General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTIME: The Resistance Is the Majority of Americans, Not a New Tea Party
The zeitgeist is quickly setting in: Republicans right now face a backlash akin to what Democrats faced from the Tea Party in 2009 and 2010. Some have gone so far as to call this resistance the Democratic Tea Party. Its a convenient comparison: Democrats like it because the Republican Tea Party was successful in 2010, and the media appreciates it as a simple and straightforward story. I've been guilty of leaning on it myself.
But the Democratic resistance and the Tea Party actually differ in a number of important ways, each of which tells a different story about where our country is and where our politics may be headed.
For starters, the Tea Party was forged as an opposition to a societal reality in our country, while todays resistance is opposed to a political reality. The Tea Party began before the election of President Obama, as a reaction to President Bush and the bank bailouts of 2008. Tea Partiers believed that society and the economy had all left them behind. The movements anger was stoked by the realization that the country had changed to the extent that it would elect someone like Barack Obama and support his liberal policies like the Economic Recovery Act (the so-called stimulus) and the Affordable Care Act (scornfully dubbed Obamacare). These members wanted the entire country to revert to a set of values that more closely resembled what they saw on Leave It to Beaver.
On the other hand, the current resistance isn't based on a belief that our country has gone astray from some former golden age. It's a political backlash, borne out of Donald Trumps policies and his presidency. Its participants arent rejecting the social structures of American society. They are embracing and defending our evolving structures of diversity and inclusiveness. The people stepping forward to resist the Trump Administration are standing against an Administration that doesnt respect the core values that this nation holds: that we are all equal and that we can all achieve our own dreams.
. . .
Todays resistance is almost the complete opposite. While Trump is indeed president winning the Electoral College by approximately 75 votes he lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million. While Republicans maintained their control of the House and the Senate, they lost seats in both. The current resistance isnt reacting to its lost status as the majority in American politics, as the Tea Party was. It is speaking out for the majority of Americans who feel inadequately represented in Washington. This resistance is giving political voice to those the political system has deprived of a voice. They are speaking for the silenced majority.
http://time.com/4676825/democratic-resistance-tea-party/
dalton99a
(81,468 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)It's in our blood to resist. We were born of revolution. All we have to do is look to the founding fathers for guidance.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Cha
(297,184 posts)TEA BAGGER for us!
Thank you, TIME!
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Glad the media is finally catching on. These are not angry people or even overtly political people. These are moderates who are finally getting frustrated with gerrymandering, electoral college and bad Supreme Court rulings that decreased their say in governance. They are mostly white, educated, fairly affluent and they are used to getting their way. Trump and his minions spitting all over them is not going over well. Trump woke the beast. He is going to pay.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Warpy
(111,254 posts)They completely misinterpreted the top-down TP and they've completely misinterpreting the grassroots resistance to Dolt45.
The TP might have started in the upper middle class suburbs, but it was easily coopted by the far right, especially the social conservatives. Koch money poured in and made sure it stayed coopted Glenn Beck and Dick Armey being their point men.
Nobody's giving much of anything to the resistance people and certainly there is no media presence to tell it what to do. Right now nobody knows exactly what to do about it and the prospect of answering to angry constituents has congress running scared. There are no leaders to discredit or buy off and they have no strategy for coping with it. They're facing an angry majority for the first time in their plush lives instead of an angry minority funded by the same plutocrats who fatten their campaign funds.
Right now, the anger is focusing on yet another diddled election and the accession to a completely inappropriate and dangerously ignorant man-baby to the White House. What it eventually morphs into is anyone's guess.
And this guy was Clinton's campaign spokesman? Whoa.
ETA: he did identify it as a majority movement, I'll give him that much. However, he also tried to pigeonhole it in the way the matured TP people could eventually be pigeonholed and it's way too soon for that.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)They've been doing some good work lately.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)democrank
(11,094 posts)Lots of different squares from lots of different places.
littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)KT2000
(20,577 posts)Gerrymandering and devising ways to prevent citizens from voting would created the mess we have now. An unpopular idiot was installed as president due to schemes to steal an election. The R's created this turmoil so they will just have to live with it.
NCcoast
(480 posts)For obvious reasons of focus and brevity he doesn't go into the fact that the Tea Party was largely redirected from anger at the bank bailout. Or that that redirection was calculated to work against the best interest of the group, which presents certain marketing difficulties. Or that they put them on buses, fed them lunch and drove them to another state for stage craft.
Conservatives have a 'tell'. They always accuse progressive of doing whatever it is they are up to. Because they're thinking 'Of course they're as sinister as us, aren't they?, so they have to be doing the same things.'
So they're crying that we're being 'organized' and that we're being 'paid'. I saw where Wayne LaPierre said recently that we lefties are getting paid $1500 a week to incite violence. Which one of you has my check?
Here's a prediction. This week has changed things. The GOP needs ignorance and public indifference to do what it does. The last thing they need is an engaged public. This week they have seen a public on fire. They'll blame Trump, and they'll get serious about getting rid of him. I think we'll get a special prosecutor for this thing, this Russia/Trump thing, whatever we're going to call it.
littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)An excuse to charge us with racketeering which could subject protesters to forfeiture and confiscation of property as well as hefty finds. Will go find a link. This is their next attack. Eleven states already. Brb
http://www.alternet.org/activism/state-lawmakers-are-brutally-cracking-down-protesters-under-cover-trumps-law-and-order
NCcoast
(480 posts)If they're saying there were payments made then make them produce some evidence of it.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)If we can't most know how to use a dictionary*, devastates the likeness to Tea Bagger argument. We would never, ever put "morans" on a protest sign.
*And the community here is home to several word smiths, editors, grammarians and creative writers that are generous with their support. ♡
NBachers
(17,108 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)Kicking. And shaking my damn head. Tea baggers, so yesterday's news.
NCcoast
(480 posts)Keep fighting the good fight.
littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)Response to littlemissmartypants (Reply #20)
NCcoast This message was self-deleted by its author.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,679 posts)This isn't going away.