Religious Right Leader Calls For Mass Civil Disobedience To Fight Gay Marriage
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by DonViejo (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Right Wing Watch
Liberty Counsel chairman Mat Staver has made anti-gay civil disobedience a recurring theme in his speeches and activism, and the pending marriage cases at the Supreme Court seem to have him on edge. In his column today, Why A Bad Supreme Court Decision May Require Civil Disobedience, Staver outlined his goal of bringing together many thousands of individuals, agencies, charities, churches and schools to peacefully refuse to countenance a Supreme Court decision that violates not only our highest legal document, but the laws of Nature and Natures God.
Staver claimed that such anti-gay activists would be following in the footsteps of Martin Luther King Jr. and Europeans who shielded Jews from the Nazi regime, adding that perhaps we would see our culture step back from the brink of insanity, or perhaps we would suffer in the face of injustice. Civil disobedience has a long and noble history in Western culture, and we will need a primer on it if, as seems likely, the Supreme Court rules against natural marriage in June.
Of course, civil disobedience is not justified just because we disagree with a human law, but only when that law conflicts with a higher revealed or Natural Law. When he was jailed for violating a law used to stop him from protesting injustice, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., wrote his famous Letter from Birmingham Jail. A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God, he argued. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.
He went on to say: I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that an unjust law is no law at all. erely because a legislature or a judge passes a law or issues an opinion does not make a law just. To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a dangerous doctrine indeed, wrote Thomas Jefferson, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.
Read more: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/religious-right-leader-calls-mass-civil-disobedience-fight-gay-marriage
bigworld
(1,807 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I'm sure they see it as equivalent. It's pretty easy to stand logic on its head by waving the Bible at people. After all, there are other "abominations" mentioned, along with homosexual activity, and these don't seem to inspire civil disobedience. Or do they plan to boycott every place that serves shrimp and clams? I look forward to seeing protesters gathered outside the local Red Lobster, with signs informing patrons they'll be stoned when they try to leave.
niyad
(113,302 posts)up with even crazier stuff than any of us could dream up!
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)starroute
(12,977 posts)If government officials refuse to issue marriage licenses or perform marriages for gay couples, that's not civil disobedience. That's a violation of their oaths. And of course churches are already free to marry or refuse to marry whoever they please.
So what kind of civil disobedience do they see "individuals, agencies, charities, churches and schools" undertaking? Do they want soup kitchens to refuse to feed the poor? Restaurants to refuse to serve any two people who are not of opposite genders? I'm really having trouble coming up with examples here.
Does anyone have a clue to their thinking?
underpants
(182,799 posts)That'll show 'em!!!
starroute
(12,977 posts)I know it's unbiblical to wear polyester-cotton blends. Surely belt-shoe discordance is just as sinful.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)TALK is cowardly- Go ahead Liberty Counsel chairman Mat Staver , don't pay your taxes and discriminate against people and see where that gets you.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)No way does this remotely compare to MLK, Jr.'s campaign.
Plus, RWers are a violent group of people that carry weapons because it gives them security.
underpants
(182,799 posts)They are delusional.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)typical/mainstream/christians are worried about.
Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)The religious right might want to find one.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)It's profitable, too.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And super ditto to taxing them.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)against RW idiots posing as some kind of religious police in charge of the morality of all people not believing in their stories and' decrees.....yeah, yeah, I know, their hypnotism while laying on the couch in god's office made it so they were/are infallible. I know about their place if they lied, added or subtracted anything also...like the GOP, they could care less what god decreed and it is full speed ahead with the agenda to put all citizens under RW control, especially those women and 'others'.......religionists are dangerous people.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Just be prepared to get that cross you wear stuffed up your butt.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)wing starts calling for mass protests. They say a million are coming, they get 165 confused people. It's a regular thing for them to suggest massive support they just do not have.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)The article you've posted was published 3/20/2015 11:55 am. You posted it Sat Mar 21, 2015, 11:35 AM; almost 24 hours after publication.
From the SOP for the LBN Forum:
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.