Sanders: 'Do Not Moan To Me About Hillary Clinton's Problems'
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by LostOne4Ever (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: The Hill
May 11, 2016, 12:31 pm
Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders on Wednesday rejected the notion that his attacks on rival Hillary Clinton provide fodder to Donald Trump as he pivots toward the general election.
During an interview with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell, Sanders huffed at the idea that Clinton is struggling to stay afloat as she deflects attacks in the primary from Sanders and Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.
"Oh, really? Andrea, in every state that we have won, in 19 states, we have had to take on the entire Democratic establishment. We have had to take on senators and governors and mayors and members of Congress, so please do not moan to me about Hillary Clinton's problems," Sanders said.
He continued to say, as he has in the past, that he will "fight for every last vote that we can get."
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/279537-sanders-do-not-moan-to-me-about-hillary-clintons-problems
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,381 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)matt819
(10,749 posts)The raised voice thing is so 2004: Howard Dean.
Grumpy old man: John McCain.
Surely you can do better than that. Or, better yet, don't even try.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)They lost their bids to become President.
cali
(114,904 posts)His donor list and ten million voters make that a certainty.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)IamMab
(1,359 posts)coffeeAM
(180 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)New Math!
IamMab
(1,359 posts)"Influential"
George II
(67,782 posts)Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)I think he's frittering away his chance to have a major voice at the convention.
He has a lot of power now, but as Clinton gets closer and closer to locking the nomination that power dissolves.
Certainly he and his delegates will have a voice at the convention. But their voice will not be near as loud as the millions Clinton will save by not having to contest the nomination.
Just by stopping his campaign Sanders gives Clinton a multi million dollar campaign contribution. That type of money inspires gratitude.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)By staying in the race, Bernie collects more pledged delegates. This translates directly into influence at the convention. Were Sanders to drop out now, that would cut into that influence. Which is, I strongly suspect, exactly why clinton supporters are demanding he do so.
Second, you illustrate very nicely a big problem that Sanders supporters have been pointing out, and which Clinton supporters exemplify - the corrupting power of money in politics. You are arguing that your candidate's favor can be bought, literally bought, with an exchange of money. You further argue as if wealth is the only critical factor in Democratic politics, that the only important thing is preserving and expanding Clinton's bank account.
reACTIONary
(5,781 posts)..... it takes money to run in the general and money to run in the primary, and any money saved in the primary goes to winning the general. Sanders is depriving the Democratic nominee of much need funds for the general election by running a dead end, vain-glorious campaign.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Maybe instead of trying to pad your candidate's already very full bank account, you ought to be trying to pad her voter numbers for the general.
Pro tip - don't demand money and talk like money is the only important thing. That polls poorly.
reACTIONary
(5,781 posts)... a pro is someone who gets paid for her efforts. And pros are needed to run a winning campaign. So the money is important. And at this point sanders is wasting our resources . .. money, time, and effort.... that would now be better applied by the Democrat nominee against her republican opponent.
And for what? What is to be gained?
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)oh well? What can you do?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Andrea Mitchell's husband, Alan Greenspan, was appointed by Clinton to the Fed.
Andrea Mitchell should not be trying to put Bernie down. We like Bernie the way he is.
He is a moral man, unlike the corrupt Clintons.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Perhaps, it takes a raised voice to get attention when the press and the elite in your status quo Party and many state parties are trying to silence you.
snort
(2,334 posts)and haggard Hillary wasn't so shrill. It hurts my ears. She needs to tone it down.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)But keep trying!
tom_kelly
(962 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)and the people with pitchforks standing behind him calling names and making babies cry?
I mean really, hyperbole much? Why bother interviewing him if MSNBC only wants their talking heads to speak?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)All I saw was Andrea whining for Hillary and I wanted to know if she served cheese and crackers with that.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Andrea trying to get her talking point out that Senator Sanders is hurting Hillary.
Hillary is hurting Hillary, no one else is.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)stands up for himself. Hillary's a big girl. She can fend for herself.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)wanna talk about condescending too?
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Izzat anything like the "shrill voice" baloney???
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)just sayin
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)But the Clinton side seems to do it quite often making me wonder if they have a special tool to do that. I wonder why it's so important.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)children. But some seem to really like the wealthy. Envy I guess, or maybe they want to be liked badly. I have to break it but the Oligarchy doesn't give a crap about those that blindly follow.
Kingofalldems
(38,485 posts)It's really nonsense.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,485 posts)The post is ridiculous though. Leave the damn thing up then.
George II
(67,782 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)I guess you didn't get one?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7823234
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The reality is that it was probably less....even much less.
Certainly not enough time to read the post, or watch the video.
I don't believe there is a special tool that can do this.
For someone to do this regularly, they have to sit on the GD: Primary menu page, and constantly hit refresh until a post that looks pro-Bernie is posted, then immediately respond with a prepared non-sequitur one liner insult, and quickly hit post.
This does not require any special tool, but anyone who does this may qualify as one.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,212 posts)Get off his lawn Andrea
merrily
(45,251 posts)similar comments about Hillary--who, just for the record, is six years younger than Sanders and looks a lot less healthy than he does.
If we say anything negative about her behavior, it's supposedly sexist, but you can make a comment like that? .
LiberalArkie
(15,729 posts)someone good who is younger than me. Please Gen Xers and Yers and Millennials, get into politics so we have someone to vote for.
Edit: What happened to our thing of "don't vote for anyone over 30" geez.
reACTIONary
(5,781 posts).... anyone over 30. You don't have to trust someone to vote for 'em.
hamsterjill
(15,224 posts)Attacks like this on EITHER candidate are disgusting to me.
One cannot help one's age. Bernie is as old as he is, and Hillary is as old as she is.
I don't like body shaming either.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Last night watching CNN, she turned to me and said, "what an angry old man he is."
I had to agree.
peace13
(11,076 posts)Being a woman who has to defend her record is 'being attacked'. Such double standards. What Bernie said is solid. And here he is defending himself against the press as well. Hillary has money flowing in and the press defending her and now they ask him to stand down to make her life easier. As Bernie said, they are all candidates and need to speak for themselves! They all have a place in this race!
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Not Hillary.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)hurt feelings. Last I heard this is still a Primary, regardless how inconvenient that may be.
Not ONE WORD about how she's done this to herself. Right up to an including that, um, Foundation.
Qutzupalotl
(14,331 posts)he/she wouldn't have been able to dis the OP with post 1. Priorities.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I would much rather have a snarling, snapping watchdog than one that plays dead at someone elses command. If Hill can handle those 3AM phone calls, she ought to easily be able to deal with a guy who uses HER OWN words to show her phoniness!
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)A good one, Plucketeer!
Response to liberal N proud (Reply #22)
frylock This message was self-deleted by its author.
brush
(53,871 posts)and still persists.
He knows he's way behind in delegates and it's laughable that super delegates will switch to him so his comment, "Don't tell me about Hillary Clinton's problems" shows he's all about himself, and shows him to be mean-spirited as well.
He's used the Dem party to run and now that he's lost doesn't want to fold it up and join the rest of the party in fighting Trump.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)as we've been telling you that for a long time. Demanding we quit the race before the end and "join" you in supporting someone that supports the very principles we are fighting is audacious.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)general election mode.
The entire Dem party should join in the fight against a repug winning the presidency.
It's starting to look like Sanders cares nothing about that, only about his Quixotic run, of which he has no chance, btw.
You have to know that.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Hillary stuck around into June. I'm sure you were plenty upset and clutched all your pearls over that behavior.
brush
(53,871 posts)We need all hands on deck to fight Trump.
He's already in general election mode and we're still battling each other, even though Sanders has no chance of winning the nomination.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)And the BS supporters are completely lost on that. Or are they?
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)You are telling me that Hillary needs more time to beat a horrible person like Trump than Obama needed to beat the seemingly more sensible and easier to vote for John McCain. That says a lot about your views on Hillary and her ability to campaign. Trump is a walking advertisement against himself and you think Hillary needs an additional month and a half over what Obama got on McCain in 2008.
Perhaps she isn't the right candidate if that's the case.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)scientist to get that.
And btw, you should maybe do some research on Sanders' Marxist, Trotskyite, Sandinista praising background.
He wouldn't be such a strong candidate by the time the repugs get through with running ads 24/7 with that stuff.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)You just made everything else typed with your stubby little sausages inconsequential.
brush
(53,871 posts)Take your head out of the sand.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)You do realize he has pushed Democratic principles and voted with the Democrats consistently, right? But you are right, I do expect that Republicans would go there. See post #128.
brush
(53,871 posts)his supporters who may not be aware of what the repugs had in store for him.
You seem knowledgeable so I'm sure you already knew this.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)You are way behind the curve on that one and not nearly as prolific as some of your fellow Hillary supporters. Your game needs work but I am sure you will get there.
brush
(53,871 posts)It consists of making a false and/or groundless accusation that some person has Trotskyite or Marxist ties, etc.
In Sanders' case it is not false so I was not red baiting.
And no I don't think I'm the first but when Sanders supporters claim Clinton will be such a weak candidate against Trump, it needs to be pointed out that he has substantial baggage in his background that will come out.
And if the repugs do bring this out, it won't be red baiting either since it would be true.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Can you point them out, Sen McCarthy?
brush
(53,871 posts)The following is a pull quote from the article:
"Sanders served as an elector for the Socialist Workers Party, which was founded on the principles of Leon Trotsky."
There are several other links too.
This stuff can't be a secret to you. It's not to the repugs.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Anybody over 40 needs to get over the Cold War.
brush
(53,871 posts)Come on, you can't do better than that?
That's why Sanders is losing with all the millennial support. They don't vote that much.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Fucking. Idiots.
brush
(53,871 posts)The repugs could use that material and Koch million and make it so shocking because it's not known by many Sanders supporters or other dems, not to mention repugs and indies. Running 24/7 they would make Sanders the worst boogey man to come along ever.
The anti-Dukakis "Willie Horton", anti-Goldwater "Daisy" and the anti-Kerry "swift boat" attack ads would look like a day in the park compared to what they would do to Sanders.
It won't happen though because Sanders won't get the nomination.
I hope he continues his movement though and helps get dems elected in 2018, because he sure isn't helping any in 2016 with all the millions his campaign brags constantly about raising.
frylock
(34,825 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)Hammers and sickles, Kremlin parades with trucked missiles rolling past, a voice over intoning about Sanders honeymoon in Moscow, and the socialist workers party association, the Sandinista/Nicaraugua/Castro/Cuban praise oh they would go town with that stuff scare the shit out of everyone away from Sanders.
So don't think he's made of teflon. That stuff would stick.
frylock
(34,825 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)The Republicans have branded EVERY Democratic candidate since FDR as a "Socialist", and they will do it to Hillary too.
I stopped worrying about "What will the Republicans do?" a long time ago.
Republicans are going to be Republicans,
and say do what Republicans say and do.
They are predictable.
Neither you nor Hillary can stop that.
Get used to it.
Its what they do.
Instead. PLAN for it.
brush
(53,871 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)She's withstood 25 years of attacks from Republicans, but a few short months of Sanders' campaign is what's going to finally topple her?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)It IS about convincing the American voters that she is dishonest and untrustworthy, and as you know, her negatives in this area are already sky high.
Your 25 year argument have some merit had Hillary stopped giving them more ammunition every time she opens her mouth.......but, sadly, she hasn't.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Hillary is an awful candidate. She doesn't have any new ideas. There really isn't much to her candidacy other than her machine.
KPN
(15,650 posts)at least 1999 when she bought a home in New York state.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)care less about her problems too.
You are mistaking grouchy for just being annoyed by people who live their life as if they are privileged.
Not grouchy, just don't give a flying rat's ass.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)her campaign and personal wealth but also the Capitalists love the cheap prison labor (read slave labor) and it helps drive down wages. And she is all about low wages ala her keeping the min wage substantially below a living wage. The corporations love her.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Link?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)campaign? LOL. And here's what Black Lives Matters thinks about Hillary:
by Black Lives Matter Activist Ashley Williams:
The 1994 Crime Bill that she so vigorously defended not only expanded incarceration, but stripped funding for college education from prisoners. The Clinton legacy allowed for policies that prevented anyone convicted of a felony drug offense from receiving food stamps or income assistance. Clinton-led welfare reform fundamentally ripped apart the social safety net.
Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton's efforts to push these policies resulted in the continued destruction of Black communities and the swift growth of our mass incarceration crisis.
Full prisons make profits for Prisons For Profits who in turn show their appreciation to the Clintons via cash.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Without the link, how do I know that you didn't put it together?
It is just about integrity of the attack you want to make against the presumptive nominee.
questionseverything
(9,660 posts)the sun will rise tomorrow and i don't feel that needs a link either
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Rhetoric only believed by Bernie's supporters and right wing pundits?
Can't back it up, I don't believe it.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Nothing to back it up
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)invisible, yet he's killing it, and every time he gets on TV they ask him about either Hillary or Trump. That grumpy old man thing is just another meme, in a campaign full of memes.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)corp profits at the expense of the poor? Clinton followers?
Congrats on getting the number one response. Someone will be very proud. Do you guys have a special tool for doing that?
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)Don't let them know about "The Special Tool"!!!!!!!!
That rates up there with LogoGate ... you know the secret code in Hillary's logo that was the 1st stick up asses last year.
frylock
(34,825 posts)That's the special tool that the utilize.
MADem
(135,425 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Nope, still sounds about right.
Ned Flanders
(233 posts)Just as bad as misogyny.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)I make up my own mind!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)a media shill who's in the tank for HRC does not = grumpy old man
If HRC can't take the heat, too bad. Meanwhile, Mrs. Greenspan can stick it
Akicita
(1,196 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)As far as the age thing, being of the silver crowd, I don't see it as agism either.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)She's a very weak candidate and she hasn't earned enough pledged delegates to boot Bernie out.
She needs 2383 pledged delegates to win the nomination.
She hasn't been able to do that.
Bernie is right. That's not his problem.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)Hillary was 300,000 votes ahead of Barack Obama in 2008, and only a few dozen pledged delegates behind, when she conceded to him in 2008.
Bernie Sanders is 3 million votes and 287 delegates behind Hillary Clinton, and he's vowing a contested convention. In 2008, Hillary, in the name of unity and out of love for her country, conceded (when she had a far better argument for a contested convention than Bernie will ever have), rallied her supporters around Barack Obama, and even nominated him from the convention floor.
And in that place where she stood and demonstrated what grace and patriotism look like, Bernie will stand there yelling and demanding that Superdelegates overturn the will of the voters.
How nasty and selfish.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)2383 is the number. PERIOD.
You get 2383 in pledged delegates and you become the nominee.
We have that number for a reason. We need a strong nominee. If the nominee is strong, they'll reach 2838 before the convention. If not, the race continues. To the convention, possibly.
The Supers can get Clinton to that number--but only at the Convention.
We'll see what happens.
global1
(25,270 posts)as it was her statement on coal (her mouth) that got her in trouble. Then she showed herself again - how she says what she thinks people want to hear - when she tried to recover from her first statement.
She's her own worst enemy. She shot herself in the foot in WV.
No need for any complicated analysis here. This is the kind of thing that will propel Trump into the WH unless the establishment Dems realize that perhaps Bernie is best positioned to beat Trump in the GE.
She's a flawed candidate that has too many skeletons in her closet - real or RW contrived - it doesn't matter. This loss of hers in WV didn't happen because of any RW attack or FBI investigation or a Bernie Sanders still in the race. She did it all on her own.
At the beginning of this primary process she marched through the South very soundly. She should have won WV as well as it is part of that South - but she lost very soundly instead. Sorry here folks - she beat herself. That's the hard cold reality.
I want a Dem in the WH in 2017 in the worse way. How can we make that happen? We need to get it together. We need to make it happen - be it Hillary, Bernie or someone else - the Dems need to stop Trump now because the Repugs are circling the wagons and coming together.
These Repug talks that are coming up are to figure out how the Repug Party will deal with Trump to allow him to be the mouthpiece - the figurehead - in order to feed his ego as that's what he's really seeking. They - the establishment Repugs - are set out to wrestle away the real control of this country from Trump and work in the background.
peace13
(11,076 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)Taking her "rightful place" on the throne of the Clinton-Bush Dynasty!
?quality=80&w=635
angrychair
(8,733 posts)While she was close, by the time she dropped out, ALL OF THE PRIMARY AND CAUCUSES WERE OVER and PBO had already flipped the SuperDelegates he needed from her side. She truly had no path forward at that point.
It had nothing to do with being "gracious" or "honorable". It was honestly and truly over.
Since we still have primary and caucus contest ongoing, this contest is not over. It really is that simple.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)She needs 2,383 delegates to win the nomination, just like Bernie.
She - and no one - is required to have 2,383 pledged delegates.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)until the Convention.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)It is just plain silly to rationalize what votes count - regarding just Hillary.
Why exactly do we have primaries? To determine no one can win?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)But she winning though...
IamMab
(1,359 posts)Worse than weak?
Gary 50
(382 posts)A miracle? Fighting the entire Democratic party establishment and the media and still winning 19 states so far. Polling much stronger against Drumpf than Hillary who may very well lose to the short fingered vulgarian. Is that weak? Seems nearly superhuman to me.
frylock
(34,825 posts)IamMab
(1,359 posts)suddenly demanding Clinton deliver. She's following the same path Obama did on his way to his successful election.
It just sticks in the craw of certain voters that their candidate didn't attract broad support and failed to win a majority of votes in this democracy they claim to love but secretly despise because they lose all the time.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Familiarize yourself with the concept of the underdog.
NewImproved Deal
(534 posts)Let's hope that killing the Democratic Party isn't among them.
[link:|
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)propagating the RWNJ attacks!
KPN
(15,650 posts)Downright disingenuous.
840high
(17,196 posts)a Clinton supporter - "She brought most of this on herself."
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)than Democrats. it making more and more sense as it goes along!
MADem
(135,425 posts)the general.
This isn't conspiracy theorizing, either--it's exit polling.
Since Trump has the nomination sewed up, they're mischief-making. They want Trump going up against the weaker candidate, and they've said as much.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/donald-trump-supporters-boost-bernie-sanders-west-virginia-n571791
A third of those who voted in West Virginia's Democratic primary say they plan to back Trump in November, according to NBC News exit polls. Sanders won those voters by a wide margin.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)It's been that way for both her and Bill's entire combined political careers. Whenever something goes wrong for them, it's someone else's fault. Whenever they face criticism, it's a conspiracy, or the critic is bad and evil. They bear no responsibility for any wrong done under their offices. They bear no responsibility for their own words, their own actions, or their own decisions. Every failing related to the Clintons is always, always due to someone else infringing upon their perfection.
Gosh.
I can see why you support them. Absolute perfection in all areas must be hard to beat. And they're such victims, these flawless beings who want only to share their paradisical utopia with the rest of us, but eternally stymied by low-bred non-thinkers and jealous rivals!
frylock
(34,825 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Nothing concrete to offer though, just the rhetoric
snort
(2,334 posts)But but but, Hillaryyyyyyy. Poor thing has to compete for the Presidency. Mean old grumpy Bernie not nice!
DrBulldog
(841 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)strong she not be allowed to do this--and certainly not without at least making a disclosure of her conflicts. I have no respect for this kind of "journalist' whatsoever.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Oh so stupid it HURTS!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)You would think most of these people have never seen a campaign between two candidate before. Or that trump is the only politician smart enough to use what is said about a candidate in the primary against a GE candidate. Think about that 3 AM phone call and then whine some more.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)Poor Hillary. that's all I can say without risking being called sexist !
Bernie is campaigning. Andrea couldn't be more transparent. Wonder how Andrea felt when Hillary's peeps went after Bernie's civil rights record - maybe that was OK because .... well I really don't know why that was OK.
Bernie is 100% correct on this one.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)green light now to start using man-baby's term "lying Crooked Hillary".
Selfish is all u can use 2 describe Bern now. He is only hurting himself and looking more and more foolish!
KPN
(15,650 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)And Bernie is strong.
The media asking Bernie if he could lay off because he's making it harder for Hillary? Lmao poor thing am I right?!
She wants to be President of the United States and can't take the heat of the primaries?
Trump doesn't need anyone's help either when it comes to slurring and smearing opponents. He'll make shit up and use truths. Use them both simultaneously enough and people can't tell the difference.
Poor Hillary. Can't handle the Bern. It's too hot! How the fuck would she handle Trump if Bernie is too much?
Response to retrowire (Reply #29)
Name removed Message auto-removed
thereismore
(13,326 posts)to help with my $$.
peace13
(11,076 posts)But it's so hard on Hillary..... let me play you this! Andrea is earning every nickel the hard way!
Akicita
(1,196 posts)them. Always has been.
pengu
(462 posts)He should fight for every vote he can get. He should fight for every policy concession he can get.
KPN
(15,650 posts)A man who speaks with honesty and courage. A man who dares to speak the truth.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)evillemike2009
(13 posts)Mrs Greenspan's EP forces her to talk with Bernie - she hates that - and so suddenly every question is about Hillary.
MSNBC sux.
truthisfreedom
(23,155 posts)Go Bernie! Give 'em hell!
TxGrandpa
(124 posts)drokhole
(1,230 posts)...the Democratic establishment, but the leviathan that is the establishment mainstream media. Exhibit: A. Mitchell.
djean111
(14,255 posts)This bullshit about Hillary already being "vetted" - yeah, okay, it does not make the baggage more palatable. Who cares, really, how Hillary feels about, copying Obama's little shoulder brushing thing - it is what voters who are hearing things for the very first time think of the baggage that is important. Not Hillary's feelings. Oh, and her stint as SOS was not vetted.
mac56
(17,574 posts)It's OK If A Republican Does It.
May be time for a new one. IOKIACDI.
It's OK If A Clinton Does It.
xocet
(3,873 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)the beatings I gave HIM!"
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)is somehow responsible interrupting Hillary's coronation...
Maybe she's still seething over Bernie ripping her husband a new one during a House Committee on Financial Services hearing.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Wonder where he is, probably laying on a beach somewhere basking in the glow of having been right behind Bernie as he took down Mr. Andrea Mitchell.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)And it was a collective look reflected back to us as Bernie metaphorically took Greenbacks over his knee and gave him a public spanking.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Time to go away. Wait, that was last month. Still time to go away.
mac56
(17,574 posts)For God's sake, quit now before you win any more primaries.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Delegate math - an inconvenient truth for the Sanders crowd.
His "wins" now are actually meaningless.
mac56
(17,574 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)Ds don't want Sanders. They don't want him in the millions.
And Sanders' CA primary director quit today. That says something.
mac56
(17,574 posts)On the other hand, proving absolutely nothing is what your team excels at.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Just as the proof is in the votes Sanders is NOT getting and the delegates he is NOT winning.
Enjoy your day!
Fla Dem
(23,758 posts)That 56% to BS's 43%.
HRC has won 1,717 pledge delegates to BS's 1437.
She has 501 unpledged delegates to BS's 41.
HRC has a total of 2218 delegates to the 2383 needed for the nomination.
HRC is winning in every facet of the primary process.
There is no path for BS to win the nomination mathematically or otherwise..
But by all means stay in the race.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Don't ask me how.
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)If she can't stand up to criticism she should go back to the Goldman Sachs boardroom.
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mac56
(17,574 posts)glowing
(12,233 posts)Doing exactly what she claims she isn't...
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)Will she have to eat the deposit?
desmiller
(747 posts)Hillary's a big girl. Let her handle her own problems.
matt819
(10,749 posts)If Clinton supporters are so confident of their candidate, why do they feel the need to bash Sanders. After all, Hillary's a lock, isn't she?
But, no, they can't seem to stop. Bash Sanders. Grumpy old man. Loud. Interrupts. Old hippie, how sweet. Now go away and let our candidate be annointed. That was her plan in 2008 with that AA whippersnapper. Who did Obama think he was, anyway? Gotta fight that one to the end, regardless of how it turns out. I guess what's OK for Hillary, and for the Clintons generally, is all that matters and applies only to Hillary.
And if we said the same things about Hillary - old (after all, 69 is not much younger than 74), loud, scolding, contemptuous - we'd be accused of being sexist, misogynist, downright rude.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I can't wait for the convention to be behind us.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)facing climate change, corruption, social challenges requires someone who can inspire the whole country to get right to work on our infrastructure, and will not invest in stupid wars.
We do not have the LUXURY to spend our attention, money or time on people with so much personal baggage. The oceans are literally dying and forests up North in Canada are on fire, it is simply INSANITY to vote for someone who has such a poor record in dealing with crises--and who cannot even manage a secure email account, it's time to get real.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)""Oh, really? Andrea, in every state that we have won, in 19 states, we have had to take on the entire Democratic establishment. We have had to take on senators and governors and mayors and members of Congress, so please do not moan to me about Hillary Clinton's problems," Sanders said. "
Well said, good sir....
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Post removed
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Bravo.
elfin
(6,262 posts)The conversation has served the nation well, but he refuses to acknowledge mathematical realities.
He is determined to make as much noise and trouble as he can, and now getting nasty after a kinder, gentler, issues only beginning.
He does not care about the Democratic Party. He is a relentless and charged up independent, regardless of consequences.
I started out a big fan, now even tho I am not a strong Clinton supporter, I want him to cease and desist and still push the issue without turning the convention into shambles and giving the Repugs even more ammo for their already voluminous oppo books.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)coffeeAM
(180 posts)jalan48
(13,886 posts)How long before Bernie becomes part of her "Vast, right wing conspiracy?"
George II
(67,782 posts)...or impermissible, or even illegal campaign contributions he's accepted.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)Only a lazy hack would use Clinton campaign talking points in an interview. She made a fool of herself on this one and got her ass handed to her for it. Good.
Bernie was spot on. Poor, poor Hillary having to take it from Trump and Bernie at the same time. Two against one - no fair. Bernie was correct to point out the obvious that he has been taking heat from the entire Democratic establishment and from the media shills for hill since he started this campaign.
I never did give anybody hell. I just told the truth and they thought it was hell.
Harry S Truman
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)That's why I admire and support him.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Sanders has been so soft on Hillary.
I would like everyone to remember that Andrea Mitchell's husband, Alan Greenspan was appointed to the Fed by Clinton and that Andrea has a conflict of interest when she talks about Hillary. She and her husband owe the Clintons a lot.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)In Hillary's world.
madokie
(51,076 posts)2cannan
(344 posts)mopinko
(70,229 posts)so willing to talk back to the media and reject the premiss of their stupid questions.
feel the bern, andrea.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
is an HRC tactic to distract from her very real election negativesuntrustability, Wall Street ties etc.
If she struggles against Trump, or loses to himit'll be framed as Bernie's Fault. It's called "triangulating the blame". Triangulationit's what the New Democrats do.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)italiangirl
(60 posts)is pro-Trump, pro-Hillary. 24/7. Andrea Mitchell just proved it. Someone who can't read a teleprompter interrogating Bernie. Give me a break! Stick it to her Bernie and hold your ground! She is a disgusting piece of nothing. She shouldn't even have a job.
Bernie all the way to the convention!
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)This is exactly the kind of educated, and forceful rebuttal this ignorant tv medium has deserved. Stand up to the slimebags.
Mike Nelson
(9,968 posts)...she's going to win, so her "problems" seem minor to Bernie. About the "shouting" - both he and Hillary raise their voices, I've noticed. I think it's probably a public speaking trait.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)screw those haves.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)sense. I agree with Sanders in answer to this question.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)against one populist because of the other; 3. repeat
Akicita
(1,196 posts)I remember back in the '90's there was an important Catholic Cardinal or Bishop who died not long after the impeachment and during a time when many in the media were trying to repair Clinton's damaged image It was fairly well known that the Cardinal was appalled by Bill's treatment of women and wanted nothing to do with him. He refused to attend any events where Clinton was going to be present.
The Clinton's attended the funeral along with former presidents and their spouses and there was extensive national news coverage of the funeral. While the Clinton's were being shown sitting in their pew, Andrea out and out lied to her viewers by opining about how much the cardinal respected Clinton and how close a relationship they had. She went on and on. Out right lies to help refurbish Clinton's image.
The Queen of the shills.
And as you can see from this interview, she is still shilling for the Clintons.
apnu
(8,758 posts)For some that will be a revelation, for others something to be reviled. And for that reason, he's going to lose. He's not winning Democrats over, he's trying to take over the party and shove everybody but his people out.
That's not how you win friends and influence people.
His view comes from a stance of combativeness in a time when he should be winning the party over with his ideals and goals. He should be convincing the party that his policies, his goals are their goals too.
It also smells of desperation, because it is desperation. He's losing, he's not losing badly, he's done better than even he expected. that makes the impending loss that much more bitter.
He can stay in as long as he wants, I don't think it will matter much in the end. If the DNC is contested, it will be OK, because Trump is that repulsive I think many independents will come to the Democratic party.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)running against her. And I suppose he shouldn't be running against her, rather he should be running along side her. After all, we all know that Hillary and Obama or their surrogates never said anything critical about each other in the 2008 campaign. Why, they just wouldn't be Democrats if they had.
mac56
(17,574 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Those are questions for her to answer. Don't be surprised if she answers with "its a good question, its a fair question...I'll get back to you on that."
I dont want to hear Sanders or Clinton moaning lol
MFM008
(19,820 posts)feel however you want
think whatever you want
but like my 79 year old mother
he blurts out--- whatever.
I believe its the 'get off my lawn syndrome'.
Happens to people that age.
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)This thread needs to die.
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=crimson][center]It is the consensus of the Hosting forum at this time to LOCK this thread as OPINION/ANALYSIS.[/center][/font]
[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#dcdcdc; padding-bottom:5px; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-bottom:none; border-radius:0.4615em 0.4615em 0em 0em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=about&forum=1014[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#f0f0f0; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-top:none; border-radius:0em 0em 0.4615em 0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.