Muslim population in Europe to reach 10% by 2050, new forecast shows
Source: The Guardian
Thursday 2 April 2015 15.01 BST
Muslims will nearly double their numbers in Europe to more than 10% by 2050 and will outnumber Christians worldwide by 2070, according to a new forecast of the growth of religions around the world.
The report, by Pew Research Center, also predicts that Muslims will become the second-largest religious group in the US at 2.1% by 2050.
Europes Muslim population, boosted by large families and immigration, will nearly double, from less than 6% (43 million people) in 2010 to more than 10% (71 million people) in 2050, the forecast estimates.
The US by 2050 will still have more Christians than any other denomination, according to the report, but they will decline from 77% to 66% of the population.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/muslim-population-growth-christians-religion-pew
Watch for RW heads to explode, both in Europe and in the States. Their bogeyman is on the move!
Muslims 'r us ! !
OMG, they're in yr streets, in yr buildings, in yr head!
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Marksman_91
(2,035 posts)I'd rather see the growth of a population that does not identify with any religion.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)marginalizing them and keeping them out of the mainstream.
Larry Engels
(387 posts)Yes and no. They want the benefits, but as a whole, they don't seem to want to assimilate. Of course, there are plenty of exceptions, but the larger muslim community looks at them as mavericks.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)of opportunity keep them out.
Larry Engels
(387 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)'star and crescent' patches on Muslim arms?
Larry Engels
(387 posts)Who said anything about that? Not me. Wow! Paranoia strikes deep!
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)second-hand knowledge?
Most Muslims see integrated ones as mavericks, reeeely? Show me the study...
Larry Engels
(387 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Well, this American opinion piece from 2005 is really germane to the discussion.
Thanks for that!
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Larry Engels
(387 posts)It's obviously gotten worse since then.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Larry Engels
(387 posts)Credit: Manhattan Institute. Much more here:
http://www.ijreview.com/2015/01/234263-president-obama-points-reason-american-muslims-less-radicalized-right/
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Larry Engels
(387 posts)Finally something that doesn't come out of a pre-cooked can of political correctness. Not kidding.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)Larry Engels
(387 posts)I'm sure of it.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Seriously.
Is this figure based on ethnicity? If you're French of Algerian descent do you get counted as Muslim?
I wonder how many people who are nominally Muslim are actually indifferent to the creed. Kind of like members of most religious faiths. I grew up in a Christian family. Does that make me a Christian? It may, but that stuff doesn't actually mean much in my real life.
And then there's the conflating of Islam with radical Islam...
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)or simply of Muslim ethnicity and extraction?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)architecture and such.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)are really bursting at the seams every Sunday.
NOT!
pampango
(24,692 posts)The European right is reacting to a Muslim population of 10% roughly like our right reacts to a 10% population (and growing) of African Americans or Hispanics - PANIC.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)his hair on fire...
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)Not about descent (it also takes into account converts (including 'converting' to no religion) in its predictions, for instance). But it's true that many nominal members of a religion may not let it affect their lives much.
You can see the soruces they used for each country here: http://www.pewforum.org/files/2015/04/PF_15.04.02_ProjectionsAppendixB.pdf
In the USA, for instance, it is 'based on 2010 combined Pew Research Center surveys for adults and four waves (2004-2010) of the National Opinion Research Centers General Social Survey for children (age 0-19)'. So your classification would depend on whether you answer 'Christian' when asked.
"And then there's the conflating of Islam with radical Islam..."
Well, it's a lot easier to objectively say whether someone follows Islam than to say they follow the subset 'radical Islam'. They are all in Islam; if you wish to define a subset, it's up to you to give a good definition and work out how to split the people.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)Unaffiliated will grow from 18.8% in 2010 to 23.3% in 2050.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)The number of people who describe themselves as atheist, agnostic or 'unaffiliated' is growing all the time. And that does not include people who identify nominally with a religion but do not take it very seriously: 'cultural' Christians; 'secular' Jews and Muslims; etc. In the UK, less than ten per cent of people attend church weekly.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)do they outnumber atheists and agnostics? I think that the atheists and agnostics are the ones who are really coming into the majority.
This is a scare tactic, plain and simple. AFAIC, it is high time for an END to all religions!
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)(and it's only worldwide, by 2070, that they're predicting Muslims will outnumber Christians).
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Do you have links to the recent study showing that?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)To a question?
If you read my post it asked a question. I do not understand why one would expect a link to a question. Perhaps you could enlighten me.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)My dear Rocco, the only reason I asked if you had any documentary proof was becasue I wanted to put the link into this thread!
I was so busy with all of the 'breaking' yesterday, that I didn't have time to go 'googling'.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)that is essential to a viable solution.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)rather than trying to change them for the worse.
If they started insisting on veils, keeping women as second class citizens and promoting sharia law then it will be problematic.
One's religion should be confined to one's heart, home and place of worship. There should be no religion anywhere else.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)changes occurring in France (& Europe) as we speak.
The Muslim population is still on the outer fringes and must be brought in from the cold.
Integrating Europe's Muslim Minorities: Public Anxieties, Policy Responses
http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/integrating-europes-muslim-minorities-public-anxieties-policy-responses
'Muslim integration is one of the most contentious issues in the immigration debate in Europe, and one that gets right to the heart of public anxieties about immigration. European countries are grappling with ways to accommodate Muslim minorities while upholding national values.'
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)won't let them modernize.
We need to import kinder/gentler mullahs from Western Turkey, India and Indonesia whilst deporting the Wahhabi mullahs bought and paid for by Saudi Arabia.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)get the red out
(13,466 posts)This is absolutely correct.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Based upon your activity on DU, I sense the latter.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Hindus in Western countries are not trying to enforce Sharia law or forcing women to wear a certain attire.
Hindus are the most affluent and most educated minority in the United States btw.
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)But, don't you mean 'home' country, rather than 'host'?
Little Tich
(6,171 posts)unlike being Christian or Jewish. Maybe it's just my lack of reading comprehension, but methinks the writer of the article is displaying some bias.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)and you happen to have an Arabic-sounding surname, you're automatically a devout, practicing Muslim.
Alrighty then...