Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jade3000

(238 posts)
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 06:02 PM Jun 2012

Lieberman Proposes Special Counsel for Leaks Probe

Source: Associated Press & ABC News

Sen. Joe Lieberman says there should be a special counsel to look into allegations that the administration has leaked information on a U.S.-Israeli cyber-warfare campaign against Iran's nuclear program and other classified activities.

The Connecticut Independent also said President Barack Obama should instruct anybody on his staff involved in such leaks to come forward and that the president should himself be interviewed by investigators.

Both Democrats and Republicans have criticized apparent leaks about the cyber-warfare initiative, on Obama's selection of targets for counterterrorism assassination plots and the mission that killed Osama Bin Laden.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/lieberman-proposes-special-counsel-leaks-probe-16590594#.T95TBrX2ZLc

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lieberman Proposes Special Counsel for Leaks Probe (Original Post) jade3000 Jun 2012 OP
Whatever else happens, this creep is gone. Faygo Kid Jun 2012 #1
Exactly dylan33 Jun 2012 #2
Where was all that GOP love in 2000? zbdent Jun 2012 #8
He will still be around. hrmjustin Jun 2012 #17
I'll never forget the golden chance to get rid of him in '06 Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #40
Shouldn't acts of war be public knowledge, Lieberman? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #3
Shouldn't he have been concerned about war crimes zbdent Jun 2012 #9
What i've figured out about Lieberman... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #14
Be easier for your adminstration dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #4
Proving once again that he shouldn't be caucusing with the Democrats. pnwmom Jun 2012 #5
Why would they need a spy quakerboy Jun 2012 #26
Who is putting cash in Joe's hand this time? nineteen50 Jun 2012 #6
Years ago I had respect for Joe, but in the asjr Jun 2012 #7
The strange thing is that those calling for a special counsel to investigate the leaks are spreading JDPriestly Jun 2012 #10
Whitewater II, coming soon to an election near you! Dustlawyer Jun 2012 #11
I wouldn't doubt for a moment that impeachment is their "backup plan" davidpdx Jun 2012 #16
i am betting oldhippydude Jun 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author oldhippydude Jun 2012 #13
My email to his office sharp_stick Jun 2012 #15
When will he finally be out of the Senate? JDPriestly Jun 2012 #28
Next January, right after the lame duck session sharp_stick Jun 2012 #35
Lieberman is a mofo traitor Special Prosciuto Jun 2012 #18
He should be caught The Wizard Jun 2012 #19
I'm obviously new here, but USD79 Jun 2012 #20
One is certainly needed for the Murdoch empire, not here though Kingofalldems Jun 2012 #27
Obama's Attorney General's office is already bipartisan because when Obama took office, JDPriestly Jun 2012 #29
Here's what's behind the wingnut outrage Zorro Jun 2012 #21
But it seems to me that a third country could easily figure out that the US would have developed JDPriestly Jun 2012 #30
Whaaa? Is that just a guess on your part or...? Poll_Blind Jun 2012 #36
I have my sources Zorro Jun 2012 #38
Fuck you LIeberman. The sooner this pos is out the better for the country and the Democratic party. still_one Jun 2012 #22
On January 3, 2013, Joe LIEberman will NO LONGER be a US Senator. Dawson Leery Jun 2012 #23
That's not soon enough for me. BlueMTexpat Jun 2012 #32
I think the Justice Department should get the The Second Stone Jun 2012 #24
Fuck you, Lieberasshole. Zoeisright Jun 2012 #25
Nobody cares what you say any more, Traitor Joe. You're a "dead man walking". MjolnirTime Jun 2012 #31
Hmm, okay, then we get one on a Republican mess, like torture, ... Festivito Jun 2012 #33
Joe's has the reputation as being a pipeline of US govt secrets SDjack Jun 2012 #34
Joe never disappoints BootinUp Jun 2012 #37
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #39
I wish Lieberman would get probed Arugula Latte Jun 2012 #41
Traitor Joe can go to hell ronwelldobbs Jun 2012 #42
Hey Joe, what about Valerie Plame? Citizen Worker Jun 2012 #43

Faygo Kid

(21,478 posts)
1. Whatever else happens, this creep is gone.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 06:03 PM
Jun 2012

And to think Gore put him a heartbeat from the presidency. Take your wealth and get lost, Joe.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
8. Where was all that GOP love in 2000?
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 06:47 PM
Jun 2012

If he would have announced that he was going to be a Republican lite, that should have endeared him to the nutjobs.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
40. I'll never forget the golden chance to get rid of him in '06
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 12:37 PM
Jun 2012

and certain people in the party (and on DU) completely kneecapped the liberal Dem nominee...You knew the fix was in when even the GOP put their unofficial support behind Lieberman

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
9. Shouldn't he have been concerned about war crimes
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 06:48 PM
Jun 2012

when he was surgically attaching his lips to Bush's a$$?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
14. What i've figured out about Lieberman...
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 07:19 PM
Jun 2012

Is that like the majority of American "Israel supporters," his primary concern is making sure Arabs (or in this case, Iranians) die or are otherwise "punished" for existing, and "pro-Israel" is just a cover for that.

Thus it stands to reason that he'll get his knackers in a twist when an act of espionage against Iran is exposed, rather than getting upset by the act itself.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
5. Proving once again that he shouldn't be caucusing with the Democrats.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 06:19 PM
Jun 2012

That's always been a fiction. Maybe he's a spy for the other side?

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
26. Why would they need a spy
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 10:17 PM
Jun 2012

When they can just illegally steal data from computers and tap phones and whatnot.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. The strange thing is that those calling for a special counsel to investigate the leaks are spreading
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 06:49 PM
Jun 2012

the information about the leaks faster than anyone.

I can imagine that foreign countries are just as capable of electronic espionage that does not require a leaker as we are.

When were there more leaks than in the Bush administration and most of them initiated by Bush and Cheney themselves.

I am a strong supporter of Israel, but even I sometimes wonder what country Lieberman represents in our Congress.

oldhippydude

(2,514 posts)
12. i am betting
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 07:11 PM
Jun 2012

that some Dominionist bible thumper on the committee leaked it...anybody heard from Michelle Bachman lately?

Response to jade3000 (Original post)

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
35. Next January, right after the lame duck session
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:48 AM
Jun 2012

he's decided to "focus on his family" instead of running for re-election. The fact that he's probably as despised as any politician could be in the State has nothing to do with it.

Last time this scumbag snuck in as an Independent because CT doesn't have a sore loser law and the CT puke party abandoned their candidate to support him.

I was really hoping he'd try running again, it would have been a lot of fun to work against him.

 

USD79

(15 posts)
20. I'm obviously new here, but
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:53 PM
Jun 2012

boy, I think a special counsel would be beneficial to Obama. It removes controversy, suspicion and is in step with his campaign promise of transparency. Why the concern about one here?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
29. Obama's Attorney General's office is already bipartisan because when Obama took office,
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 12:27 AM
Jun 2012

unlike recent presidents that preceded him, did not fire pretty much all of Bush's appointees.

And Obama has already appointed a lawyer from the Attorney General's office to investigate and prosecute the person or people responsible for the leaks.

Obama has been harder on leakers than the presidents that preceded him.

Obama can be trusted to be dispassionate and fair in this. He probably wants to find the source of the leaks more than anyone. The leaks were not done to help him, but rather to embarrass him, and the Republicans in Congress are trying to use the leaks to further embarrass Obama.

Personally, I think that the disclosures about the cyber-spying on Iran and Israel may have come from a foreign country.

Zorro

(15,740 posts)
21. Here's what's behind the wingnut outrage
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:55 PM
Jun 2012

They believe the Flame virus was developed by the Israelis, who informed the Obama administration.

The administration then leaked information about the virus, thus compromising national security and betraying Israeli trust in an attempt to both placate the Muslims and manage the growing threat of an Israeli strike against Iran.

They're trying to drive a wedge between US-Israel relations, claim that Obama betrayed the country, and affect Obama's fundraising efforts with the Jewish community. Thus Lieberman's proposal for a special counsel; Republicants and their toadies really want to make political hay out of a very sensitive situation.

That's what they're up to.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
30. But it seems to me that a third country could easily figure out that the US would have developed
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 12:29 AM
Jun 2012

the virus (assuming we did) and that it would serve the interests of a third country to publicize that fact just to show that they had adequate computer competence to figure it out. Seems a little obvious that the US would be very interested in doing what was done with that code.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
24. I think the Justice Department should get the
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 09:55 PM
Jun 2012

FBI to conduct an investigation. If it appears that the White House was the source of it, then a special council should be appointed. But we also need to consider all the other sources that this might have come from.

It's been obvious for some time that Stutnex was either Israeli or US or both. Correctly using Flame, with many of the same components would probably require the same authors to master it, at least for about 5 years after it has been studied and captured.

I don't care for Joe Lieberman at all. But this one time I do not think he is out of line. The fact that he wasn't all over the Valerie Plame leaks the same way demonstrates to me that his real loyalties are with the Republicans. But I thought that right after the Lewinsky affair.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
33. Hmm, okay, then we get one on a Republican mess, like torture, ...
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 05:20 AM
Jun 2012

FBI failure to look at fifth 9/11 hijacker's computer
Raiding of Jack Anderson widow's house
Non-release of JFK information by CIA
...
whatever.
A trade is okay.

Response to jade3000 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lieberman Proposes Specia...