General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNegative Income Tax. Your thoughts?
What do you all think of a Negative Income Tax? On the surface it seems like a good idea, supplementing incomes below a certain amount. However, the fact that Milton Friedman proposed makes me wonder if I'm missing something. His polices always seemed to benefit the 1%.
Turbineguy
(37,329 posts)at cooking up negative income. Corporations do this all the time. So it would most likely be a huge corporate subsidy mechanism.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Godzilla seems like a good idea but well, you know.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)They would use any huge investment loss to cover their risk, thus privatizing reward and socializing loss.
NashuaDW
(90 posts)He advocated for something similar and won 1 state + Dc for a total of 17 electoral votes.
Do we really want to bring it up again?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)former9thward
(32,006 posts)It is called the Earned Income Tax Benefit. It applies up to about 50,000 a year.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)On the personal-tax level we have the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is a refundable credit. (The difference between refundable and non-refundable credits: if a refundable credit pulls your tax bill below $0 they send you the money; a non-refundable credit can pull your taxes to zero but they won't send you the excess.) The old Making Work Pay credit did the same thing.
On the corporate-tax level, there are write-offs you can use that will do that. The infamous $173 million tax refund GE got is an example.