Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:18 PM Feb 2016

Would You Vote For A Supercomputer As President?

In a fan-made creation, IBM's Watson, the artificial intelligence algorithms used to beat Jeopardy in 2011, proposes a run for president.

For a machine with no human wants, desires, or motivations, Watson's political agenda is questionably liberal, advocating a single-payer healthcare policy, free university education, and the legalization of recreational drug use.

However, the machine's true agenda is revealed when talking about energy, most likely to fuel the next generation of ruling-class machines. Watson condones an aggressive push to clean, sustainable energy like solar, wind, hydroelectric, and wave farms.

http://www.popsci.com/would-you-vote-for-supercomputer-president

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would You Vote For A Supercomputer As President? (Original Post) yortsed snacilbuper Feb 2016 OP
Maybe HassleCat Feb 2016 #1
Not since I saw "Colossus: The Forbin Project"... PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #2
A great flick. longship Feb 2016 #27
Totally freaked me out as a kid Kilgore Feb 2016 #31
Is 45 years enough for public domain? Good enough for youtube either way Babel_17 Feb 2016 #35
Lol, "owe you a drink" Babel_17 Feb 2016 #33
When it needs oil... Mike Nelson Feb 2016 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #4
Fair Warning orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #8
Buy some hearts and enjoy your stay! bluedigger Feb 2016 #9
That crap won't fly here. How do you like pizza? marble falls Feb 2016 #15
Who's the programmer Alan Watts or James Watt ? orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #5
No! BillZBubb Feb 2016 #6
It would have to be pretty super. bluedigger Feb 2016 #7
No, but I might vote for a candidate who had access to one ladjf Feb 2016 #10
Is it Republican or Democrat? nt bemildred Feb 2016 #11
Is it 35 and a natural-born American citizen? n/t phylny Feb 2016 #12
You win the Internet! No more calls, please, we have a winner! jberryhill Feb 2016 #14
Well, that was sweet and phylny Feb 2016 #17
I think it was born in Urbana in the 90's. bluedigger Feb 2016 #22
doesn't meet the requirements Retrograde Feb 2016 #13
HAL 2016 gollygee Feb 2016 #16
Exactly. 2naSalit Feb 2016 #25
Only if it is a HOLMES IV named Mike. Downwinder Feb 2016 #18
Mike Holmes is a Canadian (proudly too!) and I don't think Mike Hunt is eligible. madinmaryland Feb 2016 #36
NO! Maedhros Feb 2016 #19
No..they suck at Tic-Tac-Toe Lochloosa Feb 2016 #20
nope HereSince1628 Feb 2016 #21
Daisy, dai-sy give m e you...r an..sw..er..... BlueJazz Feb 2016 #23
If you've never read the story "Franchise" by Isaac Asimov, SheilaT Feb 2016 #24
If we didn't have any candidates Nite Owl Feb 2016 #26
Open the pod bay doors! nt longship Feb 2016 #28
How does one bribe a computer? hobbit709 Feb 2016 #29
No, because this might happen..... Nye Bevan Feb 2016 #30
With Skynet in charge we'd have both full employment, ... Babel_17 Feb 2016 #32
As long as it has basic programming, Death for child fuckers, Wealthy help the needy, Bill of Rights snooper2 Feb 2016 #34
Let me tell you how much I've come to hate you since I began to govern. Orrex Feb 2016 #37
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
1. Maybe
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:21 PM
Feb 2016

Watson might have more emotional depth, more capability for sympathy and empathy, than some of the human candidates.

longship

(40,416 posts)
27. A great flick.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:05 PM
Feb 2016

Eric Braden, now a long time soap star, began his career with this flick. Word has it that he had to suppress his German accent when filming it. Susan Clark was a great supporting role, as she would be. Also William Schallert as the CIA chief.

"Welcome to world control!" Has always been my login response on all of my many Linux boxes in honor of this flick.

I heartily recommend it.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
33. Lol, "owe you a drink"
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:24 PM
Feb 2016

I posted that same video before reading through the thread. I added two other videos, from other works.

Response to yortsed snacilbuper (Original post)

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
6. No!
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:24 PM
Feb 2016

The corporation that built it, the National Security State, the MIC, and the republicans would all have hacks.

It would be worse than electronic voting machines.

Retrograde

(10,136 posts)
13. doesn't meet the requirements
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:28 PM
Feb 2016

Maybe you can make a case for being born/constructed in the US, but Watson isn't 35 years old yet.

Otherwise, it depends on who's programming it - and supplying the inputs.

madinmaryland

(64,931 posts)
36. Mike Holmes is a Canadian (proudly too!) and I don't think Mike Hunt is eligible.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:52 PM
Feb 2016

"I'm Going to make this right!" Mike Holmes.



 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
24. If you've never read the story "Franchise" by Isaac Asimov,
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:06 PM
Feb 2016

you should do so.

Here's a link:

http://www.rednovels.net/ScienceFiction/Asimov41/27325.html

I think it should be required reading every four years.

Nite Owl

(11,303 posts)
26. If we didn't have any candidates
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:03 PM
Feb 2016

and we had to choose between any of the Republicans then I would prefer a President Watson. I'd have some questions though like is he pro choice, what is his stance on the MIC etc.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
32. With Skynet in charge we'd have both full employment, ...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:22 PM
Feb 2016

and a firm handle on over population.



With AM in charge we'd have that whole "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" downside.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Have_No_Mouth,_and_I_Must_Scream



Colossus though, hmm, Colussus could be a jerk but its motives were solid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project



 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
34. As long as it has basic programming, Death for child fuckers, Wealthy help the needy, Bill of Rights
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:27 PM
Feb 2016

The debate would be cool...

Are you using Angular?



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would You Vote For A Supe...