Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:23 PM Apr 2012

$1 felony: Florida man charged over soda bill at McDonald's

Source: Christian Science Monitor

A Florida man faces felony charges after refusing to pay $1 for a cup of soda in an East Naples McDonald’s restaurant.

The local manager told sheriff's deputies that Mark Abaire filled a courtesy cup with soda and walked out of the building without paying. A McDonald's employee told him the cup was only for water. However, Abaire filled it with soda from the fountain machine and went to sit outside the restaurant.

The police report stated that when the manager asked him to pay, Abaire declined, cursed at him and refused to leave the premises, the Naples News reported.

Collier County deputies later arrested Abaire who now faces felony charges, according to the same report.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/1-felony-florida-man-charged-over-soda-bill-165100768.html;_ylt=A2KLOzKvXJhPL1QAST3QtDMD

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$1 felony: Florida man charged over soda bill at McDonald's (Original Post) shawn703 Apr 2012 OP
The free cup probably cost more than the soda was worth. bluesbassman Apr 2012 #1
"The initial charge was for petty theft. But due to Abaire’s record of prior petty theft convictions PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #2
Floriaduh is not the only state still in the russspeakeasy Apr 2012 #4
The Wikipedia article lists the states and hightlights some infamous applications of the laws: PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #5
They missed the dreaded Cheese Bandit of Yolo County KamaAina Apr 2012 #17
Prison Labor.. the fastest growing segment of the labor market... lib2DaBone Apr 2012 #33
and the private prisons get a healthy kickback from uncle sam for each inmate housed Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #46
Pretty good example of what is wrong with "three strikes" laws. yellowcanine Apr 2012 #45
Does he get free soda in jail? libinnyandia Apr 2012 #3
What a piece of shit joeglow3 Apr 2012 #6
sounds like he wanted to get back inside the joint grantcart Apr 2012 #18
Your tax dollars will pay for his incarceration NickB79 Apr 2012 #41
it's not like it was an accident d_r Apr 2012 #7
Exactly. nt cstanleytech Apr 2012 #8
The initial charge was for petty theft. But due to Abaire’s record of prior petty theft convictions AlbertCat Apr 2012 #9
but do the taxpayers deserve to pay $40,000 for that cup of soda? grasswire Apr 2012 #12
Three strikes laws are meant to disenfranchise more Dem voters shawn703 Apr 2012 #15
LOL. tabasco Apr 2012 #21
Must be my age? shawn703 Apr 2012 #22
Do you have any evidence that multiple-felons are more likely to be Democratic voters? tabasco Apr 2012 #24
This is not a multiple felony shawn703 Apr 2012 #27
I'm not googling squat. tabasco Apr 2012 #28
Nice straw man shawn703 Apr 2012 #29
So, you don't have any evidence for your claim tabasco Apr 2012 #39
Well that's easy shawn703 Apr 2012 #40
Slam. Dunk. Win. Very nice, sir. nt NickB79 Apr 2012 #43
So, you 're speculating. tabasco Apr 2012 #51
What were your answers to my questions? shawn703 Apr 2012 #52
So, you're speculating. tabasco Apr 2012 #53
Your numbers shawn703 Apr 2012 #54
Yes, those are numbers. From two Minn. professors. That don't prove anything. tabasco Apr 2012 #56
Obviously you haven't read the whole document shawn703 Apr 2012 #57
Or benefit for-profit prison companies. alp227 Apr 2012 #23
If he deserves it, then much of DU deserves for illegal downloads. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2012 #25
much of DU would not confess to a crime in a post on the internets JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2012 #36
Even if the guy is a jerk it's just a few cents worth of soda Auggie Apr 2012 #10
so the taxpayers of FL are going to pay $40,000/year... grasswire Apr 2012 #11
That's exactly what I thought! NickB79 Apr 2012 #42
Nope. Because its all but certain he will serve little or no time onenote Apr 2012 #44
This act is a felony? Give me a break! Paper Roses Apr 2012 #13
Observation: there are a lot of law-and-order republicans on this thread. Occulus Apr 2012 #14
Ain't that the truth. CanSocDem Apr 2012 #19
Indeed! Dogtown Apr 2012 #35
Dude ain't a victim! d_r Apr 2012 #38
Look on the bright side -- the perp is a 52 year old white guy. FarCenter Apr 2012 #16
If only he could have helped Rmoney ruin and loot a company, SDjack Apr 2012 #20
This guy has a history, I'm not sympathetic. Odin2005 Apr 2012 #26
"I'm not sympathetic." Dogtown Apr 2012 #34
Police State run amok. sarcasmo Apr 2012 #30
lol Complete idiot chrisa Apr 2012 #31
Someone who willingly gets felony charges for a soda has mental issues bigger than crime... saras Apr 2012 #32
Under Florida's sentencing guidelines there's virtually no chance this guy does much time if any onenote Apr 2012 #37
any way this is handled, the cost is disproportionate to the crime grasswire Apr 2012 #47
As you acknowledge, any process is going to cost more than $1 onenote Apr 2012 #48
the question is larger grasswire Apr 2012 #50
Im just saying KinMd Apr 2012 #49
where are the arrests for the BANKERS lovuian Apr 2012 #55

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. "The initial charge was for petty theft. But due to Abaire’s record of prior petty theft convictions
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:27 PM
Apr 2012

the charge was increased from a misdemeanor to a felony under Florida's 'three strikes' statute."

That's the key part of the story. Not the first time or state that something similar has happened in as
a result of 'three strike' laws.

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)
4. Floriaduh is not the only state still in the
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:33 PM
Apr 2012

stone age...? I guess that's good to know. I wonder how many "petty" criminals are in prison under this law.
As long as we have prisons for profit, I guess we need to fill them up.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
17. They missed the dreaded Cheese Bandit of Yolo County
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 05:35 PM
Apr 2012
http://www.zimbio.com/Robert+Ferguson/articles/hhyAdRSd67k/Robert+Ferguson+Sentenced+7+Years+8+Months

On Monday, Yolo County Judge Thomas Warriner sentenced career criminal Robert Ferguson to seven years and eight months in prison for stealing a package of cheese, worth $3.99, from a Woodland Nugget Market, by putting the package in his trousers, according to the Sacramento Bee. The prosecutors had originally sought a life sentence for Ferguson under the state's "three strikes" law, but dropped their bid last month by stating a psychological report had convinced them such a sentence was unwarranted.

Okay, it was Tillamook cheese, but seven years?!
 

lib2DaBone

(8,124 posts)
33. Prison Labor.. the fastest growing segment of the labor market...
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 03:41 AM
Apr 2012

Entire prisons are being offered to employment agencies for use as call centers, assembly work and farming.

Prisoners are paid 10 cents an hour and work 10-15 hours a day.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
46. and the private prisons get a healthy kickback from uncle sam for each inmate housed
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 03:45 PM
Apr 2012

if the prison isn't filled past capacity, then the prison's "CEO" is losing money

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
45. Pretty good example of what is wrong with "three strikes" laws.
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 03:04 PM
Apr 2012

Now the public gets to pay for keeping him in a prison if he is convicted. Really stupid.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
6. What a piece of shit
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:39 PM
Apr 2012

"The police report stated that when the manager asked him to pay, Abaire declined, cursed at him and refused to leave the premises, the Naples News reported."

You just got busted. Be an adult, admit it and try to rectify it. Telling the guy to fuck off and refusing to leave gives me little sympathy for the guy.

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
41. Your tax dollars will pay for his incarceration
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 02:52 PM
Apr 2012

$50K per year for however many years this guy is in prison, all because of a $1 soda?

d_r

(6,907 posts)
7. it's not like it was an accident
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:41 PM
Apr 2012

or a misunderstanding. The dude knew what he was doing, was asked to pay for it, and cursed them out for asking him to pay for it. He could have been cool and gotten out of that, but he had to be an asshole.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
9. The initial charge was for petty theft. But due to Abaire’s record of prior petty theft convictions
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:58 PM
Apr 2012

Just a reminder.

He deserves it.


Now if we would just do this to big-wig crooks, like....oh...Bush & Cheney. Or Wall Street crooks.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
12. but do the taxpayers deserve to pay $40,000 for that cup of soda?
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 05:02 PM
Apr 2012

That's the cost of locking the perp up for a year.

How about some common sense here?

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
24. Do you have any evidence that multiple-felons are more likely to be Democratic voters?
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 07:50 PM
Apr 2012

Please provide your sources or I will consider you a liar.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
27. This is not a multiple felony
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 08:07 PM
Apr 2012

Last edited Wed Apr 25, 2012, 08:43 PM - Edit history (1)

This is a misdemeanor turned into a felony because it is the third offense. Do I need to tell you what happens in Florida to the voting rights of people who are convicted of felonies? Do I really also need to tell you what political party felon disenfranchisement laws hurt the most? Try Google searching Florida 2000 felon disenfranchisement for some education.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
28. I'm not googling squat.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 08:14 PM
Apr 2012

You made the claim that more Democratic voters are criminals, so let's see your proof.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
39. So, you don't have any evidence for your claim
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 01:49 PM
Apr 2012

that the three-strikes law "disenfranchise[s] more Dem voters?"

Help me out here, professor.

If you say a three strikes law disenfranchises more Democratic voters, how is that NOT saying more Democrats are criminals?

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
40. Well that's easy
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 02:27 PM
Apr 2012

For one, prosecutors have a lot of flexibility determining which crimes they want to prosecute, what charge they will attempt to prosecute, and what penalty they will request during sentencing phase if there is a conviction. They also can choose who they will work with for a possible plea bargain and who they will try to go for the maximum sentence. The quality of representation the defendant has can play a large part in this too. This has nothing to do with who is actually engaging in criminal activity (what you are saying is my claim) and who is able to get away with it, in addition to who is best able to avoid a wrongful conviction.

With that said, I have some questions for you:
1. Which political party is most heavily favored by minorities?
2. Do you believe minorities in this country are treated the same way whites are by our legal system as a whole?

Depending on your answers to those questions, you may or may not be able to follow the logic in answering these questions:

3. Are minorities more or less likely than whites to be affected by three strikes laws?
4. Would this have a higher chance of affecting votes for Democratic or Republican candidates?



And for evidence to support my claim, how about this?

http://www.dcvote.org/pdfs/papers/woatdcrights.pdf

The number of people disenfranchised as a result of criminal convictions has increased
dramatically in recent years as a result of the introduction of harsh sentencing policies such as
mandatory minimum sentences, "three strikes" laws and truth-in- sentencing
laws. Although crime rates have been relatively stable, these laws have increased the number of
offenders sent to prison and the length of time they serve. “In California, for example, more than
40,000 offenders have been sentenced under the state's "three strikes" law as of June 1998….
Seventy percent of sentenced three-strike offenders were either African American or Hispanic.”



 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
51. So, you 're speculating.
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:25 PM
Apr 2012

Provide some numbers on political affiliation of convicted criminals in Florida.

Or you're just blowing a lot of hot air.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
52. What were your answers to my questions?
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:40 PM
Apr 2012

Apply some intellectual honesty here. I've cited evidence of how three strikes laws disproportionately affect minorities. Are you living in an alternate reality where minorities tend to vote Republican? If not, please show me how you came to the conclusion that three strikes laws are not more likely to disenfranchise Democrats than Republicans.

I'm not holding my breath.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
53. So, you're speculating.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:39 PM
Apr 2012

That's what I thought. I'll be standing by for those Florida numbers. There weren't any in the one link you provided.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
54. Your numbers
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:57 PM
Apr 2012

From here:
http://felonvoting.procon.org/sourcefiles/uggen_manza_asr_02.pdf


Sorry this is copied from a table in a PDF (page 17 of the PDF, says page 793 in the top right corner.)


Unit
U.S. total
Florida felons and ex-felons 50-percent lower turnout
Florida ex-felons only 50-percent lower turnout
Actual Total Republican Disenfran Margin -chised
–539,947 4,695,729
537 827,207 — —
— 613,514 — —
Estimated Estimated Turnout Percent
Percent Democrat 29.7 68.9
27.2 68.9 13.6 68.9
27.2 68.9 13.6 68.9
Net Democratic Votes Lost
527,171
85,050 42,525
63,079 31,540
Counter- factual Democratic Margin
1,067,118
84,513 41,988
62,542 31,003
Sources: Congressional Quarterly, Inc. (2000); Current (2000).
Population Survey (2000); National Election Study



Those are your numbers, though I would highly recommend reading the whole document. It is very informative and explains why felon disenfranchisement is very much a political tool.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
56. Yes, those are numbers. From two Minn. professors. That don't prove anything.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:59 PM
Apr 2012

"To analyze the expected turnout and vote
choice of disenfranchised felons, we do not
have any survey data that asks disenfranchised
felons how they would have voted."

Good try, though.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
57. Obviously you haven't read the whole document
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:40 PM
Apr 2012

Or you are not being intellectually honest and weighing the evidence presented which tells you how they reached their conclusions.

Either way, get back to me when you've done your own research on the topic and have reached an informed decision. Ignorance isn't good for anyone.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
36. much of DU would not confess to a crime in a post on the internets
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:21 AM
Apr 2012

WWTGSAT - What Would TaterGuy Say About This?

Auggie

(31,169 posts)
10. Even if the guy is a jerk it's just a few cents worth of soda
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:58 PM
Apr 2012

The McDonald's manager is an ass-hole -- they're tying up the courts over this?

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
11. so the taxpayers of FL are going to pay $40,000/year...
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 05:00 PM
Apr 2012

...to keep this guy in custody?

Florida is that flush with cash?

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
42. That's exactly what I thought!
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 02:53 PM
Apr 2012

That soda is going to end up costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars in the end. Not only do we have to pay to incarcerate him, but the add-on effects of him not working a job, being a productive member of society, etc.

This was a fucking stupid move by the Florida cops on every level.

onenote

(42,701 posts)
44. Nope. Because its all but certain he will serve little or no time
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 03:00 PM
Apr 2012

Under Florida's sentencing guidelines, this guy could commit this offense nearly a dozen separate times (and be charged with a felony each time) before he would be subject to a mandatory minimum term. Without a mandatory minimum sentence, even as a repeat offender, the most he might get is suspended sentence.

How would you propose to deal with repeat offenders that is different from the way Florida deals with them?

 

CanSocDem

(3,286 posts)
19. Ain't that the truth.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 06:07 PM
Apr 2012


Of course. it's acceptable when one of the pillars of American Society is under attack.

.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
38. Dude ain't a victim!
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 12:45 PM
Apr 2012

There were a thousand ways he could have gotten out of that but he pushed it and pushed it.

SDjack

(1,448 posts)
20. If only he could have helped Rmoney ruin and loot a company,
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 06:10 PM
Apr 2012

then he could buy his sodas for the rest of his life.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
32. Someone who willingly gets felony charges for a soda has mental issues bigger than crime...
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 09:41 PM
Apr 2012

... but America doesn't believe in their existence, let alone treatment, unless they fall into a category that it is profitable to medicate.

I think he should be given the choice between sane, respectful, person-centered psychiatric treatment and education, or a safe, healthy form of imprisonment. But America has neither, nor much interest in providing them. So I may as well offer flying monkeys and magic tiaras.

But the idea of someone "deserving" our current imprisonment system, from which nearly no one returns undamaged, for even three stolen soda pops is just sick. I hate to think what they'd do with a real thief - say a drunk kid that rips off a $1000 bike to ride home on and leaves it in a ditch a block from their house, the kind we see fairly regularly.

onenote

(42,701 posts)
37. Under Florida's sentencing guidelines there's virtually no chance this guy does much time if any
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:52 AM
Apr 2012

Last edited Thu Apr 26, 2012, 03:26 PM - Edit history (1)

There's a lot of heat in this thread, but not much light, so I'll try to provide some information that might put this matter in perspective.

First, as has been pointed out, this guy was charged with a felony for what would otherwise be a misdemeanor petty theft offense because he's a multiple repeat offender. Interestingly, as will be shown, this approach may well keep him out of jail (or at least get him a shorter sentence) than an approach that applies a mandatory misdemeanor sentence to multiple offenders.

Second, under Florida sentencing guidelines, felonies are broken into different classes. A repeat petty theft offender is charged with a third degree felony, the lowest level of felony. The maximum sentence for any third degree felony is five years. But there is a formula to determine the minimum sentence. The offense at hand, plus any prior felony offenses are "scored" and only when the score hits 44 points does a minimum sentence of one year kick in. This guy's multiple petty theft offense is scored at 4 points and as best I can tell, despite his rather long rap sheet, his total score based on prior felonies will be below 44 which means he still isn't subject to a mandatory sentence. The judge has discretion to let him go or fine him instead of sending him to prison. And in practice, where the point total is below 44, its pretty common for judges to impose a "community control" sentence (a form of house arrest) rather than send the accused to prison. At most he's likely to face 60 days, which is the maximum sentence for a second degree misdemeanor (but which doesn't apparently apply to repeat petty theft offenses).

Thus, for all of the noise on this thread, the Florida approach in this instance (but not necessarily in other instances, such as those involving violent crimes) is commendable in that it avoids imposing minimum sentences until someone has accumulated a substantial record of criminal activity and uses a formula under which the minimum sentence varies depending on the actual record of the offender.

I'm curious how others here would approach this situation. Should stealing a $1 soda not be a crime at all? How would that work? Should it always be a misdemeanor? Should someone who commits the same offense over and over be treated the same as a first time offender? If not, should the multiple offender be subject to a mandatory sentence? Again, under a mandatory misdemeanor sentence situation, this guy could be facing certain jail time. As it stands, he's going to have another felony charge on his record, but chances are the judge will have the discretion to let him go without any jail time or with very minimal jail time rather than be compelled to sentence him to a specified minimum sentence.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
47. any way this is handled, the cost is disproportionate to the crime
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 04:05 PM
Apr 2012

Court costs, cost of jailing the perp if he can't bail out, cost of supervision if he's under some sort of order or monitoring, cost of social services.....

No matter what is done to him, the cost is disproportionate to even a dozen petty crimes.

Money spent to adjudicate those petty crimes comes directly from the pot of money that could be used for schools, for parks, for services to elderly and families, for mental health care, for low-cost clinics.

Money spent to jail petty criminals makes money for corporations, without any deterrent effect.

Let's see.....schools, parks, social services? Or prison-industrial corporations? Where should the money go?

I believe in a concept called Restorative Justice, where victim and offender are both served in ways that divert every possible person from jail time. But that, too, takes money to administer.

No easy answers here.

The prison industrial complex has hyper-monetized the system.

onenote

(42,701 posts)
48. As you acknowledge, any process is going to cost more than $1
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 04:24 PM
Apr 2012

So should there be a point at which its legal to steal? I doubt that would win a lot of support. So if you're going to have a system in which its against the law to steal things, even things of relatively nominal value, you're going to have to deal with enforcement and you're going to have to deal with whether or not a one-time offender should be treated the same as someone who commits the same sort of offense over and over.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
50. the question is larger
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:52 PM
Apr 2012

....and the answering of it requires the specificity of the desires of local voters.

I can't speak for Florida voters. Do they value order above all else? What are they willing to sacrifice to maintain scrupulous order?

Aside from that, there is a whole set of questions as to whether we as a society make it legal to steal when we don't demand the same enforcement for a billion dollar theft as we seek for a one dollar theft. That appears to be your point at which is it legal to steal (if failure to prosecute is tacit legality).

Those who have not sought prosecution of large-scale theft support legalization of stealing. Yes? No?


KinMd

(966 posts)
49. Im just saying
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:20 PM
Apr 2012

but it coud be this guy was being loud and refusing to leave the McD's, so they locked him up to get him off the premises. Im betting they drop the charges, or release him OR and hope he dissapears

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»$1 felony: Florida man ch...