Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 11:07 AM Jun 2012

Three ways of looking at Employment

Last edited Fri Jun 1, 2012, 12:50 PM - Edit history (1)



Of these three employment statistics which one looks like the real world?

To me, the employment-population ratio (black line) best tells the tale, avoiding all the definitional "who is looking for work" type issues and really showing how this is not a normal recession. In all the other recessions (going back to 1960 as shown here, but you can take it back further) we drop and then rise. Drop and then rise.

But in this event we dropped and then went sideways, finding stability at a lower new-normal.

When this whole mess started there was a lot of public debate about whether the event would be "V-shaped" or "L-shaped." The two demand very different policy responses. You couldn't ask for a more L-shaped event than the employment-population ratio delineates.
____________

The employment/population ratio is affected by demographic factors, of course. More retirees or college students would make the p/e ratio lower while not increasing unemployment. So with this type of statistical series it can be useful to isolate the "prime working age" population to make sure the decline is from the economy, not from demographics.



____________

Charts from CalculatedRisk blog which is a well-respected daily analysis of economic statistics from a non-RW perspective. And it always has awesome charts.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Three ways of looking at Employment (Original Post) cthulu2016 Jun 2012 OP
Great graph. nt lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #1
And the now-classic one cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #2
Ever think about prison inmates? malthaussen Jun 2012 #3
Unfortunately, they're not.... Wounded Bear Jun 2012 #4
Right, of course malthaussen Jun 2012 #5
This hunter Jun 2012 #6
... cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #7

malthaussen

(17,193 posts)
3. Ever think about prison inmates?
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 12:56 PM
Jun 2012

We incarcerate more people than any other country on the planet. We incarcerate more people than some continents. I submit that they should be included in the Unemployed, since they are assuredly out of the labor pool.

-- Mal

Wounded Bear

(58,648 posts)
4. Unfortunately, they're not....
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 01:04 PM
Jun 2012

In many prisons, prisoners are put to work at minimal wages and exploited for corporate good.

They are in the work force, but not documented. In that regard, they drive wages down.

malthaussen

(17,193 posts)
5. Right, of course
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 01:10 PM
Jun 2012

What I should have said was "out of the competitive labor pool." The labor we do extract from them would certainly contribute to driving down wages, and I do believe there have been some proposals floating around recently (GA? AL?) to extend the use of prisoners for forced labor... err, "social service" or whatever spin they'll use.

On the one hand, if done with a true eye to the public good, putting prisoners to work sounds like a good idea. But alas, ideas like that never do seem to be implemented with an eye to the public good.

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Three ways of looking at ...