Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:16 PM Apr 2016

South African Opposition Leader Vows to Seize White Owned Land

The leader of South Africa's opposition Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party has launched his party's campaign for the upcoming local elections, promising to rescue citizens from poverty, unemployment and corrupt government.

Around 40,000 people turned up at Orlando Stadium in Soweto on Saturday displaying massive support for fiery EFF leader Julius Malema's promises to seize white-owned land without compensation and nationalise the banks.

The huge turnout was a shot across the bows of the ANC, which failed to fill a similar stadium during the launch of its own manifesto in the coastal city of East London two weeks ago.

"We are not chasing the whites away. We are saying you have too much land. We want you here in South Africa, but 80 percent of the land belongs to us," Malema told the crowd. The white minority still holds the vast majority of farmland as well as a disproportionate share of the country's wealth.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/04/south-africa-malema-eff-draws-huge-crowds-polls-160430203336402.html

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
South African Opposition Leader Vows to Seize White Owned Land (Original Post) philosslayer Apr 2016 OP
Good DetroitSocialist83 Apr 2016 #1
Well that policy did work so well in Zimbabwe. Makes sense. (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #2
It didn't work because the USA and Britain had no intention of honoring a single commitment malaise May 2016 #12
What did the US and Britain have to do with the failure of Zimbabwe's land confiscations? NickB79 May 2016 #14
Whatever n/t malaise May 2016 #18
South Africa can't give away the land they already purchased for land reform. Sen. Walter Sobchak Apr 2016 #3
It's payback time n/t Matrosov Apr 2016 #4
LOL linuxman Apr 2016 #5
And give it to who? Egnever May 2016 #6
If they follow Mugabe's example, to the new government officials. JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #7
The golf is good in Melbourne AngryAmish May 2016 #8
To be taken by, given to and mismanaged by party hacks Kurska May 2016 #9
Interesting and illuminating thread, I must say. Kingofalldems May 2016 #10
Worked so well before in Zimbabwe Visionary May 2016 #11
The land was stolen malaise May 2016 #13
And the farms were abused and ruined by Mugabe's supporters once it was taken back NickB79 May 2016 #15
Good luck farming in Africa in the 21st century. Climate change is about to hammer it NickB79 May 2016 #16
People in Africa are living in shanties and basically homelesss but a few hundred yards away you craigmatic May 2016 #17
Just like the Native Americans malaise May 2016 #19
exactly craigmatic May 2016 #20

malaise

(268,993 posts)
12. It didn't work because the USA and Britain had no intention of honoring a single commitment
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:42 AM
May 2016

to the process - just like the Indigenous Americans - nothing signed has meaning. There are seemingly no consequences for western violation of their own International Laws, Treaties or Conventions.
Only Westerners can promote nationalism - Africans aren't even allowed to control their own Continent.
"Jackass seh di world nuh level"!

Racism is palpable - everywhere.

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
14. What did the US and Britain have to do with the failure of Zimbabwe's land confiscations?
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:46 AM
May 2016

Mugabe destroyed the Zimbabwean agricultural sector all by himself.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
3. South Africa can't give away the land they already purchased for land reform.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:17 PM
Apr 2016

Nationalistic calls to subsistence agriculture tend to fall on deaf ears.

Julius Malema is a communist wanker.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
9. To be taken by, given to and mismanaged by party hacks
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:54 AM
May 2016

Leading to economic damage and food shortages.

That the history of this kind of stuff.

 

Visionary

(54 posts)
11. Worked so well before in Zimbabwe
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:34 AM
May 2016

Taking land from the owners who knew how to work it and giving it to cronies of the strongman in charge. No reason it shouldn't work in a similarly AMAZING fashion in this case.

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
15. And the farms were abused and ruined by Mugabe's supporters once it was taken back
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:49 AM
May 2016

Which decimated the Zimbabwean economy.

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
16. Good luck farming in Africa in the 21st century. Climate change is about to hammer it
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:52 AM
May 2016
http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/03/07/climate-change-could-make-growing-these-crops-in-africa-impossible/

Global warming threatens some of sub-Saharan Africa’s most important crops, growers have been warned.

Key cultivating regions could become unviable in the coming decades under projected climate change scenarios, according to research published in Nature on Monday.

Bananas, beans and maize are most at risk of the nine staples that provide half of agricultural production. The other six – including millet, sorghum and yam – were found to be stable.
 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
17. People in Africa are living in shanties and basically homelesss but a few hundred yards away you
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:55 AM
May 2016

mcmansions. Something has to be done. South Africa is still segregated just by economics now.

malaise

(268,993 posts)
19. Just like the Native Americans
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:12 PM
May 2016

the Aborigines of Australia, etc., etc.

Sometimes I just weep for all of humanity.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»South African Opposition ...