General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAny Thoughts On Why Major Obama Aides Are Teaming Up With Bernie Sanders ???
I'm sure some are aligning themselves with HRC, yet...
Sanders, who is running for president as a Democrat, announced on Wednesday that he has retained the services of the firm Revolution Messaging to run digital ads and online fundraising. The staffers with the firm who will be working on Sanders campaign include Revolution Messagings founder, Scott Goodstein, who ran the 2008 Obama campaign's social media and mobile programs; Arun Chaudhary, who was the first official White House videographer; Shauna Daly, who served as deputy research director on Obamas 2008 campaign; and Walker Hamilton, who was a lead programmer for that campaign.
"Like a lot of Obama supporters, we were looking for a candidate with a track record of doing the right thing -- even if it meant taking on Wall Street billionaires and other powerful interests. A candidate who could inspire a movement," said Goodstein. "Bernie Sanders is that candidate."
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/06/bernie-sanders-campaign_n_7224630.html
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)And a kick, of course.
Drop in--
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Can only get it when we go back to Wisconsin for family reunions.
Yum...
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Wha
?
*burp*
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)a kennedy
(29,672 posts)Now the beer is brewed someplace in Illinois I think. There's a brewery in La Crosse but it can't use the name Old Style.
waddirum
(979 posts)in God's country.
a kennedy
(29,672 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)msongs
(67,413 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Don't forget just how bitter the 2008 campaign was, I am sure a number of people who worked on the Obama campaign remember how dirty it was and I doubt they have all forgiven Hillary. I am sure they know more than we do as well, some of them were involved in opposition research.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Hillary has all the Obama heavyweights working for her already
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)There were a lot of people who worked on Obama's campaign.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)John Podesta
Jim Messina
John Anzalone and David Binder
Joel Benenson
Jim Margolis
Teddy Goff
Andrew Bleeker
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)No one ever claimed that no Obama staffers are working for Hillary so your post is irrelevant to the OP.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)read your post again.
good night
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Nowhere in my post did I claim that there were no former Obama staffers on the Clinton campaign.
George II
(67,782 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)carolinayellowdog
(3,247 posts)have been bullied by self-proclaimed Obama supporters for the last several years, wondering how things got so topsy-turvy-- and now are Sanders supporters being bullied by Clinton supporters in 2015 and thinking about deja vu.
This evidence you cite suggests one of two things: either Obama himself leans more toward Sanders than Clinton, which I'd love to believe, or Obama has long since been assimiliated into the 1% borg along with the Clintons, leaving those who supported him against them in 2008 looking for someone more genuinely committed to the 99%.
Unlike all those on either side who see Obama as genuine or fraudulent, I'm resigned to never knowing.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)& Rec !!!
carolinayellowdog
(3,247 posts)Naomi Klein describes a scene early in the 1992 transition in which a group of Wall Street types sat Clinton down and told him what he would and would not be allowed to do in office, regardless of what he campaigned on. So while I wonder whether Obama became a lot more 1%-friendly after he was elected, or if he only ran to Clinton's left for tactical reasons and was never as progressive as we thought-- in the end it doesn't matter.
If TPTB simply will not let the 99% get out from under plutocratic domination, regardless of who gets elected, neither Bernie nor any other possible POTUS can rescue us. But these former Obama staffers working now for Bernie suggests that their dream has not died, which is encouraging.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)PBass
(1,537 posts)Do you remember the 2008 Democratic debates? The debates were called boring, because Clinton and Obama were so close on their positions. The biggest difference was Clinton's vote on the Iraq resolution (a vote Obama criticized, but never had to take, himself).
merrily
(45,251 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)other than that, it's pretty irrelevant.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)There are hundreds of staffers who move from one campaign to another. Usually, when they get tired of the travel, etc, they take a job on the Hill or if they are lucky and have worked their way up they may get to work at the White House. Sometimes, if they are tired of DC, they move back to their home state to work for the party or in the Governor's office.
People expect them to be loyal to just one person who is on the way up but the truth is they can spin on a dime and work for anyone, it is just a job.
If you expect them to be just as passionate as you are for your candidate you will be disappointed. It is just a job.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)From OP.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)Why in the world would you expect him to say anything different as he is now in campaign mode.
It is a paying job.
It is a good thing.
We need these people in the Democratic Party. In fact, we need many more of them.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)brooklynite
(94,592 posts)She has a number of new staffers, including folks from the Obama campaign. But don't let me ruin a good stereotype.
Response to WillyT (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
peacebird
(14,195 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)And Hillary's campaign is full up?
Which it is, btw. With PLENTY of Obama people.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)they went with Bernie.
still_one
(92,217 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,181 posts)I've got the feeling that the Clinton campaign will be run very much "by the book" -- lots of do's and dont's, don't do anything before clearing it with Clinton Central, a nice "employee handbook" that must be followed at all times (gee, almost like a corporation!).
Due to the money disparity, the Sanders campaign will, out of necessity, have to be a little more creative.
And if they manage to pull off a "David vs. Goliath" outcome, I imagine their future gigs might demand a larger paycheck, along with the prestige.
For me, never having to say "good morning" to the likes of Larry Summers would be payment enough, but that's just me.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)And with Bernie, they see new hope.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)RandySF
(58,899 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Those are the people who figured out the microtargeting and mobilized the volunteers.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)"100 times more seriously", once he saw the names of the individuals that have chosen to participate in the online/digital side of Team Sanders.
ms liberty
(8,580 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)does make one a little nervous, but in the end, if he hopes to win, he's going to needs some help reaching the people without the aid of big bankers or casino magnates.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Full of hot air.....
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Because they've decided to support him.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026639604
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Bernie's candidacy whether he wins or not, will change America. It will shift the thinking about the banking and financial sectors. It will move many people, many potential voters, toward a better understanding of their own power -- even those who do not vote for him, even those who dislike his message.
We cannot continue as a nation addicted to debt and continuing to elect people who lie not only to us but to themselves. We cannot continue to have a balance of payments deficit that is astronomical. It won't work for our children and grandchildren.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)to their electorate. We have our own austerity, imposed upon us by the 1%. Maybe Bernie and Reich are our Tspiris and Yanis. One can dream...and hope.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)It's more complicated, of course, but that's why. Tech companies have to make money.
randome
(34,845 posts)Why is it necessary to see every action in the political sphere as either a pro or con for Clinton? Relax. We have 17 months to go until the election.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]