Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,618 posts)
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 06:00 AM Feb 2015

U.S. port strike pushes up freight rates with ships held up offshore

Source: Reuters

BY HENNING GLOYSTEIN

A U.S. West Coast port strike is pushing up shipping freight rates as delays in offloading and taking on new cargo mean container ships are unavailable for new orders.

Dozens of container ships are lying in wait off the large U.S. West Coast ports of Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego. Many of them have been waiting more than a week to enter port to unload or take on new cargoes, according to Thomson Reuters shipping data.

"The strike is affecting a lot of vessels. There's a lot of delays and this is pushing up panamax (container) rates as fewer ships are available for new orders," a leading Singapore-based broker said.

The Shanghai Containerized Freight Index for U.S. West Coast (USWC) rates rose 23 points last week to 2,265 and brokers said quotes had risen a further five points on Monday.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/16/us-usa-ports-west-asia-idUSKBN0LK0A420150216

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. port strike pushes up freight rates with ships held up offshore (Original Post) Omaha Steve Feb 2015 OP
You know LittleGirl Feb 2015 #1
It takes two to Tango William Seger Feb 2015 #4
Strike turbinetree Feb 2015 #2
First of all, there is no fucking strike. sulphurdunn Feb 2015 #3
Thank you. I was wondering if i had missed something overnight...... socialist_n_TN Feb 2015 #9
It isn't a strike!!! OilBurnerBob Feb 2015 #5
Punta Colonet, Baja Mexico. outside Feb 2015 #6
The long game has for years sulphurdunn Feb 2015 #11
"Shipping Corporations Price Gouging During Port Strike" | Not Reuters Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #7
The press releases sent to media are lies. “PMA is leaving ships at sea and claiming there’s no spa Sunlei Feb 2015 #8
As a couple of posters have said above: THERE IS NO STRIKE.......... socialist_n_TN Feb 2015 #10

LittleGirl

(8,287 posts)
1. You know
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 07:06 AM
Feb 2015

it's not always about retail goods with this story. We have our vehicles stuck in the Port of LA waiting for nearly 2 months now to get them on a boat. ugh! We just want our vehicles.

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
2. Strike
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:26 AM
Feb 2015

I support the Long shore men and woman and what may be playing out is that they (oligarchy) will move this to some other port and have scabs doing it, just think if the TPP was in place

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
3. First of all, there is no fucking strike.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 10:08 AM
Feb 2015

It is essentially a lock out, with the corporate press pimping for the PMA against the ILWU as usual. It's always from the same playbook: "Greedy unionized dock workers shut down ports, cost consumers billions of dollars, while the poor and powerless shipping magnates try to reason with them." Over the years it has become more sophisticated. Crude attacks on labor have been replaced with vague, false equivalency arguments, but the meme is the same. Here's the other side. The one that won't ever be reported by Reuters.

http://www.ilwu.org/ilwu-president-blasts-pma-threat-to-shut-down-us-ports/

http://www.ilwu.org/aerial-photos-of-ports-show-what-the-pma-doesnt-want-the-public-to-see/

http://www.ilwu.org/longshore-caucus-meets-to-review-status-of-contract-talks/



socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
9. Thank you. I was wondering if i had missed something overnight......
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 02:00 PM
Feb 2015

THERE IS NO STRIKE! This is a "slowdown" and both sides are blaming the other one as the reason for the slowdown. Of course the management blame goes to those greedy dock workers who are "working to the rule". Working to the rule of an EXPIRED CONTRACT, BTW.

Isn't it funny how contracts are sacred when they affect management profits, but are "negotiable" at any time when it comes to the workers and what they contracted for.

OilBurnerBob

(14 posts)
5. It isn't a strike!!!
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 11:11 AM
Feb 2015

This entire situation has been brought about by mismanagement by the PMA.

All those ships lying at anchor outside the ports... they aren't going to unload themselves. The ILWU will have to do it so this tactic by the PMA is pointless.

 

outside

(70 posts)
6. Punta Colonet, Baja Mexico.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 11:22 AM
Feb 2015

A Los Angeles firm, representing Chinese and Korean concerns, was lobbying the Mexican government to be granted permission to build the multibillion dollar port in the agricultural area of Punta Colonet, 150 miles (240 km) south of Tijuana, to handle between 1.5 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU) and 6 million TEU of cargo.

Their plan is to build 18 berths at the port capable of processing 850,000 TEU of containerized cargo annually. The consortium also planned to combine the project with an air-freight airport north of Ensenada. It was reported that instead of running a rail line 180 miles (290 km) across the Baja California peninsula to and then connect the state capital Mexicali and Yuma, Arizona, as the federal plan envisioned, the defunct consortium of HPH/UP ostensibly would have built a line to Ciudad Juárez in the state of Chihuahua where rail crossings into the United States already exist. But certainly any such rail line necessarily would run through or near Mexicali, the capital city of the state of Baja California for any tie-in with the US transcontinental rail system.=snip=

This port in Baja has been on and off for years.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
11. The long game has for years
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 07:44 PM
Feb 2015

been to break the ILWU through bypassing West Coast ports for Mexico and then shipping the cargo by rail and truck into the US. It isn't exactly rocket science, but it is expensive and the shippers want governments to pay for it, so it hasn't progressed as fast as they would like. Creating chaos on West Coast docks and calling in the Feds furthers their strategy.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
8. The press releases sent to media are lies. “PMA is leaving ships at sea and claiming there’s no spa
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 12:32 PM
Feb 2015
“PMA is leaving ships at sea and claiming there’s no space on the docks, but there are acres of asphalt just waiting for the containers on those ships, and hundreds of longshore workers ready to unload them,” said McEllrath. “The employers are deliberately worsening the existing congestion crisis to gain the upper hand at the bargaining table.”

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
10. As a couple of posters have said above: THERE IS NO STRIKE..........
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 02:07 PM
Feb 2015

but quite frankly, there should be. The ILWU has been working under an expired contract for about seven and a half months now and the Pacific Maritime Association (the owners' representative organization) has been intransigent in it's demands, mostly about curbing the power of the ILWU. It's time to up the pressure on capitalism and shut it down.

It would make a nice bookend to the USW strike against Big Oil. There are also contract drivers who move the cargo out of the ports who are struggling to organize that could probably be brought into any work stoppage. In addition, there's a healthy contingent of radical and even revolutionary supporters of labor in the areas that would be affected by a strike that are ready, willing, and able to support. It's time.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. port strike pushes u...