New NBC Poll: Hillary Clinton Dominates 2016 Democratic Field, Leads GOP Rivals
Source: NBC News
Hillary Clinton is leading her nearest Democratic competitor by a whopping 60 points, and she holds the early general-election advantage against the top Republican White House contenders, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
Seventy-five percent of national Democratic primary voters favor Clinton in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination - compared with 15 percent who pick Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., four percent who choose former Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., and two percent who select former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley.
What's more, 92 percent of Democratic voters say they could see themselves supporting Clinton for the Democratic nomination, which is up six points since March.
Just eight percent can't see themselves backing her in the current poll, which was conducted right after Clinton formally kicked off her presidential campaign with a rally in New York City. (By contrast, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's score among Republicans is 75-22 percent and Sen. Marco Rubio's, R-Fla., is 74-15 percent.)
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/hillary-clinton-dominates-2016-democratic-field-leads-gop-rivals-n379836
Hillary hasn't had any particularly significant news in her favor (thought the hype on the "scandals" have died down) since last poll. This is probably due more to the fact that the GOP field has become an even bigger clown show than 2012 and the more Americans see these guys, the less they like them.
Full results here:
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/A_Politics/6_22_PollPDF.pdf
Dem primary candidates crushing GOP field on favorability, Jeb leads GOP field, all GOP lose to Hillary by double digits, Obama approval trending back into positive territory
onehandle
(51,122 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)More like Madame Bush
apnu
(8,756 posts)Hillary is crafty, she's cagey, she's got willpower in spades. But is she anything like the BFEE? Hell no.
She won't be kissing saudi's on the lips.
She won't be eating cake while New Orleans drowns.
She won't be starting wars because somebody said something mean about her daddy.
She won't be slashing taxes for the 1% and bankrupting the Federal Government.
She won't be ignoring terrorist threats against the United States so she can take a vacation.
She won't be puking on foreign nationals.
She won't be up to her eyeballs in bank scandals.
She's not a oil soaked vampire, she's not the village idiot. She's nothing like any Bush, even Barbra Bush.
Is she a progressive? No. But she is a dependable liberal and has never wavered from liberalism.
I will be fine if she is President.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She is practically a member of the Bush family. Progressives need to split from the Democratic Party if they cannot prevent corporate war party candidates from controlling it. It's beyond disgusting. It's criminal.
Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)I bet all of them are on DU!
riversedge
(70,215 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)rwsanders
(2,599 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Wake up, sheeple!
rwsanders
(2,599 posts)I wouldn't be calling anyone a sheeple unless you can dispute L. Fletcher Prouty's exposure of the infiltration of the media by the CIA.
I personally remember how the Shrub was the presumptive candidate for the republicans long before anyone had voted and the media was useds as a ramrod for his candidacy.
Ad Hominems attacks don't do anything to help your credibility, just make me question your intellect.
still_one
(92,190 posts)also
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Remeber Unskewed Polls?
LOL.....
rwsanders
(2,599 posts)(NOT)
If anyone sounds GOP here, it is the people that have a fawning acceptance of these numbers. It sounds too much like right-wing "American exceptionalism" i.e. that polls or medial could never be manipulated here, that only happens over there.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)And I do believe this is one of those times.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)riversedge
(70,215 posts)I just read your comment--then ran across this Tweet. Great minds.
Eric Boehlert ?@EricBoehlert 3m3 minutes ago
ha. NBC poll: Hillary leads Jeb by 8 pts, Marco by 10 pts, which means 14 wks of Beltway chatter has been completely ignored by voters
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)audiences to show up at his events, and there's 10 million stories about "Crowd Size". I keep saying that Bernie has niche appeal, he can't broaden it, and that's not his fault. He is who he is.
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Sanders (who I plan to vote for) is basically where Ron Paul was in the GOP field - a solid, dedicated base of significance, but not one that will be likely expanded.
And anyone citing crowd size has no understanding of elections. Nader filled stadiums in 2000 and only got 2 percent. The GOP were adamant that the number of tea party crowds and Chik-Fil-A mobs were a surefire sign that Obama would be unseated in 2012.
The vast bulk of voters never attend political events.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)It can't be repeated enough. I understand it's exciting for his supporters, but that hasn't moved the numbers. In fact, the numbers for his main challenger have improved SIGNIFICANTLY.
BS has the same problem Howard Dean had in '04. He confused "the activist base" with the Democratic Party. He got shown, in very short order, that the two are very different animals.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Dean could've done better in a national election. He would at least fought back. Kerry rolled over. It's like the election didn't even matter.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Blown up by the media with spineless Dems not countering. Oooh. His voice got loud. Be a good little pawn and know you're place? You gotta be kidding me. What were you a Mondale and Dukakis supporter too? Wow.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)No offense to those who sell their bodies. It's a metaphor. Selling ones body is a practical choice. But real dirtbags sell their souls and our future.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)here.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Is that your sarcasm? How could she vote for anything as she's not in Congress anymore. She's probably too busy vacationing at the Bush compound anyway.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And used Pelosi as the pivot. I'm getting fed up with corporate money. This is not what our country is supposed to be about.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/01/08/americans-agree-on-trade-good-for-the-country-but-not-great-for-jobs/
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Who cares about polls. If Dems were unanimous in a poll to invade Iraq again then you would be ok with that? The vote for TPP was 60-37. 30 of those nays were democrats.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)It's all how you phrase the question.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)Not thrilled about another Clinton-Bush election, but I will support the nominee of the Democratic Party
Boomer
(4,168 posts)I support Bernie Sanders because he most accurately reflects my politics, but if Hillary Clinton wins the nomination she's got my vote. I figure either way I'm going to be pleased.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and there hasn't been a single debate. this reminds me of the non-coronation of 2008.
riversedge
(70,215 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Despite media efforts to make elections about personalities, voters still say they base vote on issues.
riversedge
(70,215 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)nothing new in that
Rossi
(56 posts)-- Public Image, Ltd.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)"Get thee beyond me, polls!
Unclean! UNCLEAN!!!"
rocktivity
herding cats
(19,564 posts)If anyone is supporting someone other than Hillary, they need to get to work. Real work, the grassroots kind, not the being snarky to people who support other candidates on the internet kind.
See if your candidate needs some people to make calls for donations, etc. Get to work folks!
Love the pic BTW!
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)in Denver.
Wall Street Journal - you know they want a Wall St. friendly President. And Bernie Sanders ain't it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)this is about corporate rule. hillary plays ball, bernie doesn.t. i wonder how many more days before m$nbc says just inaugurate her already.
brooklynite
(94,548 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Right before he captured 111 electoral votes and 46% of the popular vote. Crowd sizes can be misleading.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Stoopid lamestream media
DCBob
(24,689 posts)This is looking good!!
6chars
(3,967 posts)Rossi
(56 posts).
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)But he has declared himself to be a Democrat and that has been recognized by the party. Reporting or saying anything to the contrary is misleading.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)is still being listed as such on the Senate's website:
http://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)So are you calling the party leaders liars? Maybe you should show a little good faith and do the same.
okasha
(11,573 posts)The way you become a registered Democrat in Vermont is by joining the Vermont Democratic party, just as Dean, Leahy and state officials have done.
It's not rocket science, and it isn't a secret.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)for making the claim he is a Democrat? Yes or no?
okasha
(11,573 posts)Not the same thing.
He's going to have to become one, though, to run on the NH primary ballot.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Thanks for clearing that up.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Has he? I don't believe so.
It's what Sanders says about Sanders that counts. Not what you say about Sanders.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)I'd love to see a poll that juxtaposes presidential preferences with policy positions.
I expect that there'd be a major disconnect.
It is in HRC's best interest to remain a cipher as long as possible. Like "Hope and Change," her popularity is based primarily on a murky perception.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,315 posts)(The same goes for Jindal too)
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)I like Sanders, but the machine against him is just so strong. I can't back someone who doesn't fight for the lower and middle class. This corporate trade deal was just the last straw I guess.
I certainly can't vote Republican. Maybe I'll just write in Sanders or vote a third party if those are the only options.