Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:32 AM Jun 2015

"He wanted the Glock .45-caliber 'because he was small and and needed to protect himself'..."

The loner who allegedly shot nine people dead at a church in Charleston told friends that he wanted the gun he used in the massacre because he needed to protect himself. Dylann Roof asked for the Glock .45-caliber model 41 - which had a laser sighting on it - from his father for his 21st birthday in April because he was small and ‘didn’t feel that he could fight back’.

Friends also revealed that two days before the massacre Dylann showed them a bag stuffed with magazines of bullets he would use in the shooting and said: ‘Look at all my magazines!’



Protection: Dylann Roof, who allegedly shot nine people dead at a church in Charleston, told friends that he wanted the gun he used in the massacre because he needed to protect himself

Looking back, the Meek brothers admit that there were warning signs but they didn’t think Dylann was serious, even though he spewed out racist insults and called for racial segregation.


Accused Charleston killer Dylann Roof was staying with friends in a mobile home park in Red Bank, SC in the weeks before the massacre

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3135256/Inside-trailer-Dylann-Roof-living-hid-Glock-floor-days-Charleston-church-massacre-telling-friends-gun-small-needed-protect-himself.html

_________________

Too bad he didn't use his birthday money to sign up for some body-building or marital arts classes at the local 'Y' instead. Looks like it would have done him a power of good.

Unfortunately for those nine victims, he chose the easy way. Less effort just to swing over to the local gun emporium and pick up a handgun, if you're feeling vulnerable and inadequate.
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"He wanted the Glock .45-caliber 'because he was small and and needed to protect himself'..." (Original Post) Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 OP
How did he pass the background test for a gun while facing felony drug charges? NT Eric J in MN Jun 2015 #1
As I understand it, Lindsay Jun 2015 #5
Actually, a felony indictment is sufficient to prohibit a gun sale with background check alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #17
But, but, the background check-system is failproof, don't cha know? Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #6
The biggest problem with the background check system hack89 Jun 2015 #24
Well, yeah. What good is all of the data in the world if it Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #35
Update: It turns out that he was only facing misdemeanor drug charges. Eric J in MN Jun 2015 #8
'because he needed to protect himself' onehandle Jun 2015 #2
And some of them are masquerading as liberal Democrats right on this board. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #3
"activist gun loons. There is an endless supply of these dangerous nuts" Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #23
Guns are so protectery of peoples. onehandle Jun 2015 #25
Lies, damned lies and statistics from Controllers Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #31
Gun nuttery is so womany. onehandle Jun 2015 #34
In other words you can't defend the bogus stats so you resort to the usual MO of insults. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #37
I'm sorry. Is that a friend of yours? onehandle Jun 2015 #47
Is that how you play your silly games? Then this must be a friend of yours -- Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #50
You must be new to the Internets. First link that came up... onehandle Jun 2015 #52
The DOJ has been collecting stats for decades. It's known as the Unified Crime Report. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author onehandle Jun 2015 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author onehandle Jun 2015 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author onehandle Jun 2015 #58
So you must agree with this statement sarisataka Jun 2015 #39
Make your own fucking argument and leave us out of it. LeftyMom Jun 2015 #45
"Guns aren't a solution to relationship violence generally or rape in particular." Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #46
Most rape occurs in the context of an existing relationship of some sort. LeftyMom Jun 2015 #49
"Most rapes" isn't all rapes. Women have the right to choose the best means of self-defense. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #53
A piece of the standard right-wing victimhood narrative. Orsino Jun 2015 #30
Am I seeing things, or does he have multiple scars horizontaly on his chest? Electric Monk Jun 2015 #4
Looks more like five nail marks to me? Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #7
His father had pierced nipples. Pain: A Roof family trait. n/t leveymg Jun 2015 #62
The whole sorry saga is sure to come out once the trial starts. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #64
Typical glock owner. ileus Jun 2015 #9
Is there a required profile to become a member of the Glock club? Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #10
You have to have a big ego and join the "There's only one gun" club. ileus Jun 2015 #11
Interesting...Would Glocks be the only handgun make whose owners Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #12
No, 1911 guys are much worse. linuxman Jun 2015 #13
... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #14
"Well-adjusted." Sure. But, you may double your chances of not missing. leveymg Jun 2015 #65
Well adjusted enough to not make jokes abut suicide. linuxman Jun 2015 #69
Sig folks come in a distant second. ileus Jun 2015 #15
I don't care for Glocks 1939 Jun 2015 #67
That's why I love my Sig and CZs ileus Jun 2015 #68
They don't take harsh racist comments seriously. Baitball Blogger Jun 2015 #16
Given the context and the participants, yeah... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #18
That's the problem we're dealing with. Baitball Blogger Jun 2015 #19
^^^AMEN to this^^^ Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #22
He bought a gun because he was small and didn't feel he could fight back? mentalsolstice Jun 2015 #20
Guess he didn't think of that. In any case, he boasted that he Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #21
No way he ends up in the general population. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #70
... shenmue Jun 2015 #26
Last couple of sentence nails it regarding most gun fanciers. Hoyt Jun 2015 #27
"...if you're feeling vulnerable and inadequate", not to worry. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #29
You have a very sexist and chauvanistic view of gun ownership. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #32
Women too have feelings of vulnerability and inadequacy... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #33
So rapists and stalkers are just figments of their hysterical little minds? Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #36
So it's all in their heads? sarisataka Jun 2015 #40
For me, not so much comforted as reassured. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #71
I don't think he would ever have needed marital arts classes. KamaAina Jun 2015 #28
Oh, I don't know about that. Jamastiene Jun 2015 #41
But he would have had to get married first. KamaAina Jun 2015 #42
Good point. Jamastiene Jun 2015 #43
I suspect that he was playing most of his friends as fools since he has been planning this for jwirr Jun 2015 #38
That is why I still think some of the ones who knew he was doing all this Jamastiene Jun 2015 #44
Hmmm...it seems he really, really wanted to kill someone/people. I am amazed nobody Rex Jun 2015 #48
His friend mentioned... TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #59
Classic cognitive dissonance: "some/none of my best friends are........(fill in the blank). Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #61
My concern... TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #66
how come anytime there is a shooting gun nuts act like they are the victim JI7 Jun 2015 #51
Tis indeed a mystery. Why do they feel threatened? They're the ones packing the heat! LOL! Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #55
He needed the gun because he is small? Jane Austin Jun 2015 #60
The poor thing seems to have felt inadequate, impotent, or powerless, if you will. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #63

Lindsay

(3,276 posts)
5. As I understand it,
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:47 AM
Jun 2015

if he had been found guilty of the charges, he would not have been legally able to buy the gun. But because the charges were still pending, the purchase was legal. Innocent until proven guilty, basically.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
17. Actually, a felony indictment is sufficient to prohibit a gun sale with background check
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:47 AM
Jun 2015

You don't have to be found guilty.

The test is whether the charge could reasonably lead to a sentence of longer than 1 year, as is the case for most felonies by definition.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
24. The biggest problem with the background check system
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jun 2015

is the states providing critical data in a timely manner. Some states are much better at it than others but there are big gaps in the database. The data is useless if it doesn't get into the system.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
8. Update: It turns out that he was only facing misdemeanor drug charges.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:57 AM
Jun 2015

I had previously read that he was indicted for felony drug charges, but that information was incorrect.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. 'because he needed to protect himself'
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:42 AM
Jun 2015

The mantra of activist gun loons. There is an endless supply of these dangerous nuts.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
23. "activist gun loons. There is an endless supply of these dangerous nuts"
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 12:09 PM
Jun 2015

That's your opinion of any woman that wants to protect herself? They're all just making it up because they're unstable? No such thing as rape? No such thing as stalkers?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
31. Lies, damned lies and statistics from Controllers
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:33 PM
Jun 2015

The bogus chart you linked to only accounts DGUs resulting in the death of the attacker but DGUs also result in injury, apprehensions or simply scaring off the attacker.

You need to recognize women have the right -- like anyone -- to self-defense. And even if you refuse to recognize it they will still exercise it.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
47. I'm sorry. Is that a friend of yours?
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:48 PM
Jun 2015

I apologize to you, your friend, and the bogusness of data that frightens gun nuttery so much that the NRA's congress forbids the gubberment to collect statistics on guns.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
50. Is that how you play your silly games? Then this must be a friend of yours --
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:53 PM
Jun 2015




NRA's congress forbids the gubberment to collect statistics on guns.

Another Controller falsehood. The DOJ collects statistics and has for decades.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
52. You must be new to the Internets. First link that came up...
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:57 PM
Jun 2015

How Congress Blocked Research on Gun Violence

After the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, calls for gun-control legislation have begun. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said on NBC's Meet the Press that she plans to introduce a bill to ban assault weapons. Even West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, who calls himself a gun supporter, says he sees no reason for these types of weapons.

But as Congress considers new laws, the scientific research we need to craft the best policies is in short supply. This is by design.

In the 1990s, politicians backed by the NRA attacked researchers for publishing data on firearm research. For good measure, they also went after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for funding the research. According to the NRA, such science is not “legitimate.” To make sure federal agencies got the message, Rep. Jay Dickey (R-Ark.) sponsored an amendment that stripped $2.6 million from the CDC’s budget, the exact amount it had spent on firearms research the previous year.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2012/12/gun_violence_research_nra_and_congress_blocked_gun_control_studies_at_cdc.html

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
54. The DOJ has been collecting stats for decades. It's known as the Unified Crime Report.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:01 PM
Jun 2015

But Controllers aren't happy with those numbers because they don't support the narrative so they want to keep recounting until they get the numbers they like -- such as the bogus graphic you previously posted.

Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #54)

Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #54)

Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #54)

sarisataka

(18,655 posts)
39. So you must agree with this statement
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:02 PM
Jun 2015

made about a woman murdered by her ex while patiently waiting for NJ police to act on the gun purchase permit

she chose not to exercise other options, or plan ahead to arm herself earlier, or maybe not date that asshole in the first place,
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=168313
... make poor dating choice, suffer the consequence i.e. murder

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
45. Make your own fucking argument and leave us out of it.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jun 2015

Guns aren't a solution to relationship violence generally or rape in particular.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
46. "Guns aren't a solution to relationship violence generally or rape in particular."
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:46 PM
Jun 2015

More of a solution than just lying there and taking it.

My right to self-defense does not impinge on your right to not own a gun.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
49. Most rape occurs in the context of an existing relationship of some sort.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:53 PM
Jun 2015

Real human beings who aren't deeply fucked up aren't really wired to kill people they know with zero notice.

The notion that guns are a solution to rape is based in very misguided (and often racialized) media depictions of stranger rape. It does no service to real victims, and does real harm, as in your offensive suggestion about "lying back and taking it."

Make your own argument. Leave us out of it.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
53. "Most rapes" isn't all rapes. Women have the right to choose the best means of self-defense.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:58 PM
Jun 2015
It does no service to real victims, and does real harm

Such as?


in your offensive suggestion about "lying back and taking it."

That is the expectation. If it stings its only because the point struck true.

I have yet to find a Controller who argues in favor of waiting for the police to arrive and intervene before the rapist can act. I have also asked plenty of the Controllers here if they recognize a woman's right to defend herself against a rapist. So far the silence has been deafening.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
30. A piece of the standard right-wing victimhood narrative.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:32 PM
Jun 2015

"I might become a victim, so I need to do what I was going to do anyway."

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
4. Am I seeing things, or does he have multiple scars horizontaly on his chest?
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:46 AM
Jun 2015

Most noticeable under his right nipple, but I see some on the other side as well.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
11. You have to have a big ego and join the "There's only one gun" club.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:06 AM
Jun 2015

One of the main reasons I don't own a glock.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
12. Interesting...Would Glocks be the only handgun make whose owners
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:10 AM
Jun 2015

have outsized egos? Is that what I gather?

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
69. Well adjusted enough to not make jokes abut suicide.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jun 2015

Not sure why you would even post that.

I was bantering with another poster about internet forum, tongue-in-cheek brand elitism. You post a picture of a man with two pistols to his head and tell me I'm less likely to miss. What am I to take away from that?

1939

(1,683 posts)
67. I don't care for Glocks
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jun 2015

I prefer a pistol with a hammer. I keep my thumb on the hammer when I am holstering the pistol. If the trigger catches on something, I can feel the hammer coming back against my thumb before I shoot myself in the foot.

Baitball Blogger

(46,713 posts)
19. That's the problem we're dealing with.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:58 AM
Jun 2015

We have people who drive around with Christian stickers on the back of their cars who don't recognize that this kind of group-think has negative consequences on innocent people's lives.

mentalsolstice

(4,460 posts)
20. He bought a gun because he was small and didn't feel he could fight back?
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:59 AM
Jun 2015

I don't think he's going to fare well in prison. His fellow prisoners aren't going to be kind, gentle souls like the nine people he gunned down.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
21. Guess he didn't think of that. In any case, he boasted that he
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 11:08 AM
Jun 2015

was going to off himself after his spree.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
70. No way he ends up in the general population.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:57 PM
Jun 2015

Very well-known, multiple homicide convictions, obvious target for c. 35-40% of the population...he'll do his time in solitary. And for all that it's tempting to want him to suffer harm in jail, I'm actually okay with that. He's young. Assuming he receives a life sentence (which should be pretty much certain), we're talking decades of solitary confinement in prison. He's earned himself a really nasty fate there.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
29. "...if you're feeling vulnerable and inadequate", not to worry.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jun 2015
"...if you're feeling vulnerable and inadequate", not to worry. Just pop down to the gun store, and your inferiority complex and feelings of smallness will be assuaged. Feel the potency and bigness in that comforting, hard metal.
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
33. Women too have feelings of vulnerability and inadequacy...
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:44 PM
Jun 2015

and probably feel comforted by the weight of that cold, hard power in their hands.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
36. So rapists and stalkers are just figments of their hysterical little minds?
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:52 PM
Jun 2015

When do you set aside the sexism?

sarisataka

(18,655 posts)
40. So it's all in their heads?
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:07 PM
Jun 2015
...Permitting authorities are notorious for violating state-mandated time frames," said Bach, citing state criminal code that requires an application be granted within 30 days.

Either way, when Carol Bowne was fatally stabbed by an ex-boyfriend late Wednesday night just outside her Berlin home, she had been waiting since mid April.

Although the 39-year-old longtime hair stylist had filed a restraining order against suspect Michael Eitel, 45, the man allegedly attacked her shortly after 10 p.m. upon Bowne's arrival at her Patton Avenue home.

***
According to reports, Bowne submitted her application for a gun license on April 21 and went to see where the process stood two days before her death.{June 3}
http://www.nj.com/camden/index.ssf/2015/06/nj_gun_association_calls_berlin_womans_death_an_ab.html

I wonder what could have comforted her while she was being murdered?
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
71. For me, not so much comforted as reassured.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:13 PM
Jun 2015

A subtle difference, perhaps, but a difference nonetheless. I'm almost certainly incapable of physically defeating (or even escaping, possibly) most any statistically-likely attacker. That person is probably going to be a young male; that age/gender bracket commit the large majority of assaults. On average, he probably can't outrun me in a long race (I'm a serious cyclist...I'm in good cardio shape), but if I can't outrun him over the first 50 yard sprint, that's irrelevant. I sure as hell can't fight him: I weigh 110lbs.

A handgun gives me a chance to escape unharmed. It's not by any means a 100% effective method...there's no such thing. I could get caught unawares, etc... But a weapon gives me the option to resist. An effective weapon gives me a better chance of that resistance succeeding. A firearm provides by far the most (statistically) effective resistance method.

I call this reassuring rather than comforting because to me, the latter term has emotional connotations that aren't really the attraction for me. I'm a bit of a cold fish, I guess, but I'm really just looking to give myself options...thus my CCW permit.

If it matters to anyone here, yes, my firearms are always locked in a safe when I'm not carrying one of them and yes, I practice (very) regularly with them. I don't really buy and sell that often, but I'd never sell one to someone I thought was sketchy (and my state now has universal background checks...yay!). Yes, there really are "responsible gun owners," and we're not at all uncommon.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
41. Oh, I don't know about that.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:09 PM
Jun 2015

He handled rejection extremely poorly, by turning around and feeding his hatred and turning it against all AAs. On top of that, he claimed AAs "rape our women." Uhm, the girl chose to go out with the black guy over him. That's not rape, if the woman actually wants to be with the guy.

I think he needed marital arts classes and then some.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
43. Good point.
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:13 PM
Jun 2015

That woman chose wisely, to NOT choose to go out with him. Can you imagine how horrible her home life would have been with him? It would have been awful.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
38. I suspect that he was playing most of his friends as fools since he has been planning this for
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:01 PM
Jun 2015

months. Telling them what they want to hear. When someone is talking trash you would think that buying a gun would be the point that you would start waking up and talk with the police.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
44. That is why I still think some of the ones who knew he was doing all this
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:15 PM
Jun 2015

ahead of time should have turned him in. As it stands now, their nonchalance about his racist hate, imo, contributed to this happening. I still think they should be charged as accessories before the fact, but that's just by my own definition of right and wrong. Aparently, the law requires quite a bit more than knowing racists are extremely dangerous.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
48. Hmmm...it seems he really, really wanted to kill someone/people. I am amazed nobody
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:50 PM
Jun 2015

noticed in the months following up to the mass murder.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
59. His friend mentioned...
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:28 PM
Jun 2015

...in this OP video that Dylann was planning to "shoot up a university."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026901820

From the video, Dylann allegedly said, "I'm going to shoot the university up and they've all got 7 days to live." A week later, he murdered nine people in a church.

I wonder why this kid didn't contact authorities? It appears he knew at least a week in advance.

It's a weird video. The friend claims Dylann wasn't racist...

TYY

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
61. Classic cognitive dissonance: "some/none of my best friends are........(fill in the blank).
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:59 PM
Jun 2015
"The friend claims Dylann wasn't racist..."

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
66. My concern...
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 05:50 PM
Jun 2015

...is that he knew Dylann was planning to kill some people for at least a week before it happened.

I think there's more to this guy's story than meets the eye...

TYY

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"He wanted the Glock...