Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 12:34 PM Apr 2015

Fukushima robot stranded after stalling inside reactor

Source: Guardian

Decommissioning work at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has suffered a setback after a robot sent in to a damaged reactor to locate melted fuel stalled hours into its mission and had to be abandoned.

The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), said the robot stopped moving on Friday during its first inspection of the containment vessel inside reactor No 1, one of the three reactors that suffered meltdown after the plant was struck by an earthquake and tsunami in March 2011.

Tepco, which recently conceded that the technology for robots to retrieve the nuclear fuel had yet to be developed, said on Monday it would cut the cables to the stranded robot and postpone a similar inspection using a separate device.

Developed by Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy and the International Research Institute for Nuclear Decommissioning, the robot was supposed to be able to function for about 10 hours even when exposed to radiation at levels that would cause ordinary electronic devices to malfunction.



Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/apr/13/fukushima-robot-stalls-reactor-abandoned

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fukushima robot stranded after stalling inside reactor (Original Post) jakeXT Apr 2015 OP
We're only good at F-ing up the earth Plucketeer Apr 2015 #1
Back to the robot-engineering board. Trillo Apr 2015 #2
One possible explanation daleo Apr 2015 #17
They were actually lower FBaggins Apr 2015 #22
10 Sv/hour was the reading reported by the Japan Times. Octafish Apr 2015 #34
And that was lower than expected FBaggins Apr 2015 #35
'A classic "duh" moment.' Octafish Apr 2015 #36
I find it unbelievable that we can send a robot Calista241 Apr 2015 #26
It wasn't "designed for ten hours" FBaggins Apr 2015 #28
This would make one hell of a sci-fi movie! KamaAina Apr 2015 #3
Or a reality-TV show! nt bananas Apr 2015 #4
Was it fried by the radiation in there? The Stranger Apr 2015 #5
9.7 sievert, enough to kill humans... I don't know about robots jakeXT Apr 2015 #6
Ionizing radiation is bad for electronics. You can shield them, but at some point the shielding AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #9
Which is one reason putting computers in everything, while good for Intel, is stupid. bemildred Apr 2015 #21
Wall-e never got a fair break either benld74 Apr 2015 #7
hmm... chervilant Apr 2015 #8
Dosage, it's a thing. Who knew? AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #10
i wonder if this pacific warming is not related too questionseverything Apr 2015 #12
Fully unrelated. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #14
Nuke plants are made to heat water RobertEarl Apr 2015 #18
Then why isn't the pacific cooler? FBaggins Apr 2015 #23
The only reactor that could do it is probably in the center jakeXT Apr 2015 #31
The possibility is there RobertEarl Apr 2015 #37
You go get it! Nuh-uh, you! No way, man, YOU do it!! Myrina Apr 2015 #11
Nasty stuff, radiation. nt bemildred Apr 2015 #13
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2015 #15
Japan is a blasting of liberal politics it just blows the mind mrdmk Apr 2015 #19
Time to put Carlos Ghosn in charge Monk06 Apr 2015 #16
This robot was three years in its making Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #20
that is the thing about technology-sometimes the damn thing just does not work dembotoz Apr 2015 #24
lets hope but that company is the number one for robot tech in the world Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #25
There isn't any evidence that there's anything wrong with the robot FBaggins Apr 2015 #27
Well wait three more years until they get the next robot built Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #29
You're kidding, right? FBaggins Apr 2015 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Alkene Apr 2015 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #33

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
35. And that was lower than expected
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 11:14 AM
Apr 2015
According to Tepco spokesman Teruaki Kobayashi radiation was significantly lower than expected, so that future robots could remain in the reactor longer and wireless data connections are conceivable

http://khon2.com/2015/04/14/tepco-abandons-robot-stranded-inside-fukushima-plant-some-data-received/


a level fatal for humans

A classic "duh" moment.

What did you expect? We're not talking about tiny amounts of volatile isotopes that can barely be picked out of the background radiation levels. We're talking about physical pieces of nuclear fuel. Of course the dose rate is going to be much higher.

Just not as high as they expected.

My speculation is that they assumed that the melt-through occurred early (and quickly) enough that the molten corium "sprayed" out of the bottom of the RPV rather than flowing as a relatively cohesive mass. That would leave much of the corium all over this level and potential dose rate would be a couple orders of magnitude higher.

Don't worry...you'll see some very high readings once they send a waterproof unit to the lower level.

FYI -The second robot entered containment yesterday.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
26. I find it unbelievable that we can send a robot
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:10 PM
Apr 2015

To Mars and can't get a robot to investigate this.

Think what Curiosity had to go through to get to Mars, and is performing more or less perfectly.

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
28. It wasn't "designed for ten hours"
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:32 PM
Apr 2015

The mission was expected to take that long. They were actually able to complete ~2/3 of the mission (including the primary goal) before the unit got stuck.

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
6. 9.7 sievert, enough to kill humans... I don't know about robots
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 02:40 PM
Apr 2015

Radiation measured at deadly 9.7 sieverts in Fukushima reactor

Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Monday that radiation in the primary containment vessel of the No. 1 reactor of the Fukushima No. 1 power station gets as high as 9.7 sieverts per hour — enough to kill a human within an hour.

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/04/13/national/radiation-measured-at-deadly-9-7-sieverts-in-fukushima-reactor/

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
9. Ionizing radiation is bad for electronics. You can shield them, but at some point the shielding
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 03:49 PM
Apr 2015

weighs so much it stops being a robot, and starts being an appliance that doesn't go anywhere. The radiation near the containment is high enough to disrupt electronics, so this is to be expected, unfortunately.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
21. Which is one reason putting computers in everything, while good for Intel, is stupid.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:54 AM
Apr 2015

In exchange for being cheap, mechanical systems give you reliability, maintainability, and tolerance of normal environmental hazards. I love old mechanical stuff because it works forever and you can fix it. You do not spend your days learnng the latest stuff that some nerd in Redmond came up with.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
8. hmm...
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 02:55 PM
Apr 2015
Developed by Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy and the International Research Institute for Nuclear Decommissioning, the robot was supposed to be able to function for about 10 hours even when exposed to radiation at levels that would cause ordinary ELECTRONIC devices to malfunction.


Let's see...

--"it's only as much radiation as you would get eating a few bananas."

--"it's the equivalent of having two __________." (fill in the blank with your favorite fruit or vegetable.)

--"it's less radiation than you'd get from an x-ray."

--"the Pacific is HUGE, and will disperse the radiation until it's no longer harmful."

How many more of these statements have you read, right here on DU?

Fukushima is and will be a major catastrophe, for decades to come. The NIMBY folks seem to be struggling hard to deny that fact.

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
12. i wonder if this pacific warming is not related too
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 04:23 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112783963

i am no scientist but i know the cooling pond for our local nuke plant's water is warm year round

unfortunately at this point it doesn't look like we will have to wait for global warming to kill the oceans ,looks like we are already there

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
14. Fully unrelated.
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 06:13 PM
Apr 2015

There have been a couple 'fukushima is heating the pacific' threads, but no, physically impossible. Whatever is left of the cores at that site, they are only putting out decay heat, which is a teeny tiny fraction of the thermal output of a working reactor core. 'Hot' in more than one sense, but not mW of thermal output.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022750608

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
18. Nuke plants are made to heat water
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 10:46 PM
Apr 2015

Nuclear spent fuel, when contained {but it so happens much Fukushima material is in the Pacific, see the cesium found at Vancouver?} create heat for years and years.

Not only that, but when the earthquake tore up the piping and the 3 active cores puked their guts, that puke went right into the ocean. Hot stuff, man. Hot stuff.

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
23. Then why isn't the pacific cooler?
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 06:20 AM
Apr 2015

Last edited Tue Apr 14, 2015, 07:46 AM - Edit history (1)

Japan has after all turned dozens of units off for over two years now.

You really think that each of those melted cores is producing 20+ times as much heat as when it was actually active?

Can't wait to hear the "science" on this one.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
37. The possibility is there
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 02:01 PM
Apr 2015

No one is saying the sole reason for the extra heating is due to Fukushima, but science does make a case for the heat from melted cores and the alkali chemicals to be a contributing factor in the anomaly. To deny that is to be a science denier.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
15. K&R
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 06:28 PM
Apr 2015


- There is this famous Greek saying: ''?? ?ά?? ????ά?? ??ό ?? ???ά??.'' (The fish stinks from the head.) Which in today's terms would translate into: ''Your Prime Minister is driving your country into a shithole from which it will never reemerge.''

mrdmk

(2,943 posts)
19. Japan is a blasting of liberal politics it just blows the mind
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:29 AM
Apr 2015

Really, no wonder they cannot get this Fukushima problem fixed.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
20. This robot was three years in its making
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 03:05 AM
Apr 2015

three years ago Toshiba launches radiation-proof robot to clean up Fukushima The robot, which was specially designed to help decommission Japan's crippled Fukushima Daichi nuclear plant, features a dosimeter to measure radiation and six cameras.


http://rt.com/news/fukushima-radiation-proof-robot-292/

I see a runaway major world catastrophic fuck us that they an't telling the world............... three years for that robot... they don't know if they will launch another and they really don't know how to fix this.

dembotoz

(16,804 posts)
24. that is the thing about technology-sometimes the damn thing just does not work
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:44 AM
Apr 2015

lets hope they figure out what went wrong with plan a and come up with a better plan b

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
25. lets hope but that company is the number one for robot tech in the world
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:03 PM
Apr 2015

and it took three years to send it into the pit of hell


Remember when they had the giant ice dam plan for the reactors?
what happened to that?

Listen, my dad worked in the science of nukes so I know things that Tepco and the Japanese govt is not telling the public because of the implications of facing that reality.

anyway has my sig says..............DON'T PANIC........

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
27. There isn't any evidence that there's anything wrong with the robot
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:27 PM
Apr 2015

Certainly nothing related to radiation exposure.

It looks like they drove it into a spot that they can't get it out of. That's user error, not system failure.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
29. Well wait three more years until they get the next robot built
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:37 PM
Apr 2015

still doesn't mean shit....... they don't know how to fix it and they admitted it.

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
30. You're kidding, right?
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:40 PM
Apr 2015

They have mutliple units built. A second one was scheduled to go in yesterday from the other side of the containment, but that was delayed while they investigate how this one got stuck.

Then there's a follow-on model that's waterproof so that it can go further down to examine the corium. That's due to be completed around the end of the year.

Response to jakeXT (Original post)

Response to jakeXT (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fukushima robot stranded ...