Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:39 PM May 2015

I had a post deleted yesterday, was told the info was debunked. So I asked two who complained

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by etherealtruth (a host of the General Discussion forum).

(Via email) to please point me to where it was proven false. I do not like or support Hillary, but I would never knowingly post BS that is untrue. Neither poster has gotten back to me with info to show that what i posted was even disputed, much less debunked.
Can someone give me links that debunk the assertion that Hillary was associated with the secretive religious/political group The Family during her time in the Senate? I had posted links to a MotherJones article and a couple others. Isn't MotherJones a reputable source?

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I had a post deleted yesterday, was told the info was debunked. So I asked two who complained (Original Post) peacebird May 2015 OP
AFAIK the Mother Jones article was accurate. HooptieWagon May 2015 #1
If you ask questions there you are perceived to be an "enemy." I sort of liked HRC before but monmouth4 May 2015 #2
I posted it in general discussion. First OP I have ever had pulled there.... Second in my time at DU peacebird May 2015 #5
I have been banned from posting there as of yesterday. I really don't care...n/t monmouth4 May 2015 #10
I have been blocked and Duckhunter935 May 2015 #24
I can attest to that, blocked . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #6
Is "asking questions" what you call it? 6000eliot May 2015 #28
Good question marym625 May 2015 #3
Was it posted in a protected group? arcane1 May 2015 #4
It was in General Discussion peacebird May 2015 #7
Well that's messed up. As a juror, I wouldn't take an alerter's word for it that a post was false. arcane1 May 2015 #13
People in Groups shouldn't use GD like that . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #15
I only asked and was blocked . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #9
the actual name of the organization is The Fellowship cali May 2015 #8
Yes, The Fellowship is also referred to as The Family. peacebird May 2015 #11
they were wrong. you had a bunch of Hillary partisans on the jury m-lekktor May 2015 #14
what a crock of shit that hidden post was then. I read that book and it was in there. m-lekktor May 2015 #12
Usurpers, portraying their canidate ? orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #18
I am not sure i understand what you mean! m-lekktor May 2015 #19
This is the link to my deleted OP peacebird May 2015 #27
Link? GGJohn May 2015 #16
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026748504 peacebird May 2015 #29
Perhaps jurors are taking Skinner's advice? Nye Bevan May 2015 #17
"flamebaity crap" is subjective. m-lekktor May 2015 #20
Clearly not all jurors stopped cutting slack for jerks.. Fumesucker May 2015 #21
I was just going to post this.......... mrmpa May 2015 #23
Yep. nt stevenleser May 2015 #25
She went to their meetings and said nice things about their leader… probably as pandering. KittyWampus May 2015 #22
HRC damn sure did have ties to the Family. onecaliberal May 2015 #26
I am sorry LOCKING etherealtruth May 2015 #30
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
1. AFAIK the Mother Jones article was accurate.
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:43 PM
May 2015

You probably had a jury full of Hillary supporters who find her association with The Family to be inconvenient.

monmouth4

(9,694 posts)
2. If you ask questions there you are perceived to be an "enemy." I sort of liked HRC before but
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:44 PM
May 2015

after reading and being chastised by her supporters, I'm no longer interested in even finding answers to my questions.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
5. I posted it in general discussion. First OP I have ever had pulled there.... Second in my time at DU
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:47 PM
May 2015

The other was when I replied to a post without reqlizing it was in the hillary group. That one got me banned from posting there, which is good so I don't accidentally reply to another porst there!

monmouth4

(9,694 posts)
10. I have been banned from posting there as of yesterday. I really don't care...n/t
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:50 PM
May 2015
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
24. I have been blocked and
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:04 PM
May 2015

I do not even remember posting in that group.

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
6. I can attest to that, blocked .
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:47 PM
May 2015

6000eliot

(5,643 posts)
28. Is "asking questions" what you call it?
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:07 PM
May 2015

It seems more like "insinuating attacks disguised as questions" to me, but what do I know?

marym625

(17,997 posts)
3. Good question
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:45 PM
May 2015

I hope you get an answer. People should not be able to just say something is true or not without proof. Especially when hiding a post

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
4. Was it posted in a protected group?
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:46 PM
May 2015

It would likely be hidden in a protected group regardless if true or not, if it's critical.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
7. It was in General Discussion
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:47 PM
May 2015
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
13. Well that's messed up. As a juror, I wouldn't take an alerter's word for it that a post was false.
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:52 PM
May 2015

I would either have to already know it's false, or the alerter would have to prove it, before I would vote to hide.

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
15. People in Groups shouldn't use GD like that .
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:53 PM
May 2015
 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
9. I only asked and was blocked .
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:49 PM
May 2015
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
8. the actual name of the organization is The Fellowship
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:48 PM
May 2015

She was involved with the group for fifteen years. I don't understand why a post saying that would be deleted. The MJ article is from Sharlet's book

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
11. Yes, The Fellowship is also referred to as The Family.
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:50 PM
May 2015

I do not know why it was deleted. I was called out for posting trash and debunked info.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
14. they were wrong. you had a bunch of Hillary partisans on the jury
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:52 PM
May 2015

either that or people unaware of the book who believed the alerter comment.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
12. what a crock of shit that hidden post was then. I read that book and it was in there.
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:51 PM
May 2015

I never heard about any "DEBUNKING".

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
18. Usurpers, portraying their canidate ?
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:55 PM
May 2015

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
19. I am not sure i understand what you mean!
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:57 PM
May 2015

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
27. This is the link to my deleted OP
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:06 PM
May 2015

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
16. Link?
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:55 PM
May 2015

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
29. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026748504
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:07 PM
May 2015

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
17. Perhaps jurors are taking Skinner's advice?
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:55 PM
May 2015
Skinner (60,331 posts)
1. I can't say I'm enthusiastic about creating it yet.

How about this: People on juries should vote to hide the divisive flamebaity crap. Get hard-assed. Stop cutting the jerks any slack.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1259&pid=7980

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
20. "flamebaity crap" is subjective.
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:01 PM
May 2015

why not just make a rule nobody can criticize any candidate if he is going to post that. any criticism of a candidate is "flamebaity" to the supporters of the candidate.

I guess we have to admit the truth that DU is an arm of the Hillary campaign and people who support other candidates are being "humored" during the primaries. and that is cool, it's a private discussion board and nobody is forced to participate!

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
21. Clearly not all jurors stopped cutting slack for jerks..
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:01 PM
May 2015

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
23. I was just going to post this..........
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:04 PM
May 2015

maybe jurors are listening.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
25. Yep. nt
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:04 PM
May 2015
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
22. She went to their meetings and said nice things about their leader… probably as pandering.
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:03 PM
May 2015

I posted about that here on DU years ago.

onecaliberal

(32,849 posts)
26. HRC damn sure did have ties to the Family.
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:05 PM
May 2015

If I'm not mistaken and don't think I am it was discussed in the media in 08. None the less, your assertion is a fact. There are/were ties.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
30. I am sorry LOCKING
Sat May 30, 2015, 06:10 PM
May 2015

Please note the SoP for this forum:

Positive threads about Democratic Underground or its members are are permitted.

Threads complaining about Democratic Underground or its members; threads complaining about jury decisions, locked threads, suspensions, bannings, or the like; and threads intended to disrupt or negatively influence the normal workings of Democratic Underground and its community moderating system are not permitted.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I had a post deleted yest...