Hillary Clinton's Lead Over NH Democrats Shrinking, Poll Finds
Source: CNN
Washington (CNN)Hillary Clinton's sizable lead among Democrats in New Hampshire has been trimmed to single digits as Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders makes a strong push in a state that narrowly broke Clinton's way in 2008 to keep her campaign alive.
According to a new CNN/WMUR New Hampshire Primary poll, Clinton holds an 8-point edge over Sanders, with 43% behind Clinton and 35% backing Sanders. Vice President Joe Biden clocks in at 8%, with 2% or less supporting Martin O'Malley, Jim Webb and Lincoln Chafee.
The poll marks a significant tightening of the contest since the May Granite State Poll, which included Elizabeth Warren on its list of candidates. In that poll, Clinton stood at 51%, with Warren at 20% and Sanders at 13%.
poll seem to explain much of Sanders' gain. Looking at the demographic breakdown in primary preferences, men, younger voters and liberals appear to have moved broadly toward Sanders in the last month. Among men, 52% backed Clinton in the May survey, that fell to 32% in the new poll, while 47% now support Sanders. Likewise, among liberals, a 51% to 16% Clinton advantage is now a 48% to 41% Sanders edge. And among voters under age 50, Clinton has fallen from majority support to a near even split in the new poll, 37% back Clinton while 39% favor Sanders.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/25/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-martin-omalley-new-hampshire-poll/index.html
You were saying?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)lamp_shade
(14,834 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)repub primary voters are generally wingnut wackos. and nh has a rep of doing their own thing, which could end up hurting clinton or sanders. we.ll just have to see.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)but I wouldn't roll on my back in it that way, ewww...
merrily
(45,251 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Maybe I missed it, but I haven't heard a peep about him getting into the race
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)other.
still_one
(92,190 posts)Biden mean if he doesn't run?
Would those numbers go to undecided, Hillary, Bernie, O'Malley, Webb, or Chaffee?
That is why at this stage the pollsters have to stop adding people unless they declare. That was fine before anyone declared, but by now it only serves to confuse the poll
It also isn't made clear in the article if Senator Warren was included or not. Hopefully not, since she has made it very clear she is not running in 2016. If she changes her mind then add her to the poll
merrily
(45,251 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)The sitting VP is almost always considered a contender.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)Democratic socialist, NOT an independent
George II
(67,782 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)The DNC has made the following statement:
Democrats welcome Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders as the second candidate to officially seek the Democratic Partys nomination for President in 2016.
I do not see anyway Bernie Sanders will be kept off the ballot as a Democrat. Vermont is different from most states, and does not have formal party affiliation, but Bernie Sanders has said he is running as a Democrat.
George II
(67,782 posts)That is true for voters, not for candidates.
still_one
(92,190 posts)and if they want the Democratic Party to implode they will succeed, and put the general election in peril because if they disenfranchise the Sanders supporters in the primaries that would be enough lose the general election
Let's assume 80% of Democrats support Hillary, and 20% support Bernie. That 20% can win or lose elections easily. Let's see how the Democrats can screw up what should be a good chance in 2016, to a major struggle
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)I think that has to be the strong message to the Democratic leaders and the DNC. Whether you would really stay home or not, it's a threat that needs to be out there.
In reality, I will do everything in my power to elect the person I believe will be LESS destructive to what rights we have left. If it's Hillary, so be it.
But there has to be a believable threat that we will abandon the party if they start fucking around with us, and Bernie.
still_one
(92,190 posts)decision today is just one important factor that highlights why it is critical that the Democratic nominee win
I hope that NO one running with the Democratic party is eliminated from any ballot, and this is just unnecessary speculation
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Unless KY changes the rules just for him, he can't be on our ballot either.
still_one
(92,190 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)Much like the opposition party, the GOP ?
That's unpleasant ... ew ...
George II
(67,782 posts)....and lived in the US for ALL of my 67 years.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)The choice of avatar might lead to such guesses ...
I was not born in Brooklyn, but my mom and all my blood aunts and uncles were .... I was born in NJ, on the other end of the GW Bridge ...
I love Canadians, by the way, ... just not the one's trying to limits the choices of voters ... There is already one party that does that ...
Let's see ... who else is from Brooklyn ? ........
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)How, exactly, is he supposed to run as a registered Democrat? Move to a different state that DOES have party registration?
The idea that NH will not allow him to run is absurd.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 26, 2015, 08:50 AM - Edit history (1)
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Nobody has a party registration in Vermont. Nor do we here in Minnesota, yet, amazingly, Minnesotans are allowed to run on the presidential ballot in all 50 states.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Due to a quirky New Hampshire filing process and Sanders' status as an independent rather than a registered Democrat there are lingering questions about how easy it will be for him to file for the primary next year.
State law says that presidential candidates must be a registered member of the party whose primary ballot they are trying to get on. In fact, the Declaration of Candidacy they must fill out is fairly straightforward (emphasis added):
I, ____, swear under penalties of perjury that I am qualified to be a candidate for president of the United States pursuant to article II, section 1, clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States." I further declare that I am domiciled in _____, in the city (or town or unincorporated place) of _____, county of ____, state of ____, that I am a registered member of the _____ party; that I am a candidate for the nomination for the office of president to be made at the primary election to be held on the ____ day of _____; and I hereby request that my name be printed on the official primary ballot of said _____ party as a candidate for such nomination.
It's one of those blanks that is problematic asking candidates to say "that I am a registered member of the _____ party." Sanders is not a registered member of the Democratic Party, having been elected every time as an independent. Early in his career, he made failed runs as part of the Liberty Union Party.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)I believe he was.
He could not have been a "registered Democrat", as Vermont has NO PARTY REGISTRATION! Nobody in Vermont is a registered Democrat. Nobody in Vermont is a registered Republican.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Other states has different rules than in Vermont, as there are different rules in which voters also have. In many states if you are registered as one party then this is the primary you have to vote, as if you are registered as Democrat then you vote with the Democrat primary, two different registration books and if you are registered as Republican then you vote in the Republican primary. If you are registered as an Independent then in some states you can choose which primary you want to vote.
I don't really care the rules are in different states, there is a process to get on their ballots, either a candidate has to comply or they will not be on their ballot.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)The idea that Kentucky and New Hampshire could prevent residents of states like Vermont or Minnesota (which don't have party registration) from being on the presidential ballot is ludicrous.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)if that is shitting on Bernie you need to address those states which has created their own rules.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)in New Hampshire.
http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/24/416929786/this-quirky-new-hampshire-law-might-keep-sanders-off-the-ballot
Due to a quirky New Hampshire filing process and Sanders' status as an independent rather than a registered Democrat there are lingering questions about how easy it will be for him to file for the primary next year.
State law says that presidential candidates must be a registered member of the party whose primary ballot they are trying to get on. In fact, the Declaration of Candidacy they must fill out is fairly straightforward (emphasis added):
I, ____, swear under penalties of perjury that I am qualified to be a candidate for president of the United States pursuant to article II, section 1, clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States." I further declare that I am domiciled in _____, in the city (or town or unincorporated place) of _____, county of ____, state of ____, that I am a registered member of the _____ party; that I am a candidate for the nomination for the office of president to be made at the primary election to be held on the ____ day of _____; and I hereby request that my name be printed on the official primary ballot of said _____ party as a candidate for such nomination.
It's one of those blanks that is problematic asking candidates to say "that I am a registered member of the _____ party." Sanders is not a registered member of the Democratic Party, having been elected every time as an independent. Early in his career, he made failed runs as part of the Liberty Union Party.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Due to a quirky New Hampshire filing process and Sanders' status as an independent rather than a registered Democrat there are lingering questions about how easy it will be for him to file for the primary next year.
State law says that presidential candidates must be a registered member of the party whose primary ballot they are trying to get on. In fact, the Declaration of Candidacy they must fill out is fairly straightforward (emphasis added):
I, ____, swear under penalties of perjury that I am qualified to be a candidate for president of the United States pursuant to article II, section 1, clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States." I further declare that I am domiciled in _____, in the city (or town or unincorporated place) of _____, county of ____, state of ____, that I am a registered member of the _____ party; that I am a candidate for the nomination for the office of president to be made at the primary election to be held on the ____ day of _____; and I hereby request that my name be printed on the official primary ballot of said _____ party as a candidate for such nomination.
It's one of those blanks that is problematic asking candidates to say "that I am a registered member of the _____ party." Sanders is not a registered member of the Democratic Party, having been elected every time as an independent. Early in his career, he made failed runs as part of the Liberty Union Party.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Bernie is not a registered Independent, any more than he is a registered anything else. In the past, he has simply chosen to run as an Independent. His choice was the only thing that made him an Independent, or that could make him an Independent under Vermont law. Now, he has chosen to run as a Democrat.
still_one
(92,190 posts)names that should be in the poll are those who are declared candidates. WTF does Biden at 8% mean. If he doesn't run, where do those votes go?
This is why pollsters should include only those candidates who have declared
Robbins
(5,066 posts)we now know why CLinton campagin sent McCaskill out to trash Bernie.This is only late june and he is now at 35% In NH and first poll that has her lead in state down to single digets.
Bernie is being supported by men,liberals,and those under 50.
still_one
(92,190 posts)That may or may not be valid
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)looking at Trumps position in these polls,
however, it makes it quite clear that Bernie
is not a "fringe" candidate.
still_one
(92,190 posts)O'Malley, Webb, and even Chaffee.
I only repeated what poll said about who is supporting bernie In NH.
You may not like bernie surging but those are facts behind who is supporting him In NH.
still_one
(92,190 posts)any of the candidates were doing, and I sure as hell did not minimize Bernie's position, which is competitive and impressive. What I said is I have a problem with polls that include candidates who are not running at this time.
If you have also read my other posts I have made it very clear that if Bernie is kept off the ballot in any of the primaries the Democratic Party will implode
Where you came up with the assumption that I do no appreciate Bernie surging I have no idea. I did not even imply that
You also frame it as though I am personally attacking you, and that could not be further from the facts. I am critisizing any poll at this time which includes candidate that are not declared, and commenting on your last sentence which I took to be your opinion and not that of the poll. If I read it wrong then my appologies
George II
(67,782 posts)NH and all whites are ilrelvent according to you.
Since i am white then my vote is ilrelvent i guess according to you.
George II
(67,782 posts)I was responding to your comment "Bernie is being supported by men,liberals,and those under 50."
If you're going to single out those demographics for Sanders' support, why not mention that he's NOT getting significant support in New Hampshire from Asians, Hispanics, or African Americans?
As noted by someone else above, New Hampshire is not representative of the American electorate.
And New Hampshire's population is less than one half of one percent of the population of the United States,
Robbins
(5,066 posts)mentions those groups are who are supporting bernie.
I see dismissing NH is going to be the new talking point of Clinton supporter
frylock
(34,825 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....numbers in New Hampshire.....
frylock
(34,825 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)points were floated here earlier this week. Not a concerted effort at all. Nope.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)was just an off the cuff comment that was not at all meant to insult or impune him
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)And keep posting after you decide to not take this seriously.
Keep shoveling the denial. It'll totally work.
Now, if you want to try and make this irrelevant, point out that the winner of the NH primary very often doesn't go on to win the nomination. Like in 2008.
George II
(67,782 posts)...of the last 14 New Hampshire primaries going back to 1960, 10 were won by the ultimate nominee.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Man, Objects in that mirror are closer than they appear.
Shades of 2008.
I couldn't be happier.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)health car - Hillary
terrorism = Hillary
foreign policy - Hillary
trade policy - Hillary
economy - Hillary
personal characteristics & qualities a President should have - Hillary +11%
strongest leader - Hillary
Bernie may lead in three other categories....but the above appeal to more people than just the left wing of the Democratic party.
people don't vote for a friend, they vote for a leader.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/06/25/062515dempoll.pdf
George II
(67,782 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)He does not hold a finger up to see which way the winds blow.
frylock
(34,825 posts)when she deferred to Nancy Pelosi after being asked about her opinion on TPP. Truly awe inspiring.
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)because the "experts" thought she needed to in order to stay viable as a future presidential candidate.
kath
(10,565 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Bookmarked.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)RichVRichV
(885 posts)This NH only poll has a larger sample size of Democratic voters (360 polled) than the national NBC/WSJ poll (247 Democrats polled) being touted by Clinton followers all over the place.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)I'll simply say, this is great news, better than I expected to see when I clicked on this thread.
This is going to cause a lot of talk.
Thanks for posting it!
Vinca
(50,271 posts)She's unnatural. If you asked her the time of day, she'd have to consult with her aides before answering. On the rare occasion she speaks, unscripted, from the heart she is very appealing. I think she is being "overhandled" and it's not doing her any favors. She would be wise to follow Bernie's lead and just tell us what she thinks, love it or hate it.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)She says things like she and Bill were "dead broke" when they left the White House.
She tells stories about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire.
She says truly heartless things like "We came, we saw, he died" to sum up the U.S. role in Libya.
She's dangerous unscripted, but completely artificial and unconvincing when she's scripted.
You can't convincingly fake that you really care about regular people unless you truly do.
At least not for long.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Its good to know our support is neither requested nor required.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)A second place finish will doom Bernie. Hillary could recover from a second place finish in Bernies backyard.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Her lead over Sanders in New Hampshire is what's shrinking, not her lead over New Hampshire Democrats. And Sanders is not a New Hampshire Democrat.
The MSM are such lowlifes.