Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joe Scar smearing the 3-0 decision. Do people understand that SCOTUS doesn't have to take (Original Post) nikibatts Feb 2017 OP
Joey is a Trump sychopant. Trumpocalypse Feb 2017 #1
Oh, the whining this a.m. is delish. I don't think the SCOTUS will hear it either. Lower courts monmouth4 Feb 2017 #2
Rs are cosummate whiners Skidmore Feb 2017 #3
Was he wearing an Ivanka Trump blouse with a matching purse? grantcart Feb 2017 #4
Just looked and sadly no cartoon for Joe Hortensis Feb 2017 #9
What do you think the odds are he has actually read the decsion? Hokie Feb 2017 #5
you're actually giving it a chance of "slim"? unblock Feb 2017 #6
I was stunned he was pimping so forcefully for Trump in this case. Vinca Feb 2017 #7
i dont understand why people watch that show Ohioblue22 Feb 2017 #8
 

Trumpocalypse

(6,143 posts)
1. Joey is a Trump sychopant.
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 07:26 AM
Feb 2017

I hope they are saving the recording of all his show. They'll be needed at the war crimes trial.

monmouth4

(9,752 posts)
2. Oh, the whining this a.m. is delish. I don't think the SCOTUS will hear it either. Lower courts
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 07:27 AM
Feb 2017

were unanimous and that will be enough for them..

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
4. Was he wearing an Ivanka Trump blouse with a matching purse?
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 07:32 AM
Feb 2017

Now that is something I would turn into see

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. Just looked and sadly no cartoon for Joe
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 09:00 AM
Feb 2017

with that or--surprisingly--a Trump combover. (Would have settled happily for that.)

They're not doing their job. He's getting off far too easily, and so are his regulars.

Vinca

(50,382 posts)
7. I was stunned he was pimping so forcefully for Trump in this case.
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 08:26 AM
Feb 2017

They keep talking about a law Congress passed that gives the POTUS broad powers re immigration. I get that. But even if a law has been passed, it doesn't automatically mean it's Constitutional. I'm not an attorney - obviously - but doesn't the Constitution take precedence over everything else? Joey Scar kept saying Scalia would vote in Trump's favor in a heartbeat, but if he was the "originalist" they claim he was, wouldn't he side with the founding document?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joe Scar smearing the 3-0...