Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,986 posts)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 10:46 AM Mar 2017

Reince Priebus FBI contacts suddenly look even worse after yesterday's testimony

We learned about a month ago that Priebus spoke with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe about Team Trump’s Russia scandal, and by some accounts, the White House chief of staff hoped to persuade FBI officials to reach out to journalists to downplay the significance of the controversy.

As we discussed at the time, there are rules in place that severely limit the communications between the FBI and the White House, though in this case, Reince Priebus either didn’t know or didn’t care about those restrictions. Politico had a report over the weekend – before yesterday’s testimony from FBI Director James Comey, obviously – about the communications.

Reince Priebus’s request that the FBI refute a report of Donald Trump associates’ contacts with Russian intelligence appears to have violated the White House’s policy restricting political interference in pending investigations, according to a copy of the policy obtained by POLITICO.

The policy says only the president, vice president and White House counsel can discuss specific investigations or cases with the attorney general, deputy attorney general, associate attorney general or solicitor general. Any other conversations require the approval of the White House counsel, according to the document.


In other words, Priebus’ chats with the deputy director of the FBI – communications that the White House has already acknowledged – were problematic on their face.

But in light of yesterday’s news, they seem quite a bit worse.

Based on what we now know, the White House chief of staff improperly communicated with a leading FBI official while an FBI counter-intelligence investigation into the Trump campaign was already underway. Priebus hoped to get the FBI’s help in knocking down reports of a scandal while the FBI was reviewing that scandal.


MORE:
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/reince-priebus-fbi-contacts-suddenly-look-even-worse#break
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reince Priebus FBI contacts suddenly look even worse after yesterday's testimony (Original Post) kpete Mar 2017 OP
Haven't heard much from Rinse lately BannonsLiver Mar 2017 #1
I was wondering about that, too. Interesting, isn't it? randome Mar 2017 #8
He'll be going down shortly malaise Mar 2017 #2
He's too busy janterry Mar 2017 #3
at this point, they are the most blatantly corrupt and criminal WH possible Fast Walker 52 Mar 2017 #4
Sure sounds like attempted obstruction of justice to me. nt SunSeeker Mar 2017 #5
Sorry, but amateur hour is long over for the Trump administration gratuitous Mar 2017 #6
"Where is the Attorney General on this".. denbot Mar 2017 #7
Yeah, Jeff's got his own problems right now gratuitous Mar 2017 #9
Kick for exposing rince Cha Mar 2017 #10
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. I was wondering about that, too. Interesting, isn't it?
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:48 PM
Mar 2017

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
4. at this point, they are the most blatantly corrupt and criminal WH possible
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:06 PM
Mar 2017

they ALL need to go -- either removed from office or thrown into jail.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Sorry, but amateur hour is long over for the Trump administration
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:23 PM
Mar 2017

I'm not buying any assertion that Preibus "didn't know" he wasn't supposed to contact the FBI. Once you get in the big office, you're supposed to fucking know about this stuff, and the responsibility for following the rules goes right to the top. None of this "Oh, we didn't know" bullshit. Maybe that flies with the low-information voters the Republicans rely on so heavily, but it shouldn't fly with the Department of Justice. Where is the Attorney General on this?

denbot

(9,899 posts)
7. "Where is the Attorney General on this"..
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:44 PM
Mar 2017

You mean the guy who lied under oath? I'm guessing he's preoccupied right about now..

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
9. Yeah, Jeff's got his own problems right now
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 02:50 PM
Mar 2017

But start at the beginning, and demand that proper procedure be followed. Hard to argue that you're being "partisan" or that you're going to make the Ghost of David Broder cry if you're making a legitimate request.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reince Priebus FBI contac...