General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill anything be more important than 'likeability/personality' in future national elections?
Last edited Wed Dec 7, 2016, 04:11 PM - Edit history (1)
In the last 25 years, we have seen every Presidential election go to the person who is more relatable and more 'genuine'.
Policy, experience etc... All seem to fade to a distant second in the modern media age.
Any chance it can ever change or is it just something that has to be accepted and worked with?
marybourg
(12,637 posts)"presidential timber" or timbre. Now we ask "who would you rather have a beer with".
Begabig
(76 posts)... And it's the easiest thing to fill time with and the most open to opinion.
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)You can't be bald either.
Begabig
(76 posts)I personally have hope for a bald president one day. Followed by an atheist...
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)Begabig
(76 posts)Any day now, I'm sure...
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I see some hair in the back, but his head is otherwise as bare as a baby's ass.
kskiska
(27,048 posts)because he ran only a few years after WWII, in which he was considered a national hero. Not that generals were particularly good presidents.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Nothing.
Voters didn't mostly like him, you know.
I don't think Trump generally was more liked than Clinton in this election - I think it was his positions that some liked - mostly about the jobs, partly about immigration, although that is also job-related.
Begabig
(76 posts)Trump was an ass but he was perceived as a genuine ass. IOW, his public personal likely matched his private.
The Clintons have traditionally played the long game and kept things close to the chest and waited problems out. The price for that was a hit to their transparency and ability to appear genuine.
I don't think most people liked either candidate but in the end one beat the other.
I was thinking more about Obama vs Romney or Bush vs Gore.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Maybe not so much true for Hillary.
But I don't get the sense that Trump's victory was due to personality/charisma/etc. Hillary is a much better speaker, a much better debater, and in general just a much more admirable public figure.
I think it was his positions. Certainly it was the immigration/trade planks that got him the Republican nomination, and from there I think it was those two positions that gave him the electoral college victory.
Even the people who voted for him often seemed skeptical of Trump's personality.
Begabig
(76 posts)Everything came across as scripted and fresh from a focus group.
I don't even know how to compare debates this last cycle. It's like they were playing different sports on the same field.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I thought he was not good in the debates at all.
Maybe you saw more what many saw. My perceptions might be filtered through my Trump allergy. You could be right.
After all, it doesn't matter what's true, what matters is what his voters received and how they felt.
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)One of the most charismatic people I ever met was a polygamist with 5 wives.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Obviously my own reactions to the two are colored by my feelings.
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)There is nothing more fake than the way politicians are sold to us, like soap or toothpaste.
"They sell us the president the same way
They sell us our clothes and our cars
They sell us everything from youth to religion
The same time they sell us our wars"- "Lives in the Balance", Jackson Browne
Cosmocat
(14,575 posts)right wing populism has fully infected the masses in this country.
Skittles
(153,202 posts)I don't see it changing
we are simply not getting the presidents we could have