Son of Kansas lawmaker dies on Verrückt slide at Schlitterbahn water park in Kansas City, Kan. Read
Source: Kansas City Star
It was elected officials day Sunday at the Schlitterbahn water park in Kansas City, Kan., and the place teemed with lawmakers and their families, who received free admission and lunch and a day of fun.
But by midafternoon, the joy came to a horrible end when the 10-year-old son of a Kansas state representative from Olathe died on the Verrückt, at 17 stories the tallest water slide in the world.
Caleb Thomas Schwab, a freckled baseball and soccer enthusiast, was the son of Rep. Scott Schwab and his wife, Michele. Hours after the fun and laughter, the Schwabs were being comforted at their home with hugs and kisses from friends and colleagues. One of them was state Sen. Greg Smith, who lost his own daughter, Kelsey, to a murderer in 2007.
Expressions of grief and condolences over Calebs death poured in. The Schwabs issued a statement thanking everyone for their compassion.
Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article94254507.html
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tblue37
(65,340 posts)like that. It just seems so random.
Poor little guy.
Granny M
(1,395 posts)wheniwasincongress
(1,307 posts)how could that happen?!
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)I'm guessing the scenario was similar to that.
I remember seeing videos of that before it opened here on the local news but not sure if they are still available on the interwebs out there.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)it looks like there is netting with some supports holding the netting up over the entire thing? So if someone flew up and out of it like on the video with the dummies, I could see them potentially getting "decapitated" (or at least some major damage) by flying up into the net and supports.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)the news this morning said it was "severe neck injury", and that the kid had somehow gotten off the raft... I guess either the restraints failed or he wasn't properly restrained...
citood
(550 posts)That indicates the entire raft went airborne, and they all hit the net support.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Amusement park accidents are almost always the result of deliberately disobeying safety instructions.
Boomer
(4,168 posts)Systems should never rely on rider obedience to keep them from being decapitated. There will always, always be someone who doesn't follow the rules.
spinbaby
(15,089 posts)There was a minimum age of 14 on that slide.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)bighart
(1,565 posts)Do you think the state legislature forced the park to change the age requirement for this ride?
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)But to address the premise of your question, it is false to assume that deregulation in-and-of-itself forces the park. No.
If (and I do not know if they did, hence the reason I am asking the question), if the state removed a requirement of a minimum age for aquatic slides if one existed (and I do not know if one did), then the park would not be forced to remove the minimum age. They would be allowed to remove it, not required to remove it. But if other parks lowered or removed (freely under deregulation) an age requirement, then the park would feel competitive pressure to lower or remove their own age requirement.
citood
(550 posts)An age limit on a theme park ride is about useless, since most 14 year olds don't carry id. So they changed it to height, like just about every other theme park ride ever. (and weight)
Also, the boy's age had zero, zilch, nada, to do with his death.
Now there are some much larger regulatory issues to look at, dealing with the permitting of the ride in the first place. When this thing first went up, they had a lot of problems with test runs...to the amusement of local news crews which filmed test rafts flying off the ride. So the owner continued his tweeks and testing at night, out of the media spotlight. That sets off alarm bells....but the boy's age - meaningless.
Judi Lynn
(160,527 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)And even if you could I would not want to live in that bubble wrapped, tasteless world.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)in this case. The slide actually had to be rebuilt for safety concerns at a cost of $1M (the sandbags and dummies and the raft were going airborne). There is a fairly narrow band of weight where the three riders must be in. Finally they use Velcro straps to hold the riders in even though this ride is as dangerous as a roller coaster. Sounds like there was a second injury as well.
Ace Rothstein
(3,161 posts)With all the chemicals in the water, the restraints need to be inspected and replaced more frequently.
Kablooie
(18,632 posts)citood
(550 posts)IOW, the entire raft flew up.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)This was not rider negligence at all it seems.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)BigDemVoter
(4,150 posts)NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)From a 2014 report:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/26/travel/worlds-tallest-water-slide/
"He decided to build it himself," Schooley said.
"We have long experience in building water park rides and developing new technology. Our park in Kansas City doesn't have a height restriction so we decided to put it right here."
Emphasis added.
World's tallest water slide finally open
By Astead Herndon, special to CNN
Updated 10:02 AM ET, Fri July 11, 2014
When no one wanted to build the world's tallest and fastest water slide, Jeff Henry built it himself.
So when Verrückt was completed, and it was time to test the 168-foot coaster in his Kansas City, Kansas, water park, the choice of test riders was rather easy.
The guinea pigs: Henry, owner of Schlitterbahn Waterparks and Resorts; Henry's assistant; and head designer John Schooley.
"It was terrifying," Schooley said. "It was great fun, but it was actually terrifying."
The slide finally opened to the public on Thursday, July 10, after several weeks of delays. Technical glitches forced the original May 23 opening date to be pushed back three times, a park spokesperson said.
citood
(550 posts)The real differentiating factor is the second hill. No other mega waterslide has this, and it is where rafts flew off in testing...and where this boy died.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)That was a very new slide? A slide using net on top and the net supports always looked like an instant death if anyone managed to make contact.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Count me out. I'd have an acrophobia meltdown before I ever got into that raft.
The rafts now have seat with velcro straps, so it's less dangerous that this video.
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)...as opposed to the Nanny State water park across the State Line in Missouri.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Down the chute behind the raft so I imagine the restraint failed. There was another report from another rider earlier that her restraint came undone at the end of the ride.
I'm just speculating but I wonder since the 2other riders on the raft were also injured if the raft went airborne and hit the netting and the seatbelt on the boy failed launching him out of the raft.
This is horrible. My grandson is 12 and s big kid, 5'4" and he loves rides but there are a few we don't let him ride. I can't watch him on some of them, he's always the kid with his hands up in the air.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)Probably need enough weight to keep the raft weighted down and on the water slide. How can people loading the ride be sure they are getting the correct weight? And another rider talking about feeling like she was leaving her seat because the restraints were not tight enough. Sounds like a badly designed ride.
Very sad for that family. Out for a day of fun and your whole world changes in an instant
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)and then again at the top. They are matched into groups by weight (so no raft with a group of kids -- they split them up).