National Geographic Society sets biggest layoff in its history
Source: Washington Post
November 3 at 4:22 PM
The National Geographic Society of Washington will lay off about 180 of its 2,000 employees in a cost-cutting move that follows the sale of its famous magazine and other assets to a company controlled by Rupert Murdoch.
The reduction, the largest in the organizations 127-year history, appears to affect almost every department of the nonprofit organization, including the magazine, which the society has published since just after its founding in 1888. The reduction also will affect people who work for the National Geographic Channel, the most profitable part of the organization. Several people in the channels fact-checking department, for example, were terminated on Tuesday, employees said.
The National Geographic Society said involuntary separations will represent about 9 percent of its workforce. In addition, buyout offers have been made to an undetermined number of employees.
In September, the organization sold the magazine and its stake in the National Geographic cable TV channel, as well as other media properties, for $725 million to a for-profit partnership controlled by 21st Century Fox. The society will have a 27 percent stake in the partnership, called National Geographic Partners; Fox a company controlled by Murdoch and his family will own the balance.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/national-geographic-society-sets-biggest-layoff-in-its-history/2015/11/03/2966e1b4-8252-11e5-a7ca-6ab6ec20f839_story.html
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)damn
RobinA
(9,896 posts)there's much good left, at least on a national scale.
progree
(10,920 posts)... what other scientific institutions and media are in the hands of our good friends on the right?
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Or, maybe the War on Truth.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)It's a consequence of unregulated capitalism.
Rupert Murdoch shouldn't have been allowed to acquire any additional media.
Have any of our Democratic candidates for office, any office, said anything about reining in the excesses of runaway capitalism?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Men riding around on dinosaurs 6000 years ago.
Also David Barton Rewrites History Dominunist edition.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Staying on would have driven them crazy. They'll be happier as Wal-Mart greeters.
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)I'm way past fed up with this monopolistic empire which has no checks and balances on monopolies. Talk about breaking up the banks, how bout breaking up this monopoly? Anti-trust investigation? Not here.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,633 posts)in our lifetimes, after such a distinguished history?
These fascists are absolutely no different from the dirty conquistadores who killed native populations and destroyed all their histories, their homes, ways of life, and made servants of them, if they didn't torture and kill them first for resisting.
sorechasm
(631 posts)Growing up in WVA before cable or color television, National Geographic photos and articles were my most vivid window on the world. To date, Nat Geo still included the deepest discussions connecting Climate Change with Geo-Political cultures around the globe.
An informed and intellectually-armed public must be quite a threat Rupert's minions.
'STOP LOOKING BEHIND THAT CURTAIN!'
Where's Toto when we need him?
MisterP
(23,730 posts)and Aguirre wanted *Peru* to conquer *Spain* and wanted to cross the Atlantic on a bridge of Spanish and Native corpses alike
Judi Lynn
(160,633 posts)"The Wrath of God" would have traded places with Murdoch in a heart-beat, no doubt! So many more people to destroy within his reach.
Aguirre had to do so much more evil in person, and take so many more risks. Hardly seems fair! The upside, he got to see people suffer far more, up close!
Same instincts driving them both, unfortunately for the world of living beings.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,633 posts)[center][/center]
former9thward
(32,082 posts)The internet is killing off all newspapers and magazines. Why do you think the National Geographic is exempt? Do you think they operate in their own private economic system?
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)I had a subscription until last year when we left the states. I really like that magazine. Kept all of the old issues too.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)As a society we need to raise holy hell about Rupert Murdoch acquiring and destroying more media.
former9thward
(32,082 posts)That is killing 99% of it.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)former9thward
(32,082 posts)Younger people don't read them anymore -- including the Geographic. They go to the internet.
brooklynite
(94,748 posts)"Please watch your inbox for important information about your employment status tomorrow."
Javaman
(62,534 posts)I predict, in a few short years, national geographic mag will either be gone or resemble anything like it is today.
hunter
(38,331 posts)"Beaches of the World" or some such nonsense.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)"This issue of Nation Geographic features: holy water: flavored or plain? you decide"
Gloria
(17,663 posts)Bring it on !!!!!
Triana
(22,666 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,505 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,633 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)That says it all.
PufPuf23
(8,840 posts)because of disrespecting assholes.