 2016 #33

still_one

(92,190 posts)
1. Russia today is a propaganda outlet financed by Putin.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:56 PM
Oct 2016

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
7. EXACTLY. Total Russian Propaganda, Which the MSM Will Adopt
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:04 PM
Oct 2016

The Clinton campaign e-mails are hacked by Russians, appear on Wikileaks (a third party outlet), then are immediately categorized and distributed through Russia Today.

There are a lot of stories that sort of discuss this in passing reference, but think about how Fox News tried to make something out of President Obama's connections with Saul Alinsky or Reverand Wright. Yet. you have this current and ongoing propaganda effort by a foreign actor, and the media has been fairly muted in its coverage.

My take is the United State MSM ultimately cannot resist the ratings associated with jumping on the RT bandwagon, so watch this RT story get plagiarized by the U.S. media along with same editorializing.

LiberalFighter

(50,912 posts)
30. And Ed Schultz should be excoriated for being part of RT.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 05:39 PM
Oct 2016

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
2. This week is going to be ugly for the Clinton camp
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:57 PM
Oct 2016

Russia probably has been holding the best for last. Unload all of that this week on top of the FBI letter hoping for the kill shot.

I am so disgusted by this. I guess we are the ones thinking more will be dropped on Trump but it's the other way around.

Did we underestimate the thuggery of the whole Trump circle? Did the Clinton camp underestimate their thuggery as well?

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
3. Gonna be uglier for Trump
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:58 PM
Oct 2016

Watch

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
5. I hope so
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:00 PM
Oct 2016

I want something so damning to be dropped on him. He is such a horrible, deceitful, sleazy person - how can there not be something yuge? He must have spent a fortune in non-disclusures on simply everyone he comes in contact with.

Farmgirl1961

(1,493 posts)
10. I am watching with baited breath.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:08 PM
Oct 2016

still_one

(92,190 posts)
13. ++++++++++++++++++++++
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:16 PM
Oct 2016
 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
4. Yeah, Hillary is going to lose.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:00 PM
Oct 2016

You guys are so transparent.

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
6. No
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:03 PM
Oct 2016

But it's not going to be the landslide we all hoped for - especially for the down ballot races.

All of this in and of itself would not rattle me, but the media is no help to the election. Anything that is even the slightest bit controversial in the emails will be combined with the FBI letter and the assholes in the media will blow it up.

Response to meadowlark5 (Reply #6)

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
11. Transparent in what way?
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:10 PM
Oct 2016

Oh I'm a "concern troll"

Oh, maybe I'm being paid to come incite panic on democratic message boards.

Don't read my posts if it causes you such anger and distress.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
14. Oh no, a different opinion!
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:20 PM
Oct 2016

Proceed with your meltdown.

 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
17. Russia probably has been holding the best for last.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:31 PM
Oct 2016

my fear as well

So grateful for the Electoral College.

 

molova

(543 posts)
32. "Did the Clinton camp underestimate their thuggery as well?"
Mon Oct 31, 2016, 12:03 AM
Oct 2016

Don't bash Democratic public figures. It's in the rules.

ms liberty

(8,574 posts)
8. I do not know who alerted on this
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:05 PM
Oct 2016

But they're being ridiculous. Your commentary after the snip makes it clear that the article was NOT posted to criticize HRC or Dems, but to analyze the flow of propaganda. C'mon, people.
BTW, I voted that this post did not break the rules, and that the alerter was not acting in good faith.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
12. Thank You. Russia Today Is Replete With These Sort of Stories...
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:11 PM
Oct 2016

...and I am not going to post them all of them. However, lets not minimize or ignore the fact that the Russians are taking an active role in this election in unprecedented fasion. Russia Today is clearly a propaganda outlet, and its editorial decisions are designed to advance Russian interests. Also, U.S. media outlets facilitate this by jumping on the same narratives advanced by RT.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-u-s-officials-investigating-russias-attempts-to-influence-2016-election/

Intelligence and law enforcement officials are investigating how and to what extent Russia is attempting to influence the United States presidential election, according to a new report.

The Washington Post reported Monday that the new probe is underway with James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, heading the efforts.

“This is something of concern for the DNI,” Charles Allen, a former longtime CIA officer, told the Post. “It is being addressed.”

The move to further investigate Russia’s attempts to influence U.S. politics comes after a series of high-profile hacks into party committee servers as well as state elections systems.

world wide wally

(21,742 posts)
15. Trump's plan is working. He has Russia working hand in hand with our own FBI
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:27 PM
Oct 2016
 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
18. Trump is not that brilliant
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:33 PM
Oct 2016

I profoundly refuse to accept that.

world wide wally

(21,742 posts)
19. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn sometimes
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:39 PM
Oct 2016
 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
20. yes, but that doesnt mean the blind squirrel masterminded the acorn distribution
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:42 PM
Oct 2016

world wide wally

(21,742 posts)
21. I wouldn't even claim he "masterminded" it.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:44 PM
Oct 2016
 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
22. well, you said it was "Trumps's plan"
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:51 PM
Oct 2016


But we are bickering over nothing. We both agree Trump is a fucking threat to world stability, besides the fact he empowers the racist, homophobic, sexist and religious loons who make up 35% plus of the USA.

He and his nazi legions must be CRUSHED.

world wide wally

(21,742 posts)
23. He always talks about how much Putin likes him and then says, "wouldn't it be nice if the US and
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:00 PM
Oct 2016

Russia could work together"
If you have never heard this pay more attention.

 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
24. lol at your "pay more attention" shade toss
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:04 PM
Oct 2016

you just are spoiling for a fight

and I am done

have a good night

world wide wally

(21,742 posts)
25. You too
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:07 PM
Oct 2016

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
26. ooooh, discussing security concerns re: a trip to China, what a scandal! not
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:23 PM
Oct 2016

C Moon

(12,213 posts)
27. Yawn...Russia is about as creative as the GOP in this election.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:24 PM
Oct 2016

ellennelle

(614 posts)
28. my my
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:34 PM
Oct 2016

such fretting, such pearl clutching. fetch the smelling salts!

first of all, wikileaks does NOT solicit specific documents; they only accept whatever anyone sends their way, and even then they vet for authenticity on all of them. and assange has no access to the sources, so even if it was the russians, he would not know.

(plus, fwiw, RT hosts numbers of great progressives, inc. ed schultz, thom hartmann, chris hedges, etc. perspective is a good thing; facts even better.)

the fact that these have all been dem emails does not say anything about assange; he hates both candidates. he must not be getting anything leaked on the GOP, and certainly not on trump. hell, the MSM news on trump is pretty damning, so what would that even look like?

also, while true that the DOJ has a rule not to expose such materials near an election, that is not a rule that applies to wikileaks. that this should not have been released so close to 11/8 is a point that can be made, but it can't be driven, well, anywhere, let alone home.

as for concerns that anyone - even russia! (where are those smelling salts??) - would dare to interfere with american elections is, well, pretty rich. i'm not condoning it, but the fact is, the US has meddled in more international elections than anyone can count, and that includes in the present admin. so for any citizen, even a dem citizen, to complain about this is the height of hypocrisy; US interference in other countries' elections has been rampant for over a half century, under both parties, and it has been done in our name. this is NOT to condone it, i repeat, but we have zero legs to stand on in taking that position.

plus, i can find the counter-argument to the DOJ position against releasing sensitive info near election day pretty compelling. just a minor example: emails in the bush admin planning to punish us attys for not filing voter fraud cases represent the sort of thing i feel should be released. etc.

which brings me to the second point, which is that - hate to break it to you folks, but - these emails and their content appear to be the real deal. they're authentic, and these exchanges and perspectives and opinions and so on all really occurred. period. to complain about the source and their motives is to kill the messenger. to complain about the content as 'unfair' is utter foolishness.

the point is, we need to look at these facts squarely, as they offer us the gift of seeing inside the sausage factory. we always suspected these things go on, but looking at it forces us to accept it and confront it, head on. no more can we sigh and content ourselves with the delusion that this is the sort of thing only republicans do, dems would never stoop so low. who amongst us is still suffering this delusion? seriously; you do so at the peril of the country, as despite how 'minor' these things appear to be compared to what we know the GOP has done ad nauseam, that comparison does not alter the fact that, just for instance, it is WRONG for brazille to have handed HRC a debate question. do not let yourself go there; it spells doom.

but, watch for the elite establishment inside the party to start showing their annoyance with having to face a public that can no longer be led around by that myth. this will force them to be humble and to listen. because, we now have their number. and we damn well better use it.

as for all this email kerfuffle being so close to the election, it looks like it may well backfire in comey's general direction when all he was trying to do apparently was not screw with the outcome, but simply cover his ass wrt more house hearings. i can't say as i blame him on that count, but it looks like he let them get to him. this new data point about chaffetz being involved early on, just makes it all worse, but it's as big a mess on the republican plates as it is the dems. which, of course, makes for great tv. snark.

so, you know, perspective; keep it.

ellennelle

(614 posts)
29. to my own points
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:42 PM
Oct 2016
pete williams with more details.

GeorgeGist

(25,320 posts)
31. Weak sauce, Julian.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 06:46 PM
Oct 2016

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
33. Don't post RT articles in LBN - locking
Mon Oct 31, 2016, 05:20 AM
Oct 2016

The Statement of Purpose for posts in Latest Breaking News

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only.
No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours.
Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=about&forum=1014

RT is not a reputable mainstream site. It is the propaganda arm of the Russian government.
You can repost in GD if you like

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»#PodestaEmails23: WikiLea...