General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLocked in GDP. Senator Bob Graham: Obama is lobbying congress of behalf of Saudis...
....on the 28 pages.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2016/04/16/sen-graham-on-9-11-blame.cnn
What the heck is going on?
The Saudis have threatened yesterday to sell off their U.S. assets and bring about financial chaos if the bill passes that allows the release of the 28 pages.
Obama has slow walked the release.
..........................................................
This is a big story, on all the networks. It got 29 recs before it was locked.
Let's continue the conversation, please.
brush
(53,876 posts)The Saudi's of course don't want that as there is bound to be some incriminating info against them in those documents.
I think Obama is trying to figure out how to handle a release before his term ends and the Saudi's threat to hurt our economy.
elleng
(131,144 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)But his handler, Bush Sr, informed him he better not.
brush
(53,876 posts)Or are you just talking out of your you know what?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:01 PM - Edit history (1)
The question should be raised and do you have proof of whether or not a certain politician cheats on their spouse? No...but it doesn't mean it probably doesnt happen. If you're looking for proof one way or the other, good luck. Its obvious the Clintons would never cross the Bush family or their allies and my money is on Obama fearing reprisal as well.
homegirl
(1,434 posts)against Obama? Of what sort? He cannot run again, he will retire, rest for a while then write a book, set up the Obama Presidential Library and go on the lecture circuit.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)God, I wish I was. Life would be so much simpler...like a lobotomy. Why do you think in 2008 Obama at the last minute not only pulled his promise of a filibuster of the Telecom Immunity Act but also decided to then vote for it. He just saw the rosy side of it suddenly? Are you not aware of what the Bush family and intelligence circles are capable of? Do you know what happened to Ex-Cia Director William Colby when he wrote a forward to a book in 1995 accusing Bush Sr and Cheney in involvement in pedophile rings for blackmail? The ex-olympic swimmer was found drowned where he was fishing. It's called hardball. And thats how they play it.
Cary
(11,746 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)I understand people's fears of not consuming consensus reality. But I'm not a coincidance theorist.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Another self-anointed arbiter of TRUTH.
So rare on the internet these days.
trumad
(41,692 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Who probably still believes the official story of the Gulf Of Tonkin Incident, IranContra, JFK, MLK, RFK, JFK Jr, Wellstone and even the sinking of the Lusitania. Probably would make a good attorney defending the republican officials caught rigging the lottery recently too. Could probably defend sex offenders and claim all in the victims mind and no proof... probably believes everything they are fed on TV as long as everyone in their peer group does.
senz
(11,945 posts)and your ability to think outside the box, bill. You may or may not be right some of the time, any of the time, or much of the time, but I don't think you deserve the putdowns you get from some commenters. I'd rather have a few wide ranging minds like yours around than self-appointed censors and thought police.
If people don't like your views, they can simply ignore you.
Hang in there.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)I really appreciate it.
I thought the MSM manipulating elections was a conspiracy theory.
Now I've see so much of it I am literally beside myself.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Facts Not Theories"
You should then offer as much rather than prophecies and editorials rationalized as satire. However, "I understand people's fear of not consuming conspiracy theories. But then I'm not an irrational person..."
homegirl
(1,434 posts)I don't think so, I am a former American ex pat lived in a neutral European country for 20 years. Saw them all, met many of them, foreign government operatives, easy to spot after a few years exposure.
Once out of office the fact is that Obama can no longer sign EO's, legislation or wield much influence. In plain language he is not worth terminating at that point. Facts of life.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)seizures which attack whistleblowers exposing right wing dirty tricks is just a result of another one of Newton's Laws. Unfortunately that is bullshit. The fact is that right wingers in both parties don't give a shit about ethics and morality, and that extends to the extreme steps they will take to evade accountability and exposure.
brush
(53,876 posts)There have been earlier reports that Obama has signaled to Graham that he will release the documents.
Because of the sensitivity of the information I'm sure you can understand the timing of any release has to he handled with care.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Anyone here recall when the Iran brouhaha was happening and Jeb Bush and his father made a surprise visit to Obama? O think Occupy was raging them too. It was reported in the Dallas News...with photos of them slipping in and trying to hide it. I have no idea what was discussed but what the fuck were those two assholes doing showing up without being scheduled? I'm sure some DUers would say oh they just like to see their old house and check out the drapes. Lol.
MadLinguist
(790 posts)you add exactly zero to the conversation
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)That is obvious. Them and those whose intellect is too lazy and whose heart is too cowardly to challenge their own self-serving belief systems.
MadLinguist
(790 posts)I just object to incoherent posts. The questions about how 9-11 came about are numerous and its clear that the public has been given very little real information. None of that makes your post worth much. Didn't even know you were on questioning 9-11, from your post (# 38).
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)They don't get it.
lark
(23,158 posts)They didn't like her telling the truth so they ended the problem. No, exactly zero proof, but she did sting them badly and her death was extremely suspicious and fortuitous for BFEE.
louis-t
(23,297 posts)Her husband committed suicide.
lark
(23,158 posts)I meant Katherine Graham, don't know how in the world I made that mistake?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Looks like Bush Sr and Cheney have another poodle besides Tony Blair.
Nitram
(22,892 posts)You're getting way out there, dude. Or are you a paid propagandist?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)The only paid sock puppets here are military contractors. I hardly think they would question 911 in any way. Especially with Bushes allies. You sound way more illogical than me. I don't think Obama likes the Bushes or the Clintons and those two families ARE in love with each other and collude. I could easily accept that one reason Obama had flipped on his promised regarding surveillance, lobbyist regulators and military intervention is because he is under constant threat from the security establishment who is according to most accounts the actual government. Handler may have been a bit hyperbolic but the point remains...these politicians are just figureheads and mouthpieces and when they try to actually change anything they end up like JFK/RFK/MLK or maybe the modern more subtle version of being William Colby'd or Wellstoned.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)UK's top biological weapons expert (retd.)
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)They like their comfortable lives.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Why I'm here.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)What the docs probably don't say is that they did it with the full cooperation of George W. Bush, but maybe once their goose is cooked they'll turn on him too.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)It's all about them, paying the terrorists and aiding the plot and the Bushes cover up of this.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 06:50 PM - Edit history (1)
It was a simple mistake.
elleng
(131,144 posts)Doesn't sound unreasonable to me; should be in GD.
Response to elleng (Reply #5)
Rex This message was self-deleted by its author.
elleng
(131,144 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)IMO.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)see those 28 pages. NOW.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Apparently habit took over when I was writing the locking post and accidentally bolded the wrong sentence.
It was locked for being in the wrong forum which is why I said "you can repost in General Discussion."
Rex
(65,616 posts)This information needs to come out, I don't think it is damaging to our party at all. IMO, this will reveal what was going on during the high level talks between the Bush WH and the Osama Bin Laden family right before they jetted away to safety.
keithbvadu2
(36,937 posts)How did Bush know that his Saudi friends and bin Laden's relatives needed safe passage out of this country?
senz
(11,945 posts)out of the country, just a couple of days after the attacks, should have been viewed with suspicion by anyone capable of logical thought.
Clearly something "funny" was going on.
Then we find out that something like 2/3 - 3/4 of the attackers were Saudis.
And, of course, none were Iraqis.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/10/saving-the-saudis-200310
Long read but worth the time!
senz
(11,945 posts)So glad these important events are finally getting another look. It's been almost 15 years, and yet unresolved questions remain.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,741 posts)It is a great day!
OS
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Saudis are trying to keep report secret, so it can't be used in 9/11 damages/deaths lawsuits. Maybe a trillion $ or more in payoffs at stake. If Clinton is elected, she'll certainly keep the reports hidden...Saudis have paid her tens of millions.
Really, this IS an issue for GD-P, as it affirms the level of corruption of the leading Dem candidate. Of course Clinton supporters (including DU ownership) would like to minimize discussusion of the topic.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Hot damn. This rue is thickening real fast. And as for what group to post it in...I would think that just about everything is political at this point, no? Right up until election day.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)and would be expected to be part of her administration, I would think most Saudi discussion is relevant to GD-P...including classified reports linking Saudi govt to 9-11. Understandable that Clinton supporters, including DU ownership, would like to restrict those conversations.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt
grasswire
(50,130 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I apologize, I messed up on the locking message. GDP is for discussion of the democratic primaries which is why I said to repost this in GD.
There was no partisan reason to the locking, strictly due to it being in the wrong forum.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)elleng
(131,144 posts)hence giving their threat teeth.
Rex
(65,616 posts)We need to see those 28 pages.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)And it would appear to be criminal if SOS Clinton knew this while selling arms to the Saudis, even though they then contributed to the Clinton Global Initiative.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)If that is a true figure, then let them go for it. It will take a lot of time and effort for them to pull out and sell off their assets.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Come to think of it, even if it's more, ©£¥ 'em. Hit to my IRA would be worth it.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)There must be more of a threat then they're letting on. Perhaps some prominent Americans will be implicated as well? Afraid we'll figure out how the sausage is made?
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Fuck 'em - they were involved with 9-11
arcane1
(38,613 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)calls the shots in this country. Is it our elected government? Is it the multinational corporations who buy off the Republicans and too many Democrats? Is it entire nations like Saudi Arabia or China? Or is it divvied up among them? What would TPP do to the balance?
Sometimes I despair that we'll ever be able get back to democracy. Sometimes I feel like running back through time and begging Madison, Jefferson, et. al. to please come to the 21st century and save us because it's all totally fucked up now.
But then I remember that Bernie still stands a chance to win the Democratic nomination. So much depends upon one honest, courageous old man who is giving it his best.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)for the link, Enthusiast. Good article and it look like a great website. If I don't survive DU, I'll be interested in other sites where real progressives can talk about what's happening.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)We need to know.
brush
(53,876 posts)And they would also be flirting with destabilizing their country as that monarchy is totally dependent on oil money coming in to keep their proles in line.
If we stop buying their oil in retaliation to whatever they try to do by selling off US assets, they'll be hurt worse as we can ramp up our own production and/or get oil on the open market.
I'm sure Venezuela is hurting and would love to have the cash infusion from us buying their oil.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)drokhole
(1,230 posts)yes
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Congress-Critters and maybe even one president candidate.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)We've easily done it with other countries.
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)Really,anyone surprised the government wants to protect our dear friends... keep the close so they can stab us in the back again..just more corporate power being used in an attempt to run the country through money...
2naSalit
(86,804 posts)Obama is going to visit in the next week or so and it could be really embarrassing... which leads me to think there's a 50% chance it will be released while he's there.
And then, it will not only expose the Saudi participation, it will also pull the curtain back to expose those traitors in our government who helped make the whole thing happen... like the BFEE and the CFEE for starters. Can't have that now can we?
grasswire
(50,130 posts)If it is, this will be a helluva summer!!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Depending on the results of NY primary, the probability of status quo would influence Obama.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)The CDO CDS house of cards stands with new wings added to the house. The cash flow problem that brought economic halt under Bush W that he fed and left Obama to continue the feeding would be back again.
The Saudis keep that money in banks. Without that money inside the vaults, things will break down. Loaning goes. Runs occur on banks. Banks close.
I'm not an expert at any of this, is my common sense.
hueymahl
(2,510 posts)Not with the crap Bush left Obama, but that that amount of money would cause a noticeable change in the economy. It is just too small an amount. And it is pure bluff - it would hurt the Saudi's far more than us. FAR more.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)Our banking system resilience is still questionable. What 750B$ might look like from financiers over years is a big question mark to me.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)He saw what happened when Beverly Eckert's plane crashed after trying to bring things to light.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/nyregion/14eckert.html?_r=0
grasswire
(50,130 posts)And it is her job to protect them from this.
Someone needs to ask her directly, RIGHT NOW, where she stands on the 28 pages being released right now.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)RATM435
(392 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)My mother taught me that Americans NEVER bow to royalty.
NEVER.
keithbvadu2
(36,937 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,595 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)The Saudis lobbying firm in DC is owned by John Podesta, Hillary's Campaign Chairman... Before that he was a special advisor to Obama. And Bill Clintons Chief of Staff. All while owning that massive lobbying firm..
He and the co-owner, his brother, have bundled millions for Dems over the years. All whole lobbying for foreign nations and weapons manufacturers. And big pharma.
And of course the Saudis gave millions to the Clintons Foundation...
So I'm not surprised at all that the Dems are siding with the Saudis over victims of 911. Because that's exactly what's going on here.
I'd also remind people that Bob Graham told Hillary she should read the NIE which said that there was no operational relationship between AQ and Saddam and no evidence for WMDs or a nuclear program in Iraq, two days before she publicly claimed the opposite and voted for the Iraq War, saying it was a good business opportunity for US corporations.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)The Podesta Group is an octopus. From massive Russian bank to Hillary's campaign, to way too much connection to the Clinton Foundation....etc.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Festivito
(13,452 posts)It would set the Dems on their heels as unable to effect good economy the same as the Republican disaster at the end of Bush W, exonerating Repubs of that memorable event.
Who started this release? I'm sure it has come with the okay of CIA NSA and enough of the rest of alphabet soup.
Inheritor class rights protected. Revolution in doubt.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)The fact that if you replaced the name "Bush" for "Clinton", and "Podesta" for "Cheney", virtually everyone on this board would rightfully erupt with righteous indignation. And yet I've seen some interesting cerebral contortions trying to twist this into being acceptable because "first woman president" or some such bullshit.
And if Clinton prevails and we spend 4 years embroiled in one scandal after another I'm going to remind certain people that they should have seen this train wreck coming and have no right to complain about anything.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)is that - just like with products - people are obsessed with brands in politics. People genuinely don't care very much about war profiteering or corruption, as long as they get theirs...
...and then when they their opponents are shown to be corrupt they unironically scratch their head and wonder how in the world thing have gotten so bad.
It's a symptom of just how lousy humans are at having any real sense of morality... and why hypocrisy is so casually ignored by true believer and beneficiaries of corruption.
Years ago I started this little campaign, locally in Boston, that was basically just t-shirts and stickers that read: Expect More From Your Leaders.
The idea - which is obvious I'm sure - is that we expect so little from anyone in a position of authority that we're part of the problem, a big - YUGE - part.
And my god, the hero worship that surrounds Obama is pretty sad... He's an OK President at very best, and half the time I think that's a very generous assessment.
Between his disastrous foreign policy, his corruption, his stalwart defence of the center-right, and his pretend populism I just... it's hard for me to be a big fan. He's better than Clinton, but dear god what a low bar that is.
Duppers
(28,127 posts)Thanks for posting an-Inconvenient
-to-some Truth!
onecaliberal
(32,902 posts)CrispyQ
(36,527 posts)it's less likely I'll be able to vote for her if she gets the nom.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Many many many of us feel the same way.
lark
(23,158 posts)It's the Dem establishment that's covering this up and they are both big cogs in that machine.
Right now Clinton is one of the biggest establishment members in the party. In fact Obama inherited Podesta from Bill.
The wheel turns, etc.
lark
(23,158 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)That's one of the many reasons Bernie is so important.
lark
(23,158 posts)Help us Bernie - You are our only hope!
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)The female President you're looking for.
lark
(23,158 posts)I'm pinning my hopes on an old white guy, who just happens to get it right for a change. Someone who is in it to help others and not just themselves and their 1% cronies. In other words, I'm a Bernie person.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)angrychair
(8,733 posts)We do not give in to terrorist threats.
Fuck them.
jeepers
(314 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)I would love to hear their individual viewpoints on how this should be handled.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)..has heard her response.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)this morning. He spoke to her before he spoke to Bernie and asked him the same thing. She would not answer...said she would have to read up on all of it. I think he even said "Do you mean you haven't heard about this?" (referring to the Saudi threat.) And I believe she said no, that she needed to read up or study on it. YouTube should have George's show uploaded by now. Look it up. You will hear for yourself what both of them said.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)My first guess is she would prefer not to answer this question.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Hill can't say anything, because she knows everything.
mac56
(17,574 posts)Sounds like Drumpf.
dchill
(38,547 posts)Once Hillary has the nom.
Evil.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)if that comes out in a ge, just another reason hillary will lose.
i think he will try and stall till after nov.
if by some freak chance she is able to win a ge, impeachment hearings will begin immediately.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Leave those of us who support Democrats alone.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)its about the president doing the right thing for the people and not playing politics with 911
have a nice day
Duppers
(28,127 posts)Do they not?
Perhaps this poster was referring to older polls where she was losing?
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)They couldn't get the money to continue AJA in conjunction with all the oil revenue coming down so far, they're loosing their assess.
This is not the dungeon anymore, and frankly, it about time we DID talk about this.
Isn't it funny that after all those people died, the only thing to bring the Saudis down is money?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)This indicates two things. First, that they don't foresee a big rise in oil prices in the immediate future, and they think the money from tha sale will get a better return invested elsewhere. Second, that perhaps they think their hold on power is more tenuous than we realize. If their wealth is no longer in Saudi Arabian ground, then they can skip town if things get too hot, and still have their wealth. Of course that would mean the Saudi citizens couldn't gain either ownership of the oil, nor the wealth the Royal family shipped offshore.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)THAT sucks...
But, it's pretty sunny in Saudi Arabia and the real uprising would be for the Saudi people to nationalize products of the sun and wind. The world should dig deep on exposing these families. Let the so-called leaders fall.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I mean, after all, the PNAC did request a new Pearl Harbor. Seems like an awful lot of coincidence if you ask me.
I think sometimes we fail to see the forest for the trees. Additionally, we see two separate teams in opposition when if fact there is but one. I assume this is the goal of the professional obfuscators that surround us.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I've always believed in LIHOP, thus mentioned DU-2's dungeon, where I've had my share of discussion (while all the bar flies landed on it).
PNAC was in essence the doctrine that allows this, in my view. It's not coincidence.
senz
(11,945 posts)LIHOP is the only thing that makes sense of the period leading up to 9/11 and what happened afterwards. At the time I discussed it in a great little progressive forum that is now defunct, and though I lurked at DU, I didn't have the time and patience to get comfortable with the software. So it's nice to know that some of my fellow Berners see those events the same way!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Has basically given pretty much every country in the world some kind of gun to hold to our head. So there you go.
Duppers
(28,127 posts)$$$$$ explains a lot.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2010/10/20101020173353178622.html
senz
(11,945 posts)as he was filming Fahrenheit 911.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)The SS protects them?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The coverup has continued. Sen Graham has been fighting for years to expose them. He not only co-chaired the 9/11 hearings, but was on Senate Intelligence Committee. He knows, but has been forbidden to talk about details and names. That info is contained in the classified documents.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The question is why?
senz
(11,945 posts)Those of us who were paying attention already knew about the Bush-Saudi connection, the private post-911 flight of Saudis and bin Laden relatives out of the States, and the fact that most of the hijackers were Saudis.
Plus, there were news reports shortly after Dubya took office of the FBI being ordered to lay off the bin Ladens. On an old defunct computer, I'd bookmarked the reports. Don't know if there is any trace of them on the internet now.
But from what we do know, the Saudis have tremendous clout in the United States and a strange connection to 911. They are a barbaric regime, forceful over their own people, intolerant of females, given to horrible punishments of their citizens.
Do we tolerate them because of oil? I don't know. Moore's film made the point that they own a big chunk of us.
If we'd listened to Jimmy Carter when he tried to get us off fossil fuels and onto sustainable energy ... I think I could go on a rant ...
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)he "had to keep his powder dry", "couldn't afford to spend political capital on this issue", "which would be mostly symbolic anyway", and "the president had more things on his plate".
Nice to know that civil rights are demonstrably inferior to financial assets of a foreign power.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Obama will lobby Congress for the TPP and to protect the Saudis.
The American people? Not so much.
.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Duppers
(28,127 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)rights.
jamzrockz
(1,333 posts)And freeze their bank accounts for sponsoring terrorism but I guess they may have even more dirt on the US so it puts the US and Saudis in a stand off. We expose their involvement in 9/11 and they hold off their support for ISIS and this will make takiing over or breaking up Syria even that much impossible for the US
Response to grasswire (Original post)
FreedomRain This message was self-deleted by its author.
AxionExcel
(755 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)I admire Graham for trying desperately to get this out there for the American people. Amazing that Saudis know more about what's in those 28 pages than Americans do.
Obama's allowing himself to be compromised by Saudi threats. He's got to grow a pair and just do it. Get it out there.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)someone besides the Saudis. Someone in the U.S. Or someones. Bob Graham said that documents show complicity by parties in the U.S. The interviewer cautioned that complicity is a strong word. But Graham did not back down from it.
Complicity with the attackers.
Watch the 28 pages get buried for 'national security reasons'.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...and at the very least, will clearly show L I H O P. I would expect that this 28-page treasure trove also clearly shows that certain members of the cheney*/bush* junta, knowingly and willingly turned the other way and allowed 9/11 to unfold as it did.
Further, I expect the 28 pages demonstrate in no uncertain terms, that certain members of the Royal House of Al Saud have been financially sponsoring terrorism FOR YEARS, and Bin Laden's 9/11 "extravaganza" was bought and paid for by members of the Saudi Royal house, with checkstubs and wire orders to prove it.
lindysalsagal
(20,733 posts)And just like they'd never admit if they ever found alien life, they'll never tell us what really goes on.
I figure it's Iran/contra 24/7, America, included.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)a deal to avoid us attacking, e.g., surrender all their property in USA and in SA and those responsible for the 9/11 attack.
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)like this, they'd already be a smoking hole in the ground.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I'm so sick of these terrorist turds.
Not that we didn't hold their hands and kiss them while they were funding attacks on us.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)never.
.99center
(1,237 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:15 PM - Edit history (1)
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Supports a Republican Senator's smear against a sitting Democratic President. This is Democratic Underground. Knock off this bullshit.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:00 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Where do you even start with this alert?
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sui generis. I fail to see where the OP "supports" a GOP senator's smear. The thread itself is a crazy train. This is just the locomotive (loco-motive--see what I did there?) Can't vote to hide, however.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Some people can't take the truth.
The idea that Senator Graham is "smearing" anyone is outrageous.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)"Graham
Former Senator from Florida, Democrat"
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bob_graham/300046
.99center
(1,237 posts)I thought my sarcasm was clear, I'll fix that.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Fuck the Saudis...
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)...to the PNAC Clubhouse, Hillary Clinton, herself.
It would appear the centurions of New Rome have found themselves a new Caesar... and she wears a pantsuit.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)LS_Editor
(893 posts)As easy as an amendment.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)he is a Republican.