Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:03 PM May 2015

Any Thoughts On Why Major Obama Aides Are Teaming Up With Bernie Sanders ???

I'm sure some are aligning themselves with HRC, yet...

With the help of a crew of former aides to President Barack Obama, Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) campaign has raised $3 million in four days for his presidential campaign -- a dramatic indication that he won’t be confined simply to a long-shot role in the Democratic primary.

Sanders, who is running for president as a Democrat, announced on Wednesday that he has retained the services of the firm Revolution Messaging to run digital ads and online fundraising. The staffers with the firm who will be working on Sanders’ campaign include Revolution Messaging’s founder, Scott Goodstein, who ran the 2008 Obama campaign's social media and mobile programs; Arun Chaudhary, who was the first official White House videographer; Shauna Daly, who served as deputy research director on Obama’s 2008 campaign; and Walker Hamilton, who was a lead programmer for that campaign.

"Like a lot of Obama supporters, we were looking for a candidate with a track record of doing the right thing -- even if it meant taking on Wall Street billionaires and other powerful interests. A candidate who could inspire a movement," said Goodstein. "Bernie Sanders is that candidate."


Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/06/bernie-sanders-campaign_n_7224630.html


59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Any Thoughts On Why Major Obama Aides Are Teaming Up With Bernie Sanders ??? (Original Post) WillyT May 2015 OP
Because they are good at technical things? leftofcool May 2015 #1
I regret that I have but one rec to give. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #2
Damn... I Love Old Style Beer.... WillyT May 2015 #9
*hic* Jackpine Radical May 2015 #37
LOL SoapBox May 2015 #46
That's what La Crosse was known for.....the Old Style Brewery..... a kennedy May 2015 #45
fully Kreuzened waddirum May 2015 #51
Yup...and actually never knew what in the heck that meant..... a kennedy May 2015 #52
Maybe they just like him? nt LiberalElite May 2015 #3
They need a gig? n/t winter is coming May 2015 #4
because if you want a campaign job you must find a campaigner? nt msongs May 2015 #5
I had not heard this but it does not surprise me Bjorn Against May 2015 #6
wrong OKNancy May 2015 #10
Yep. DURHAM D May 2015 #13
All of them? I think you meant to say some of them. Bjorn Against May 2015 #16
partial list - "heavyweights" OKNancy May 2015 #23
The OP was about Obama staffers who are now working for Bernie Bjorn Against May 2015 #24
I was responding to YOUR post OKNancy May 2015 #26
Maybe you should read my post again Bjorn Against May 2015 #29
Reread the Subject line George II May 2015 #43
Bingo... We Have A Winner !!! WillyT May 2015 #19
most of us who were Obama supporters bullied here by Clinton supporters in 2008... carolinayellowdog May 2015 #40
Great... And Honest Post !!! WillyT May 2015 #50
The Shock Doctrine really spooked me about Clinton and any possible POTUS carolinayellowdog May 2015 #54
Your historical account is right on from my perspective - nt dreamnightwind May 2015 #58
interesting? Rosa Luxemburg May 2015 #7
I don't find the connection to Obama's 2008 campaign all that relevant. PBass May 2015 #8
For me, ONE of the biggest was she wanted the individual mandate and he supposedly did not. merrily May 2015 #28
except for the fact that his digital strategy is considered by most to have won him the race nashville_brook May 2015 #31
No more job openings at Hill campaign? JaneyVee May 2015 #11
Apparently they needed jobs. DURHAM D May 2015 #12
Maybe... And Maybe If They're Smart, They Say Just Stuff Like That... But What If It's True ??? WillyT May 2015 #17
Seriously? DURHAM D May 2015 #25
Because HRC kept the team that worked so well for her in '08? corkhead May 2015 #14
except that she didn't? brooklynite May 2015 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #15
Because they think Hillary will wind up like Obama? immoderate May 2015 #18
Because they believed what Obama said in his campaign and hope Bernie can deliver? peacebird May 2015 #20
People we've never heard of need a paycheck? onehandle May 2015 #22
the Revolution folks could work with anyone they want. nashville_brook May 2015 #32
Because that is what they do for a living still_one May 2015 #27
Because he hired them? KMOD May 2015 #30
His campaign might be a lot more fun to work on. Buns_of_Fire May 2015 #33
The 2008 Obama campaign supporters wanted real change, and perhaps were disappointed... AZ Progressive May 2015 #34
Most Honest, Least Cynical, Post... WillyT May 2015 #35
Because they are free to choose whom to support. RandySF May 2015 #36
If he got the computer folks, he's going to go far. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #38
Ari Rabin-Havt (XM radio host) said today that he now takes Bernie's campaign bullwinkle428 May 2015 #39
I like Ari, he's got a good show. n/t ms liberty May 2015 #59
Bernie needs a ground game. These guys put together the best ground game in modern history. It Ed Suspicious May 2015 #41
Go Bernie! BeanMusical May 2015 #42
They know Hills is.... LovingA2andMI May 2015 #44
Same reason others are going with Hillary. pnwmom May 2015 #47
Because they want to work for a winner. n/t jtuck004 May 2015 #48
Paying for their sins? Phlem May 2015 #49
Because the job is a huge challenge and because JDPriestly May 2015 #53
This is beginning to remind me of the Greek Situation.Tsispris and Yanis are serious with their duty libdem4life May 2015 #55
Because they were hired to do that? MineralMan May 2015 #56
Because...freedom? randome May 2015 #57
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
9. Damn... I Love Old Style Beer....
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:16 PM
May 2015

Can only get it when we go back to Wisconsin for family reunions.

Yum...




a kennedy

(29,672 posts)
45. That's what La Crosse was known for.....the Old Style Brewery.....
Thu May 7, 2015, 11:17 PM
May 2015

Now the beer is brewed someplace in Illinois I think. There's a brewery in La Crosse but it can't use the name Old Style.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
6. I had not heard this but it does not surprise me
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:11 PM
May 2015

Don't forget just how bitter the 2008 campaign was, I am sure a number of people who worked on the Obama campaign remember how dirty it was and I doubt they have all forgiven Hillary. I am sure they know more than we do as well, some of them were involved in opposition research.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
16. All of them? I think you meant to say some of them.
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:26 PM
May 2015

There were a lot of people who worked on Obama's campaign.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
23. partial list - "heavyweights"
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:33 PM
May 2015

John Podesta
Jim Messina
John Anzalone and David Binder
Joel Benenson
Jim Margolis
Teddy Goff
Andrew Bleeker

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
24. The OP was about Obama staffers who are now working for Bernie
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:36 PM
May 2015

No one ever claimed that no Obama staffers are working for Hillary so your post is irrelevant to the OP.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
29. Maybe you should read my post again
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:41 PM
May 2015

Nowhere in my post did I claim that there were no former Obama staffers on the Clinton campaign.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
40. most of us who were Obama supporters bullied here by Clinton supporters in 2008...
Thu May 7, 2015, 10:57 PM
May 2015

have been bullied by self-proclaimed Obama supporters for the last several years, wondering how things got so topsy-turvy-- and now are Sanders supporters being bullied by Clinton supporters in 2015 and thinking about deja vu.

This evidence you cite suggests one of two things: either Obama himself leans more toward Sanders than Clinton, which I'd love to believe, or Obama has long since been assimiliated into the 1% borg along with the Clintons, leaving those who supported him against them in 2008 looking for someone more genuinely committed to the 99%.

Unlike all those on either side who see Obama as genuine or fraudulent, I'm resigned to never knowing.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
54. The Shock Doctrine really spooked me about Clinton and any possible POTUS
Fri May 8, 2015, 06:06 AM
May 2015

Naomi Klein describes a scene early in the 1992 transition in which a group of Wall Street types sat Clinton down and told him what he would and would not be allowed to do in office, regardless of what he campaigned on. So while I wonder whether Obama became a lot more 1%-friendly after he was elected, or if he only ran to Clinton's left for tactical reasons and was never as progressive as we thought-- in the end it doesn't matter.

If TPTB simply will not let the 99% get out from under plutocratic domination, regardless of who gets elected, neither Bernie nor any other possible POTUS can rescue us. But these former Obama staffers working now for Bernie suggests that their dream has not died, which is encouraging.

PBass

(1,537 posts)
8. I don't find the connection to Obama's 2008 campaign all that relevant.
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:15 PM
May 2015

Do you remember the 2008 Democratic debates? The debates were called boring, because Clinton and Obama were so close on their positions. The biggest difference was Clinton's vote on the Iraq resolution (a vote Obama criticized, but never had to take, himself).

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
31. except for the fact that his digital strategy is considered by most to have won him the race
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:49 PM
May 2015

other than that, it's pretty irrelevant.

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
12. Apparently they needed jobs.
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:22 PM
May 2015

There are hundreds of staffers who move from one campaign to another. Usually, when they get tired of the travel, etc, they take a job on the Hill or if they are lucky and have worked their way up they may get to work at the White House. Sometimes, if they are tired of DC, they move back to their home state to work for the party or in the Governor's office.

People expect them to be loyal to just one person who is on the way up but the truth is they can spin on a dime and work for anyone, it is just a job.

If you expect them to be just as passionate as you are for your candidate you will be disappointed. It is just a job.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
17. Maybe... And Maybe If They're Smart, They Say Just Stuff Like That... But What If It's True ???
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:28 PM
May 2015
"Like a lot of Obama supporters, we were looking for a candidate with a track record of doing the right thing -- even if it meant taking on Wall Street billionaires and other powerful interests. A candidate who could inspire a movement," said Goodstein. "Bernie Sanders is that candidate."


From OP.


DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
25. Seriously?
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:36 PM
May 2015

Why in the world would you expect him to say anything different as he is now in campaign mode.

It is a paying job.

It is a good thing.

We need these people in the Democratic Party. In fact, we need many more of them.

brooklynite

(94,592 posts)
21. except that she didn't?
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:30 PM
May 2015

She has a number of new staffers, including folks from the Obama campaign. But don't let me ruin a good stereotype.

Response to WillyT (Original post)

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
22. People we've never heard of need a paycheck?
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:30 PM
May 2015

And Hillary's campaign is full up?

Which it is, btw. With PLENTY of Obama people.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,181 posts)
33. His campaign might be a lot more fun to work on.
Thu May 7, 2015, 10:03 PM
May 2015

I've got the feeling that the Clinton campaign will be run very much "by the book" -- lots of do's and dont's, don't do anything before clearing it with Clinton Central, a nice "employee handbook" that must be followed at all times (gee, almost like a corporation!).

Due to the money disparity, the Sanders campaign will, out of necessity, have to be a little more creative.

And if they manage to pull off a "David vs. Goliath" outcome, I imagine their future gigs might demand a larger paycheck, along with the prestige.

For me, never having to say "good morning" to the likes of Larry Summers would be payment enough, but that's just me.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
34. The 2008 Obama campaign supporters wanted real change, and perhaps were disappointed...
Thu May 7, 2015, 10:07 PM
May 2015

And with Bernie, they see new hope.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
38. If he got the computer folks, he's going to go far.
Thu May 7, 2015, 10:39 PM
May 2015

Those are the people who figured out the microtargeting and mobilized the volunteers.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
39. Ari Rabin-Havt (XM radio host) said today that he now takes Bernie's campaign
Thu May 7, 2015, 10:44 PM
May 2015

"100 times more seriously", once he saw the names of the individuals that have chosen to participate in the online/digital side of Team Sanders.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
41. Bernie needs a ground game. These guys put together the best ground game in modern history. It
Thu May 7, 2015, 10:59 PM
May 2015

does make one a little nervous, but in the end, if he hopes to win, he's going to needs some help reaching the people without the aid of big bankers or casino magnates.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
53. Because the job is a huge challenge and because
Fri May 8, 2015, 12:28 AM
May 2015

Bernie's candidacy whether he wins or not, will change America. It will shift the thinking about the banking and financial sectors. It will move many people, many potential voters, toward a better understanding of their own power -- even those who do not vote for him, even those who dislike his message.

We cannot continue as a nation addicted to debt and continuing to elect people who lie not only to us but to themselves. We cannot continue to have a balance of payments deficit that is astronomical. It won't work for our children and grandchildren.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
55. This is beginning to remind me of the Greek Situation.Tsispris and Yanis are serious with their duty
Fri May 8, 2015, 09:32 AM
May 2015

to their electorate. We have our own austerity, imposed upon us by the 1%. Maybe Bernie and Reich are our Tspiris and Yanis. One can dream...and hope.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
56. Because they were hired to do that?
Fri May 8, 2015, 09:35 AM
May 2015

It's more complicated, of course, but that's why. Tech companies have to make money.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
57. Because...freedom?
Fri May 8, 2015, 09:38 AM
May 2015

Why is it necessary to see every action in the political sphere as either a pro or con for Clinton? Relax. We have 17 months to go until the election.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any Thoughts On Why Major...