General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould You Vote For A Supercomputer As President?
In a fan-made creation, IBM's Watson, the artificial intelligence algorithms used to beat Jeopardy in 2011, proposes a run for president.
For a machine with no human wants, desires, or motivations, Watson's political agenda is questionably liberal, advocating a single-payer healthcare policy, free university education, and the legalization of recreational drug use.
However, the machine's true agenda is revealed when talking about energy, most likely to fuel the next generation of ruling-class machines. Watson condones an aggressive push to clean, sustainable energy like solar, wind, hydroelectric, and wave farms.
http://www.popsci.com/would-you-vote-for-supercomputer-president
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Watson might have more emotional depth, more capability for sympathy and empathy, than some of the human candidates.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Eric Braden, now a long time soap star, began his career with this flick. Word has it that he had to suppress his German accent when filming it. Susan Clark was a great supporting role, as she would be. Also William Schallert as the CIA chief.
"Welcome to world control!" Has always been my login response on all of my many Linux boxes in honor of this flick.
I heartily recommend it.
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)Great movie, need to see if its on Netflix
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)I posted that same video before reading through the thread. I added two other videos, from other works.
Mike Nelson
(9,953 posts)...it could sputter like Rubio - so... No!
Response to yortsed snacilbuper (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Welcome, I think ?
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)marble falls
(57,080 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)The corporation that built it, the National Security State, the MIC, and the republicans would all have hacks.
It would be worse than electronic voting machines.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Way more than Rubio level functional, I mean.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)and knew how to access it properly.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)phylny
(8,380 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)phylny
(8,380 posts)you have one of my hearts <3
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)So it won't eligible for a while, yet.
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)Maybe you can make a case for being born/constructed in the US, but Watson isn't 35 years old yet.
Otherwise, it depends on who's programming it - and supplying the inputs.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I don't think that's a good idea, yortsed.
2naSalit
(86,577 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)"I'm Going to make this right!" Mike Holmes.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Compassion is important in a President.
Lochloosa
(16,063 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)you should do so.
Here's a link:
http://www.rednovels.net/ScienceFiction/Asimov41/27325.html
I think it should be required reading every four years.
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)and we had to choose between any of the Republicans then I would prefer a President Watson. I'd have some questions though like is he pro choice, what is his stance on the MIC etc.
longship
(40,416 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)and a firm handle on over population.
With AM in charge we'd have that whole "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" downside.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Have_No_Mouth,_and_I_Must_Scream
Colossus though, hmm, Colussus could be a jerk but its motives were solid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project
snooper2
(30,151 posts)The debate would be cool...
Are you using Angular?