Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:11 PM Jul 2015

Bernie Sanders Blasts MSNBC and Comcast For Canceling Ed Schultz--Removing Voice for Working America

Bernie Sanders Blasts MSNBC and Comcast For Canceling Ed Schultz

Sen. Bernie Sanders blasted MSNBC and Comcast for canceling Ed Schultz and removing one of the few voices for working Americans from television.

In a statement Sen. Sanders (I-VT) said:

We live in a time when much of the corporate media regards politics as a baseball game or a soap opera. Ed Schultz has treated the American people with respect by focusing on the most important issues impacting their lives. He has talked about income and wealth inequality, high unemployment, low wages, our disastrous trade policies and racism in America.

I am very disappointed that Comcast chose to remove Ed Schultz from its lineup. We need more people who talk about the real issues facing our country, not fewer.

At a time when a handful of large, multi-national corporations own our major media outlets, I hope they will allow voices to be heard from those who dissent from the corporate agenda.


It is rare to see a sitting U.S. Senator blast a network for a programming decision, but it is also rare that a network makes such a blatantly pro-corporate decision as the one that MSNBC has made. The cancelation of Ed Schultz means that one of the only populist voices for blue collar liberalism will be taken off the air. The decision to replace Schultz’s voice with that of NBC News Political Director Chuck Todd made MSNBC’s new direction obvious.

They don’t get much more corporate than Chuck Todd. MSNBC could have replaced Schultz with a wide variety of journalists, but the network intentionally chose to replace an anti-corporate voice with a man who owes his career to not rocking the boat and doing the bidding of his corporate bosses.

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/07/23/bernie-sanders-blasts-msnbc-comcast-canceling-ed-schultz.html
137 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders Blasts MSNBC and Comcast For Canceling Ed Schultz--Removing Voice for Working America (Original Post) KoKo Jul 2015 OP
K&R! G_j Jul 2015 #1
I will not watch that channel. Todd, dear God what a loser. olegramps Jul 2015 #120
Real news = AlJazeera America. Its hosts are not celebrities:"Wolf," "Hannity," Rachel Maddow … SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #136
Who on earth is going to watch Chuck Todd? Who.do they think is his market? myrna minx Jul 2015 #2
I'm suspicious that they don't care. Cleita Jul 2015 #4
Bingo! Thank you. NCcoast Jul 2015 #23
I shudder when I see Chuck Todd passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #33
I really don't see what Chuckie has at all wordpix Jul 2015 #79
A great example is the BP oil spill and resulting litigation. BP put the fix in by offering the Dustlawyer Jul 2015 #107
Yep. n/t SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #135
yes I've noticed more ads for ME business like U.Emirates arline wordpix Jul 2015 #78
Public Relations for Boing, Big Oil etc. 2banon Jul 2015 #122
good take G_j Jul 2015 #126
MSNBC = corporate "news." This is not a surprise. MSNBC= the Great Pretender. n/t SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #133
I want some billionaire to finance a media outlet for Schultz, Maddow, Olberman, O'Donnell, and Cris kelliekat44 Jul 2015 #22
MSNBC liberal from boston Jul 2015 #28
Who will replace Jon Stewart, political instructor extraordinaire? wordpix Jul 2015 #81
Trevor Noah has already been announced as Jon Stewart's replacement Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #99
I think Al Gore tried that with Current TV. Commercial TV still is Cleita Jul 2015 #31
He found out liberals are cheap... Historic NY Jul 2015 #44
we need a new model like picking out your own networks for a bundled price wordpix Jul 2015 #82
Yeah, that's what pissed me off about The Lecherous Channel 47of74 Jul 2015 #92
Yes, Al Gore did try. We watch Duval Jul 2015 #104
Same here, for 3 years. Best there is is FSTV (Free Speech TV) carried on appalachiablue Jul 2015 #46
Unfortunately, progressive media and commercialization don't mix well. alp227 Jul 2015 #88
Add TYT SCVDem Jul 2015 #98
I'm usually spent after watching Alex Wagner. alfredo Jul 2015 #128
MSNBC is a corporate hack, too. Chuck Todd? ugh. SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #131
LOL - of course since Ed is a big Sanders supporter OKNancy Jul 2015 #3
Jealous much? OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #15
Yeah, 'cause "everybody" knows they are tight Capn Sunshine Jul 2015 #39
The pic is from 2008 Go Vols Jul 2015 #110
+1 appalachiablue Jul 2015 #47
I think that is exactly why he was taken off passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #35
They have a huge problem with Bernie? Really? Capn Sunshine Jul 2015 #41
They have a problem with his message. passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #50
Agree and follow the corpos $$$$ wordpix Jul 2015 #84
Absolutely she could be next. MSNBC is not "progressive" news. It serves its corporate masters. n/t SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #137
I am guessing that you and other HRC supporters are not Big Ed/union supporters. rhett o rick Jul 2015 #85
Big Ed fan and big Union fan and Hillary supporter here. Nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #116
Good to know. I was hoping that some Clinton supporters would show up rhett o rick Jul 2015 #125
you are wrong. I actually liked Ed's show OKNancy Jul 2015 #117
Yes, I misunderstood your post. You were only taking a shot at Sanders and rhett o rick Jul 2015 #124
Oh Yeah... That'll Get Them To Vote For Hillary... Nice Job... WillyT Jul 2015 #115
K&R Cleita Jul 2015 #5
Comcast could not handle the truth being told, so they purposely insult their viewers with Rex Jul 2015 #6
I think they will nadinbrzezinski Jul 2015 #7
They won't. The oil companies and MIC industries that will buy Cleita Jul 2015 #9
Views and Click Bait to their Online Website... KoKo Jul 2015 #66
well said & the only way to win is turn out the vote wordpix Jul 2015 #77
I think they let him go because of Bernie... kentuck Jul 2015 #8
Wall Street and the MIC definitely don't want Bernie to have any face time. Cleita Jul 2015 #10
that was the first thing I thought when I heard this - I think you're spot on n/t Nevada Blue Jul 2015 #12
yes there's a discussion about Bernie's role upthread wordpix Jul 2015 #86
i am SO ANGRY with MSNBC for taking off the 3 GOOD Programs that I like. I HATE Chuck Toad trueblue2007 Jul 2015 #11
Just more bullshit world wide wally Jul 2015 #13
If they take Rachel off then we will know they have gone over to the dark side. jalan48 Jul 2015 #14
So I hear they are bringing Olberman back passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #36
I guess it's really who does MSNBC/Comcast support. jalan48 Jul 2015 #40
my thought about Rachel, too. I stand strong for journalist truth tellers wordpix Jul 2015 #89
Upchuck is a defacto republican, a puppet, a tool aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2015 #16
oh gawd, that story shows what a wuss he is wordpix Jul 2015 #91
Fuckie Todd - proof that ignorance is bliss malaise Jul 2015 #17
FEAR!!! They see what's coming.... Augiedog Jul 2015 #18
I like Ed Schultz yuiyoshida Jul 2015 #19
Blame me, I haven't really watched Ed since he came back from weekend duty... HereSince1628 Jul 2015 #25
I seriously doubt yuiyoshida Jul 2015 #29
But they do count viewers. And I've not watched him. HereSince1628 Jul 2015 #30
This is why they cancelled his show yeoman6987 Jul 2015 #102
Ed's show is always very educational about labor issues wordpix Jul 2015 #93
I love Big Ed! This so pisses me off! whathehell Jul 2015 #56
What pisses me off is yuiyoshida Jul 2015 #58
Correct. No one but Ed would talk about the TPP, I was whathehell Jul 2015 #62
Fire Morning Joe Omaha Steve Jul 2015 #20
Sadly, he's the last one they'll let go. TDale313 Jul 2015 #90
what? After he got his new hair color, cool glasses & thinned down? wordpix Jul 2015 #94
If you think along the lines of cui bono ... nikto Jul 2015 #21
My opinion: Toad should be fired immediately after the first night's flop London Lover Man Jul 2015 #24
The Toad taking over for Big Ed? Where is this going? Jack Rabbit Jul 2015 #26
Corporate media doing what they ALWAYS do before an election. blm Jul 2015 #27
needless to say... chillfactor Jul 2015 #32
So much GOP crap will come from that new kairos12 Jul 2015 #34
LOL - DUZY for sure aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2015 #42
Great one! Marty McGraw Jul 2015 #129
MSNBC ORjohn Jul 2015 #37
Olberman was a discipline problem and a giant ass ego. Capn Sunshine Jul 2015 #43
Which is why he's been fired from pretty much every job he's ever had on TV mythology Jul 2015 #51
Exactly! zappaman Jul 2015 #57
Yeah but what a great 8 year run on Countdown on MSNBC aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2015 #67
Agree 100 percent. Keith and the West Wing helped me keep sane during the Shrub regime. kairos12 Jul 2015 #71
I agree he was brilliant there wordpix Jul 2015 #95
Olbermann was the greatest. He Duval Jul 2015 #105
Every single TV NewsTalker... bvar22 Jul 2015 #80
Well, what is the inside information you have on this, then? MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #100
The liberal purge at MSNBC started with Phil Donohue dflprincess Jul 2015 #101
That's right... MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #103
Do they not understand that this crowd does not like Chuck Todd? We avoid him at all cost. YOHABLO Jul 2015 #38
A disappointing decision to read and wake up to in the afternoon. TexasTowelie Jul 2015 #45
WHAT????? SusanCalvin Jul 2015 #48
who is going to bother watch WTF CHUCK budd3456 Jul 2015 #49
Maybe someone at Fox News will stand up for the working men and women of the USA? Octafish Jul 2015 #52
Yeah. That's the ticket. Enthusiast Jul 2015 #69
Oh Yeah when Hell Freezes over and the "Peek-a-Boo" Up the Ladies legs gets Stale! KoKo Jul 2015 #83
Sorry to disagree, but.... HenryWallace Jul 2015 #53
You might have a point..although I disagree that Ed's Viewers don't have a Right to Pissed off.. KoKo Jul 2015 #74
disagree - right now many still use cable but main prob is ads wordpix Jul 2015 #96
While not necessarily disagreeing, consider one thing... brooklynite Jul 2015 #114
Ed's plain talk appeal is too dangerous in an election year, I guess. Fuckin' Fascism. nt valerief Jul 2015 #54
Chuck Todd is corporate diarrhea. nt valerief Jul 2015 #55
Chuck Todd? Unknown Beatle Jul 2015 #59
Two Problems... Rosco T. Jul 2015 #60
I am so angry right now I can't even see straight. Coventina Jul 2015 #61
Were Ed's ratings particularly low? senseandsensibility Jul 2015 #63
Yes they were low and he wasn't 'singled out' Rosco T. Jul 2015 #70
They're all difficult time slots wordpix Jul 2015 #97
what???? northoftheborder Jul 2015 #64
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2015 #65
to bring back the Toad JCMach1 Jul 2015 #68
I called them today and gave them my mind. Told them to bring back Olbermann, too. nt silvershadow Jul 2015 #72
How Discouraging colsohlibgal Jul 2015 #73
we do need more people qazplm Jul 2015 #75
whaaaaaat? They're replacing Ed with Chuckie Todd? NOOOOOOOO wordpix Jul 2015 #76
I bet that HRC supporters really like the Chuckster. nm rhett o rick Jul 2015 #87
I always liked him...but I don't spend endless hours watching people pontificate on Cable News brooklynite Jul 2015 #112
The only thing left for BSComcast to do is to get rid of Rachel davidpdx Jul 2015 #106
I think Rachel is probably safe for now aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2015 #108
Oh, I forgot about Lawrence O'Donnell davidpdx Jul 2015 #109
Since his ratings are far higher than Ed's, I'm thinking he doesn't need to... brooklynite Jul 2015 #113
It can happen to anyone. MSNBC is a pretender. I quit watching years ago. n/t SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #132
Went to see Bernie in Madison, WI. and who was there? indivisibleman Jul 2015 #111
chuck Todd!? hornyfrog Jul 2015 #118
And as the Bugs Bunny /Pork Pig, would say ................. turbinetree Jul 2015 #119
Bern one bora13 Jul 2015 #121
Very nicely done Bernie! rock Jul 2015 #123
On the bright side, we'll have the pleasure of seeing Chuck Todd get neverforget Jul 2015 #127
"Just another brick in the wall", lark Jul 2015 #130
K&R'd! snot Jul 2015 #134

SusanaMontana41

(3,233 posts)
136. Real news = AlJazeera America. Its hosts are not celebrities:"Wolf," "Hannity," Rachel Maddow …
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 03:14 PM
Jul 2015

Whoops. Check that. The economist does have his name in the title. Can't remember it.

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
2. Who on earth is going to watch Chuck Todd? Who.do they think is his market?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:14 PM
Jul 2015

This is a horrible decision.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
4. I'm suspicious that they don't care.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:23 PM
Jul 2015

Look for the commercials that are run. If it's for Boeing. (Are you going to run out and buy a jet.) Ads to locate your business in any oil rich ME nation? Ads for oil companies about the joys of fracking and drilling in the Arctic? None of those ads are for the middle class consumer. They are purchases of that station's time to prevent relevant and useful news from being aired that interfere with corporate agendas. Nobody but Chuckie's family and some Republican operatives will be watching and they don't care.

NCcoast

(480 posts)
23. Bingo! Thank you.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:04 PM
Jul 2015

The last three times I watched video segments from Rachel and Chris Hayes' shows streaming from the MSNBC website I was treated to pro fracking commercials. I shuttered when I saw those. The only reason they would be buying those spots is for the purpose of exerting financial pressure on MSNBC when there's a story they want suppressed, or spun. Or when they want influence over selection and control of on air talent. These are bad signs for MSNBC, one of the few voices in the MSM who'll give a fair shake to the left.

Fortunately there's not enough turd polish in the world to make Chuck Todd watchable. They'll spend a fortune backing that sad sack. Serves them right.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
79. I really don't see what Chuckie has at all
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:17 PM
Jul 2015

He is not a dynamo like all the people in the top MSNBC spots like Rachel, Chris Hayes, Rev, Chris M., etc. and Ed was one of those.

But Chuck Todd? Really? Verrrrrrrry bad choice. I hope MSNBC/Comcast feel the heat somehow.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
107. A great example is the BP oil spill and resulting litigation. BP put the fix in by offering the
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 11:01 PM
Jul 2015

sell out Plaintiff's Steering Committee (PFC) $600,000,000 to agree to a one-sided class action settlement. The catch was that they don't get the money unless the settlement goes through to the end without being over-turned. The victims are stuck in the class and cannot opt out even though it is denying 75% of the victims. Most people believe that there really was a $20,000,000,000 fund. That fund was as real as unicorns, but was reported as gospel by everyone!

Ed Shultz was the only network personality to come down and accurately report that the victims are being screwed and most never get paid. When my boss asked him about catching heat for doing the story (he ended up doing segments for over a week on it) since BP has been one of the biggest advertisers of all media, he said he can do what he wants. Guess who was just replaced by chuck Toad? I don't believe Ed was replaced for the BP stories of several months back, I believe it was because Bernie is surging and Ed was his biggest media backer! Bernie has made it clear he would work to bust up the media oligopoly!

Our once great country has been rotted to the core by campaign contributions and sell out politicians!

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
78. yes I've noticed more ads for ME business like U.Emirates arline
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:12 PM
Jul 2015

anyone seen this? Very clever ad showing people enjoying all these beautiful interesting places all over the planet. I start thinking, what is being sold here? You don't find out til the end of the ad what it is.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
122. Public Relations for Boing, Big Oil etc.
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 11:00 AM
Jul 2015

that's what those ads are about. Public Relations for "Big Business". Businesses that are involved in egregious harm to the planet and to humanity must have it's "Good Citizen" PR .

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
22. I want some billionaire to finance a media outlet for Schultz, Maddow, Olberman, O'Donnell, and Cris
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:01 PM
Jul 2015

Citizens are ignorant enough just having to watch FOX and listen to Rush. If you thing the ratings are bad now, just take off one or two more of the MSNBC hosts.

28. MSNBC
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:13 PM
Jul 2015

Totally agree kelliekat44. This is a deliberate decision to make sure that a Republican will be put in the White House in 2017!!!! Remember MSNBC ratings were astronomical in the 2012 Presidential election. In fact Rachel & Lawrence were beating fox in their time slots. MSNBC was a major factor in President Obama's re-election in 2012.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
81. Who will replace Jon Stewart, political instructor extraordinaire?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:22 PM
Jul 2015

Educating his audience in a very funny way. There's one person who comes to my mind right now and that's Wanda Sykes.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
99. Trevor Noah has already been announced as Jon Stewart's replacement
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:08 PM
Jul 2015

He is a South African comedian who is relatively unknown in the US, but extremely popular in his home country as well as Europe.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
31. I think Al Gore tried that with Current TV. Commercial TV still is
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:18 PM
Jul 2015

about who buys ads. The only cable channels besides Free Speech TV that aren't dependent on Ads are Al Jazeera and BBC.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
44. He found out liberals are cheap...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:44 PM
Jul 2015

they aren't willing to put up. You can't run TV w/o making a profit, either from ads, or subscriptions . Then they ran out of liberal commentators, including Olbermann, Spitzer, Behr, Cenk, etc...

http://www.wsj.com/articles/al-gore-had-reservations-about-selling-current-tv-to-al-jazeera-court-papers-say-1408652509

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
82. we need a new model like picking out your own networks for a bundled price
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:28 PM
Jul 2015

Instead of the cable co. telling you what networks you get for basic cable on up, they give you a price for a bundle of, say, 10 networks on up to the max. available. I would not choose the shopping networks, for example.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
92. Yeah, that's what pissed me off about The Lecherous Channel
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:52 PM
Jul 2015

I have to pay for that shit but can't have WGN unless I upgrade to the next package level.

Fuck.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
104. Yes, Al Gore did try. We watch
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:41 PM
Jul 2015

FSTV, and Al Jazeera, also. We watch Lawrence O'Donnell, too. Well, the number of shows that tell us the truth is decreasing. Bad news for us and the country. BTW, I won't watch Todd, but I do want to say that Chris Matthews is worse! Ed was the one who first took on the Bush crap. This is awful.

appalachiablue

(41,131 posts)
46. Same here, for 3 years. Best there is is FSTV (Free Speech TV) carried on
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:58 PM
Jul 2015

Dish, Direct and some select cable carriers. The FSTV channel airs Thom Hartmann's 3 hr. weekday program, Amy Goodman's "Democracy Now!" and excellent documentaries which can also be seen at freespeech.org online.

Too many people assume that folks know of alternative news sites online, but they don't. And not everyone can afford Sirius XM for some progressive radio talkers either, not in these times. Only 10% of US households have internet service I just read, if that's true; it sounds plausible.

This country needs an accessible, alternative and independent (non corp) Media. Where those wealthy backers are I don't know. (Gore's Current TV wasn't the end). This country is descending into dangerous decline... Watching the final minutes of Ed Schultz now, what a shame..

alp227

(32,020 posts)
88. Unfortunately, progressive media and commercialization don't mix well.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:42 PM
Jul 2015

Since many progressive positions directly conflict some big money advertisers' (oil for instance) interests. Ultimately, non-profit or viewer-supported (think Democracy Now, The Young Turks) should be the way to go. The outlets I mentioned have lasted longer than Air America Radio or MSNBC's "Liberal Fox" models have.

alfredo

(60,071 posts)
128. I'm usually spent after watching Alex Wagner.
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:07 PM
Jul 2015

I can stand TV for about an hour. After that I have to do something productive.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
3. LOL - of course since Ed is a big Sanders supporter
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:16 PM
Jul 2015

He didn't mind last time Ed was taken off. Why now? Because he gives Sanders a lot of free air time.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
39. Yeah, 'cause "everybody" knows they are tight
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:37 PM
Jul 2015

Know why Rupert is kissing Hill's ass in this meeting? Because he KNOWS who the next President of the US will be. Billionaires like to cover their bets.

Of course, a pic like this at DU creates a lot of "knowledge" about Hillary's ties and viewpoints.


passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
35. I think that is exactly why he was taken off
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:26 PM
Jul 2015

Because MSNBC has no problem with Hillary but they have a huge problem with Bernie. Last time it wasn't primary season with Bernie running.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
41. They have a huge problem with Bernie? Really?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:39 PM
Jul 2015

They seem to be the only major network covering the masses showing up at Bernie's Rallies. If Chuck Todd even mentions it, it's accompanied by the inside the beltway line " long shot outsider".

Even though Bernie is about as insider as it gets.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
50. They have a problem with his message.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:06 PM
Jul 2015

Just my opinion. Why else would they take off the only person talking about his message?

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
84. Agree and follow the corpos $$$$
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:38 PM
Jul 2015

The big oil/real estate/Wall St. exec pricks making millions off things like toxic debt, stock options and just plain salaries do not want to change the status quo. Oh, no. They want to keep their tax havens and fake headquarters in the Caymans and moving jobs overseas and buying the congressmen. In short, they like things just fine and Bernie is a big threat.

This means Rachel could be next. I hope he watches her back.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
85. I am guessing that you and other HRC supporters are not Big Ed/union supporters.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:41 PM
Jul 2015

Tell me I am wrong.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
117. you are wrong. I actually liked Ed's show
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 05:14 AM
Jul 2015

and I grew up singing union songs.
My dad loved this part of the Woody Guthrie song ( an Okie by the way)

You gals who want to be free, just take a tip from me;
Get you a man who's a union man and join the ladies' auxiliary.
Married life ain't hard when you got a union card,
A union man has a happy life when he's got a union wife.
.....

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
124. Yes, I misunderstood your post. You were only taking a shot at Sanders and
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 11:33 AM
Jul 2015

not Big Ed. You are aware that Goldman-Sachs is not a big union supporter and that a lot of Sen Sander's financial support comes from union members.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
6. Comcast could not handle the truth being told, so they purposely insult their viewers with
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:25 PM
Jul 2015

their new choice - Chuck "I'm not actually a reporter" Todd. I hope they lose billions.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. They won't. The oil companies and MIC industries that will buy
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:32 PM
Jul 2015

commercial time will consider it money well spent to shut down any discourse that thwarts their agenda to drill and frack every drop of oil on the earth and then put that to use in the new and awesome weapons being manufactured to to bomb every third world country on this earth to smithereens. Then Wall Street will dance a conga line over all the fabulous profits the 1% will reap because of it.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
66. Views and Click Bait to their Online Website...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:49 PM
Jul 2015


And, as always, Competing with Faux News and the "Leg Ladies Peek-a-Boo's."

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
77. well said & the only way to win is turn out the vote
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:09 PM
Jul 2015

get people interested and registered. Nuts and bolts things like that.

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
8. I think they let him go because of Bernie...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:30 PM
Jul 2015

He had Bernie on his show a lot and Bernie was gaining more and more Democratic voters. I don't think they wanted to continue giving Bernie that platform?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
10. Wall Street and the MIC definitely don't want Bernie to have any face time.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:36 PM
Jul 2015

If they are moving this aggressively to shut him and anyone who supports him down this early, it's going to be a bad fight for this Presidential race in 2016.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
86. yes there's a discussion about Bernie's role upthread
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:42 PM
Jul 2015

How dare Ed Schulz highlight a candidate who talks seriously about the nation's problems, offers solutions and tells the truth.

Maybe Comcast clients will decide to go elsewhere.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
16. Upchuck is a defacto republican, a puppet, a tool
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:20 PM
Jul 2015

He's the guy who's had an endless string of Republicans on Meet The Press and when asked why he never challenges their version of facts or their mistaken opinions, he responds that if he challenged any of their lies, they wouldn't come on his show.

That's not journalism.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
91. oh gawd, that story shows what a wuss he is
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:48 PM
Jul 2015

Doesn't he realize that these politicians love publicity and so of course they will continue to come on the show. And if they don't, who cares, that's good for Dems if the repukes don't show to spout their lies and Obama-aimed venom.

Augiedog

(2,546 posts)
18. FEAR!!! They see what's coming....
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:45 PM
Jul 2015

The real ground swell in America is embodied in the Sanders campaign. The goofy right wing Trump humpers are exposing the real republican skeleton for the god awful wack jobs they are. People are sick of corporate cruelty and 1%er social welfare state. Getting rid of the venues through which the ideas and platforms of the rational majority; Dems, Progressives, Liberals and even Socialists is just a beginning. Voting machines are the real weak spot and you can expect election fraud on an unprecedented scale in 2016 by right wing extremists. They are running scared and they see their own end coming and are willing, as any wild animal is, to do anything to save their rabid, vile and creepy existence.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
25. Blame me, I haven't really watched Ed since he came back from weekend duty...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:09 PM
Jul 2015

I think Ed's heart is in the right place. He is certainly sympathetic to labor and to Wisconsin.







yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
29. I seriously doubt
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:15 PM
Jul 2015

that you are an executive at MSNBC. They are ones who removed Ed.. and they are pretty short sited, but I get that all they are thinking about is the dollars in their pocket. But, omg.. Chuck Todd, is a total loser and should be removed from Television. He certainly doesn't add extra money to their coffers...

MSNBC may be about politics, but its more about what they can sell to the general public to put more money into their pockets.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
30. But they do count viewers. And I've not watched him.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:17 PM
Jul 2015

Totally about Chuck Todd. He needs to learn how to knot a bow-tie. Theny he'd better fit his political predacessor on MSNBC

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
102. This is why they cancelled his show
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:37 PM
Jul 2015
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/thursday-cable-ratings-ed-schultz-hits-new-low-of-25k-in-demo/


You cannot have a show on TV when you have 25 thousand viewers in the 18-49 age group. That is just way too low. I mean 25,000 watch the show in that age group? That is really low.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
93. Ed's show is always very educational about labor issues
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:52 PM
Jul 2015

He is really very good on every aspect of labor, including the business/ coprporate side such as exec. salaries, bonuses, perks, scams, etc.

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
58. What pisses me off is
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:16 PM
Jul 2015

MSNBC are sell-outs. They aren't in this cause they want to inform the American people about politics.. they want to fill their pockets with green, and move on.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
62. Correct. No one but Ed would talk about the TPP, I was
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:21 PM
Jul 2015

very suspicious that Chris Hayes and Rachel were being "gagged'" on the issue.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
94. what? After he got his new hair color, cool glasses & thinned down?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jul 2015

Oh no, Joe is gonna stay young and virile forever.

 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
21. If you think along the lines of cui bono ...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:56 PM
Jul 2015

Then it seems all too likely that the main reason Schultz was taken off is because he gives Bernie a platform
in the 1st place.
Corporate ownership surely disapproves.


Sometimes, something is so disturbingly obvious, that 1/2 the Public can't even believe it, and doesn't.

Shame on them.

Corporations and banks operate entirely on the principle of BENEFIT, so, since those interest$ are basically running the show in America (and essentially own all media), using cui bono as a standard way of looking at politics is just the smart thing to do these days, IMO.

 

London Lover Man

(371 posts)
24. My opinion: Toad should be fired immediately after the first night's flop
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:05 PM
Jul 2015

and Schultz resigned into a long-term contract ensuring MSNBC and Comcast will have to pay HEAVILY for him to leave them, promising the following

1) New primetime show
2) New radio show
3) Meet the Press host spot
4) Promising more progressive shows instead of pretending to be Faux Nooz.
5) More exposure on the Internet and social media

blm

(113,052 posts)
27. Corporate media doing what they ALWAYS do before an election.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:12 PM
Jul 2015

Padding the number of RW voices for their war-profiteering masters.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
43. Olberman was a discipline problem and a giant ass ego.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:44 PM
Jul 2015

They hardly "pulled the plug" on him. He ultimately fired himself. It just took him a while to find a big enough trailer to haul his ego along with him.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
67. Yeah but what a great 8 year run on Countdown on MSNBC
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:49 PM
Jul 2015

Olbermann was truly a voice in the wilderness, another Edward R. Murrow in taking on George Bush and Dick Cheney night after night. No one at that time had his guts and his ability to level withering attacks on the war makers. And his fights with Bill O'Reilly were legendary. No one else could make O'Reilly squirm as Keith Olbermann could. Often, great artists have great egos and Olbermann was truly great.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
105. Olbermann was the greatest. He
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:54 PM
Jul 2015

pulled no punches. I never thought he had this HUGE EGO. BS! They couldn't handle his straight forward and thoughtful opinions. We still miss him. GOOD for Bernie Sanders!

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
80. Every single TV NewsTalker...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:21 PM
Jul 2015

..has a giant ass ego.
So does every politician.


Why would someone without giant ass ego want to be a newscaster or politician these days?

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
100. Well, what is the inside information you have on this, then?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:11 PM
Jul 2015

Large ass ego's Olbermann's included, are not directly proportional to discipline and the need to "dump".

Olbermann is legend. There is a liberal purge, starting with Keith and ultimately will end with Rachel, I'm guessing.

They fear…. speaking TRUTH to POWER.

dflprincess

(28,075 posts)
101. The liberal purge at MSNBC started with Phil Donohue
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:34 PM
Jul 2015

he had good ratings, but he opposed Bush's war so he had to go.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
103. That's right...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:37 PM
Jul 2015

I stand corrected on that. God… How could I forget that?

After all these years, Phil was interviewed, and he seemed to have this tender aura around him. This, when he might rightly be filled with rage, given the early indicators, starting with his questions…. The ones dared not be asked!

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
38. Do they not understand that this crowd does not like Chuck Todd? We avoid him at all cost.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:36 PM
Jul 2015

Why don't they give that boring Mrs.Greenspan the ax? Talk about dull. They've now made another big mistake IMO> and many others. I don't watch MSNBC anymore, sometimes Rachel and Chris Hayes but very rarely. I tune into Thom Hartmann, Ring of Fire on the weekends. I listen to Democracy Now. Corporate tv is just propaganda at this point that caters to the oligarchy that runs this country. Screw them.

TexasTowelie

(112,161 posts)
45. A disappointing decision to read and wake up to in the afternoon.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:48 PM
Jul 2015

It looks like I'll be sleeping until the evening now.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
48. WHAT?????
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:59 PM
Jul 2015

This is a slap in the face, plain and simple. I watch Ed. You @$#!ers think I don't know the difference between Ed and Chuck? How stupid do you think I am? How stupid are you?

 

HenryWallace

(332 posts)
53. Sorry to disagree, but....
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:11 PM
Jul 2015

MSNBC's ratings are tanking (and have been for some time).

I don't think it is a knock on the network so much as a sign of the times.

Cable television is in free fall....... "Cable cutters" are quickly transforming the industry. In a few years cable providers and cable-only channels will be as relevant a Blockbuster Video!

Progressives are less likely to sit and stare at any six hour block of programing than their conservative counterparts (who are generally older and well, less open to variety).

In addition, Progressives are more likely to be unsatisfied with cable television in generally and probably make up a higher percentage of the people leaving the medium.

The future is not Fox News, or it's liberal alternative, but something else.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
74. You might have a point..although I disagree that Ed's Viewers don't have a Right to Pissed off..
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 08:56 PM
Jul 2015

We have older Roku Boxes in our house.

We went to replace our 6 year old Roku with their New Roku 2 and the Salesperson at Best Buy who looked to be in his Mid-20's said to us..I use it for everything except my "I Tunes Library." He said, "actually, we have a hard time keeping them in stock."

I said to him: "But Roku sells the online" and "we are here because we just decided to upgrade and thought we'd skip their 20% discount and the hassel of doing it online."

He said: "Yeah..that's what we find...that some have Roku Boxes for multiple TV's and they come in here because they are buying it for Kids Birthday or their Parents for some special occasion and they need it now and don't want to order online even if its the 20% Discount considering its for a special gift." He asked if that's why we were there and we said..."No..not special occasion..we just decided to upgrade and didn't want to do it online."

I have no doubt that one of the Major Hedge Fund/Venture Capitalists or even Comcast or TWC will buy Roku Out to Stifle the Competition at some point. But, for now, this works for us to get rid of the endless loud commercials we find time consuming and offensive and the constant drone of stale content or voyeur style viewing that can get kind of sick and tiresome.

For now things are Great with Alternative Media ....but, it won't take much longer before our Freedom to View is Bought Out by Another Big Company and we are back into the WEEDS with Manipulated Watching that we pay Double For...or just sit at home listening to Pod Cast Radio.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
96. disagree - right now many still use cable but main prob is ads
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:04 PM
Jul 2015

I am very close to stopping cable TV due to all the ads.

brooklynite

(94,527 posts)
114. While not necessarily disagreeing, consider one thing...
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:30 AM
Jul 2015

...cable news channels, whatever people think of them, PAY people to collect, edit and report the news. If the cable channel goes away in your new world, how many reports are you going to get from a war zone, and how many investigative pieces are people going to spend months preparing for free?

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
60. Two Problems...
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:18 PM
Jul 2015

1) Much as I love Ed, his ratings are in the tank.
2) He's doing the show from his place in ND, not NY. "Out of the Loop"

that said, I think they could have moved him to weekends.

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
70. Yes they were low and he wasn't 'singled out'
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:57 PM
Jul 2015

"The Cycle' and Alex Wager's show are also cancelled

basically that 3 hour block

northoftheborder

(7,572 posts)
64. what????
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 06:41 PM
Jul 2015

How did I miss this news. I LIKE ED. Chuck Todd???? Certainly not going to tune in for him. My favorite MSNBC hosts & shows are: Daily Rundown and Newsnation, in the morning; The Cycle and Ed Schultz in the afternoon, and Chris Hayes, Rachel, and O'Donnell at night.

Can't believe Ed is going - I used to listen to him on the radio. He's an institution.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
73. How Discouraging
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 08:33 PM
Jul 2015

Olbermann coyly hinted on his show today he would be on to somewhere, but MSNBC seems an unlikely landing spot now, wow.

This move is just so alarming, dropping Schultz for a corporate toadie like Todd.

qazplm

(3,626 posts)
75. we do need more people
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:00 PM
Jul 2015

but Sorry Ed Schultz is not very good on TV. He's a radio guy and that's where he should stay. There are other, better progressive talents out there who can say the same thing.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
76. whaaaaaat? They're replacing Ed with Chuckie Todd? NOOOOOOOO
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:06 PM
Jul 2015

We need to organize to get Ed back on the air and get rid of the person (s) who made that stupid greedmongering decision.

Yet another shout out to my guiding light, Sen. Bernie Sanders. Terrible Comcast corporate, I hope this crummy company gets a good public backlash.

brooklynite

(94,527 posts)
112. I always liked him...but I don't spend endless hours watching people pontificate on Cable News
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:24 AM
Jul 2015

Whether MSNBC or Fox.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
106. The only thing left for BSComcast to do is to get rid of Rachel
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:56 PM
Jul 2015

to make it a clean sweep. Then they can officially become the new Fox lite.

brooklynite

(94,527 posts)
113. Since his ratings are far higher than Ed's, I'm thinking he doesn't need to...
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:27 AM
Jul 2015
With 58K viewers in the 25-54 demo at 5 p.m., MSNBC’s The Ed Show was the lowest rated hour across all of cable news on on Wednesday afternoon (Ari Melber guest-hosted). In the same time slot, Fox News’ The Five was #1 with 253K and CNN’s The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer came in second with 96K.


http://www.mediaite.com/tv/friday-cable-ratings-msnbcs-schultz-last-in-demo-with-58k/

indivisibleman

(482 posts)
111. Went to see Bernie in Madison, WI. and who was there?
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:08 AM
Jul 2015

Ed Schultz of course. Ed has his hand on the pulse of the progressive movement and needs to stay on the airwaves.
Thanks Senator Sanders for speaking out about this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders Blasts MSN...