General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama's approval rating among liberal democrats rises to 86%
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspxBetty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)has had some shifts. If liberal democrats approve of Obama, then I am no liberal democrat by any stretch of the definition.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Not all Liberals think alike, my friend, and it's one of those words that means more to the person claiming the label or having the label apply to them.
I gotta run but I will elaborate more when I come back if you want.
PEACE
DSB
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I am a big l liberal because I have empathy for folks in distress and identify with the proverbial little guy. I favor a path to immigration for undocumented workers and their famiies, affirmative action, the addition of glbtq persons to existing civil rights laws, criminal justice reform, decriminalization of drugs, a liveable wage, and access to medical care for all independent of ability to pay.
I don't care how much money a person earns as long as it was earned honestly and he or she is willing to pay their fair share of taxes...i worry more about comforting the afflicted then afflicting the comfortable. Let them get rich as long as they are willing to share their wealth with the rest of us.
I am not interested In "excommunicating " people from the Liberal community because they favor or oppose the TPP, or don't want to declare war on banksters and corporatists, or don't see the world through the prism of the 1%-99$% divide.
I try to define myself by what I am for and not what I am against.
think
(11,641 posts)or they have a partial & incorrect understanding based on something they saw on Morning Joke or Fox & Fiends.
This is showing that most self described liberals aren't paying close enough attention.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)....good luck with that insult.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)and they can decide how they want to take it.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)Obama and treacherous Democrats along with the Republicans are selling us out. Obama has done a long of good, but it looks more and more everyday like his positives were smoke and mirrors.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)from the uber liberals right here on DU.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)looking for a used car to tow their Trojan Horse Trailer.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Some of those here on DU who spread that crap, are they themselves the used car salesmen, and maybe even some of them are "Trojan horses" pretending to be something are are really not?
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)it can't be because most here aren't.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...so there is that mixed messaging
mopinko
(70,118 posts)some people look at what he has done. and who he is.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)It's sad; but, Mr. Obama came into office with so much political capital! He has spent that capital - and more - with his support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, his drone policy and his support for the Keystone pipeline.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)you're paying attention to. That's a possible explanation.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to whine about Obama.
Cha
(297,276 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)liberal N proud
(60,335 posts)Nothing but haters here lately
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)G_j
(40,367 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Maybe they're looking at the whole picture, rather than individual issues.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)It's for some other reason.
That makes a lot more sense.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)It just asked if they approved of him. It didn't ask the questions you wanted it to ask, apparently.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Who knew?
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Dupes, one and all, I guess.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)if the POTUS gets his way on TPP, their jobs are shipped overseas, and they find themselves dumpster diving for food or working for Wal-Mart as a result. But that will take a couple of years and he will be out of office, so whoever the next POTUS is will likely get the blame.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)At least I shall and I will keep reminding people!
Deeply disappointed with him, and as a result he's ruined his legacy.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Hekate
(90,714 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Aren't paying attention, and have no idea what the word liberal actually means.
low-information voters abound.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)nice going.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)People claiming some exclusive monopoly on the term "liberal" obviously don't get outside the DU bubble much.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)I never looked too much into the "Underground" part of the name. That explains why DU polls tend to be the opposite of polls of Democrats offline, and why moderates and more mainstream Dems get heat here.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)That fits DU perfectly. People trying to define what makes a "liberal" often confuse their narrow definition with accepted wisdom. No one owns the label.
Cha
(297,276 posts)Obamacare helps as well.
This is important that the country is not like DU.. this will help us in electing our next Democratic election.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)How come?
Hekate
(90,714 posts)General Discussion was a place for honest sources. DU had a sense of humor about itself. "Underground" was about the common cause of surviving BushCheney, and not undermining fellow Democrats. It was agreed that if the country was to survive, we would have to make common cause with those with whom we did not agree 100%. It was raucous, but it felt productive.
Odd how that lasted right up until we got an actual Democrat in the White House, at which point it became clear that a surprisingly large number of people had no clue how that works. As in, working, producing, progressing.
Some were just along for the continual rage, indiscriminately. Indiscriminate rageaholics are worse than counterproductive-- they're boring.
Why am I here? I have friends, for one thing. There are some good and thoughtful people here, and I enjoy their contributions. Why are you here?
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)TPP, the corporate stooges that he has leading various government agencies, and his arrogance towards the base will place him among the most dangerous president to the middle class and to our country.
I am so saddened that I worked so hard to get him elected!
Very tragic!
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)pushing TPA. It's no secret he wants it and his visit to Congress was pretty high profile and covered by numerous media outlets.
Yet, his numbers among liberal dems have not suffered.
You think his numbers among liberal dems will suddenly crash?
I don't think that's the case, but I'll be sure to post the next poll when it comes out. Rarely does his approval among liberal dems fall below 80%.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Hyperbole much?
onenote
(42,714 posts)Cha
(297,276 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)I consider myself a Liberal, but I won't EVER answer any polls that simply ask me a general question about "job approval" because it can be taken as COMPLETE support and twisted to include all subjects.
Cha
(297,276 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)As with EVERY OTHER DIRE PREDICTION made by hair-on-fire DU'ers during the past 7 years, none of them will come true. Why? Because it's all FUD, and FUD isn't reality.
Sorry you're so concerned David, but Democrats trust Obama because he has earned that trust over a long period of time. That's how real life works.
every fucking one.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)So?
tridim
(45,358 posts)Are you really going to go there? My gawd DU is lost.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)going on here.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)Do you have a problem with that?
progressoid
(49,991 posts)And I support our party too. But when our party screws up, I support them by being critical of those mistakes. Some people prefer the alternative.
To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.
tridim
(45,358 posts)Not a single time, progressoid. Nice quote, but it means precisely nothing in context.
Might I suggest that you are upset because so many progressives support Obama despite your best efforts to the contrary?
And maybe, just maybe, all this TPP FUD is just that, FUD.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)Just pointing out that within that approval rating, there are people that would vote in support no matter what. There are Republicans that do the same. Which is what I was responding to above.
No, sorry, I'm not upset because so many progressives support Obama despite my(?) best efforts to the contrary.
And yes, TPP is shrouded in fear, uncertainty and doubt. Perhaps if it weren't being done in secret, and supported by a majority of Republicans, it wouldn't be.
Response to tridim (Reply #56)
Name removed Message auto-removed
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)It just doesn't seem possible and if it would be even close to true too many "liberal" democrats are not paying attention.
tridim
(45,358 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Just sayin'.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)61. Too bad he needs Latinos, AA's and women for the win!
99. And he will have them
Once they become informed.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Everything you hear to the contrary is just noise. If he gets out of single digits with AA's, I'll be shocked. And Hillary beat Obama with Latinos last time, so I don't look for those numbers to budge much. And women? Fuggedaboutit!
I think it's hilarious that people arguing that "people don't know who Bernie is yet", and in the same breath bragging about the size of his crowds. People know BS, and they know he's been loafing around DC for decades singing the same song from the halcyon days of his youth.
People not knowing BS at this stage of his political career is no badge of honor. They should stop using that, because it speaks volumes, and not in a good way.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)and that the poll represents only the low (re: stupid) information voter.
And so suddenly these voters will be informed about Bernie and regardless of the insults tossed at them by Bernie Supporters they are going to embrace that constituency and want to belong? Yep...aboiut 20% of them will.
Fwiw, I hadn't thought about the name recognition issues...if they don't know him after 25 years, won't the voter wonder about that?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)at that. Make no mistake, Bernie has a ceiling, and singing the same old one note won't help him break through it. His message has to resonate outside the Thom Hartmann/Ed Schultz/RT bubble. That's his problem. Not enough of us give a shit about any of the aforementioned, or anything they have to say.
And organizations like MoveOn who send out these panicky alerts, which always include a plea for money, are basically concerned about their own survival.
Like I said, people not knowing BS at this stage of his political career is no badge of honor.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)People can actually form their own opinions.
Cha
(297,276 posts)President Obama and that's going to really help us with our next Democratic President.
Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
pintobean This message was self-deleted by its author.
djean111
(14,255 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)There! Fixed it for ya!
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)moderate and conservative democrats.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)I wanted to look at their methodology to see what questions were asked, where the samples took place, etc. but I can't seem to find anything. I'm a bit suspicious about this polling if I can't see the data gathered. At least Quinipiac is honest about their polling data.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)with conservative democrats throughout his presidency,this poll isn't an anomaly.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)With Pew at least I can read their raw data to more or less discern the hype from the actual facts.
http://www.people-press.org/2015/01/20/obama-in-a-word-good-incompetent/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/24/7-charts-on-how-the-world-views-president-obama/
For some reason I can't find any data other than what Gallup has posted on their website. Without raw figures I can only take Gallup at their word. These are also the same guys who said that Reagan had a higher approval rating in his sixth year as president than Obama.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/181208/obama-averages-job-approval-year-six.aspx
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Meaningless poll.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)Yay me!
Trajan
(19,089 posts)The persons here who love that man, no matter what, are not liberals from where I sit ... Why would it be different outside of DU?
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I'm to the left of the mainstream democratic party. I identify mainly as democratic socialist. I believe President Obama and his Administration have done the absolute best they can, given the role of Congress and the mood of voters who keeping electing republicans and wishy washy democrats. I won't bother giving links to all the things his Administration has accomplished. You can find them if you wish. I hope you have a good day. I'm not your enemy.
I don't consider anyone a messiah. Not Obama. Not Hillary. Not Bernie. No president. I just don't believe the presidency is the be all and end all of the three branches of government and the powerful corporate fourth estate. I think we need much more than the presidency to advance a truly liberal or democratic socialist agenda that will be good for our economy and good for all. That will come about best through organizing at local levels, continuing that support through mayoral, city council, statewide, school boards, congressional, all sorts of elections.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I can accept that you are supporting Hillary. I certainly would question your 'liberal credibility' on a damn message board.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Edited out the wrong image. Oops, sorry.
Ryano42
(1,577 posts)Nazi, Used Car Selling, POS President and I am happy I voted for him twice!
He is far from ideal but there are no ideals in the real world...
DCBob
(24,689 posts)He deserves it!
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)up-thread about their disagreement with the polling results, saying that the poll respondents "don't know what liberal means" or are "low-info". That sure is an excellent way to win people over to one's way of thinking--insulting their intelligence and doing yet another litmus test.
Again, who would've thought a Democratic site would have so much animus towards a Democrat and his/her supporters?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)what an interesting conundrum.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Some of them hurling the insults really don't want to see "ANY" democrat elected, that's not their goal.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I'm glad there are some people here who actually like progressive change whether it is in small increments or bigger increments. If we really want them in bigger increments, in my opinion, we have to do a heck of a lot better at attracting people toward getting involved in voting at all levels, not just for presidential elections. And to me, voting is the least one does, not the most. It seems to me that a lot of people here love talking down to people as though they are ignorant. Which is really a sign of laziness or insecurity. Especially on the damn internets.
avebury
(10,952 posts)It is a good thing that he is prohibited from running again. I doubt he could win another Presidential election. He is pushing stuff that is just devestating to the majority of Americansa and this country.
The first time I voted for President Obama, he got my vote because I believed in him. The second time, he got my vote because he was the lesser of the evils (i.e. Romney and Ryan). Under R&R things would be a whole lot worse then they are now, but Obama certainly is not helping things.
Prism
(5,815 posts)I think President Obama will be much beloved upon leaving office. In ten years, after the effects of the pro-corporate hosing are more perceivable and measurable, people will do a reassessing.
Although, it depends on charisma, too. I mean, partisans still adore Clinton, no matter how hard his policies have ultimately railed the lower classes.
The politics of personality are a funny thing.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)funny thing about long term policy realities and fuzzy memories.
Prism
(5,815 posts). . . amg, there's a woman pretending to be black in Washington!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)onenote
(42,714 posts)just today, we have a poll showing massive support for Obama among Democrats and yet a guarantee that any Democrat that supports TPP ( which of course Obama supports) will lose in 2016.
Go figure.
Cha
(297,276 posts)seething cheap pot shots.
Mahalo Cali
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)Not some angry message board posters who hope to 'win us over' by yelling and screaming at us about how ignorant we are, roflmao.
Cha
(297,276 posts)lovemydog~
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)The Obama coalition will help elect the next democratic President. And I hope it helps elect the next President.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)The declining living standards and prospects of American citizens are irrelevant; polls are what really counts.
hay rick
(7,624 posts)I'm waiting for the Gallup poll that shows Obama's approval rating among "liberal democrats" [sic] is 106%.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)The respondents are stupid.
The respondents are liars.
The respondents are uneducated.
The poll is bullshit.
The poll doesn't mean anything.
No one I know would respond this way.
I wouldn't respond this way.
Fuck something.
Argle bargle.
Did I leave anything out?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Lisa D
(1,532 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)inb4 "Lozo"
Sid
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)who's a liberal and who isn't?
Should we ask all polling firms to drop their identification methodology and simply ask Romulox of Democratic Underground who's a liberal and who isn't?