General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse Bill Would Make It Harder To Prosecute White-Collar Crime
CEOs could be off the hook for even gross negligence.
Zach Carter
Senior Political Economy Reporter,
House Republicans on Monday unveiled legislation that would decriminalize a broad swath of corporate malfeasance, a move that injects white-collar crime issues into the thus-far bipartisan agenda on criminal justice reform.
The public debate over criminal justice reform has focused on reducing severe sentences for nonviolent drug offenses. But some influential conservative voices, including the billionaire Koch brothers and the Heritage Foundation, have quietly advocated for curbing prosecution of corporate offenses as well.
The House bill would eliminate a host of white-collar crimes where the damaging acts are merely reckless, negligent or grossly negligent. If enacted, it would make it more difficult for federal authorities to pursue executive wrongdoing, from financial fraud to environmental pollution.
Department of Justice spokesman Peter Carr blasted the legislation in a statement provided to HuffPost, saying it "would create confusion and needless litigation, and significantly weaken, often unintentionally, countless federal statutes," including "those that play an important role in protecting the public welfare ... protecting consumers from unsafe food and medicine."
more
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-collar-crime-prosecution_564a2336e4b06037734a2f84
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 19, 2015, 11:11 PM - Edit history (1)
They rob us blind and then pretend America is about opportunity and "anyone can make it if they work hard enough".
Not with the deck stacked against us.
forest444
(5,902 posts)think
(11,641 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)think
(11,641 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Bankster Protection Act.
"Yeah, see. Protection."
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)daybranch
(1,309 posts)go home with one percent who brought her to the dance or triangulate and make it appear she is for the people? I think triangulation is becoming more noticeable and more damaging, so will her 1 percent friends accept her being against this until she takes office and sign it after election when it comes back up?
I really do not know when she will change to her true self (evolve is a polite word) and support the 1 percent more openly, okay you got me, she will wait and hope the public will buy a phony explanation of the issue just because she is a woman, and women know better , and we never had one as President or Vice president for that matter, and she talks to important experts (conservative ones it seems) so she knows more than other progressives, like Warren or Bernie, or Sherrod Brown or the Progressive Caucus in the House, and I hope she has quit claiming to be a progressive herself. So whats a gal gonna do? Life must be tough to try to fool the people over and over. Hopefully our desirous empress is revealed without the trappings and regalia of style over substance paid for with investments of the 1 percent.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Oh wait, they're tough on poor people's crimes. Yeah, not their own.
marmar
(77,080 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Feel the Bern!
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Johonny
(20,842 posts)because its laws like this that the GOP support. Never a thing that helps the common man. Oh, I'm sure there's some myth that these protective laws will help create jobs... there's always a myth to help quell the mind of the GOP voter.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)The real dirty work is done quietly. They will loudly trumpet something like banning Syrian Refugees, but quietly pass this on a late friday night. The average con voter would not even believe you if you told them about it. Certainly it will never be mentioned by Fox, or Rush.....
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)this is now what are "elected" representatives have now reached for a new low, to make corruption and greed legal.
Gotta send out a big thank you to Paul Ryan, for going out into the public and saying that he and his band of corruption are gonna wipe the slate clean
It is now "good / fair / " to call bilking "merely reckless, negligent or grossly negligent." to the public that it is now OKAY.
The last time I checked, I think it was Barclay's was just given a "negligent" fine for around 135 million for some kind of "negligent fraud", no criminal prosecution, no frog stepping of any one (corporations) are now people (gotta thank the right wing Roberts Court for this mess).
I wonder how parents would explain this to there kids, bad is good and good is bad logic. I just wonder if this is how Ryan goes home to explain this to his kids and this Ayn Rand logic
Honk-----------------fora political revolution Bernie 2016
tclambert
(11,085 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)It's all about the uber wealthy. Congress just doesn't care about the people who elected them. They only care about their corporate masters.
lark
(23,099 posts)Repugs want to do away with any and all controls on the 1%, one tiny bit at a time so it's not that noticeable to most. Until your child is killed by salmonella, or your family dies in a car crash due to faulty tires that the company knew about and didn't report, or something along those lines, you'd never know that the rich can cause conditions which hurt/kill others with impunity. Of course the Kochs want this. They are so busy polluting, they don't want to be held responsible when people die.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... but my hatred of the Republican Party now burns several million lumens brighter.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)because they passed laws making what they were doing legal. Laws like Glass-Steagall were repealed.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)They seem to have zero sense of justice.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)abhor true reality and those who choose to live authentic lives.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)ever want to feel like a worthless sprocket, work in the tech field. They use you up and spit out, used. I've helped a few tech startups get up and running only to be laid off and have my stock shares involuntarily taken from me. The last straw was working for a couple of Mormons running a tech company. You are literally expendable so the bottom line can be shored up for the few, and the special.
Corporations are SO not people my friends.
Solly Mack
(90,764 posts)Yallow
(1,926 posts)Use this piece of crap bill to bash Republicans, set yourself apart from Hillary (who won't say a word) and get 50 Democrats elected to congress.
Democrats could use this to take back the congress, but they won't. They are afraid of all the money too.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)How do you know when corporatist corruption is widespread across the system? When they don't even PRETEND not to want to make anything corporations and their executives do legal.
As if it wasn't nearly impossible to convict executives of anything anyway...
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Gothmog
(145,176 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)get 15 to life. Rob a bank with a pen and paper and get bonuses, golden parachutes, and photo ops with Presidents.
Unreal.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)lark
(23,099 posts)The problem is you never know when he's going to go corporatist on us. Hope this isn't one of those times.
graegoyle
(532 posts)"unintentionally"