Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,214 posts)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:14 PM Feb 2016

Hillary Clinton Pledges Not To Cut Social Security Benefits

Last edited Sun Feb 7, 2016, 11:25 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: HuffingtonPost



Hillary Clinton Pledges Not To Cut Social Security Benefits

Progressive groups applauded the move, but Sanders isn't as impressed.

02/06/2016 02:45 pm ET

Daniel Marans
Reporter, The Huffington Post

Matthew Cavanaugh/Getty Images
Hillary Clinton vowed that she would not cut Social Security benefits on Friday, assuaging progressive groups that had demanded a definitive pledge.

Hillary Clinton promised on Friday that she would not cut Social Security benefits, winning praise from progressive groups that had pressured her to take such a stance -- but drawing questions from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who challenged her commitment to the issue.


The post was a response to something Sanders had tweeted earlier in the day, when he urged Clinton to "join me in saying loudly and clearly that we will never cut Social Security."............
"I won't cut Social Security," Clinton wrote in an initialed tweet that included a link to her campaign website’s Social Security page. "As always, I'll defend it, & I'll expand it. Enough false innuendos."..................

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-pledges-not-to-cut-social-security_us_56b630dfe4b04f9b57d9d482?utm_hp_ref=politics



Sanders is playing stupid games and scaring people who depend on Soc Security. Shame on the Sanders camp.



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Golly gee.

Sanders has not stepped on this advocacy group like he has PP and Human Rights Campaign!!

Edit to Add:


BoldProgressives.org ?@BoldProgressive Feb 5

PCCC co-founders @StephanieTaylor & @AdamGreen w/ @SSWorks @NancyAlt. @HillaryClinton promises no Soc Security cuts!

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Pledges Not To Cut Social Security Benefits (Original Post) riversedge Feb 2016 OP
Why would she have to do this??? SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #1
Only in the light of day and popular opinion does She commit . orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #3
Because of the grand bargain Dems2002 Feb 2016 #4
Did she Reeavluate the effect since the debate ? Flop, have her do the same with the TPP . orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #2
Always Following Bernie's Lead cantbeserious Feb 2016 #5
She has hsd it on her website since last summer. Educate yourself before you post before you look riversedge Feb 2016 #14
You're wrong, riversedge. Educate yourself before you post before you look foolish again. w4rma Feb 2016 #23
Good job w4rma!!! wolfie001 Feb 2016 #24
somebody is not listening to her speeches all along. bye riversedge Feb 2016 #27
I guess you have the transcripts of her Goldman Sachs speeches? wolfie001 Feb 2016 #35
Comes down to this: NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #6
Howdy! 8 track mind Feb 2016 #15
Not at all. NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #21
thanks! 8 track mind Feb 2016 #22
Is it a cut if you change the benefit formula for someone who is not yet receiving Soc Sec? antigop Feb 2016 #29
Chained CPI would be a cut. JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2016 #34
I'm not talking about chained cpi. I'm talking about changing the benefit formula for antigop Feb 2016 #38
If it's in your retirement plan, it's a cut JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2016 #40
and what's her definition of 'cut'? That's the question. nt antigop Feb 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #7
She'll change her position to get something else. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #8
kill to cap - tax all income equally SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #9
Don't think so... Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #16
We the People SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #17
This problem is of her own doing and comes from 2008 PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #10
K&R nt Duval Feb 2016 #12
I flat out don't trust her on this dragonfly301 Feb 2016 #11
Sure. She'll call it reform or just "cutting the fat" me b zola Feb 2016 #13
Of course not. She's a Democrat. onehandle Feb 2016 #18
A man who has yet to present a proposal that is doable Cryptoad Feb 2016 #19
Strange, I still detect the stench of Pete Peterson.... tokenlib Feb 2016 #20
You mean Pete Peterson, co-founder of Black Rock, where Hillary just postponed a fundraiser? Fuddnik Feb 2016 #32
Yeah, I don't believe her fbc Feb 2016 #25
hillary pledges ? Really? LOL!! Sorry hillarys pledges are worthless bowens43 Feb 2016 #26
I want them both to promise no hike in the retirement age. (eom) HassleCat Feb 2016 #28
But hillary is a known liar. Bernin Feb 2016 #30
I've stopped believing Hillary. 840high Feb 2016 #42
she is lying to get the vote from hopemountain Feb 2016 #31
If Hillary gets the nomination, thanks to Bernie: she'll be more progressive... marble falls Feb 2016 #33
You think she is going to tack hard left for the General? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2016 #37
Not hard. Maybe she feels she that 'liberal' damages more than 'first woman"... marble falls Feb 2016 #39
Simply not good enough 4dsc Feb 2016 #36
k&r DesertRat Feb 2016 #43
Nothing but lip service. Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #44

Dems2002

(509 posts)
4. Because of the grand bargain
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:20 PM
Feb 2016

Had republicans held together, Obama would have passed a "grand bargain" to change the funding formula for social security to a chained cpi, which would have lowered benefits while also not being an accurate assessment of how seniors spend their money.

In addition, Hillary hadn't ruled out increasing the retirement age limit, which seems to be appealing to "centrists" who like to "get things done" by screwing over working class workers who typically are already too broken in body to make it to 68 as it is.

riversedge

(70,214 posts)
14. She has hsd it on her website since last summer. Educate yourself before you post before you look
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:43 PM
Feb 2016

foolish again.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
23. You're wrong, riversedge. Educate yourself before you post before you look foolish again.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

Nancy Altman, a co-founder of Social Security Works who has 35 years of experience in the field, said that Clinton campaign's statement and the policy descriptions on her website, do not definitively promise not to cut the program.

"What Secretary Clinton has said about Social Security is completely consistent with the Bowles-Simpson plan," Altman said, referring to a Fiscal Commission proposal in 2010 that would have made major cuts to middle-class benefits, even as it marginally lifted those of poor beneficiaries. "From the very beginning, there have been those who have wanted to boost benefits at the low end and cut middle-class benefits -- pushing it in the direction of becoming a kind of welfare program. It is very important that the candidates not only expand benefits but promise not to cut them. Otherwise there could be cuts that undermine what the program is: insurance, where you get a fair benefit for the money paid."
http://huff.to/20LyJ2L

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
6. Comes down to this:
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:20 PM
Feb 2016

It depends on what the definition of "cuts" is.

Is raising the retirement age a "cut"? To me it is, but is it to Hillary?

Is Chained CPI considered a cut? To me it is, but is it to Hillary?

Is means testing considered a cut? This one is debatable, but enacting it would take the "universal" out of "universal coverage" and could open the door to legal challenges to the program (which I think is the likely idea driving means testing as a solution).

antigop

(12,778 posts)
29. Is it a cut if you change the benefit formula for someone who is not yet receiving Soc Sec?
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:25 PM
Feb 2016

Is reducing a future benefit a "cut"?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
34. Chained CPI would be a cut.
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:58 AM
Feb 2016

Yes, future impact can be measured as "net present value", which is how Republicans and other advocates would claim immediate value and victory over the current and future elderly.

But, not all changes need to cut. We could change to a more "Senior-oriented" CPI which might reduce the impact of gasoline prices, but increase the impact of changes in food prices and health insurance costs. Those would have caused an increase in this year's social security payment. Instead, Social Security payments were flat, while Medicare costs increased.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
38. I'm not talking about chained cpi. I'm talking about changing the benefit formula for
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 11:47 AM
Feb 2016

people who are not yet collecting Social Security.

Is it a "cut" if you aren't yet collecting?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
40. If it's in your retirement plan, it's a cut
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

It can either lower your retirement expectations, or it can delay your retirement plans.

Call it a cut, or not, it still hurts.

Response to riversedge (Original post)

Wounded Bear

(58,653 posts)
16. Don't think so...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:57 PM
Feb 2016

IIRC, Bernie wanted to raise the cap to $250k, but still keep it. It makes sense, so Repubs will never go for it.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
10. This problem is of her own doing and comes from 2008
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:32 PM
Feb 2016

when Obama was the candidate who strongly defended Social Security and Clinton was
the candidate that indicated we should have another "bi-partisan" commission look at it.

Here is one exchange they had:

CLINTON: I am totally committed to making sure Social Security is solvent. You’ve got to begin to reign in the budget, pay as you go, to try to replenish our Social Security Trust Fund. And with all due respect, the last time we had a crisis in Social Security wa 1983. Pres. Reagan and Speaker Tip O’Neill came up with a commission. That was the best and smartest way, because you’ve got to get Republicans and Democrats together. That’s what I will do. And I will say, #1, don’t cut benefits on current beneficiaries they’re already having a hard enough time. And #2, do not impose additional tax burdens on middle-class families.

OBAMA: That commission raised the retirement age, and also raised the payroll tax. So Sen. Clinton can’t have it both ways.

(From: http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Social_Security.htm )

dragonfly301

(399 posts)
11. I flat out don't trust her on this
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:37 PM
Feb 2016

When the Grand Bargain was being floated a few years ago, I was spending time on Dkos. Whenever someone wrote a diary criticizing the grand bargain, one popular kossack would jump the tip jar to proclaim that CPI is not a cut. Every f'ing time. Never bothered to ask a retiree if getting less SS money in your pocket was a cut to them or not... I don't want to gamble on what the definition of "cut" is - I'm voting for Bernie.

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
20. Strange, I still detect the stench of Pete Peterson....
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 07:14 PM
Feb 2016

Maybe if Hillary would disown Third Way..then maybe I'd find her words credible.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
32. You mean Pete Peterson, co-founder of Black Rock, where Hillary just postponed a fundraiser?
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:43 AM
Feb 2016

That Pete Peterson? The guy whose life's mission is to PRIVATIZE or cut Social Security. That Pete Peterson?

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
26. hillary pledges ? Really? LOL!! Sorry hillarys pledges are worthless
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:20 PM
Feb 2016

most people understand that what hillarys says or 'pledges' has very little to do with what she actually does.

 

Bernin

(311 posts)
30. But hillary is a known liar.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:58 PM
Feb 2016

So I don't believe her on this or just about anything.

That's the biggest problem with your loser candidate.
The rest of the country feels the same way.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
31. she is lying to get the vote from
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 02:04 AM
Feb 2016

the working class - who pay into social security and who will be dependent upon it for retirement.
then after the election - she will revert to her past stances/statements on the issues.

the scorpion wanted to cross the rushing creek. it sat on a rock waiting for the frog she spotted on the other side. sure enough the frog hopped the rocks to cross the creek waters and began feeding on fresh new delicacies.

"hello, frog" said the scorpion.
"hello, scorpion" said the frog.
"hey frog, do you think when you cross back over i can hitch a ride on your back?" asked the scorpion.
"hell no!" said the frog. "if i give you a ride you'll just sting me before we even get across!"
"no i won't!" promised the scorpion.
"yes, you will. i've seen you do it before to other frogs!" replied the frog.

at last, after more promises from the scorpion that it would not sting the frog, the frog relented and the scorpion hopped onto the frog's back.

with the scorpion on it's back, the frog hopscotched across one rock after another to get across the creek. and, just as they were about to reach the last rock - the scorpion stung the frog.
a scorpion is a scorpion is a scorpion. they do not change.

marble falls

(57,081 posts)
39. Not hard. Maybe she feels she that 'liberal' damages more than 'first woman"...
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 02:05 PM
Feb 2016

helps. I don't get it. When she became "co-President" and attempted to take on national healthcare, I thought she was left. And I think the President plays it too centralist. ADA is a program that should have the conservatives jumping for joy. What she was postulating (and I think is what we need) is single payer. She's against it now. Why the change?

Then again in spite of FISA courts, deregulation of banks, the ascendancy of private corrections management corporations, the beginnings of intercepting all long distance calls and e-mail, that all began or were wildly expanded under big dog's Presidency - I kinda wish he had one more term. Those were the best times economically I ever had.

Why does the President and former SoS Clinton think we the people are a minority and that they have to cobble 'coalition' constituencies? Thats my biggest problem with her: she underestimates us.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton Pledges N...