Justices take up dispute over union fees
Source: Associated Post, via the Washington Post
Business
By Sam Hananel?|?AP June 30 at 9:41 AM
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court will consider limiting the power of government employee unions to collect fees from non-members in a case that union officials say could threaten membership and further weaken organized labor.
The justices said Tuesday they will hear an appeal from a group of California teachers who say it violates their First Amendment rights to have to pay any fees if they disagree with the unions positions.
The teachers want the court to overturn a 38-year-old precedent that said unions can require non-members to pay for collective bargaining costs as long as the fees dont go toward political purposes. Public workers in half the states are required to pay fair share fees if they are represented by a union, even if they are not members.
Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/justices-take-up-dispute-over-union-fees/2015/06/30/69a13fb4-1f2d-11e5-a135-935065bc30d0_story.html
Omaha Steve
(99,614 posts)They should pay for it!
http://www.aflcio.org/Learn-About-Unions/What-Unions-Do/The-Union-Difference
Union members earn better wages and benefits than workers who arent union members. On average, union workers wages are 27 percent higher than their nonunion counterparts.
Unionized workers are 60 percent more likely to have employer-provided pensions.
More than 79 percent of union workers have jobs that provide health insurance benefits, but less than half of nonunion workers do. Unions help employers create a more stable, productive workforcewhere workers have a say in improving their jobs.
Unions help bring workers out of poverty and into the middle class. In fact, in states where workers dont have union rights, workers incomes are lower.
Check It Out
See related topics:
Nonunion Workers Pay Lower
Better Pensions, Health Care
Wages Higher with Union Rights
alarimer
(16,245 posts)They benefit directly from the union; they should pay for it.
cstanleytech
(26,289 posts)I've never known any teachers or anyone else to refuse benefits the union negotiated. They blissfully take what others have earned, and fought for, and pretend they have taken the high road against unions.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Maybe they want to throw the unions in jail. Maybe the five wingers might make that possible.
riversedge
(70,204 posts)oh crap--workers are being day day after day!
http://www.afscme.org/blog/lawsuit-seeks-to-curtail-freedom-of-firefighters-teachers-nurses-first-responders-to-stick-together-and-advocate-for-better-public-services-better-communities
AFSCME
17 mins
Multiple unions issued this joint statement on today's Supreme Court decision to hear Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association:
We are disappointed that at a time when big corporations and the wealthy few are rewriting the rules in their favor, knocking American families and our entire economy off-balance, the Supreme Court has chosen to take a case that threatens the fundamental promise of America that if you work hard and play by the rules you should be able to provide for your family and live a decent life."
#?VoiceForAll
ag_dude
(562 posts)Does it impact private sector unions as well?