Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

inanna

(3,547 posts)
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 02:54 AM Nov 2015

National Geographic Society sets biggest layoff in its history

Source: Washington Post

November 3 at 4:22 PM

The National Geographic Society of Washington will lay off about 180 of its 2,000 employees in a cost-cutting move that follows the sale of its famous magazine and other assets to a company controlled by Rupert Murdoch.

The reduction, the largest in the organization’s 127-year history, appears to affect almost every department of the nonprofit organization, including the magazine, which the society has published since just after its founding in 1888. The reduction also will affect people who work for the National Geographic Channel, the most profitable part of the organization. Several people in the channel’s fact-checking department, for example, were terminated on Tuesday, employees said.

The National Geographic Society said “involuntary separations” will represent about 9 percent of its workforce. In addition, buyout offers have been made to an undetermined number of employees.

In September, the organization sold the magazine and its stake in the National Geographic cable TV channel, as well as other media properties, for $725 million to a for-profit partnership controlled by 21st Century Fox. The society will have a 27 percent stake in the partnership, called National Geographic Partners; Fox — a company controlled by Murdoch and his family — will own the balance.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/national-geographic-society-sets-biggest-layoff-in-its-history/2015/11/03/2966e1b4-8252-11e5-a7ca-6ab6ec20f839_story.html

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Geographic Society sets biggest layoff in its history (Original Post) inanna Nov 2015 OP
is there anything good that they do not want to destroy? SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2015 #1
I Don't Think RobinA Nov 2015 #12
So Murdoch owns National Geographic, and the Koch Bros. fund PBS's NOVA, and progree Nov 2015 #2
It's their War on Science tecelote Nov 2015 #7
It's the war on truth. Truth which may contain information about climate change. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #9
Soon we will see Nat Geo special on workinclasszero Nov 2015 #23
Who needs fact checking if Murdoch owns it??? Gloria Nov 2015 #3
It was an act of mercy to fire the fact checkers. Jim Lane Nov 2015 #8
+1 n/t Hugin Nov 2015 #14
This is another reason why Bernie needs to win the nomination and White House. Left Coast2020 Nov 2015 #4
+1 You nailed it. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #10
Who would have expected a tradition as respected, and notable as Nat'l Geographic would be killed Judi Lynn Nov 2015 #5
Conquistadors indeed! Well said Judy Lynne sorechasm Nov 2015 #20
I'm pretty sure Murdoch's killed more than Aguirre MisterP Nov 2015 #21
It would be hard to be more destructive than Murdoch. Judi Lynn Nov 2015 #27
how does a Conquistador/flower warrior hybrid empire tickle ya? MisterP Nov 2015 #29
It might not be pretty... Judi Lynn Nov 2015 #30
This is the internet -- not the "fascists" as you call it. former9thward Nov 2015 #24
very sad LittleGirl Nov 2015 #6
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Nov 2015 #11
Are you going to raise "holy hell" about the internet destroying media? former9thward Nov 2015 #25
You will have clarify that for me. I don't favor any media destruction. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #31
You haven't noticed newspapers and magazines disappearing??? former9thward Nov 2015 #34
Apparently, staff were sent the falling message: brooklynite Nov 2015 #13
This has all the earmarks of a "bain capital" type take over. Javaman Nov 2015 #15
A spring "Swimsuit Issue" perhaps? hunter Nov 2015 #17
very likely. the further dumbing down of society. Javaman Nov 2015 #18
Naked native babes frolicking with baby seals... Gloria Nov 2015 #19
Of course. Now that Murdoch owns it. Bye bye wonderful National Geographic. n/t Triana Nov 2015 #16
Not good. HuckleB Nov 2015 #22
Oh just croak already, you piece of shit living fossil. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Nov 2015 #26
Exactly! What's the hold up? n/t Judi Lynn Nov 2015 #28
Terminating the "fact checking department". DCBob Nov 2015 #32
RIP National Geographic as we have known PufPuf23 Nov 2015 #33

progree

(10,920 posts)
2. So Murdoch owns National Geographic, and the Koch Bros. fund PBS's NOVA, and
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:12 AM
Nov 2015

... what other scientific institutions and media are in the hands of our good friends on the right?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
9. It's the war on truth. Truth which may contain information about climate change.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 07:15 AM
Nov 2015

It's a consequence of unregulated capitalism.

Rupert Murdoch shouldn't have been allowed to acquire any additional media.

Have any of our Democratic candidates for office, any office, said anything about reining in the excesses of runaway capitalism?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
23. Soon we will see Nat Geo special on
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 06:24 PM
Nov 2015

Men riding around on dinosaurs 6000 years ago.

Also David Barton Rewrites History Dominunist edition.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. It was an act of mercy to fire the fact checkers.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 06:06 AM
Nov 2015

Staying on would have driven them crazy. They'll be happier as Wal-Mart greeters.

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)
4. This is another reason why Bernie needs to win the nomination and White House.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:36 AM
Nov 2015

I'm way past fed up with this monopolistic empire which has no checks and balances on monopolies. Talk about breaking up the banks, how bout breaking up this monopoly? Anti-trust investigation? Not here.

Judi Lynn

(160,633 posts)
5. Who would have expected a tradition as respected, and notable as Nat'l Geographic would be killed
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:46 AM
Nov 2015

in our lifetimes, after such a distinguished history?

These fascists are absolutely no different from the dirty conquistadores who killed native populations and destroyed all their histories, their homes, ways of life, and made servants of them, if they didn't torture and kill them first for resisting.

sorechasm

(631 posts)
20. Conquistadors indeed! Well said Judy Lynne
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 01:52 PM
Nov 2015

Growing up in WVA before cable or color television, National Geographic photos and articles were my most vivid window on the world. To date, Nat Geo still included the deepest discussions connecting Climate Change with Geo-Political cultures around the globe.

An informed and intellectually-armed public must be quite a threat Rupert's minions.
'STOP LOOKING BEHIND THAT CURTAIN!'

Where's Toto when we need him?

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
21. I'm pretty sure Murdoch's killed more than Aguirre
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:58 PM
Nov 2015

and Aguirre wanted *Peru* to conquer *Spain* and wanted to cross the Atlantic on a bridge of Spanish and Native corpses alike

Judi Lynn

(160,633 posts)
27. It would be hard to be more destructive than Murdoch.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:32 AM
Nov 2015

"The Wrath of God" would have traded places with Murdoch in a heart-beat, no doubt! So many more people to destroy within his reach.

Aguirre had to do so much more evil in person, and take so many more risks. Hardly seems fair! The upside, he got to see people suffer far more, up close!

Same instincts driving them both, unfortunately for the world of living beings.

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
24. This is the internet -- not the "fascists" as you call it.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 07:54 PM
Nov 2015

The internet is killing off all newspapers and magazines. Why do you think the National Geographic is exempt? Do you think they operate in their own private economic system?

LittleGirl

(8,291 posts)
6. very sad
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 05:23 AM
Nov 2015

I had a subscription until last year when we left the states. I really like that magazine. Kept all of the old issues too.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
11. Kicked and recommended!
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 07:18 AM
Nov 2015

As a society we need to raise holy hell about Rupert Murdoch acquiring and destroying more media.

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
34. You haven't noticed newspapers and magazines disappearing???
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:55 AM
Nov 2015

Younger people don't read them anymore -- including the Geographic. They go to the internet.

brooklynite

(94,748 posts)
13. Apparently, staff were sent the falling message:
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 09:17 AM
Nov 2015

"Please watch your inbox for important information about your employment status tomorrow."

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
15. This has all the earmarks of a "bain capital" type take over.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 09:53 AM
Nov 2015

I predict, in a few short years, national geographic mag will either be gone or resemble anything like it is today.

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
18. very likely. the further dumbing down of society.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 12:34 PM
Nov 2015

"This issue of Nation Geographic features: holy water: flavored or plain? you decide"

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»National Geographic Socie...