Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
so what do you think is in those tax returns (Original Post) wilt the stilt Jul 2012 OP
Maybe he made a huuuge donation to Planned Parenthood tularetom Jul 2012 #1
Investments in Iran ? C_U_L8R Jul 2012 #2
Lots of stuff.. charitable donations that conservatives won't approve of Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #3
Declared income or paid taxes as head of Bain after 1999? moondust Jul 2012 #4
I don't think that's likely. I think it's who else is giving Mitt 6+ figure salaries to "do nothing" patrice Jul 2012 #5
Romney may have cheated on his tithing. HereSince1628 Jul 2012 #6
Actually, he could donate stock to his church, which they can sell at a profit, of course, that is patrice Jul 2012 #8
No federal taxes. That's what I think too. pa28 Jul 2012 #7
He supposed to tithe a certain percent. Perhaps he doesn't want the mormon church to Liberal_in_LA Jul 2012 #9
the bastard probably got refunds. on second thought Solomon Jul 2012 #10
Edit: I think he did something illegal Maraya1969 Jul 2012 #11
I think at the very least... Kalidurga Jul 2012 #12
Maybe Baine own an super money generator escort service in its portfolio. nt CK_John Jul 2012 #13
He claimed Seamus as a dependent n/t Blaukraut Jul 2012 #14
I think he shorted the U.S. (bet against U.S. prosperity) like Eric Cantor did. FarLeftFist Jul 2012 #15
My speculation: an absurdly low effective tax rate. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2012 #16
I think it is a low rate or even zero for some years. former9thward Jul 2012 #30
Bain's investment in Colombian cocaine cartel. trof Jul 2012 #17
The question is more powerful than the answer. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #18
I say he didn't pay for SEVERAL years, and that there is evidence of some kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #19
I'm also wondering why he's dragging his feet on 2011 aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #20
2009 was when the offshore amnesty expired. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #22
2009 is a year McCain wouldn't have seen aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #25
Clearly something that he knows will cost him a lot of votes. Incitatus Jul 2012 #21
I think thats the thing - nothing illegal Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #23
A 527/529 account for a love child? Earth_First Jul 2012 #24
They show how much he made from Bain for doing absolutely nothing RedStateLiberal Jul 2012 #26
Maybe absolutely nothing is illegal in the tax forms and that scares me. ... spin Jul 2012 #27
Conservative porn DJ13 Jul 2012 #28
a dead hooker Bucky Jul 2012 #29
Can't imagine. But aren't they are a matter of public record, from when he was Governor of MA? freshwest Jul 2012 #31
My guesses. Igel Jul 2012 #32
I suspect Willard paid $0 in taxes. AtomicKitten Jul 2012 #33

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. Maybe he made a huuuge donation to Planned Parenthood
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:39 PM
Jul 2012

And he doesn't want his new dumbass buddies to find out about it.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
3. Lots of stuff.. charitable donations that conservatives won't approve of
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:40 PM
Jul 2012

unique tax shelters most Americans won't understand (like his horse)

profits from companies that are involved in abortion services

Other stuff I can't even think of, the low tax rate is just the tip of the iceberg.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
5. I don't think that's likely. I think it's who else is giving Mitt 6+ figure salaries to "do nothing"
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:43 PM
Jul 2012

i.e. who else is making deposits to his FOREIGN accounts.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. Romney may have cheated on his tithing.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:45 PM
Jul 2012

It's possible that he only tithed on his US income. God doesn't give exclusions for income from sources outside the US.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
8. Actually, he could donate stock to his church, which they can sell at a profit, of course, that is
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:50 PM
Jul 2012

tax free, because they are a church.

If he did that, it'd be real interesting to see how much of what corporations the Mormons MAY have either kept or sold their interests in, which we won't know exactly because that will be on their own tax filings, but it'd be interesting to know who received that kind of opportunity.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
7. No federal taxes. That's what I think too.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:46 PM
Jul 2012

Between his miraculous 100m 401k and his assets in offshore tax havens (whoops forgot to add the 77k dressage horse and similarly abusive deductions) there is a very good possibility he paid no tax at all for quite a few years.

If he won't release more than two years of his tax returns maybe he'll just answer this question. Have you filed a return with zero federal income tax liability in the last 20 years?

 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
9. He supposed to tithe a certain percent. Perhaps he doesn't want the mormon church to
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:51 PM
Jul 2012

see his total income during those years. Money is obviously very important to him.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
12. I think at the very least...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:58 PM
Jul 2012

it will show he considered his residency to be in Utah, not Mass as he claimed he lived there for at least 7 years so he could weasel his way into a governorship. Then there are those medicinal horses, which I think is a lot of poppycock. And he probably paid less than 14% on his income and people will understand that is a very low rate. Then it might show how many other countries he invests in rather than invest in the US, which he would rather bleed to death than invest in. Evil donations for sure, the kind not even rabid RWers would like. I think the fetus disposal business is probably the least of his worries, maybe he even donated to NOW, the RWers won't have that for sure. Maybe he even claimed more dependents than he actually has, who knows this guy is a weasel can't put anything past him.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
16. My speculation: an absurdly low effective tax rate.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:06 PM
Jul 2012

I also suspect he's been giving the impression of being less rich than he actually is...as in he's really a billionaire. Combine those, and you have a billionaire that's paying little to no taxes. Result: candidacy flushed down the toilet (amidst a sigh of relief that tar and feathers have gone out of style).

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
30. I think it is a low rate or even zero for some years.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:41 PM
Jul 2012

But he couldn't be a billionaire because he has released his 2010 return. That would show his wealth.

trof

(54,256 posts)
17. Bain's investment in Colombian cocaine cartel.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:14 PM
Jul 2012

Hey, it was a money maker with EXCELLENT returns to investors.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
18. The question is more powerful than the answer.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:29 PM
Jul 2012

I hope he sticks to his guns with not releasing being less damaging than the answer.

But, I agree - deferred interest carryover filings with <10% taxes paid.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
20. I'm also wondering why he's dragging his feet on 2011
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:58 PM
Jul 2012

and so far has released only an estimate. We're more than half way through the year and still waiting. What gives?

As far as the previous years are concerned, I have no idea. My guess is that he paid virtually no taxes in certain years, even less than the 13.9 percent in 2010. I do think 2009 may be a problematic year for him. If 2009 were like 2010, he would have released that return to avoid controversy. But if something is problematic about 2009, it would not only make him want to keep that year private, but it would prevent any other returns being released because of the noticeable gap in tax returns it would create. What happened in 2009 and if the return is just like 2010 was, why not at least release that, too?

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
22. 2009 was when the offshore amnesty expired.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:11 PM
Jul 2012

That allowed people to fess up as to their offshore tax havens at a fraction of the taxes due and no penalty.

2009 is my top pick, with 2008 close behind.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
25. 2009 is a year McCain wouldn't have seen
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:18 PM
Jul 2012

Thanks for the info about the tax amnesty. I didn't consider that and it sounds interesting.

Incitatus

(5,317 posts)
21. Clearly something that he knows will cost him a lot of votes.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:02 PM
Jul 2012

But if it was something illegal, why doesn't the IRS know about it. Would they not take a second look given recent events? Is there a reason they would ignore problems with his returns?

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
26. They show how much he made from Bain for doing absolutely nothing
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:20 PM
Jul 2012

(according to him). Just think how out of touch he'd look for getting at least $100,000 a year salary for three years for no work (as he claims).

spin

(17,493 posts)
27. Maybe absolutely nothing is illegal in the tax forms and that scares me. ...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:21 PM
Jul 2012

Romney might be laying a trap. He could let the media and the Obama camp go wild for a month or so or even wait until the debates when Obama challenges him to release the forms. He then do so and might simply laugh when after the media searches through the documents the results merely only show he is a very rich but charitable man who had some perfectly legal offshore accounts.

Offshore Business Bank Accounts

It is not illegal to have foreign bank accounts. In fact, there are many legitimate reasons for U.S. taxpayers to maintain offshore accounts. Some of our many clients have inherited accounts from relatives. Others may be hedging their investments in foreign currencies as part of an overall investment strategy, and still others may have established the accounts to protect their family’s assets while they were fleeing from oppressive regimes abroad.

Regardless of the reason these funds are being held overseas, taxpayers must disclose the existence of their foreign accounts, and report any income derived from them to the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS is pursuing offshore tax evasion in earnest. Pressure can only be expected to increase on U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts. A Voluntary Disclosure provides U.S. taxpayers with previously undisclosed offshore accounts a way to avoid the harshest penalties and potential criminal prosecution.
http://www.newjersey-tax-lawyer.com/practices/Offshore-Accounts/


Of course Romney could be hiding something serious and if he is and it is discovered he never will become President.

Bucky

(54,003 posts)
29. a dead hooker
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:35 PM
Jul 2012

Not financial evidence indicating Romney's role in the death (or at least corporeal disposal) of a deceased prostitute. My theory is that the sheer physical heft of his financial statement, along with the paperwork backing up all the claims, exemptions, and evasions he made to horde his money, is so voluminous that he was able to actually bury a dead women (or rugby player) in it.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
31. Can't imagine. But aren't they are a matter of public record, from when he was Governor of MA?
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:54 PM
Jul 2012

At least for those years and maybe a few before. I don't know what the MA open records laws would allow a reporter to find. I just can't imagine, if those tax returns had any problems, it wouldn't be in the IRS records. Also, whatever state he's claimed residence in that has state income taxes, would have records.

I understand that it would be considered foul play for OFA to cross the line although I believe GWB crossed many lines during his reign, to take a look at those 23 years or whatever is in question in the IRS records.

Although i'm not sure that they keep them that long, some place has them on file... for many purposes. Such as getting a bailout, getting compensation from his corporations, and a whole string of things. I'll be we have some DU members who understand this.

But frankly, I don't think this line of attack, while we're enjoying it, is going to result in much for OFA. Because Americans are known for trying to get out of paying with deductions, etc. and some may feel, some common ground with Mittens. I think more focus on Bain is needed. The right is always making their case, which is a bad one but works on their base, that the Democrats are about taxes and nothing else.

I believe the deficit issue is a false one, no matter how much screaming is done. Because deficits get ignored, Bush and Co. sure as hell said they didn't mean a thing. And during times of disasters either man-made or not, the important thing is the LIVING. Not DEAD things. I don't even believe we have a deficit in the terms that it's generally expressed. We have a MORAL DEFICIT.

We have not addressed what is happening and I don't mean the SHAM morality of the pro-life movement. We are killing each other and the planet. We are destroying so many things that are infinitely more valuable than our economic system.

Back to the taxes. I think they can used to show for some that Romney and this vulture system hurts them. that they are not making it because of it. I think the Democratic Party is best able to make this argument. The GOP has fought and is continuing to fight us AGAINST EVERY SINGLE THING that provides LIFE for Americans and the world for JUST MONEY.

We need to make this about FAIRNESS and EQUALITY. I believe the Bain issue, as Krugman says, is the main tool to use. This is the debate that Obama has said needs to happen. And it does, this country needs to decide about the haves and have nots NOW. Are we are nothing but a predatory, greedy nation that preys on everything and everyone? Is this what we really are?




JMHO.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
32. My guesses.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:07 PM
Jul 2012

-- People would be surprised at how much he donated to the church. It's one thing to be a Mormon. It's another to give them $10 million in stock.

-- His returns for those years may not have been separate from his wife's. And he doesn't want to hand over his wife's returns (and properly so--they're nobody's business).

-- His returns show dealings that are contractually obligated to be kept secret. If he can't get a waiver from the other parties, he's stuck.


Some others seem plausible:
Between tax write-offs and special rules for the income from his position (active or not) at Bain, I'd image that the US portion of his adjusted earned income might be relatively low in at least one year.

Other portions may be listed by where they originate, and perhaps he figures nobody would like if he had legal, but in hindsight evil, dealings with some place like Libya.

And then there are the losses that he almost certain had in some places. After all, this is 1999, 2000, and 2001. What was going on? NASDAQ crash and first NYSE crash in 2000. Recession in 2001, with the finale of the NYSE crash that began, slightly recovered, and concluded the following year.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»so what do you think is i...