Cameron 'will try to cling to power even if coalition loses majority'
Source: The Guardian
The polls are consistently indicating a hung parliament, with the Tories gaining slightly more seats than Labour but the Liberal Democrats losing so many that a combined Tory-Lib Dem coalition would not get a majority in the Commons.
There are now reports that Cameron will in this scenario insist on staying on in Downing Street regardless of his ability to pass laws in the Commons, rather than allow Labour a chance to form a government leading to a constitutional gridlock.
A senior Labour official said: All the noise coming out of the mouths of David Cameron and Nick Clegg is about how they can cling on to power even if their coalition loses its majority.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/04/cameron-to-cling-onto-power-coalition-majority-lib-dem-tories
Historically, Parliament could be dissolved by a vote of no confidence, so a majority Party or coalition was necessary. The new FIXED TERM PARLIAMENTS ACT may allow Cameron to try to run a minority Government.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)I would consider the party worthy of elimination.
rurallib
(62,411 posts)after signing on with Cameron in the first place. What a bunch of power grabbing whores.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Nihil
(13,508 posts)> What a bunch of power grabbing whores.
T_i_B
(14,737 posts)But beyond that they aren't fussy at all. All that seems to matter to the Lib Dems is that Nick Clegg keeps his cushy job and salary.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)What it changed is that the government itself cannot call a snap election without a supermajority of two-thirds agreeing.
Section 2 of the Act also provides for two ways in which a general election can be held before the end of this five-year period:
If the House of Commons, with the support of two-thirds of its total membership (including vacant seats), resolves "That there shall be an early parliamentary general election".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixed-term_Parliaments_Act_2011
The fourteen days is to give time for a different government to be formed by a new coalition (or with a different PM) if that is feasible.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Politicians who run for office want to be in or stay power.
What The Guardian is saying is water is wet.
If only the SNP wasn't a factor
Gumboot
(531 posts)... is every single old Etonian removed from Westminster.
A tall order I know, but this jaded expat can still dream.
I'm really hoping The Greens will do well enough to make a difference.
T_i_B
(14,737 posts)But beyond that, I wouldn't expect Greens to be wining any seats, although they could finish 2nd or 3rd in a few places. I have noticed quite a few Green party posters and lawn signs in Sheffield for instance.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)The SNP is ideologically close to Labour and Nicola Sturgeon has already said the SNP will do what it can to ensure the Cons don't stay in power.
Britain just may see the most meaningful Parliament since Clement Attlee under a Labour-SNP coalition govt.
Nihil
(13,508 posts)The combination of the usual Labour whores and some power-hungry Scot is not going to make
any more sense than when the Lib Dems turned traitor and sold out to the Tories.
Bring back Guy Fawkes - the only man ever to enter parliament with honest intentions.