Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,425 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 09:59 AM Jun 2015

Justices take up dispute over union fees

Source: Associated Post, via the Washington Post

Business

By Sam Hananel?|?AP June 30 at 9:41 AM

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will consider limiting the power of government employee unions to collect fees from non-members in a case that union officials say could threaten membership and further weaken organized labor.

The justices said Tuesday they will hear an appeal from a group of California teachers who say it violates their First Amendment rights to have to pay any fees if they disagree with the union’s positions.


The teachers want the court to overturn a 38-year-old precedent that said unions can require non-members to pay for collective bargaining costs as long as the fees don’t go toward political purposes. Public workers in half the states are required to pay “fair share” fees if they are represented by a union, even if they are not members.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/justices-take-up-dispute-over-union-fees/2015/06/30/69a13fb4-1f2d-11e5-a135-935065bc30d0_story.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justices take up dispute over union fees (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 OP
They benefit from a union contract Omaha Steve Jun 2015 #1
I can't believe that people don't understand this. alarimer Jun 2015 #2
WTB infinity plus symbol !!!! cstanleytech Jun 2015 #6
Exactly LeFleur1 Jun 2015 #7
True and correct. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #9
in what fking world can the court order a company to do work for nothing Romeo.lima333 Jun 2015 #3
Prisoners comes to mind d_legendary1 Jun 2015 #5
Multiple unions issued this joint statement on today's Supreme Court decision to hear Friedrichs v. riversedge Jun 2015 #4
Isn't this just for government employees? ag_dude Jun 2015 #8

Omaha Steve

(99,614 posts)
1. They benefit from a union contract
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 10:08 AM
Jun 2015

They should pay for it!

http://www.aflcio.org/Learn-About-Unions/What-Unions-Do/The-Union-Difference

Union members earn better wages and benefits than workers who aren’t union members. On average, union workers’ wages are 27 percent higher than their nonunion counterparts.

Unionized workers are 60 percent more likely to have employer-provided pensions.

More than 79 percent of union workers have jobs that provide health insurance benefits, but less than half of nonunion workers do. Unions help employers create a more stable, productive workforce—where workers have a say in improving their jobs.

Unions help bring workers out of poverty and into the middle class. In fact, in states where workers don’t have union rights, workers’ incomes are lower.

Check It Out
See related topics:

Nonunion Workers’ Pay Lower
Better Pensions, Health Care
Wages Higher with Union Rights


alarimer

(16,245 posts)
2. I can't believe that people don't understand this.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 10:35 AM
Jun 2015

They benefit directly from the union; they should pay for it.

LeFleur1

(1,197 posts)
7. Exactly
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 11:04 AM
Jun 2015

I've never known any teachers or anyone else to refuse benefits the union negotiated. They blissfully take what others have earned, and fought for, and pretend they have taken the high road against unions.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
5. Prisoners comes to mind
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 10:52 AM
Jun 2015

Maybe they want to throw the unions in jail. Maybe the five wingers might make that possible.

riversedge

(70,204 posts)
4. Multiple unions issued this joint statement on today's Supreme Court decision to hear Friedrichs v.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 10:49 AM
Jun 2015

oh crap--workers are being day day after day!



http://www.afscme.org/blog/lawsuit-seeks-to-curtail-freedom-of-firefighters-teachers-nurses-first-responders-to-stick-together-and-advocate-for-better-public-services-better-communities



AFSCME
17 mins

Multiple unions issued this joint statement on today's Supreme Court decision to hear Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association:

“We are disappointed that at a time when big corporations and the wealthy few are rewriting the rules in their favor, knocking American families and our entire economy off-balance, the Supreme Court has chosen to take a case that threatens the fundamental promise of America — that if you work hard and play by the rules you should be able to provide for your family and live a decent life."

‪#?VoiceForAll‬

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justices take up dispute ...