Milo Mania: Do President Donald J. Trump and the CPAC Crowd Owe UC-Berkeley Rioters an Apology?

[EricMaundry]

The question that had to be asked.

http://sierramadretattler.blogspot.com/2017/02/milo-mania-do-president-donald-j-trump.html

[meadowlander]

1. No, they're still assholes and probably plants.

No excuse for disrupting a peaceful protest, putting the genuine protestors in harm's way and discrediting the message.

[brush]

3. More info pls. who are you?

[meadowlander]

4. Bizarre request.

Alert if you think I'm a troll.

Who I am is irrelevant to the discussion of whether or not rioters ever deserve an apology.

I am someone who protests peacefully and is sick of having my wellbeing at protests threatened by dipshits in black masks playing anarchist, not to mention the one time in a hundred that the protest actual does get any press it then only becomes about the dipshits smashing windows and not the tens of thousands of people who came out because they actually believe in something and want to improve things.

[BamaRefugee]

2. I live in Sierra Madre

the Tattler is always must reading

[jmg257]

5. No - no one who disrupts a peaceful protest with violence and vandalism deserves an apology.

Blac block rioters can go f&^% themselves.

[Initech]

6. The peaceful protestors at Berkeley are the ones who are owed an apology.

The violent pieces of shit looting and rioting can go fuck themselves.

[Caliman73]

7. I think the question should be asked a different way

Does anyone owe the rioters at Berkeley an apology? I would say, No, not at all. Do they owe the peaceful protesters who were present before the disruptive rioters came about, an apology? I would still say, No.

Are the peaceful protesters who did not want a disgusting POS like Yiannopolis to speak at their school vidicated? There I would say, Yes, yes they were. They knew, like most of us know, that Yiannopolis says nothing that contributes anything to any discussion about anything. They most likely did not know about the pedophilia statements, but still, they were vindicated.

There are some riots that are understandable, though not condoned. The Watts Riots, the similar riots in DC, Philadelphia, etc... during the late 1960's and the riots in 1992, because of the conditions that people were living under.

Protests against vile and hateful people are acceptable and should continue. Riots that damage property in communities, over someone speaking, that is not acceptable.