Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

teach1st

(5,935 posts)
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:21 PM Oct 2016

Citing 'obscene' disenfranchisement, federal judge hands Florida Democrats another voting victory

Source: Tampa Bay Times

Calling existing rules "obscene" disenfranchisement, a federal judge in Tallahassee declared late Sunday that Florida must provide a method for voters to fix signature problems that might arise when they vote by mail in the presidential election.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker's ruling was a victory for the Florida Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee, which sued the state Oct. 3 arguing Florida canvassing boards shouldn't immediately reject a ballot if a voter's signature doesn't match the one on file. The state gives voters who forget to sign their mail ballots a chance to fix the problem before Election Day — but doesn't offer voters with mismatched signatures the same opportunity.

Walker opined the "bizarre" double-standard was unconstitutional."

It is illogical, irrational, and patently bizarre for the State of Florida to withhold the opportunity to cure from mismatched-signature voters while providing that same opportunity to no-signature voters," he wrote. "And in doing so, the State of Florida has categorically disenfranchised thousands of voters arguably for no reason other than they have poor handwriting or their handwriting has changed over time."

Read more: http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/citing-obscene-disenfranchisement-federal-judge-hands-florida-democrats/2298409?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Citing 'obscene' disenfranchisement, federal judge hands Florida Democrats another voting victory (Original Post) teach1st Oct 2016 OP
Stuff like this is why people are afraid radical noodle Oct 2016 #1
I have a mail-in ballot teach1st Oct 2016 #2
LOL! I've been wondering if they'd show up at mine too. radical noodle Oct 2016 #4
Be sure to tell the Trump idiot it's how your long dead relatives vote 15 times every year. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2016 #12
I'm sure you know your local rules better than I but Imperialism Inc. Oct 2016 #17
Yes, in Ohio only the Board of Elections can accept mail-in ballots Maeve Oct 2016 #19
Did that in 2008 HockeyMom Oct 2016 #21
Signing a "signature" is a very cultural practice, and this discriminated. Coyotl Oct 2016 #3
I think they mostly look for a difference in the name radical noodle Oct 2016 #6
Who uses their middle name in their signature? LisaL Oct 2016 #7
That was just an example radical noodle Oct 2016 #8
I do. My father and I have the same first and last name. Just the middle name is different. mackdaddy Oct 2016 #10
If you have to go in the polls anyway, why even use an absentee ballot? LisaL Oct 2016 #11
Early voting in Ohio you fill out a really basic 1 page form. mackdaddy Oct 2016 #13
Yea, I would rather vote on machine (with a paper print out) where I don't have to worry LisaL Oct 2016 #14
One correction--all absentee ballots are opened in Ohio Maeve Oct 2016 #20
Some years back I was told I should always use my middle initial in my signature, PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2016 #16
Handwriting DOES change over time.... Hulk Oct 2016 #5
Hell, they're not even teaching cursive in schools now! williesgirl Oct 2016 #9
This is a VOTER victory, a victory for the ELECTORATE. Hortensis Oct 2016 #18
my signature today looks NOTHING mopinko Oct 2016 #22

teach1st

(5,935 posts)
2. I have a mail-in ballot
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:27 PM
Oct 2016

I have a mail-in ballot, but I'm not going to mail it in. Besides, I kinda want to show up at my polling place to see who in my rather red community is doing Trump duty and to laugh at them.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
4. LOL! I've been wondering if they'd show up at mine too.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:34 PM
Oct 2016

Be sure to take your mail-in ballot with you to the polls.

Imperialism Inc.

(2,495 posts)
17. I'm sure you know your local rules better than I but
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 01:42 AM
Oct 2016

here in Ohio if you request a mail-in ballot and then don't send it back and show up in person, you have to vote provisionally.

Maeve

(42,282 posts)
19. Yes, in Ohio only the Board of Elections can accept mail-in ballots
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 07:39 AM
Oct 2016

We can't take them at the polling place and you would have to vote provisionally (and take your mail-in home; we're not even supposed to dispose of it for you!)

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
21. Did that in 2008
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 08:29 AM
Oct 2016

Came back from NY the Monday before election. Early voting was over but the County Board of Elections Office was open. I drove there and handed in my ballot.

Can't do this year. I will be 30,000 miles up in the sky on election day. I only voted once at the Polls in a Florida Republican area. "Lookie here!" "We got ourselves a Democrat!" Poll worker yelled that out. No polling place for me. I can just imagine what this year might be like with Trump supporters.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
3. Signing a "signature" is a very cultural practice, and this discriminated.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:28 PM
Oct 2016

A South American banker needs a very exacting signature, difficult to forge and precisely the same every time. People who write infrequently can't do that if they try.

One wonders where else they are throwing out votes when a signature does not match. How much voter ID info does the "signature judge" have when determining if the person's vote should be discarded? Is the voter informed? Are they counted as having not voted when the next purge rolls along?

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
6. I think they mostly look for a difference in the name
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:37 PM
Oct 2016

If the name shows in the registration as John Robert Doe but the signature on the ballot is John R Doe then they can toss it out. That's what I've been told anyway.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
8. That was just an example
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:41 PM
Oct 2016

but however they did it when they registered is how they expect it on the ballot. It could as easily be John R Doe vs. John Doe. Not everyone remembers how they signed up or even knows it matters.

mackdaddy

(1,527 posts)
10. I do. My father and I have the same first and last name. Just the middle name is different.
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 12:21 AM
Oct 2016

I am not consistent, except on checks where my name is printed.

Sometimes I write out my full middle name, sometimes I just use my middle initial, some time just my first and last if I am in a hurry.

The book at the polls was nice in that I could just go with what they had on file. When I early voted, I could not remember if they had my full first middle name or just the initial on file there. I wrote it out on the application and they took it.

I have had banks and agencies just put my middle initial into the computer, even when I wrote out the whole name also.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
11. If you have to go in the polls anyway, why even use an absentee ballot?
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 12:25 AM
Oct 2016

I could have used an absentee ballot (here you could and you don't need a reason) but I don't want to.

mackdaddy

(1,527 posts)
13. Early voting in Ohio you fill out a really basic 1 page form.
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 12:35 AM
Oct 2016

The BOE office is only a few miles from my home, and I am assured my vote will be counted when I vote on the machine there.

Absentee ballots may not even be opened if the apparent spread it enough, and if there is a problem with the absentee form, my ballot could be spoiled, and I may not even be informed of it.

This way, I know my vote is in the system, will be counted, and that no shenanigans had happened with my registration, and I had time to get my registration fixed if there were problems.

And early voting is really a stress reliever. My part is DONE!

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
14. Yea, I would rather vote on machine (with a paper print out) where I don't have to worry
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 12:39 AM
Oct 2016

that somebody will decide my signature doesn't match.

Maeve

(42,282 posts)
20. One correction--all absentee ballots are opened in Ohio
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 07:48 AM
Oct 2016

Yes, some are rejected, but most count, usually that same night. Provisional ballots have to be checked to make sure it isn't a double vote (if the voter already sent in an absentee ballot or voted early in person) and that it's in the right precinct, things like that. You can check on-line to see when you absentee ballot was sent out, and when it is received (go to your local BOE's website and find 'track my ballot&quot

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,855 posts)
16. Some years back I was told I should always use my middle initial in my signature,
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 12:54 AM
Oct 2016

which struck me as very dumb. But I did it for a number of years. Then, I realized I was actually the only Poindexter Oglethorpe out there (not actually my real name), so I had no need to sign Poindexter R. Oglethorpe.

I almost never use that middle initial, except on serious legal documents, so it's possible to claim my signatures don't match.

But there's another problem in that over the years, the actual signature has changed, somewhat dramatically. I used to write out my full name rather clearly, then it got elided and condensed, and a while back was more or less a Pscribble Oscribble. only more like Pscr Osc. I've since changed it back once again to a fully legible signature, so depending on what I signed when, I have more than one non-matching signature.

Luckily, I live in a state with good early in person voting.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
5. Handwriting DOES change over time....
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:35 PM
Oct 2016

Glad someone in the legal system gives a shit about voters' rights.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
18. This is a VOTER victory, a victory for the ELECTORATE.
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 06:57 AM
Oct 2016

This article does not point out that Democrats are fighting to make one man, one vote a simple reality for everyone, but we should.

mopinko

(70,099 posts)
22. my signature today looks NOTHING
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 09:53 AM
Oct 2016

like the one on the voter rolls. i really should change it one of these sleepy cycles. i signed that thing 35 years ago. i dont even use my full name much any more. i just sign w my initial.

most poll watchers know this. but it does get a lot of petition signatures dumped.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Citing 'obscene' disenfra...