Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:01 PM Apr 2016

Locked in GDP. Senator Bob Graham: Obama is lobbying congress of behalf of Saudis...

....on the 28 pages.

http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2016/04/16/sen-graham-on-9-11-blame.cnn

What the heck is going on?

The Saudis have threatened yesterday to sell off their U.S. assets and bring about financial chaos if the bill passes that allows the release of the 28 pages.

Obama has slow walked the release.
..........................................................

This is a big story, on all the networks. It got 29 recs before it was locked.

Let's continue the conversation, please.

182 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Locked in GDP. Senator Bob Graham: Obama is lobbying congress of behalf of Saudis... (Original Post) grasswire Apr 2016 OP
Isn't Graham trying to get the 9/ll documents released, and has been for years? brush Apr 2016 #1
Yes, Sentor Bob Graham has been trying to get the documents released for years. elleng Apr 2016 #4
No Obama Promised To Release Years Ago billhicks76 Apr 2016 #31
Do you have anything to back up such an outrageous statement. brush Apr 2016 #36
It's Called Hyperbolic Satire billhicks76 Apr 2016 #38
Reprisal homegirl Apr 2016 #42
Are You That Naive??? billhicks76 Apr 2016 #51
Conspiracy theory much? Cary Apr 2016 #56
Facts Not Theories billhicks76 Apr 2016 #66
Awesome Cary Apr 2016 #74
Tinfoil is bright with this one. trumad Apr 2016 #108
Ah Yes...Another Not So Bright Coincidence Theorist billhicks76 Apr 2016 #174
I appreciate your sincerity, your willingness to connect the dots senz Apr 2016 #82
What senz said. Scuba Apr 2016 #96
What senza and scuba said! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #110
What they said. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #126
^^This^^ Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #163
You should then offer LanternWaste Apr 2016 #117
Am I that naive? homegirl Apr 2016 #119
Me too. It would be much less depressing to pretend that small airplane crashes and brain GoneFishin Apr 2016 #136
Why not wait and see what happens with the Saudi docs instead of making unfounded accusations? brush Apr 2016 #43
CNN Reported Obama Would Release Years Ago billhicks76 Apr 2016 #88
word stew, generated by a bot or a particularly short-circuited human MadLinguist Apr 2016 #67
The Bots Are The Ones Who Freak Out When One Questions 911 billhicks76 Apr 2016 #179
ain't nobody freaking out Mr Hicks 76. MadLinguist Apr 2016 #182
One comic to another bill JackInGreen Apr 2016 #107
Kathleen Harris died very suspiciously within a very short time after dimson seized power. lark Apr 2016 #131
Uh, Kathleen Harris is still alive... louis-t Apr 2016 #153
LOL trumad Apr 2016 #177
I was so brainless yesterday. lark Apr 2016 #181
*Breaking News* Obama Will Veto Bill billhicks76 Apr 2016 #180
Obama's handler, Bush Sr? I'd lay off the conspiracy sites and the acid if I were you. Nitram Apr 2016 #71
If I Called You Paid I'd Get Red-Flagged billhicks76 Apr 2016 #89
Or, for "little" people, like Dr. David Kelly, Ghost Dog Apr 2016 #103
People On DU As Blind or Afraid As Anyone Else billhicks76 Apr 2016 #130
Some, many; not all. Ghost Dog Apr 2016 #175
So the Saudi's know what's in these documents and the American people do not? YOHABLO Apr 2016 #48
Yup. That 9/11 was a Saudi government operation AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #59
Yep, Yep... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #63
Exactly! lark Apr 2016 #132
I stand corrected. Rex Apr 2016 #2
Was the reason it was locked because it was in GD:P? elleng Apr 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Rex Apr 2016 #7
Lots of silliness happening these days. elleng Apr 2016 #9
Too much of it imo, we better start pulling together as a team. Rex Apr 2016 #10
Yes. elleng Apr 2016 #12
And yes, this is something we can pull together. We need to jwirr Apr 2016 #133
I messed up in the locking post, it was locked for being in GDP when it's not about the primaries. tammywammy Apr 2016 #17
NP. I will retract my statement and I apologize. Rex Apr 2016 #23
"reveal" - good word keithbvadu2 Apr 2016 #45
Yes, the post-911 private flight carrying Saudis & bin Ladens senz Apr 2016 #79
"Saving the Saudis" (Vanity Fair, 2003) KansDem Apr 2016 #129
Thanks! Looks like a good read. senz Apr 2016 #141
...! Worth the read and reread... KoKo Apr 2016 #145
And remember, no planes were flying after 911. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #164
IKR? Sure did seem scripted. They left just a little too fast. Rex Apr 2016 #120
IF that is your worst mistake of the day Omaha Steve Apr 2016 #25
Clinton's guy John Podesta, is a lobbyist for Saudi Govt. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #77
Bingo..John Podesta is a Saudi Lobbysit. ReRe Apr 2016 #125
Since her campaign chair, Podesta, is a Saudi lobbyist.... HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #127
K&R Plenty of Opening Posts are locked in strange ways, here at DU lately... Jeffersons Ghost Apr 2016 #8
Hopefully it will stop once primary season is over. nt Rex Apr 2016 #11
yep, thanks nt grasswire Apr 2016 #16
It was locked for being in GDP. tammywammy Apr 2016 #19
So do we capitulate to the Saudi's. They literally own a good share of us. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #3
Right, they own a good share of us, elleng Apr 2016 #6
Maybe their 'stock' has fallen since the price dropped to the bottom of the oil barrel. Rex Apr 2016 #13
It will greatly disappoint me if our President balks at releasing the documents. floriduck Apr 2016 #21
Totally agree with everything you said. BeanMusical Apr 2016 #40
I read that if they pull ALL their money, it's still less than 1% of bond market. Turn CO Blue Apr 2016 #22
If your numbers are right, €©£¥ 'em. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #61
If that's true dorkzilla Apr 2016 #92
Nationalize their assets Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #37
When it comes to the Saudis, it doesn't seem to matter who is president n/t arcane1 Apr 2016 #57
Right, and that takes us back to the question of who actually senz Apr 2016 #83
It's an interesting question. One answer we can agree on is Enthusiast Apr 2016 #91
Thanks so much senz Apr 2016 #149
Let em threaten. Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #14
.+1 840high Apr 2016 #15
I agree. They'll hurt their own econony as well, and I believe we can outlast them. brush Apr 2016 #20
BRING IT ON! SammyWinstonJack Apr 2016 #33
also see this grasswire Apr 2016 #18
From the sounds of it, wouldn't be the first time they helped finance an attack on the US. drokhole Apr 2016 #24
sigh grasswire Apr 2016 #26
The subtle threat here is that the Saudi's will pull their payolla to certain rhett o rick Apr 2016 #27
Subtle? They're being about as subtle as Trump is about women!! Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #29
Freezing their assets might be one solution... KoKo Apr 2016 #150
Not real surprising Old Codger Apr 2016 #28
I think it's being slow-walked because 2naSalit Apr 2016 #30
I don't think it will be released now. grasswire Apr 2016 #32
Plus, there's that election thing... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #64
Visit's a good reason. Add, 750B$ cash gone means a Bush style recession as an Obama legacy. Festivito Apr 2016 #68
I disagree hueymahl Apr 2016 #118
You're right, it's small. We seem to be on the same line of facts. Festivito Apr 2016 #156
Obama Answers To Bush Sr billhicks76 Apr 2016 #34
Face it. Hillary OWES the Saudis big time. grasswire Apr 2016 #35
Saudis OWN Hillary and John Podesta. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #78
Not completely, but they are major shareholders. Fuddnik Apr 2016 #105
Preach sarcasmo Apr 2016 #178
Obama Bows to Saudi King . RATM435 Apr 2016 #39
Damn!! grasswire Apr 2016 #44
Kissing is ok? keithbvadu2 Apr 2016 #49
As long as you don't use tongue. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Apr 2016 #53
ewwwwww. blec. that photo gets me every time. nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #86
If it's not on the mouth. nt thereismore Apr 2016 #115
I defended Obama back then. Now it seems a bit fucked up. nt thereismore Apr 2016 #114
An interesting coincidence EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #41
Yes grasswire Apr 2016 #46
^^^^^ INDEED ^^^^^ MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #65
The money withdrawl would make a nice disaster capitalism routine. Festivito Apr 2016 #70
You known what makes me fucking nuts about this? dorkzilla Apr 2016 #94
The truth EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #98
Frickin Exactly! Duppers Apr 2016 #151
What dorkzilla said + 10000000000 onecaliberal Apr 2016 #159
Every time I read something about HRC or Bill, CrispyQ Apr 2016 #109
You're not alone. EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #124
Funny, everyone's dogging Clinton on this, but it's Obama who's held these up for 7 years. lark Apr 2016 #134
And EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #137
Most of them are in it together. lark Apr 2016 #142
Absolutely. EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #143
100% lark Apr 2016 #146
This is not EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #147
Sadly true. lark Apr 2016 #148
Recommend for Exposure... KoKo Apr 2016 #138
Standing U.S. Policy angrychair Apr 2016 #47
but we do bend over for dollars jeepers Apr 2016 #52
Has Sanders or Clinton responded to this? chknltl Apr 2016 #50
Sanders has. He said we won't be blackmailed by Saudi Arabia. I don't know if Clinton has spoken. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #58
Thanks. Maybe someone from Clinton DU... chknltl Apr 2016 #62
Yes, he did...n/t KoKo Apr 2016 #139
Hillary was asked by George Steffenopolis (sp?) ReRe Apr 2016 #69
Sounds non-committal so far. chknltl Apr 2016 #72
That's what I took away from the interview... ReRe Apr 2016 #73
"And I believe she said no, that she needed to read up or study on it." mac56 Apr 2016 #122
Obama will release the docs... dchill Apr 2016 #54
then he is helping to ensure a gop presidency. restorefreedom Apr 2016 #87
You sound like a pro-Trump troll, go to a right wing forum Democat Apr 2016 #90
trump has nothing to do with this restorefreedom Apr 2016 #104
Latest polls have Hillary beating all the GOP candidates Duppers Apr 2016 #152
they sound like the tbaggers with benghaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii and emails saturnsring Apr 2016 #157
That's no doubt one of the reasons Al Jazeera America went down... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #55
I read an article saying the Saudis are planning to sell their oil reserves, still in the ground. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #84
Well... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #85
You don't believe there was any Bush—Cheney involvement? Enthusiast Apr 2016 #95
Didn't say there wasn't... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #100
I agree, MMM. senz Apr 2016 #144
Well, our dear government, over the years, SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #60
***Arms Sales*** In 2010 **$60 billion in arms were sold to the SAUDIS!! Duppers Apr 2016 #154
SS questioning Michael Moore's presence across the street from the Saudi Embassy senz Apr 2016 #75
interesting grasswire Apr 2016 #76
Bush covered up for Saudis after 9/11. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #80
What is disturbing is this administration has continued that coverup. EndElectoral Apr 2016 #112
Yes, it has. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #113
Well that's what I wondered when seeing it in 2004. senz Apr 2016 #81
So for 28 pages, he's willing to relentlessly lobby congress. But when gay rights were involved, Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #93
Kinda like Universal Healthcare, or even it's little cousin Single Payer. Scuba Apr 2016 #97
And Clinton wants to give us more of the same? That's some mantle to don... eom Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #106
A $60Bn arms sale may have something to do with this. Duppers Apr 2016 #158
He's got his comfortable shoes on now. nt thereismore Apr 2016 #116
And his "comfortable walking shoes" to stand with the unionists while Wanker was stripping their Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #170
Just seize the properties jamzrockz Apr 2016 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author FreedomRain Apr 2016 #101
Release the Evil-revealin Crock O'Shiten (R) AxionExcel Apr 2016 #102
Complicity. Thousands of other documents. Documents need to be released not held hostage. EndElectoral Apr 2016 #111
apparently he's covering for someone grasswire Apr 2016 #135
LIHOP. Rex Apr 2016 #140
I have said year-after-year, that eventually something will come to light... Raster Apr 2016 #165
The realities of what really goes on with world leaders are probably mind blowing lindysalsagal Apr 2016 #171
If the Saudis are responsible, then we declare war on them, seize their property, and offer them NCjack Apr 2016 #121
If it was any country but the Saudis (or Chinese) threatening our economy SwankyXomb Apr 2016 #123
The Saudis can go fuck themselves. blackspade Apr 2016 #128
the 28 pages will be released on the same day that the Abu Garib photos will. which will be... Javaman Apr 2016 #155
Republican Senator Bob Graham .99center Apr 2016 #160
thank you for that grasswire Apr 2016 #167
Bob Graham is a lifelong Democrat... Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #172
Sorry about that .99center Apr 2016 #173
Recommended. Release the 28! panader0 Apr 2016 #161
Lobbying on behalf of the pnac gang?! The bush cabal?! Impeachment is off the table gang?! Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #162
But of course. And we are very close to nominating their newest member.... Raster Apr 2016 #166
and carries a bottle of hot sauce in her bag. nt grasswire Apr 2016 #168
We should seize whatever U.S. assets they own. LS_Editor Apr 2016 #169
Because by his own admission he is a Reagan Republican. On all matters of money or power GoneFishin Apr 2016 #176

brush

(53,876 posts)
1. Isn't Graham trying to get the 9/ll documents released, and has been for years?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:07 PM
Apr 2016

The Saudi's of course don't want that as there is bound to be some incriminating info against them in those documents.

I think Obama is trying to figure out how to handle a release before his term ends and the Saudi's threat to hurt our economy.

brush

(53,876 posts)
36. Do you have anything to back up such an outrageous statement.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:18 PM
Apr 2016

Or are you just talking out of your you know what?

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
38. It's Called Hyperbolic Satire
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:27 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:01 PM - Edit history (1)

The question should be raised and do you have proof of whether or not a certain politician cheats on their spouse? No...but it doesn't mean it probably doesnt happen. If you're looking for proof one way or the other, good luck. Its obvious the Clintons would never cross the Bush family or their allies and my money is on Obama fearing reprisal as well.

homegirl

(1,434 posts)
42. Reprisal
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:38 PM
Apr 2016

against Obama? Of what sort? He cannot run again, he will retire, rest for a while then write a book, set up the Obama Presidential Library and go on the lecture circuit.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
51. Are You That Naive???
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:05 PM
Apr 2016

God, I wish I was. Life would be so much simpler...like a lobotomy. Why do you think in 2008 Obama at the last minute not only pulled his promise of a filibuster of the Telecom Immunity Act but also decided to then vote for it. He just saw the rosy side of it suddenly? Are you not aware of what the Bush family and intelligence circles are capable of? Do you know what happened to Ex-Cia Director William Colby when he wrote a forward to a book in 1995 accusing Bush Sr and Cheney in involvement in pedophile rings for blackmail? The ex-olympic swimmer was found drowned where he was fishing. It's called hardball. And thats how they play it.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
66. Facts Not Theories
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:04 PM
Apr 2016

I understand people's fears of not consuming consensus reality. But I'm not a coincidance theorist.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
174. Ah Yes...Another Not So Bright Coincidence Theorist
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:29 PM
Apr 2016

Who probably still believes the official story of the Gulf Of Tonkin Incident, IranContra, JFK, MLK, RFK, JFK Jr, Wellstone and even the sinking of the Lusitania. Probably would make a good attorney defending the republican officials caught rigging the lottery recently too. Could probably defend sex offenders and claim all in the victims mind and no proof... probably believes everything they are fed on TV as long as everyone in their peer group does.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
82. I appreciate your sincerity, your willingness to connect the dots
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:30 PM
Apr 2016

and your ability to think outside the box, bill. You may or may not be right some of the time, any of the time, or much of the time, but I don't think you deserve the putdowns you get from some commenters. I'd rather have a few wide ranging minds like yours around than self-appointed censors and thought police.

If people don't like your views, they can simply ignore you.

Hang in there.

 

DemocracyDirect

(708 posts)
126. What they said.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:55 AM
Apr 2016

I really appreciate it.

I thought the MSM manipulating elections was a conspiracy theory.

Now I've see so much of it I am literally beside myself.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
117. You should then offer
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:27 AM
Apr 2016

"Facts Not Theories"

You should then offer as much rather than prophecies and editorials rationalized as satire. However, "I understand people's fear of not consuming conspiracy theories. But then I'm not an irrational person..."

homegirl

(1,434 posts)
119. Am I that naive?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Apr 2016

I don't think so, I am a former American ex pat lived in a neutral European country for 20 years. Saw them all, met many of them, foreign government operatives, easy to spot after a few years exposure.

Once out of office the fact is that Obama can no longer sign EO's, legislation or wield much influence. In plain language he is not worth terminating at that point. Facts of life.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
136. Me too. It would be much less depressing to pretend that small airplane crashes and brain
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:27 PM
Apr 2016

seizures which attack whistleblowers exposing right wing dirty tricks is just a result of another one of Newton's Laws. Unfortunately that is bullshit. The fact is that right wingers in both parties don't give a shit about ethics and morality, and that extends to the extreme steps they will take to evade accountability and exposure.

brush

(53,876 posts)
43. Why not wait and see what happens with the Saudi docs instead of making unfounded accusations?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:39 PM
Apr 2016

There have been earlier reports that Obama has signaled to Graham that he will release the documents.

Because of the sensitivity of the information I'm sure you can understand the timing of any release has to he handled with care.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
88. CNN Reported Obama Would Release Years Ago
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:06 AM
Apr 2016

Anyone here recall when the Iran brouhaha was happening and Jeb Bush and his father made a surprise visit to Obama? O think Occupy was raging them too. It was reported in the Dallas News...with photos of them slipping in and trying to hide it. I have no idea what was discussed but what the fuck were those two assholes doing showing up without being scheduled? I'm sure some DUers would say oh they just like to see their old house and check out the drapes. Lol.

MadLinguist

(790 posts)
67. word stew, generated by a bot or a particularly short-circuited human
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:07 PM
Apr 2016

you add exactly zero to the conversation

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
179. The Bots Are The Ones Who Freak Out When One Questions 911
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:22 AM
Apr 2016

That is obvious. Them and those whose intellect is too lazy and whose heart is too cowardly to challenge their own self-serving belief systems.

MadLinguist

(790 posts)
182. ain't nobody freaking out Mr Hicks 76.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 08:22 PM
Apr 2016

I just object to incoherent posts. The questions about how 9-11 came about are numerous and its clear that the public has been given very little real information. None of that makes your post worth much. Didn't even know you were on questioning 9-11, from your post (# 38).

lark

(23,158 posts)
131. Kathleen Harris died very suspiciously within a very short time after dimson seized power.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:58 PM
Apr 2016

They didn't like her telling the truth so they ended the problem. No, exactly zero proof, but she did sting them badly and her death was extremely suspicious and fortuitous for BFEE.

lark

(23,158 posts)
181. I was so brainless yesterday.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:59 AM
Apr 2016

I meant Katherine Graham, don't know how in the world I made that mistake?

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
180. *Breaking News* Obama Will Veto Bill
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:24 AM
Apr 2016

Looks like Bush Sr and Cheney have another poodle besides Tony Blair.

Nitram

(22,892 posts)
71. Obama's handler, Bush Sr? I'd lay off the conspiracy sites and the acid if I were you.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:01 PM
Apr 2016

You're getting way out there, dude. Or are you a paid propagandist?

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
89. If I Called You Paid I'd Get Red-Flagged
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:14 AM
Apr 2016

The only paid sock puppets here are military contractors. I hardly think they would question 911 in any way. Especially with Bushes allies. You sound way more illogical than me. I don't think Obama likes the Bushes or the Clintons and those two families ARE in love with each other and collude. I could easily accept that one reason Obama had flipped on his promised regarding surveillance, lobbyist regulators and military intervention is because he is under constant threat from the security establishment who is according to most accounts the actual government. Handler may have been a bit hyperbolic but the point remains...these politicians are just figureheads and mouthpieces and when they try to actually change anything they end up like JFK/RFK/MLK or maybe the modern more subtle version of being William Colby'd or Wellstoned.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
59. Yup. That 9/11 was a Saudi government operation
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:23 PM
Apr 2016

What the docs probably don't say is that they did it with the full cooperation of George W. Bush, but maybe once their goose is cooked they'll turn on him too.

lark

(23,158 posts)
132. Exactly!
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:02 PM
Apr 2016

It's all about them, paying the terrorists and aiding the plot and the Bushes cover up of this.

elleng

(131,144 posts)
5. Was the reason it was locked because it was in GD:P?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:11 PM
Apr 2016

Doesn't sound unreasonable to me; should be in GD.

Response to elleng (Reply #5)

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
17. I messed up in the locking post, it was locked for being in GDP when it's not about the primaries.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:36 PM
Apr 2016

Apparently habit took over when I was writing the locking post and accidentally bolded the wrong sentence.

It was locked for being in the wrong forum which is why I said "you can repost in General Discussion."

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
23. NP. I will retract my statement and I apologize.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:50 PM
Apr 2016

This information needs to come out, I don't think it is damaging to our party at all. IMO, this will reveal what was going on during the high level talks between the Bush WH and the Osama Bin Laden family right before they jetted away to safety.

keithbvadu2

(36,937 posts)
45. "reveal" - good word
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:44 PM
Apr 2016

How did Bush know that his Saudi friends and bin Laden's relatives needed safe passage out of this country?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
79. Yes, the post-911 private flight carrying Saudis & bin Ladens
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:03 PM
Apr 2016

out of the country, just a couple of days after the attacks, should have been viewed with suspicion by anyone capable of logical thought.

Clearly something "funny" was going on.

Then we find out that something like 2/3 - 3/4 of the attackers were Saudis.

And, of course, none were Iraqis.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
129. "Saving the Saudis" (Vanity Fair, 2003)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:43 PM
Apr 2016
Just days after 9/11, wealthy Saudi Arabians, including members of the bin Laden family, were whisked out of the U.S. on private jets. No one will admit to clearing the flights, and the passengers weren’t questioned. Did the Bush family’s long relationship with the Saudis help make it happen?

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/10/saving-the-saudis-200310


Long read but worth the time!
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
141. Thanks! Looks like a good read.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:39 PM
Apr 2016

So glad these important events are finally getting another look. It's been almost 15 years, and yet unresolved questions remain.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
77. Clinton's guy John Podesta, is a lobbyist for Saudi Govt.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:59 PM
Apr 2016

Saudis are trying to keep report secret, so it can't be used in 9/11 damages/deaths lawsuits. Maybe a trillion $ or more in payoffs at stake. If Clinton is elected, she'll certainly keep the reports hidden...Saudis have paid her tens of millions.
Really, this IS an issue for GD-P, as it affirms the level of corruption of the leading Dem candidate. Of course Clinton supporters (including DU ownership) would like to minimize discussusion of the topic.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
125. Bingo..John Podesta is a Saudi Lobbysit.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:45 AM
Apr 2016

Hot damn. This rue is thickening real fast. And as for what group to post it in...I would think that just about everything is political at this point, no? Right up until election day.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
127. Since her campaign chair, Podesta, is a Saudi lobbyist....
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:56 AM
Apr 2016

and would be expected to be part of her administration, I would think most Saudi discussion is relevant to GD-P...including classified reports linking Saudi govt to 9-11. Understandable that Clinton supporters, including DU ownership, would like to restrict those conversations.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
19. It was locked for being in GDP.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:39 PM
Apr 2016

I apologize, I messed up on the locking message. GDP is for discussion of the democratic primaries which is why I said to repost this in GD.

There was no partisan reason to the locking, strictly due to it being in the wrong forum.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
13. Maybe their 'stock' has fallen since the price dropped to the bottom of the oil barrel.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:25 PM
Apr 2016

We need to see those 28 pages.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
21. It will greatly disappoint me if our President balks at releasing the documents.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:46 PM
Apr 2016

And it would appear to be criminal if SOS Clinton knew this while selling arms to the Saudis, even though they then contributed to the Clinton Global Initiative.

Turn CO Blue

(4,221 posts)
22. I read that if they pull ALL their money, it's still less than 1% of bond market.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:49 PM
Apr 2016

If that is a true figure, then let them go for it. It will take a lot of time and effort for them to pull out and sell off their assets.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
61. If your numbers are right, €©£¥ 'em.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:37 PM
Apr 2016

Come to think of it, even if it's more, €©£¥ 'em. Hit to my IRA would be worth it.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
92. If that's true
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:51 AM
Apr 2016

There must be more of a threat then they're letting on. Perhaps some prominent Americans will be implicated as well? Afraid we'll figure out how the sausage is made?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
83. Right, and that takes us back to the question of who actually
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:50 PM
Apr 2016

calls the shots in this country. Is it our elected government? Is it the multinational corporations who buy off the Republicans and too many Democrats? Is it entire nations like Saudi Arabia or China? Or is it divvied up among them? What would TPP do to the balance?

Sometimes I despair that we'll ever be able get back to democracy. Sometimes I feel like running back through time and begging Madison, Jefferson, et. al. to please come to the 21st century and save us because it's all totally fucked up now.

But then I remember that Bernie still stands a chance to win the Democratic nomination. So much depends upon one honest, courageous old man who is giving it his best.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
149. Thanks so much
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

for the link, Enthusiast. Good article and it look like a great website. If I don't survive DU, I'll be interested in other sites where real progressives can talk about what's happening.

brush

(53,876 posts)
20. I agree. They'll hurt their own econony as well, and I believe we can outlast them.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:41 PM
Apr 2016

And they would also be flirting with destabilizing their country as that monarchy is totally dependent on oil money coming in to keep their proles in line.

If we stop buying their oil in retaliation to whatever they try to do by selling off US assets, they'll be hurt worse as we can ramp up our own production and/or get oil on the open market.

I'm sure Venezuela is hurting and would love to have the cash infusion from us buying their oil.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
27. The subtle threat here is that the Saudi's will pull their payolla to certain
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:00 PM
Apr 2016

Congress-Critters and maybe even one president candidate.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
28. Not real surprising
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:02 PM
Apr 2016

Really,anyone surprised the government wants to protect our dear friends... keep the close so they can stab us in the back again..just more corporate power being used in an attempt to run the country through money...

2naSalit

(86,804 posts)
30. I think it's being slow-walked because
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:12 PM
Apr 2016

Obama is going to visit in the next week or so and it could be really embarrassing... which leads me to think there's a 50% chance it will be released while he's there.

And then, it will not only expose the Saudi participation, it will also pull the curtain back to expose those traitors in our government who helped make the whole thing happen... like the BFEE and the CFEE for starters. Can't have that now can we?

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
64. Plus, there's that election thing...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:49 PM
Apr 2016

Depending on the results of NY primary, the probability of status quo would influence Obama.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
68. Visit's a good reason. Add, 750B$ cash gone means a Bush style recession as an Obama legacy.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:22 PM
Apr 2016

The CDO CDS house of cards stands with new wings added to the house. The cash flow problem that brought economic halt under Bush W that he fed and left Obama to continue the feeding would be back again.

The Saudis keep that money in banks. Without that money inside the vaults, things will break down. Loaning goes. Runs occur on banks. Banks close.

I'm not an expert at any of this, is my common sense.

hueymahl

(2,510 posts)
118. I disagree
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:36 AM
Apr 2016

Not with the crap Bush left Obama, but that that amount of money would cause a noticeable change in the economy. It is just too small an amount. And it is pure bluff - it would hurt the Saudi's far more than us. FAR more.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
156. You're right, it's small. We seem to be on the same line of facts.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:39 PM
Apr 2016

Our banking system resilience is still questionable. What 750B$ might look like from financiers over years is a big question mark to me.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
35. Face it. Hillary OWES the Saudis big time.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:17 PM
Apr 2016

And it is her job to protect them from this.

Someone needs to ask her directly, RIGHT NOW, where she stands on the 28 pages being released right now.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
41. An interesting coincidence
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:29 PM
Apr 2016

The Saudis lobbying firm in DC is owned by John Podesta, Hillary's Campaign Chairman... Before that he was a special advisor to Obama. And Bill Clintons Chief of Staff. All while owning that massive lobbying firm..

He and the co-owner, his brother, have bundled millions for Dems over the years. All whole lobbying for foreign nations and weapons manufacturers. And big pharma.

And of course the Saudis gave millions to the Clintons Foundation...

So I'm not surprised at all that the Dems are siding with the Saudis over victims of 911. Because that's exactly what's going on here.

I'd also remind people that Bob Graham told Hillary she should read the NIE which said that there was no operational relationship between AQ and Saddam and no evidence for WMDs or a nuclear program in Iraq, two days before she publicly claimed the opposite and voted for the Iraq War, saying it was a good business opportunity for US corporations.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
46. Yes
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:44 PM
Apr 2016

The Podesta Group is an octopus. From massive Russian bank to Hillary's campaign, to way too much connection to the Clinton Foundation....etc.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
70. The money withdrawl would make a nice disaster capitalism routine.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:57 PM
Apr 2016

It would set the Dems on their heels as unable to effect good economy the same as the Republican disaster at the end of Bush W, exonerating Repubs of that memorable event.

Who started this release? I'm sure it has come with the okay of CIA NSA and enough of the rest of alphabet soup.

Inheritor class rights protected. Revolution in doubt.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
94. You known what makes me fucking nuts about this?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:09 AM
Apr 2016

The fact that if you replaced the name "Bush" for "Clinton", and "Podesta" for "Cheney", virtually everyone on this board would rightfully erupt with righteous indignation. And yet I've seen some interesting cerebral contortions trying to twist this into being acceptable because "first woman president" or some such bullshit.

And if Clinton prevails and we spend 4 years embroiled in one scandal after another I'm going to remind certain people that they should have seen this train wreck coming and have no right to complain about anything.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
98. The truth
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:51 AM
Apr 2016

is that - just like with products - people are obsessed with brands in politics. People genuinely don't care very much about war profiteering or corruption, as long as they get theirs...

...and then when they their opponents are shown to be corrupt they unironically scratch their head and wonder how in the world thing have gotten so bad.

It's a symptom of just how lousy humans are at having any real sense of morality... and why hypocrisy is so casually ignored by true believer and beneficiaries of corruption.

Years ago I started this little campaign, locally in Boston, that was basically just t-shirts and stickers that read: Expect More From Your Leaders.

The idea - which is obvious I'm sure - is that we expect so little from anyone in a position of authority that we're part of the problem, a big - YUGE - part.

And my god, the hero worship that surrounds Obama is pretty sad... He's an OK President at very best, and half the time I think that's a very generous assessment.

Between his disastrous foreign policy, his corruption, his stalwart defence of the center-right, and his pretend populism I just... it's hard for me to be a big fan. He's better than Clinton, but dear god what a low bar that is.

CrispyQ

(36,527 posts)
109. Every time I read something about HRC or Bill,
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:38 AM
Apr 2016

it's less likely I'll be able to vote for her if she gets the nom.

lark

(23,158 posts)
134. Funny, everyone's dogging Clinton on this, but it's Obama who's held these up for 7 years.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:15 PM
Apr 2016

It's the Dem establishment that's covering this up and they are both big cogs in that machine.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
137. And
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:30 PM
Apr 2016

Right now Clinton is one of the biggest establishment members in the party. In fact Obama inherited Podesta from Bill.

The wheel turns, etc.

lark

(23,158 posts)
148. Sadly true.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:53 PM
Apr 2016

I'm pinning my hopes on an old white guy, who just happens to get it right for a change. Someone who is in it to help others and not just themselves and their 1% cronies. In other words, I'm a Bernie person.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
50. Has Sanders or Clinton responded to this?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:01 PM
Apr 2016

I would love to hear their individual viewpoints on how this should be handled.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
69. Hillary was asked by George Steffenopolis (sp?)
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

this morning. He spoke to her before he spoke to Bernie and asked him the same thing. She would not answer...said she would have to read up on all of it. I think he even said "Do you mean you haven't heard about this?" (referring to the Saudi threat.) And I believe she said no, that she needed to read up or study on it. YouTube should have George's show uploaded by now. Look it up. You will hear for yourself what both of them said.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
73. That's what I took away from the interview...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:13 PM
Apr 2016

Hill can't say anything, because she knows everything.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
87. then he is helping to ensure a gop presidency.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:31 AM
Apr 2016

if that comes out in a ge, just another reason hillary will lose.

i think he will try and stall till after nov.

if by some freak chance she is able to win a ge, impeachment hearings will begin immediately.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
90. You sound like a pro-Trump troll, go to a right wing forum
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:08 AM
Apr 2016

Leave those of us who support Democrats alone.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
104. trump has nothing to do with this
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 08:01 AM
Apr 2016

its about the president doing the right thing for the people and not playing politics with 911

have a nice day

Duppers

(28,127 posts)
152. Latest polls have Hillary beating all the GOP candidates
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:23 PM
Apr 2016

Do they not?

Perhaps this poster was referring to older polls where she was losing?

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
55. That's no doubt one of the reasons Al Jazeera America went down...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:13 PM
Apr 2016

They couldn't get the money to continue AJA in conjunction with all the oil revenue coming down so far, they're loosing their assess.

This is not the dungeon anymore, and frankly, it about time we DID talk about this.

Isn't it funny that after all those people died, the only thing to bring the Saudis down is money?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
84. I read an article saying the Saudis are planning to sell their oil reserves, still in the ground.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:50 PM
Apr 2016

This indicates two things. First, that they don't foresee a big rise in oil prices in the immediate future, and they think the money from tha sale will get a better return invested elsewhere. Second, that perhaps they think their hold on power is more tenuous than we realize. If their wealth is no longer in Saudi Arabian ground, then they can skip town if things get too hot, and still have their wealth. Of course that would mean the Saudi citizens couldn't gain either ownership of the oil, nor the wealth the Royal family shipped offshore.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
85. Well...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:00 AM
Apr 2016

THAT sucks...

But, it's pretty sunny in Saudi Arabia and the real uprising would be for the Saudi people to nationalize products of the sun and wind. The world should dig deep on exposing these families. Let the so-called leaders fall.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
95. You don't believe there was any Bush—Cheney involvement?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:11 AM
Apr 2016

I mean, after all, the PNAC did request a new Pearl Harbor. Seems like an awful lot of coincidence if you ask me.

I think sometimes we fail to see the forest for the trees. Additionally, we see two separate teams in opposition when if fact there is but one. I assume this is the goal of the professional obfuscators that surround us.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
100. Didn't say there wasn't...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 07:19 AM
Apr 2016

I've always believed in LIHOP, thus mentioned DU-2's dungeon, where I've had my share of discussion (while all the bar flies landed on it).

PNAC was in essence the doctrine that allows this, in my view. It's not coincidence.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
144. I agree, MMM.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
Apr 2016

LIHOP is the only thing that makes sense of the period leading up to 9/11 and what happened afterwards. At the time I discussed it in a great little progressive forum that is now defunct, and though I lurked at DU, I didn't have the time and patience to get comfortable with the software. So it's nice to know that some of my fellow Berners see those events the same way!

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
60. Well, our dear government, over the years,
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:32 PM
Apr 2016

Has basically given pretty much every country in the world some kind of gun to hold to our head. So there you go.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
75. SS questioning Michael Moore's presence across the street from the Saudi Embassy
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:37 PM
Apr 2016

as he was filming Fahrenheit 911.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
80. Bush covered up for Saudis after 9/11.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:06 PM
Apr 2016

The coverup has continued. Sen Graham has been fighting for years to expose them. He not only co-chaired the 9/11 hearings, but was on Senate Intelligence Committee. He knows, but has been forbidden to talk about details and names. That info is contained in the classified documents.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
81. Well that's what I wondered when seeing it in 2004.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:16 PM
Apr 2016

Those of us who were paying attention already knew about the Bush-Saudi connection, the private post-911 flight of Saudis and bin Laden relatives out of the States, and the fact that most of the hijackers were Saudis.

Plus, there were news reports shortly after Dubya took office of the FBI being ordered to lay off the bin Ladens. On an old defunct computer, I'd bookmarked the reports. Don't know if there is any trace of them on the internet now.

But from what we do know, the Saudis have tremendous clout in the United States and a strange connection to 911. They are a barbaric regime, forceful over their own people, intolerant of females, given to horrible punishments of their citizens.

Do we tolerate them because of oil? I don't know. Moore's film made the point that they own a big chunk of us.

If we'd listened to Jimmy Carter when he tried to get us off fossil fuels and onto sustainable energy ... I think I could go on a rant ...

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
93. So for 28 pages, he's willing to relentlessly lobby congress. But when gay rights were involved,
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:59 AM
Apr 2016

he "had to keep his powder dry", "couldn't afford to spend political capital on this issue", "which would be mostly symbolic anyway", and "the president had more things on his plate".

Nice to know that civil rights are demonstrably inferior to financial assets of a foreign power.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
97. Kinda like Universal Healthcare, or even it's little cousin Single Payer.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:37 AM
Apr 2016

Obama will lobby Congress for the TPP and to protect the Saudis.







The American people? Not so much.





.

 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
99. Just seize the properties
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 07:03 AM
Apr 2016

And freeze their bank accounts for sponsoring terrorism but I guess they may have even more dirt on the US so it puts the US and Saudis in a stand off. We expose their involvement in 9/11 and they hold off their support for ISIS and this will make takiing over or breaking up Syria even that much impossible for the US

Response to grasswire (Original post)

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
111. Complicity. Thousands of other documents. Documents need to be released not held hostage.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:06 AM
Apr 2016

I admire Graham for trying desperately to get this out there for the American people. Amazing that Saudis know more about what's in those 28 pages than Americans do.

Obama's allowing himself to be compromised by Saudi threats. He's got to grow a pair and just do it. Get it out there.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
135. apparently he's covering for someone
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:23 PM
Apr 2016

someone besides the Saudis. Someone in the U.S. Or someones. Bob Graham said that documents show complicity by parties in the U.S. The interviewer cautioned that complicity is a strong word. But Graham did not back down from it.

Complicity with the attackers.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
165. I have said year-after-year, that eventually something will come to light...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:32 PM
Apr 2016

...and at the very least, will clearly show L I H O P. I would expect that this 28-page treasure trove also clearly shows that certain members of the cheney*/bush* junta, knowingly and willingly turned the other way and allowed 9/11 to unfold as it did.

Further, I expect the 28 pages demonstrate in no uncertain terms, that certain members of the Royal House of Al Saud have been financially sponsoring terrorism FOR YEARS, and Bin Laden's 9/11 "extravaganza" was bought and paid for by members of the Saudi Royal house, with checkstubs and wire orders to prove it.

lindysalsagal

(20,733 posts)
171. The realities of what really goes on with world leaders are probably mind blowing
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:54 PM
Apr 2016

And just like they'd never admit if they ever found alien life, they'll never tell us what really goes on.

I figure it's Iran/contra 24/7, America, included.

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
121. If the Saudis are responsible, then we declare war on them, seize their property, and offer them
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:10 AM
Apr 2016

a deal to avoid us attacking, e.g., surrender all their property in USA and in SA and those responsible for the 9/11 attack.

SwankyXomb

(2,030 posts)
123. If it was any country but the Saudis (or Chinese) threatening our economy
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:25 AM
Apr 2016

like this, they'd already be a smoking hole in the ground.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
128. The Saudis can go fuck themselves.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:17 PM
Apr 2016

I'm so sick of these terrorist turds.
Not that we didn't hold their hands and kiss them while they were funding attacks on us.

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
155. the 28 pages will be released on the same day that the Abu Garib photos will. which will be...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:38 PM
Apr 2016

never.

.99center

(1,237 posts)
160. Republican Senator Bob Graham
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:11 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:15 PM - Edit history (1)



REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Supports a Republican Senator's smear against a sitting Democratic President. This is Democratic Underground. Knock off this bullshit.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:00 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Where do you even start with this alert?
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sui generis. I fail to see where the OP "supports" a GOP senator's smear. The thread itself is a crazy train. This is just the locomotive (loco-motive--see what I did there?) Can't vote to hide, however.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
167. thank you for that
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:38 PM
Apr 2016

Some people can't take the truth.

The idea that Senator Graham is "smearing" anyone is outrageous.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
166. But of course. And we are very close to nominating their newest member....
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:34 PM
Apr 2016

...to the PNAC Clubhouse, Hillary Clinton, herself.

It would appear the centurions of New Rome have found themselves a new Caesar... and she wears a pantsuit.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
176. Because by his own admission he is a Reagan Republican. On all matters of money or power
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 08:46 PM
Apr 2016

he is a Republican.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Locked in GDP. Senator B...