General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI think the more important discussion to have on Bernie Sanders is 'socialism.'
And, honestly, I'm taking a very neutral approach to the word and the concept.
Several polls a few years back that found millennials and other key demographics in the Democratic coalition are quite receptive to socialism. There is some ambiguity in the polls and I'll leave that to the number crunchers.
... Reaction to capitalism is lukewarm among many demographic groups. Fewer than half of young people, women, people with lower incomes and those with less education react positively to capitalism.
http://www.people-press.org/2010/05/04/socialism-not-so-negative-capitalism-not-so-positive/
http://www.gallup.com/poll/125645/socialism-viewed-positively-americans.aspx
I think, after the big recession, these numbers might swing more in favor of socialism. But that's just a guess. But what I do come away with is Bernie's socialism won't be a big issue in the Democratic primaries. Should he make it to the general election, the key (as with any election) will be turning out the Democratic block that is at least receptive to it or, at the very least, vehemently opposed to the alternative. But that should be obvious, anyway. It would be interesting to see how he would respond to the smears.
Good luck Senator Sanders.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Americans love "Socialist" policies. They're just afraid of the name. Bernie's great at explain that:
Socialism = Policies U Like
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)The only groups they have locked up are the older white conservatives & the evangelicals, also the poor would have much more of an incentive to turn out (turnout gaps widen the poorer you go)
JHB
(37,161 posts)Perhaps not the textbook definitions, but what people mean by them in everyday usage.
What counted as "capitalism" back in the depths of the Cold War is derided as "socialism" today. The terms have been very deliberately been pushed rightward, so that their usage today was the stuff of ranting cranks back in the 50s and early 60s.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)They'll call any candidate fielded from the left a socialist. This waters down the the word to meaninglessness for most people.
rogerashton
(3,920 posts)Let me quote two important economists:
1) Schumpeter: By the twenty-first century capitalism will evolve into an order of things which it will be merely a matter of taste and terminology to call Socialism or not.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1928), The Instability of Capitalism, The Economic Journal v. 38, no. 151 (Sept.) pp. 361-368.
2) Sir Arthur Lewis: Socialism is not, in the first instance, about property any more than it is about the state. Socialism is about equality. A passion for equality is the one thing that links all socialists; on all others they are divided.
Lewis, W. A. (1969), Principles of Economic Planning (London: Allen and Unwin).