Hillary Clinton Pledges Not To Cut Social Security Benefits
Last edited Sun Feb 7, 2016, 11:25 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: HuffingtonPost
Hillary Clinton Pledges Not To Cut Social Security Benefits
Progressive groups applauded the move, but Sanders isn't as impressed.
02/06/2016 02:45 pm ET
Daniel Marans
Reporter, The Huffington Post
Matthew Cavanaugh/Getty Images
Hillary Clinton vowed that she would not cut Social Security benefits on Friday, assuaging progressive groups that had demanded a definitive pledge.
Hillary Clinton promised on Friday that she would not cut Social Security benefits, winning praise from progressive groups that had pressured her to take such a stance -- but drawing questions from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who challenged her commitment to the issue.
The post was a response to something Sanders had tweeted earlier in the day, when he urged Clinton to "join me in saying loudly and clearly that we will never cut Social Security."............
"I won't cut Social Security," Clinton wrote in an initialed tweet that included a link to her campaign websites Social Security page. "As always, I'll defend it, & I'll expand it. Enough false innuendos."..................
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-pledges-not-to-cut-social-security_us_56b630dfe4b04f9b57d9d482?utm_hp_ref=politics
Sanders is playing stupid games and scaring people who depend on Soc Security. Shame on the Sanders camp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Golly gee.
Sanders has not stepped on this advocacy group like he has PP and Human Rights Campaign!!
Edit to Add:
BoldProgressives.org ?@BoldProgressive Feb 5
PCCC co-founders @StephanieTaylor & @AdamGreen w/ @SSWorks @NancyAlt. @HillaryClinton promises no Soc Security cuts!
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)She should have been shouting this for years
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Dems2002
(509 posts)Had republicans held together, Obama would have passed a "grand bargain" to change the funding formula for social security to a chained cpi, which would have lowered benefits while also not being an accurate assessment of how seniors spend their money.
In addition, Hillary hadn't ruled out increasing the retirement age limit, which seems to be appealing to "centrists" who like to "get things done" by screwing over working class workers who typically are already too broken in body to make it to 68 as it is.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
riversedge
(70,214 posts)foolish again.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Nancy Altman, a co-founder of Social Security Works who has 35 years of experience in the field, said that Clinton campaign's statement and the policy descriptions on her website, do not definitively promise not to cut the program.
"What Secretary Clinton has said about Social Security is completely consistent with the Bowles-Simpson plan," Altman said, referring to a Fiscal Commission proposal in 2010 that would have made major cuts to middle-class benefits, even as it marginally lifted those of poor beneficiaries. "From the very beginning, there have been those who have wanted to boost benefits at the low end and cut middle-class benefits -- pushing it in the direction of becoming a kind of welfare program. It is very important that the candidates not only expand benefits but promise not to cut them. Otherwise there could be cuts that undermine what the program is: insurance, where you get a fair benefit for the money paid."
http://huff.to/20LyJ2L
wolfie001
(2,229 posts)Very informative post!
riversedge
(70,214 posts)wolfie001
(2,229 posts)That's right, you don't.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)It depends on what the definition of "cuts" is.
Is raising the retirement age a "cut"? To me it is, but is it to Hillary?
Is Chained CPI considered a cut? To me it is, but is it to Hillary?
Is means testing considered a cut? This one is debatable, but enacting it would take the "universal" out of "universal coverage" and could open the door to legal challenges to the program (which I think is the likely idea driving means testing as a solution).
8 track mind
(1,638 posts)Do you care if i steal that GIF?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Be my guest!
8 track mind
(1,638 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)Is reducing a future benefit a "cut"?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)Yes, future impact can be measured as "net present value", which is how Republicans and other advocates would claim immediate value and victory over the current and future elderly.
But, not all changes need to cut. We could change to a more "Senior-oriented" CPI which might reduce the impact of gasoline prices, but increase the impact of changes in food prices and health insurance costs. Those would have caused an increase in this year's social security payment. Instead, Social Security payments were flat, while Medicare costs increased.
antigop
(12,778 posts)people who are not yet collecting Social Security.
Is it a "cut" if you aren't yet collecting?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)It can either lower your retirement expectations, or it can delay your retirement plans.
Call it a cut, or not, it still hurts.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Response to riversedge (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)that is the Sanders solution
Wounded Bear
(58,653 posts)IIRC, Bernie wanted to raise the cap to $250k, but still keep it. It makes sense, so Repubs will never go for it.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Stand together and we get what we want - fuck the republicans
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)when Obama was the candidate who strongly defended Social Security and Clinton was
the candidate that indicated we should have another "bi-partisan" commission look at it.
Here is one exchange they had:
OBAMA: That commission raised the retirement age, and also raised the payroll tax. So Sen. Clinton cant have it both ways.
(From: http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Social_Security.htm )
Duval
(4,280 posts)dragonfly301
(399 posts)When the Grand Bargain was being floated a few years ago, I was spending time on Dkos. Whenever someone wrote a diary criticizing the grand bargain, one popular kossack would jump the tip jar to proclaim that CPI is not a cut. Every f'ing time. Never bothered to ask a retiree if getting less SS money in your pocket was a cut to them or not... I don't want to gamble on what the definition of "cut" is - I'm voting for Bernie.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)...but ok, Hillary...whatever
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Has been one for decades more than five minutes.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)shouldnt be casting stones
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Maybe if Hillary would disown Third Way..then maybe I'd find her words credible.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)That Pete Peterson? The guy whose life's mission is to PRIVATIZE or cut Social Security. That Pete Peterson?
fbc
(1,668 posts)This is about as phony as her stance against TPP.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)most people understand that what hillarys says or 'pledges' has very little to do with what she actually does.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)So I don't believe her on this or just about anything.
That's the biggest problem with your loser candidate.
The rest of the country feels the same way.
840high
(17,196 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)the working class - who pay into social security and who will be dependent upon it for retirement.
then after the election - she will revert to her past stances/statements on the issues.
the scorpion wanted to cross the rushing creek. it sat on a rock waiting for the frog she spotted on the other side. sure enough the frog hopped the rocks to cross the creek waters and began feeding on fresh new delicacies.
"hello, frog" said the scorpion.
"hello, scorpion" said the frog.
"hey frog, do you think when you cross back over i can hitch a ride on your back?" asked the scorpion.
"hell no!" said the frog. "if i give you a ride you'll just sting me before we even get across!"
"no i won't!" promised the scorpion.
"yes, you will. i've seen you do it before to other frogs!" replied the frog.
at last, after more promises from the scorpion that it would not sting the frog, the frog relented and the scorpion hopped onto the frog's back.
with the scorpion on it's back, the frog hopscotched across one rock after another to get across the creek. and, just as they were about to reach the last rock - the scorpion stung the frog.
a scorpion is a scorpion is a scorpion. they do not change.
marble falls
(57,081 posts)than she intended to be.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)marble falls
(57,081 posts)helps. I don't get it. When she became "co-President" and attempted to take on national healthcare, I thought she was left. And I think the President plays it too centralist. ADA is a program that should have the conservatives jumping for joy. What she was postulating (and I think is what we need) is single payer. She's against it now. Why the change?
Then again in spite of FISA courts, deregulation of banks, the ascendancy of private corrections management corporations, the beginnings of intercepting all long distance calls and e-mail, that all began or were wildly expanded under big dog's Presidency - I kinda wish he had one more term. Those were the best times economically I ever had.
Why does the President and former SoS Clinton think we the people are a minority and that they have to cobble 'coalition' constituencies? Thats my biggest problem with her: she underestimates us.
4dsc
(5,787 posts)We need someone who going to strength SS not remain with the status quo.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)She will cut SS, guaranteed, if she is President.