Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 11:36 AM Sep 2016

Colin Kaepernick's practice socks appear to disrespect the police

It appears that over the past few weeks, Kaepernick has been wearing socks that show a pig in a cop's hat.

The quarterback has been wearing them since at least Aug. 10.

Kaepernick hasn't been asked about his socks yet, but it wouldn't be shocking to find out that it's part of his statement that he's trying to make against police brutality.

It's definitely no accident that Kaepernick's wearing these in practice, and there's also no question that the socks were designed to make fun of cops.




http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/look-colin-kaepernicks-practice-socks-appear-to-disrespect-the-police/
127 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Colin Kaepernick's practice socks appear to disrespect the police (Original Post) pintobean Sep 2016 OP
Oh, the horror! Those poor cops! What must it be like to get one's feelings hurt? Aristus Sep 2016 #1
What does that have to do with football pintobean Sep 2016 #3
It seems he's getting a lot of support from the military KMOD Sep 2016 #5
Lol. That's the military? pintobean Sep 2016 #7
No, it doesn't go any deeper than that. KMOD Sep 2016 #12
Really? What do you think happens to people pintobean Sep 2016 #18
Do they play the National Anthem at your work? KMOD Sep 2016 #19
That's so weak... pintobean Sep 2016 #20
and your position is historically ignorant and ethically invalid TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #25
I wouldn't categorize equation cops with pigs citood Sep 2016 #65
I support him and am a vet JonLP24 Sep 2016 #101
You're right there, ronnie624 Sep 2016 #8
I'm not advocating any such thing. pintobean Sep 2016 #11
BS heaven05 Sep 2016 #9
They are paid to provide security. Glassunion Sep 2016 #32
If this is crapping on cops, what do we call it if those same cops murder unarmed bravenak Sep 2016 #36
Lots of false equivalency going around these days. mountain grammy Sep 2016 #55
This is all about publicity. cwydro Sep 2016 #40
Yup. pintobean Sep 2016 #42
"His value goes down" with this. Pretty soon 49ers won't be able to sell him. Leopolds Ghost Oct 2016 #124
OH NO! NOT SOCKS!!! KMOD Sep 2016 #2
OH NOES! demmiblue Sep 2016 #4
Nice. ronnie624 Sep 2016 #6
I'll wear them heaven05 Sep 2016 #10
that's not protesting, that's name calling. Childish IMHO frankieallen Sep 2016 #43
The H stands for humble. Iggo Sep 2016 #53
OMG KMOD Sep 2016 #54
I still support his right to sit during the national anthem CreekDog Sep 2016 #13
I support his right to sit, as well. pintobean Sep 2016 #23
says you CreekDog Sep 2016 #24
So much for agreeing with creekdog. pintobean Sep 2016 #31
Holy Sh*t!?!? YOU control free speech in professional sports? Call the media!! TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #27
Only mine pintobean Sep 2016 #28
But you seem to think your opinion about what speech the NFL should allow TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #49
That's something you've made up. pintobean Sep 2016 #51
It certainly isn't helping his Lonusca Sep 2016 #119
So childish. Any gravitas to his POV gets thrown out the window with this. writes3000 Sep 2016 #14
And just think...some people get sent home for wearing the Black Lives Matter t-shirt in school. Stellar Sep 2016 #15
Outrage! I demand he be fired! Oneironaut Sep 2016 #16
He'll likely be cut anyway. Bonx Sep 2016 #44
Some are saying all this is an attempt to prevent that. pintobean Sep 2016 #58
He's been blacklisted by neo-McCarthyites in the front offices. They HATE BLM protesters in ranks Leopolds Ghost Oct 2016 #125
Discrimination in the workplace n/t Leopolds Ghost Oct 2016 #126
Game over, man! Game. Over. gratuitous Sep 2016 #17
Am I the only one who read your subject in Bill Paxton's voice? Glassunion Sep 2016 #35
Aliens? Yeah, me too. Loved that movie. nt DLevine Sep 2016 #37
Go back and read Gratuitous' post totally in Bill's voice. Glassunion Sep 2016 #46
Perfect! nt DLevine Sep 2016 #61
this isn't going to end well. Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #21
so how exactly do you think this WILL end? TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #26
The way it always ends Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #29
If you want a more specific prophecy you'll have to ask my blood brother. Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #30
righteous and plaintive cries against mere socks LanternWaste Sep 2016 #22
The real answer is that he isn't good enough to get away with this... TipTok Sep 2016 #33
I think he's hurting his own chances. NaturalHigh Sep 2016 #70
Definitely... TipTok Sep 2016 #76
oh yes definitely! TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #92
That's my point... TipTok Sep 2016 #94
I notice many white folks are getting thenselves al lathered up with OUTRAGE bravenak Sep 2016 #34
preach preach!!!!!!!! psychmommy Sep 2016 #38
It really is funny bravenak Sep 2016 #41
Tell it girl. sheshe2 Sep 2016 #50
You Said It, Bravenak ProfessorGAC Sep 2016 #59
thank you for saying it so clearly TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #64
... NurseJackie Sep 2016 #105
Well you see those socks threaten all the rich gated communities out there. Rex Sep 2016 #111
I support this man's right to wear those socks, and sit during the anthem, frankieallen Sep 2016 #39
My right to let you know psychmommy Sep 2016 #45
Oh, things are going to change pintobean Sep 2016 #48
How so? KMOD Sep 2016 #57
Lol. That's the second time for that accusation pintobean Sep 2016 #66
His team mates are standing by him. KMOD Sep 2016 #75
Black people don't like violence either. sheshe2 Sep 2016 #117
What does that have to do with me being accused of making a threat? pintobean Sep 2016 #118
lay it out for us, please TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #63
To 99% of fans his name will be toxic and sponsors will avoid anything associated with him. Throd Sep 2016 #67
That, too. pintobean Sep 2016 #69
The sponsors can really hurt him. MicaelS Sep 2016 #71
yes, I know you fervently hope that corporate overlords will punish TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #83
He could probably overcome that if he had the talent... NaturalHigh Sep 2016 #72
BWAHAHAHAHA. OK, you savvy readers of the collective consciousness. TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #74
Sponsors avoid controversy. It is as simple as that. Throd Sep 2016 #80
obviously, the only ones who care about the sponsors TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #81
You're misreading me. Throd Sep 2016 #85
YEAH, BEATS BY DRE IS REALLY GONNA CAN HIS ASS TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #88
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #52
That's some Grade A trolling by Kaepernick. Ace Rothstein Sep 2016 #47
You mad at him or the socks? Iggo Sep 2016 #56
Maybe. Still not to the level the police disrespected Garner or any other untold number of POC. NCTraveler Sep 2016 #60
some of those who work forces are the same that burn crosses TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #62
That's free speech. I support his right to have that tattoo pintobean Sep 2016 #73
Since you are question the "how" and "where" Mr. Kaepernick chooses to protest. Glassunion Sep 2016 #77
I fully support Kaepernick's right of free expression... NaturalHigh Sep 2016 #68
Agree 100% Dreamweaver 5.0 Sep 2016 #78
Here is a clue: if you're more upset about a QB's socks TheSarcastinator Sep 2016 #79
spot on! KMOD Sep 2016 #82
^^^ Iggo Sep 2016 #84
+1 (I am glad to see that only 3 people recced this thread) n/t demmiblue Sep 2016 #87
Nailed it. SixString Sep 2016 #90
Thank you! bravenak Sep 2016 #102
You found the bottom line. kwassa Sep 2016 #103
So, whether a person stands up or not or what socks he wears... Else You Are Mad Sep 2016 #86
Those socks don't make fun of cops. lapucelle Sep 2016 #89
Give me a break... Socks = Dehumanizing? Glassunion Sep 2016 #93
The image portrays cops as animals rather than as human beings. lapucelle Sep 2016 #95
Give me a break... (*** Trigger Warning ***) Glassunion Sep 2016 #98
More pointless attention-seeking. nt LittleDuckie Sep 2016 #91
You're paying attention, aren't you? backscatter712 Sep 2016 #108
I guess if you can't play worth a shit Dreamer Tatum Sep 2016 #96
Does this guy play football? treestar Sep 2016 #97
This is obviously a non-issue. NuclearDem Sep 2016 #99
Lol. pintobean Sep 2016 #109
Where do you buy those? JustAnotherGen Sep 2016 #100
Just Socks? Ok, hypocrisy check: If a white player was wearing socks dissing BLM, jonno99 Sep 2016 #104
It's that 'punching down' is considered bad taste. immoderate Oct 2016 #127
Methinks he's gonna be sued Wednesdays Sep 2016 #106
Good gopiscrap Sep 2016 #107
fuck him, he is a piece of shit Skittles Sep 2016 #110
Indeed. pintobean Sep 2016 #112
Really? sheshe2 Sep 2016 #121
That has nothing to do with LittleDuckie Sep 2016 #122
They make their own context. pintobean Sep 2016 #123
. Rex Sep 2016 #113
He has very skinny legs. trof Sep 2016 #114
. Rex Sep 2016 #115
I am so glad this LOSER is not a Packer! Still In Wisconsin Sep 2016 #116
Maybe the socks are in support of the police. Autumn Sep 2016 #120

Aristus

(66,587 posts)
1. Oh, the horror! Those poor cops! What must it be like to get one's feelings hurt?
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 11:42 AM
Sep 2016

Less awful than being an unarmed young black man getting shot by a cop for no reason, I'm guessing...

Cue the carefully crafted, prime-time-ready outrage...

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
3. What does that have to do with football
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 11:55 AM
Sep 2016

or the 49ers? The cops he's crapping on provide security for this guy so he can make his millions. He's a distraction. He's hurting his team and the league. His value goes down with every new story about his selfish look-at-me antics. Tonight he goes to San Diego where the Chargers will be saluting the military. Big military town - he might be appreciating that police protection.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
7. Lol. That's the military?
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:10 PM
Sep 2016

I'm a vet. I don't use twitter and never claim to speak for the military. I wonder how many actual vets really support him trash talking cops. BLM using a hashtag doesn't mean much here.

I'm not talking about his right to sit during the anthem - I support that. It goes a hell of a lot deeper than that.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
12. No, it doesn't go any deeper than that.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:26 PM
Sep 2016

His socks, nor his sitting during the anthem to protest the racial bias in the police department, do not harm you in any way, shape or form.

I wonder how many vets appreciated the San Francisco officers who trashed talked minorities.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
18. Really? What do you think happens to people
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:32 PM
Sep 2016

who bring their politics and activism to work? It's disruptive and unrelated to the business.

What does, or doesn't, effect me is irrelevant. Like you, I'm not an NFL player. That hasn't stopped you from opining on this issue for days. It's not going to stop me.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
19. Do they play the National Anthem at your work?
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:40 PM
Sep 2016


I'm not sure why this subject upsets you so much. I'm a huge NFL fan, I am certain that once the anthem is finished, the players will take the field and not give it another thought.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
25. and your position is historically ignorant and ethically invalid
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:54 PM
Sep 2016

Athletes in the US have a long history of speaking up about political issues that affect their communities. Kapernick is not obligated to protect your widdle fee-fees. Your opinion of such cultural luminaries and leaders as Jesse Owens ("I realized now that militancy in the best sense of the word was the only answer where the black man was concerned, that any black man who wasn't a militant in 1970 was either blind or a coward.&quot , Tommie Smith, John Carlos, Mohammed Ali, Labron James and scores of others is completely inconsequential. But by all means, keep airing your grievances: they reveal much about you and little about those you think you are in a position to judge.

citood

(550 posts)
65. I wouldn't categorize equation cops with pigs
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:27 PM
Sep 2016

With Jesse Owens.

Sit down for the anthem - yawn.

Paint all cops as pigs - now he's trying to be an asshole.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
11. I'm not advocating any such thing.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:21 PM
Sep 2016

He'll be getting an earful, and the cops around him will be a comfort for him.

I won't be there, and I'm not suggesting anyone do anything. I'm looking at likelihood and possibility. Luckily, Chargers fans are not like Philly fans. I doubt there will be, and hope there won't be, any violence. Like Kap, the fans have every right to voice their opinion, though.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
32. They are paid to provide security.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:11 PM
Sep 2016

He has fame, and a voice. Should he remain quiet about a very real, and present social issue? Or should he speak in his own way for those with no voice? You know, like that unarmed black homeless woman the SFPD killed? The very same PD that is under investigation by the Justice Department right now.

So you have a guy wearing funny socks, which you equate to a metaphor for taking a bowel movement on a particular group. A group who have personally shot 11 unarmed people in the past 5 years. Socks may hurt the little delicate flower's feelings, but the police hurt people.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
36. If this is crapping on cops, what do we call it if those same cops murder unarmed
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:25 PM
Sep 2016

black citizens? Why the hell do you think he owes them anyfucking thing for doing thed job they are paid well to do. If cops could control their racial biases, black folks would not need piggy socks to express ourselves. I see no concern for black lives in this op nor in the police.

mountain grammy

(26,693 posts)
55. Lots of false equivalency going around these days.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:15 PM
Sep 2016

It's astonishing, maddening and dangerous and so much more.

I love those socks!

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
10. I'll wear them
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:21 PM
Sep 2016

proudly The purpose of all protest to me is to try to make this country a better place for all. It's plain as day that many don't desire that this country be a better place for all.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
13. I still support his right to sit during the national anthem
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:26 PM
Sep 2016

even if I don't think the socks are helpful.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
23. I support his right to sit, as well.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:50 PM
Sep 2016

If that's all he was doing, I doubt there would be much of a problem. The NFL isn't the place for political activism.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
27. Holy Sh*t!?!? YOU control free speech in professional sports? Call the media!!
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:57 PM
Sep 2016

Here we have the one genius who gets to decide what type of protest and political speech is and is not permissable by the NFL, and possibly all professional sports across the nation. Aren't we lucky to have you among us today!?

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
28. Only mine
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:00 PM
Sep 2016

which you seem to think I have no right to. Good thing you're here to tell us who's opinions matter.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
49. But you seem to think your opinion about what speech the NFL should allow
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:04 PM
Sep 2016

is binding and valid. It is not, at all.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
51. That's something you've made up.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:08 PM
Sep 2016

I'm simply expressing my opinion. You seem to think that only people who agree with you are allowed to do that.

writes3000

(4,734 posts)
14. So childish. Any gravitas to his POV gets thrown out the window with this.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:28 PM
Sep 2016

Clearly, he just wants attention.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
15. And just think...some people get sent home for wearing the Black Lives Matter t-shirt in school.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:30 PM
Sep 2016


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3765234/Arizona-high-school-student-speaks-banned-wearing-disruptive-Black-Lives-Matter-shirt-picture-day.html

Arizona high school student sent home for wearing a Black Lives Matter t-shirt for the class picture

Mariah wrote: 'I walk into her office and I sit and listen on how she tells me that my shirt is creating a disruption in the learning of education, she then tells me that I am not allowed to wear the shirt that means a great deal to me and my African American friends.

'She then walks out of the office and hands me a white shirt that's meaningless and non political and has nothing to do for what I'm standing for.'

Mariah continued: 'I heard her loud and clear but I do plan to continue wearing my shirt.

'The reason why I apparently can't wear this shirt is because on Friday , August 19th I got into a argument with a young caucasian boy who said "black lives don't matter" and "that shirt is meaningless" #blacklivesmatter.'

Mariah's mother Roxane Havard told 12 News: 'She was asked to change and she didn't question them - she was being respectful.

Oneironaut

(5,556 posts)
16. Outrage! I demand he be fired!
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:31 PM
Sep 2016

(Don't worry - the Internet will find something else to be outraged about soon, and this will all go away)

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
58. Some are saying all this is an attempt to prevent that.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:17 PM
Sep 2016

That the Niners will fear that if they cut him, it will be seen as being due to his protests, not his mediocrity. I'm not that cynical. I think he knows he's done, and he's going out with a bang.

Leopolds Ghost

(12,875 posts)
125. He's been blacklisted by neo-McCarthyites in the front offices. They HATE BLM protesters in ranks
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 02:45 PM
Oct 2016

What do you think about blacklisting, say, Larry King? (for having a show on RT)

Should people be discriminated against in the workplace for free speech in an optional ceremony?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
17. Game over, man! Game. Over.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:31 PM
Sep 2016

Fuck, who would have thought the United States would be taken down by some sportsball guy wearing socks? We had a good run, USians. A darned good run. But our police, military, government institutions and Constitution were no match for this. The center cannot hold. Get ready for brother to battle brother, children rising up against their parents, blood to run in the streets, and the total breakdown of all civil and societal forms.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
46. Go back and read Gratuitous' post totally in Bill's voice.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:55 PM
Sep 2016

It totally improves the read. I can't stop giggling.

Oh dear Lord Jesus, this ain't happening, man... This can't be happening, man! This isn't happening!

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
29. The way it always ends
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:00 PM
Sep 2016

Odin will sew my lips shut, I'll get mad about it and me and the kids will raise an army from Hel and storm the Rainbow Bridge.

One of my kids will kill the idiot with the Hammer and the world will be plunged into darkness.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
22. righteous and plaintive cries against mere socks
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 12:49 PM
Sep 2016

It seems if they're not burning anything down, not disrupting traffic, not tying up resources, not getting in anyone's way, not boycotting, or not even marching, we still desire a querulous reason to voice our righteous indignation and plaintive cries against mere socks and sitting down.

A few degrees better than pouring a milkshake on someone's head... and it's that reverent and faith-based justification that allows us to rationalize our bias.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
33. The real answer is that he isn't good enough to get away with this...
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:14 PM
Sep 2016

I foresee a good bit of free time in his future...

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
70. I think he's hurting his own chances.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:55 PM
Sep 2016

There's a possibility he'll be picked up by Minnesota if SF cuts him, but they may not touch him if he continues to make an ass of himself.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
92. oh yes definitely!
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:53 PM
Sep 2016

I mean, look at the hardline the Vikings took against Adrian Peterson when he got caught whipping his 4 year old son across the genitals with a switch hard enough to draw blood, right?

I know you guys really want this uppity young man to get his just desserts, so don't stop believing, you brave patriots.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
94. That's my point...
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 04:18 PM
Sep 2016

Peterson was good enough that the benefit to the owners outweighed the cost in PR and $$$.

Not so much for Kapernick...

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
34. I notice many white folks are getting thenselves al lathered up with OUTRAGE
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:15 PM
Sep 2016

like they feel like every black man in the public eye is their personal property that they should be able to control and judge, as if they ard somehow more aware or informed about what that black man ought to be doing to make them happy.
Every thing he does gets them pissed because he does not give a damn what they think he should be doing. Black folks can wear what the fuck we want to. Go obsess over the folks who dress up in sheets and Dixie flags and get the cops to stop murdering black men and there would be no need for those socks. Same folks outraged by those socks gave no damns about The Murder of Walter Scott.

psychmommy

(1,739 posts)
38. preach preach!!!!!!!!
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:35 PM
Sep 2016

I love the he's not good enough comment, lol somewhere in the previous comments. I sit with Colin and I would totally wear those sox in the fall.

ProfessorGAC

(65,581 posts)
59. You Said It, Bravenak
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:18 PM
Sep 2016

The stances on this very website are disheartening. It's the messenger not the message, i guess.

I'll admit the Castro tee-shirt was a bad look, but these socks seem to be consistent with the crux of his social criticism.

And, i really am disappointed in folks who keep thinking he doesn't matter because he'll be cut from the football team. As if that has a single thing to do with anything.

Just poor

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
111. Well you see those socks threaten all the rich gated communities out there.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 06:43 PM
Sep 2016

In some stupid way. Series.

 

frankieallen

(583 posts)
39. I support this man's right to wear those socks, and sit during the anthem,
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:35 PM
Sep 2016

and my right to think he is a piece of shit for doing both.

psychmommy

(1,739 posts)
45. My right to let you know
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:54 PM
Sep 2016

No one cares what you think. AA's will protest and support each other. You and yours will whine and complain. But, things are going to change and eyes are being opened every day. One day hopefully yours will as well. But if not, so what.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
66. Lol. That's the second time for that accusation
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:33 PM
Sep 2016

I don't like violence at all. It's a shame that some people see threats in harmless words.

Okay, he will either be cut, traded, or become very familiar with that bench as third string qb. That's speculation around the league, based on his performance. He's never been popular with his teammates, or fellow players. That's not a good thing for the leadership role of quarterback. I can't see his current antics endearing him to anyone. He's isolating himself further.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
75. His team mates are standing by him.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:03 PM
Sep 2016

I'm seeing a lot of support for Colin. The outrage seems to be coming from people like trump and sarah palin, etc.

And yeah, he might not be kept by the 49ers, but I guarantee you he will land a spot of another team's roster.

Anyone who is upset over this, really need to think about why? He's got people talking about racial injustice again, and that's a good thing.

sheshe2

(84,171 posts)
117. Black people don't like violence either.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 08:09 PM
Sep 2016

Harmless words. Harmless actions.

Black And Unarmed: Women And Girls Without Weapons Killed By Law Enforcement



When we talk about police brutality, we often forget about the women who have been killed by police. Here are just a few.

Recently, The Root ran a piece that included a slideshow of unarmed black men killed by police. It was a disturbing, to say the least.

But too often when we talk about police brutality, we forget about the women who have been killed by police. Mostly because those cases don’t get the same type of attention or galvanize the community in the same way attacks on men do.

So in light of such disparities, it only seemed right to compile a brief list of black women and girls killed by police.

Tarika Wilson (Lima, Ohio)



On January 4, 2008, 26-year-old Tarika Wilson was shot and killed in her home while holding her 1-year-old baby in her arms. The infant was shot as well, but survived the injuries. Her other four children, in the home and witnesses to their mother’s murder, escaped physical injury as well. Police officers claimed that they were looking for her previous boyfriend when they decided to shoot into her home, leaving her five children, all the under the age of 10, without a mom.

More http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2014-08-black-unarmed-women-girls-without-weapons-killed-law-enforcement/

There is no, LOL about this! NONE!

Throd

(7,208 posts)
67. To 99% of fans his name will be toxic and sponsors will avoid anything associated with him.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:41 PM
Sep 2016

That is how it's going to be.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
83. yes, I know you fervently hope that corporate overlords will punish
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:26 PM
Sep 2016

that uppity young man for daring to protest brutality and murder. That much is quite clear.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
72. He could probably overcome that if he had the talent...
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:01 PM
Sep 2016

but let's face it, he's just not that good.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
74. BWAHAHAHAHA. OK, you savvy readers of the collective consciousness.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:03 PM
Sep 2016

I mean, look how supporting BLM has completely ruined Labron James! And how deeply disrespected is the memory of Muhammed Ali! And how deeply villifed Tommie Smith and John Carlos are today!

You'll have to excuse me if I believe your prognostications come entirely from up your own backside.

It's also very interesting to me that you seem to think that the opinion of corporate sponsors somehow indicates the morality of Kaepernick's protest. As stated elsewhere by the great Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, that says much more about you than it does about him.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
81. obviously, the only ones who care about the sponsors
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:21 PM
Sep 2016

are the clowns who think D.K. should be punished for daring to speak his mind in protest. I'm not worried, and obviously neither is the QB in question. You'll just have to keep hoping for your divine corporate sponsors to teach that uppity young man a lesson.

Throd

(7,208 posts)
85. You're misreading me.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:28 PM
Sep 2016

He gets to make a statement about an important subject he cares deeply about.

I also think that police brutality and unequal treatment by the police is a very important issue.

I'm merely pointing out that sponsors just want to sell beer, pick-up trucks and pizza without controversy and will react accordingly.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
88. YEAH, BEATS BY DRE IS REALLY GONNA CAN HIS ASS
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:41 PM
Sep 2016

How many of D.K.'s sponsors have dropped him because of this issue so far? Name them, please.

http://www.benzinga.com/news/16/08/8403509/colin-kaepernicks-controversial-decision-wont-affect-current-sponsors

"Drew Rosenhaus appeared on CNBC to talk about Kaepernick's controversial decision and how it may impact his career and endorsements. Rosenhaus did not believe it would jeopardize his current endorsements with Nike Inc, Apple Inc.'s, Beats By Dre, and MusclePharm Corp."

He may lose sponsors if he continues to play at a level that doesn't match the competition but that has zippetyshite to do with the protest.

Response to psychmommy (Reply #45)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
60. Maybe. Still not to the level the police disrespected Garner or any other untold number of POC.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:19 PM
Sep 2016

Not anymore than the police disrespected the tennis player in NY when they tackled him. One and only one reason he was tackled. He was black.

I'm liking Kap more and more.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
62. some of those who work forces are the same that burn crosses
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:24 PM
Sep 2016

I support Colin Kaepernick's right to protest injustice.

http://www.phillyvoice.com/photos-surface-philly-police-officer-nazi-tattoo/

"Photographs depicting a Philadelphia police officer on duty with a Nazi tattoo began circulating on social media late Wednesday night.

The photo appears to show the Nazi Party's partieadler emblem tattooed on the left forearm of an officer identified as Ian Hans Lichterman, 39. The party emblem features an eagle, with outstretched wings, holding a wreath containing a swastika. The photo shows the eagle topped by the word "Fatherland," but it is not clear if the tattoo includes the enwreathed swastika at the bottom, which cannot be seen in the photo.

Lichterman's right arm features an assault rifle laid over the United States flag."

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
73. That's free speech. I support his right to have that tattoo
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:02 PM
Sep 2016

However, it has no place in the police department, or in any public employment. I think he should be immediately fired. The police are expected to serve and protect all in the community. Symbols of bigotry and hatred should not be tolerated.

I would also encourage any private sector employer to shit-can any asshole with that tattoo.


I also support Colin Kaepernick's right to protest injustice. I just question the how and where. That is my right.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
77. Since you are question the "how" and "where" Mr. Kaepernick chooses to protest.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:06 PM
Sep 2016

Would you care to share, what you feel would be a more appropriate method and place for him to do so?

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
68. I fully support Kaepernick's right of free expression...
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:44 PM
Sep 2016

including his right to sit during the national anthem or wear these socks. I also reserve the right to call him a douchebag for both.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
79. Here is a clue: if you're more upset about a QB's socks
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:13 PM
Sep 2016

and take more time to discuss them than you are upset by the sustained, repeated brutalization and slaughter of African American men at the hands of Law Enforcement and the State, you are the goddamn problem and need to get woke right now.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
86. So, whether a person stands up or not or what socks he wears...
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:30 PM
Sep 2016

Brings more headlines and outrage than the fact that there are innocent black people and children being extrajudiciously murdered because they are being targetted by the police?!

What is wrong with this country, instead of focusing on the outrage against this person, why don't we focus on the reason he is protesting? They only way to get a protest noticed is by doing the outrageous that will be covered by the news.

We all need to stop shooting the messenger and listen to his message.

lapucelle

(18,423 posts)
89. Those socks don't make fun of cops.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:41 PM
Sep 2016

They dehumanize cops. I don't think it's ever a good idea for us to dehumanize each other.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
93. Give me a break... Socks = Dehumanizing?
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 04:17 PM
Sep 2016

How about being killed by agents of the state with almost absolute impunity while unarmed?

Keith Childress
Bettie Jones
Kevin Matthews
Michael Noel
Miguel Espinal
Nathaniel Harris Pickett
Jamar Clark
Bennie Lee Tignor
Anthony Ashford
Junior Prosper
Keith Harrison McLeod
India Kager
Felix Kumi
Asshams Pharoah Manley
Christian Taylor
Samuel DuBose
Albert Joseph Davis
Darrius Stewart
Salvado Ellswood
Victor Emanuel Larosa
Spencer McCain
Kris Jackson
Brendon Glenn
David Felix
William Chapman
Frank Shephard
Walter Scott
Eric Harris
Brandon Jones
Bobby Gross
Anthony Hill
Naeschylus Vinzant
Tony Robinson
Charly Leundeu Keunang
Thomas Allen
Lavall Hall
Jeremy Lett
Artago Damon Howard
Nicholas Thomas
Janisha Fonville

Go ahead and tell us again how the socks dehumanize the very folks who killed all of these unarmed black people last year?

lapucelle

(18,423 posts)
95. The image portrays cops as animals rather than as human beings.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 04:35 PM
Sep 2016

That's what the word "dehumanize" means. And it's not right to do that to any group.





Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
98. Give me a break... (*** Trigger Warning ***)
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 05:15 PM
Sep 2016

Awww... Da poor wittle flowers haz been dehoomanized as wittle piggies on a pair of socks

























So really what's the problem here? A pair of fucking socks?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
97. Does this guy play football?
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 04:41 PM
Sep 2016

He's starting to seem like an attention seeker at this point. Can't he get famous for his playing?

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
99. This is obviously a non-issue.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 05:18 PM
Sep 2016

But Batgirl shirts at Target and Black Olives Matter on a pizza store sign, oh the humanity.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
109. Lol.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 06:26 PM
Sep 2016

Were they the hottest things trending on Facebook when they hit the news?

I keep being accused of being outraged by people who are clearly outraged that this thread exists.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
104. Just Socks? Ok, hypocrisy check: If a white player was wearing socks dissing BLM,
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 05:39 PM
Sep 2016

or had socks emblazoned with (perish the thought!) "All live matter", would the responses on this thread be the same?

Methinks not.

sheshe2

(84,171 posts)
121. Really?
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 08:59 PM
Sep 2016

Murdered by cop







Yeah skittles, nothing at all to do with cops.

fuck him, he is a piece of shit
he has issues that have nothing to do with the police


WTF are you talking about? Wow, you are okay with unarmed black men and women being murdered by police? You think it is not an issue for him? Well hey. I am white and it is an ISSUE FOR ME!

 

LittleDuckie

(42 posts)
122. That has nothing to do with
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 09:27 PM
Sep 2016

whether Kaepernick is an attention-seeking piece of shit. Also, you should be ashamed of implying that someone is a racist ("okay with unarmed black men and women being murdered by police&quot when you have absolutely no evidence to support such an accusation.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
123. They make their own context.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 09:32 PM
Sep 2016

That way, they think they can post whatever they want. The same thing happened to me up-thread. It's shameful and underhanded, but obvious.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
116. I am so glad this LOSER is not a Packer!
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 06:54 PM
Sep 2016

I mean, he always flushes out of the pocket when receivers are open, he never throws to secondary receivers, he throws deep into double coverage, and he steps right into blitzes.

Oh, what was the deal with his socks?

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
120. Maybe the socks are in support of the police.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 08:44 PM
Sep 2016
They are cute I have a Niece who is a Deputy, I think she would like those. He has a right to say what he wants to say and I have no problem with it. Him making that crack about Hillary and letting Trump skate was a dickish move though .

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Colin Kaepernick's practi...